The history of food additives always feels like peeking behind the curtains at the world’s breadbasket. DATEM, or Diacetyl Tartaric Acid Esters of Mono- and Diglycerides, first appeared on ingredient lists in the mid-twentieth century. Engineers and food scientists wanted bread that stayed fresh longer and rose higher, so they began tinkering with emulsifiers. As post-war food production shifted to mass-market baking, the old methods just couldn’t keep up. Big bakeries needed a way to make soft, chewy bread that didn’t collapse. DATEM turned out to work well—its introduction set off a wave of innovations, reshaping how supermarkets stocked bread and what people started expecting from their morning toast.
DATEM plays a starring role in commercial bread, especially in products labeled as “soft” or “enriched.” It keeps dough stable during mixing, proofing, and baking. Without it, some breads sag or dry out too soon. DATEM isn’t flavorless, but its impact pops more in structure than in taste. I’ve baked at home without it; rustic loaves work out fine, but mass-producing a sandwich loaf? That’s another challenge. Bakeries that want a tight crumb, soft bite, or good shelf life lean on DATEM as a dependable partner.
DATEM looks like a pale, waxy powder, easy to handle in an industrial kitchen. It's made by reacting mono- and diglycerides with tartaric and acetic acid. The molecule’s shape lets it move between fats and water, which comes in handy during the hectic phases of dough mixing and rising. In water, it swells a little but mostly sticks to fats, creating microscopic bridges between watery starches and oily gluten. That unique structure explains its ability to keep bread soft and airy well past its bake date.
Manufacturers ship DATEM under different product numbers, but the global food labeling standard usually refers to it as E472e. In North America, labels call it “DATEM” or sometimes its long-form chemical name. It often turns up alongside other dough conditioners—enzymes, oxidizing agents, and ascorbic acid all serve as co-stars. The recommended levels vary by bread type; using too much introduces off flavors or an odd texture, so quality control teams check the dosing carefully. In the United States, the FDA has cleared DATEM as safe with specific upper limits for baked goods, and every manufacturer sticks close to those guidelines to stay compliant.
DATEM production starts with vegetable oils, broken down through partial glycerolysis to yield mono- and diglycerides. Reacting these fats with tartaric acid and acetic acid under heat transforms them into DATEM. Chemical engineers tune reaction conditions to hit the right level of esterification. Filtration and deodorization remove byproducts and off-odors, leaving a high-purity emulsifier. Each batch gets checked to make sure it meets purity and performance standards. For bakers, that translates into operations running smoothly, with doughs that mix up fast and breads that turn out looking much the same from week to week.
During its manufacture, DATEM’s reactive groups form bonds with tartaric and acetic acid “arms.” In dough, those arms interact with gluten proteins. DATEM lines up along the protein network, keeping things loose instead of letting strands bunch up too tightly. In practice, the result is bread that rises high, slices cleanly, and stays soft well past the day it was baked. Some manufacturers tweak the molecular structure, chasing variations that might fit better with specific recipes. Modifying the balance of tartaric and acetic acid can shift the emulsifier’s performance; some blends target high-oil doughs, others help lean breads keep their shape.
Food chemists file DATEM under several names: diacetyl tartaric acid ester of mono- and diglycerides, E472e, or simply DATEM. On product ingredient lists, you might spot “emulsifier (E472e)” in Europe, while North American bakers use straightforward “DATEM.” Commercially, it shows up in catalogs under tradenames from big suppliers like Cargill or DuPont. Each supplier tweaks their process for performance and shelf life, but the molecule at the heart is almost always the same.
Food regulators in the United States (FDA), European Union (EFSA), Australia, and Canada have all reviewed DATEM. Each agency sets its own standards. The FDA lists DATEM as GRAS—generally recognized as safe—when used within strict limits. Every batch has to pass purity checks and microbiological safety tests. That means manufacturers can’t cut corners; contaminants like heavy metals or residual solvents have to stay far below legal thresholds. In every plant I’ve visited, workers get regular safety training. DATEM itself poses little risk during normal use, but staff stick to dust handling procedures and wear respirators when measuring out large bags. Equipment manufacturers often design automated feeders for bulk DATEM, keeping exposure low.
Bread leads the way, but DATEM finds its way into a range of baked products. Brioche and enriched rolls rely on DATEM to keep the texture and extend shelf life. Hamburger buns that stay soft and resilient for restaurant supply chains come loaded with DATEM. In pizza crusts, DATEM helps doughs withstand the long proofing times. Certain styles of crackers and sweet goods also benefit from a touch to improve the bite. Outside baking, ice cream occasionally uses DATEM to stabilize fats, but the major demand follows the bakery sector. Whenever I talk to commercial bakers who deal with changing flour quality or long distribution distances, DATEM stands out as one of the first additives they check in their formulation.
Ongoing research investigates how DATEM pairs with other dough conditioners, searching for ways to reduce the need for artificial additives. Some university labs test new esterification methods—think biocatalysis or enzyme-driven synthesis—to cut down on chemicals and waste. Others look at replacing DATEM entirely with “clean label” solutions like plant-based lecithins or enzymes. So far, no single replacement has matched the all-around performance. Teams also explore ways to dial back the dosing without losing bread quality—an aim that matters as consumer skepticism about “additives” gets stronger. Investment in R&D reflects growing demand for longer-lasting, fresher-tasting breads with shorter ingredient labels.
Safety data on DATEM comes from decades of animal feeding trials and more recent in-vitro studies. Rats and mice fed high doses showed little toxicity, and no buildup of DATEM in body tissues. Some studies checked reproductive and carcinogenic risks; they didn’t find a link to health problems at normal consumption levels. The EFSA reevaluation in the last decade set a safe upper daily intake of 50 mg per kilo of body weight, a level much higher than daily bread would provide. Still, food scientists keep new studies coming, partly to satisfy cautious consumers and partly to watch for long-term effects as eating habits change. For people with rare food intolerances or severe digestive issues, doctors sometimes advise avoiding emulsifiers in general, but bread lovers without health problems face little personal risk.
Looking ahead, the story of DATEM follows both regulation and market pressure. Some countries consider lowering the maximum allowed dosing, especially as food labeling laws get stricter. At the same time, bakers want bread that lasts, looks good, and fits modern shopper expectations. New food technology companies push for enzyme-based solutions that can stand in for DATEM, but the road to scale and consistency remains rough. Shelf life calls for reliable chemistry, and DATEM delivers. Still, research races on. My guess? Baked goods will see a gradual shift toward cleaner labels, but big bakeries won’t give up their tried-and-true emulsifier unless something comes along that's just as good at half the price or less. In every bite of soft sandwich bread, you’re tasting a mix of old-school chemistry and the latest demands of global food supply chains.
DATEM rolls off the tongue like a chemical from a science textbook, but people like me—folks who check bread labels—see it in lots of our food. The full name, diacetyl tartaric acid ester of mono- and diglycerides, won’t win a spelling bee. For bakers, it’s old news. Most commercial loaves, burger buns, bagels, and even some crackers carry DATEM. Why? It helps dough get that specific, airy structure and lets a slice bounce back instead of collapsing. With bread, appearance and texture drive what makes us buy one loaf over another.
I spent years as an amateur baker wondering how bakery rolls get so chewy. Home dough, unless you knead forever or use specialty flour, turns out denser. DATEM gets thrown in at the mixing stage. It encourages the protein in flour—gluten—to form strong, stretchy webs. Those webs trap tiny gas bubbles during fermentation and baking. End result: a light crumb and a soft crust, the qualities that sell better and travel further on trucks. Fast food chains rely on these traits to deliver the same product every time, whether you’re stopping in Phoenix or Philadelphia.
Concern about additives isn’t overblown. Plenty of families in my neighborhood cut down on anything they can’t recognize on a label. Food regulators, including the FDA and EFSA in Europe, have looked at DATEM’s impact on health. Both mark it as safe within certain limits. Their findings rest on animal studies and human observations; no evidence surfaced to suggest negative effects when used as directed. DATEM doesn’t come from genetically modified organisms, and it breaks down in the digestive system. Still, anyone with allergies or special dietary restrictions reads labels for peace of mind.
There’s a debate between purists and mass producers. Independent bakeries pride themselves on short ingredient lists. You’ll hear people say a good loaf only needs flour, water, yeast, and salt. They spend hours perfecting fermentation so gluten networks build naturally. Large bakeries need a steady schedule and consistent loaves. They use DATEM so their bread springs up in any factory, in any weather.
Having baked with and without commercial dough conditioners, I can tell the difference is subtle but real. The home-baked bread without DATEM tastes fuller, even if it turns slightly drier the next day. Convenience stores need fresh, springy bread every morning—so they lean on these additives to avoid crumbly slices.
Some producers look for solutions more aligned with clean eating trends. Sourdough fermentation, or using natural dough conditioners like lecithin, can help. These require longer rising times or careful balancing. For those with time and passion, results are worth it. For companies with big grocery contracts, sticking with DATEM works for now.
Knowing why DATEM gets tossed in food gives shoppers a little more control. Some families won’t care; others want nothing but simple ingredients. Reading labels and understanding each additive helps everyone make their own call at the store. Bread isn’t just bread, and DATEM’s role is all about balancing tradition and shelf life, flavor and convenience.
Food labels fill up with chemical-sounding words these days, and DATEM (short for diacetyl tartaric acid ester of mono- and diglycerides) keeps popping up, mostly in store-bought bread. The name doesn’t sound appetizing, and that can feel off-putting. DATEM gives dough the strength to create fluffy bread, keeps it from collapsing, and protects that soft slice in your sandwich loaf. Most people eat DATEM without even realizing it—it's found in breads, rolls, bagels, tortillas, and sometimes even in coffee creamers. So, it’s fair to question how safe it really is, especially since bread shows up at nearly every meal table.
Regulators across the globe have looked closely at DATEM. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) both cleared DATEM for use in small quantities. The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives has also run reviews. Years of data show that DATEM doesn’t mess with genetics, cause cancer, or trigger allergic reactions in the vast majority of people. Toxicologists determined that, for most healthy people, consuming the typical amounts found in a regular diet doesn’t lead to any known health problems. Most bread eaters aren't exposed to high enough levels of DATEM to cause trouble.
One study from the early '90s raised questions, linking high doses of DATEM to changes in adrenal glands and the heart in lab animals. The key phrase: “high doses.” To hit those numbers, a person would need to eat a very unrealistic amount of commercial bread every single day. Still, that study continues to make some people wary, since it’s tough to always rely on assurances that “a little shouldn’t hurt.”
Despite the official safety reviews, a lot of people want to know why so many additives exist in everyday food. That curiosity grows every time another ingredient gets tied to health risks, as happened with trans fats years ago. Bread doesn’t have to include DATEM, but making soft, uniform slices on a massive scale gets easier with it. For manufacturers, economics often beat out tradition. That doesn’t always match up with what consumers want for their families. Most home bakers never touch DATEM, and their bread usually just goes stale a little faster. People who stick to bakery bread or make their own don’t have to think about it at all.
Not many long-term human studies track health outcomes from eating DATEM specifically. Most additive approval relies on animal research, short-term trial results, and assumptions about typical daily consumption. Food watchdog groups keep monitoring ingredient lists and pushing for more testing. Consumers can ask for more transparency—if an ingredient doesn’t have to be in bread, it’s fair to push for clear labeling and simpler recipes.
If you feel uneasy about DATEM, skipping store-bought bread isn’t too hard. Some brands advertise “DATEM-free” or “clean label” products. Farmer’s market bread or loaves from small bakeries stick closer to flour, water, yeast, and salt. Home baking lets you leave DATEM out entirely. For everyone else, reading labels and trusting the science both matter. Sticking with foods that feel right for you and your family always matters more than following trends or hype. Food safety depends on honest labeling, rigorous review, and a little common sense in the kitchen.
Take a look at almost any loaf of supermarket bread, and you'd probably spot “DATEM” listed near the bottom. The full name stands for diacetyl tartaric acid ester of mono- and diglycerides, though bakers usually just call it DATEM. Grocery shoppers with food allergies or celiac disease deserve straight answers about what’s hiding behind those acronyms. If someone in the family reacts to the smallest crumb of wheat or deals with food allergies, skipping vague ingredient names can feel like a survival skill. So what does DATEM mean for anyone paying close attention to allergens and gluten?
DATEM belongs to a group called emulsifiers. Companies use it to strengthen doughs and improve the texture of baked goods. The building blocks of DATEM start with ingredients like glycerol, tartaric acid, and fatty acids. Most major suppliers extract the fatty acids from plant oils—soybean or palm, for example. Sometimes, the source can be animal fats, but food-grade DATEM in North America usually gets made from plants. What raises eyebrows in the allergy community? It's about how those base ingredients are sourced and processed before ending up in bread and baked snacks.
Peanut, tree nut, egg, dairy, soy, fish, shellfish, wheat, and sesame top the list of common allergens. Unlike lecithin, which often comes from soy, DATEM does not start off as a direct derivative of these foods. Cooks and dietitians generally agree that DATEM isn't itself an allergen. That’s a relief to parents whose kids attend nut-free classrooms or those who have stood in the bakeshop, reading labels until the store lights flicker off for the night.
But allergies sometimes don’t care about technicalities. Cross-contamination can sneak in if a manufacturer makes multiple products at the same facility. Some people have reported reactions after eating foods with DATEM, and sometimes the root cause traces back to shared equipment or incomplete cleaning rather than the emulsifier itself. Real-world stories underline the need for vigilance on production lines, especially for those dealing with severe allergy risks.
For those with celiac disease, gluten is the real culprit. DATEM by itself isn't made from wheat or other gluten-containing grains. Reputable makers confirm that DATEM is usually gluten-free. In my own experience of looking out for a sibling with celiac, I found that checking for certified gluten-free labeling takes stress off grocery trips. Not every loaf with DATEM will carry that certification. Wheat flour and other gluten sources could end up in recipes where DATEM appears—so looking at the whole product, not just the emulsifier, keeps everyone safer.
Reading through long, scientific-sounding labels isn't anyone’s favorite task, but it turns out to be necessary in a world of processed food. The best move for consumers looking for certainty is to look for packages with clear allergen statements. Some brands go the extra mile by explaining the origin of their additives and providing gluten-free or allergen-free guarantees. Bakeries and brands that respond to questions earn customer trust more quickly than those who hide behind the small print.
At the end of the day, higher food safety standards—from full disclosure of ingredient origins to more transparent handling practices—serve people with allergies, gluten sensitivities, and everyone who wants peace of mind about what they’re eating. From my side, the lesson sticks: a simple question like “Is DATEM safe?” deserves a straightforward answer. Food makers would do well to remember that a clear label isn’t just law—it builds loyalty from real people protecting their loved ones.
Walk down any supermarket bread aisle and you’ll find more than wheat, flour, and yeast tucked inside those loaves. DATEM—short for diacetyl tartaric acid ester of mono- and diglycerides—often shows up in many packaged breads and buns. It helps bakers make their bread soft and fluffy, keeps it from getting stale in just a few days, and makes those burger buns hold up under the juice of a hot patty. Try squeezing a store-bought roll and feel how pillowy it is. That’s not just good luck—that’s food science at work.
Once you start looking for DATEM, you spot it on labels well beyond sliced bread. Bagels need to stay chewy and have a nice tight crumb; DATEM helps there, too. Pizza dough, especially the frozen kind, relies on this ingredient to snap back after being squished for weeks in a box. Croissants from the store—those with more staying power than your local bakery version—use DATEM to hang onto their golden layers longer.
A box of cookies calling your name from the pantry shelf may have DATEM near the bottom of its ingredient list. The compound strengthens the dough, so shape and crunch don’t fade on the ride from factory to home. Crackers also benefit—DATEM keeps them crisp and ready for that afternoon cheese snack. Sometimes, even the humble graham cracker, meant for fireside s’mores, is made with this emulsifier.
Frozen waffles, pancakes, and toaster pastries carry DATEM as well. They need to survive freezing, then heating up quickly without turning into rubber or drying out. Ready-made sandwich rolls and fast food hamburger buns almost always use DATEM to take the beating of transport, reheating, and squishing before hitting the plate. The ingredient can even be found in some types of tortillas and wraps because nobody wants their burrito falling apart halfway through lunch.
My experience working short stints in bakeries and restaurants taught me that food companies have real headaches keeping baked goods soft and fresh. Throw out half of what goes stale, and you start to see profits vanish. Factories make billions of products that travel far, so ingredients like DATEM help make food sturdy and tasty for as long as possible. According to the FDA, DATEM has approval for safe use in these foods within set limits. Still, some folks notice stomach discomfort after eating too many commercial baked goods and wonder about all the extra stuff packed in for shelf life.
If you’d rather skip DATEM, start reading those ingredient lists. Bakeries making bread fresh each day often avoid it because their products get eaten well before staling. I learned to bake simple bread at home during college: flour, yeast, salt, water, a little oil—enough for most needs, and you get to know exactly what you’re eating. As more people turn to homemade or smaller batch brands, demand grows for simpler recipes. Companies do listen when customers ask for less processed choices. They adjust recipes and let shoppers in on what goes into each loaf or treat.
DATEM isn’t going away in mass-market food. But learning which foods rely on it gives you more options. Some decisions boil down to convenience versus control. Baked goods with simple ingredients take longer or cost a bit more, but for many, trading that in for fewer food additives feels worth it.
Every trip through the bread aisle puts us face-to-face with ingredients that sound like science class. DATEM often pops up on the label. Bakers use this additive, short for diacetyl tartaric acid ester of mono- and diglycerides, to help dough rise higher and give bread a chewy, stable texture. Many food companies lean on DATEM to keep products soft and tasty for longer. I started paying more attention to ingredient lists after going vegetarian, and this ingredient always raised an eyebrow.
DATEM has a reputation for being safe according to international health agencies. Still, safety isn’t the only concern for people avoiding animal products. The source of the ingredients matters just as much. The main raw materials are usually vegetable oils. So, for lots of products, DATEM lines up with plant-based diets. Yet things get tricky because mono- and diglycerides can come from animal fat too. Unless the company clearly shares its source, there’s no easy way to know just by reading the package.
For vegetarians and vegans, the uncertainty around ingredient sourcing can be frustrating. Not long ago, I called a few bread companies about DATEM in their products. Some responded quickly and confirmed a plant origin, but a few said their suppliers provided a blend from both plants and animals. Some were friendly but couldn't give any details at all. That uncertainty often leads many in the plant-based community to skip products with DATEM or stick to brands who confirm everything comes from plants.
The law does not force companies to disclose whether their DATEM started with plants or animals, and most don’t print this on the bag or box. Packaging only needs to list it as an emulsifier. In practice, lots of commercial manufacturers favor plants since vegetable oils usually cost less and work well. Still, as long as the door stays open for animal sources, labels will leave a question mark for ethical eaters.
Navigating this issue means becoming a bit of a detective. Anyone avoiding animal products may want to contact brands before buying new bread or snacks. Most major companies have customer service emails set up for ingredient requests, and many get similar questions every week. I’ve found that sticking with certified vegan brands—or brands with strong transparency commitments—removes most of the guesswork.
Food producers who tap into the plant-based movement could meet customer needs by specifying the source on their packaging, or publishing ingredient sourcing on their websites. Demand is going up as more people take an interest in the story behind their food, not just the nutrition facts. Honest labeling increases trust and keeps customers loyal.
While DATEM itself isn’t inherently off-limits to vegans or vegetarians, uncertainty about its origin makes it a gray area. Until food labeling rules catch up, those following strict plant-based diets must keep asking questions and sharing information. It takes some extra effort, but pushing for clear answers can nudge the whole food industry toward honest, transparent practices for everyone.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 2,3-Diacetoxy-1,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-butanetetrayl bis(2-acetoxypropanoate) |
| Other names |
E472e Tartaric acid esters of mono- and diglycerides DATEM |
| Pronunciation | /daɪˈæsɪtɪl tɑːrˈtærɪk ˈæsɪd ˈɛstərz ʌv ˈmoʊnoʊ ənd ˌdaɪˈɡlɪsəraɪdz ˈdeɪtɛm/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono- and diglycerides |
| Other names |
E472e Diacetyltartaric acid esters of mono- and diglycerides DATEM |
| Pronunciation | /daɪˌæsɪˌtaɪl tɑːrˈtærɪk ˈæsɪd ˈɛstərz əv ˈmoʊnoʊ ənd daɪˈɡlɪsəˌraɪdz ˈdeɪtɛm/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 999-19-3 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3442484 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:85909 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL3980524 |
| ChemSpider | 75638 |
| DrugBank | DB14093 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03e221af-b0a7-44a2-89c9-9e12b2c6ff13 |
| EC Number | E472e |
| Gmelin Reference | 87848 |
| KEGG | C20362 |
| MeSH | Esterification |
| PubChem CID | 86289072 |
| RTECS number | SJ3325000 |
| UNII | 2QU75101F8 |
| UN number | Not regulated |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID0041070 |
| CAS Number | 999-43-5 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3440862 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:85001 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL4296778 |
| ChemSpider | 148157 |
| DrugBank | DB11156 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03b5291c-ef5e-4e81-961a-09c8bc567aaa |
| EC Number | E472e |
| Gmelin Reference | 476111 |
| KEGG | C20411 |
| MeSH | Diacetyl-Tartaric Acid Esters of Mono- and Diglycerides |
| PubChem CID | 2704409 |
| RTECS number | SE5950000 |
| UNII | 30O08Y210F |
| UN number | Not regulated |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | urn:uuid:4e8a2f1a-6e6d-45e4-92f4-8d0853e128cf |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C27H50O8 |
| Molar mass | 1068.23 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.97 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | -8.2 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Basicity (pKb) | 6.16 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.465–1.485 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 2.89 D |
| Chemical formula | C27H50O8 |
| Molar mass | 822.99 g/mol |
| Appearance | White or light yellow powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.05 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | -2.7 |
| Acidity (pKa) | pKa ≈ 3.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 9.55 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.470 - 1.480 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 2.92 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | Not listed |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A10BX |
| ATC code | A21EA05 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause mild skin and eye irritation, dust may cause respiratory irritation |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: "Not classified as hazardous according to GHS |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | No signal word |
| Hazard statements | Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). |
| Precautionary statements | Keep container tightly closed. Store in a cool, dry place. Avoid contact with eyes, skin, and clothing. Wash thoroughly after handling. Use with adequate ventilation. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
| Flash point | > 260 °C |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (rat, oral): >5,000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | NA |
| PEL (Permissible) | No PEL established |
| REL (Recommended) | 50 mg/kg bw |
| Main hazards | May cause mild skin and eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | No signal word |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements |
| Precautionary statements | Keep container tightly closed. Store in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated place. Avoid breathing dust. Wash hands thoroughly after handling. Use personal protective equipment as required. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Autoignition temperature | > 400°C (752°F) |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Rat oral > 35 g/kg |
| REL (Recommended) | 50 mg/kg bw |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | IDLH (Immediate danger): Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids Lactic acid esters of mono- and diglycerides Citric acid esters of mono- and diglycerides Polyglycerol esters of fatty acids Sodium stearoyl lactylate Calcium stearoyl lactylate |
| Related compounds |
Mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids Lactic acid esters of mono- and diglycerides Citric acid esters of mono- and diglycerides Acetylated tartaric acid esters of mono- and diglycerides Sucrose esters of fatty acids |