© 2026 Alchemist Worldwide Ltd,
All Right Reserved
People have searched for ways to fight infection far longer than most realize. During my time in research labs and clinics, the hunt for reliable antibiotics shaped many conversations. Sulfadimidine Sodium entered the scene in the early days of sulfonamide discovery, riding high on the worldwide interest in drugs that didn’t come with penicillin’s heavy price tag or manufacturing demands. Researchers in the 1930s churned through hundreds of chemical variations, hoping to walk the tightrope between safety and effectiveness. Sulfadimidine was one of those early discoveries, arriving at a time when most hospitals couldn’t keep up with outbreaks of pneumonia and other deadly infections. Its sodium salt form, prized for dissolving easily in water, brought a practical edge to the world of injectables and rapid dosing.
Sulfadimidine Sodium sits among the family of sulfonamide antimicrobials. Its job in the world, at a glance, is straightforward: slow down and halt the growth of bacteria by throwing a wrench in their ability to produce folic acid. Without this tiny molecule, bacteria stall and fade away. In hospitals and on farms, bottles and vials of Sulfadimidine Sodium show up as trusted rescue lines for everything from respiratory tract infections to troublesome cases of gastroenteritis. It’s not a panacea, but folks in veterinary and medical medicine know it well. Years ago, I spent enough sleepless nights in clinics to remember how it earned a spot in many first-generation drug kits, especially when cost or supply pinched harder alternatives.
You can tell a lot about Sulfadimidine Sodium by looking and handling it. It usually appears as a white or nearly white crystalline powder, carrying a faint bitter tang. Touching it between your fingers, it feels dry and fine, clumps easily if damp, and gives off a mild medicinal odor—hard to miss if you’ve spent time mixing stock solutions. Water quickly dissolves it, turning clear as glass, thanks to the sodium addition. Chemically, the structure shows a classic sulfonamide backbone, scored with an amino group and a pyrimidine ring. These features don’t just look nice on a blackboard—they mean stuff in real work. I’ve watched more than a few early-stage technicians get lost in the details, but those structural points control how the drug moves through the bloodstream and why it stands up to a range of bacterial bugs.
A closer look at packaging and technical sheets always helps. Sulfadimidine Sodium usually comes labelled by weight—often 500g bottles or ampoules for hospitals and veterinary clinics. Labels matter, a lesson hammered home in fieldwork, since one incorrect decimal places patients squarely in harm’s way. The drug lays out its strength (often 98% purity or greater), shelf life, recommended storage temp (cool and dry makes it last), and caution notes about mixing and dosing. Legal rules vary from country to country but strict requirements about traceability, batch number, and expiry dates cover every container. Even a small slip-up can draw regulatory heat, especially with global supply chains where a mislabeled bottle in one place risks a recall in another.
Making Sulfadimidine Sodium in a lab involves a blend of chemical artistry and steady patience. The basic recipe starts by coupling 4-aminobenzenesulfonamide with the methylated pyrimidine ring, usually under pressure and moderate heat. During my short stint helping junior chemists, a careful hand and steady temperature control made the difference between a clean, shiny product and a stubborn, off-colored mass that didn’t pass purity tests. Sodium salt formation follows—tossing in sodium hydroxide or another base, coaxing the sulfonamide to form the water-soluble salt that makes fast IV and oral use possible. Lab techs then filter, dry, and mill the result into that familiar fine powder. Hiccups in any of these steps won’t just drop yields; contaminant traces or leftover solvents can trigger regulatory rejections straight off the shipping line.
Chemists worked hard to give Sulfadimidine Sodium its punch. The molecule’s sulfonamide group sits at the core of most of its reactions. Tinkering with substitutions on the pyrimidine ring or the amine can help the drug dodge resistance or reduce unwanted reactions with animal tissues. While some tried making esters or new salts, not all these tweaks brought real-world results. In the summer of 2009, during a project looking at analogs, we hit plenty of dead ends and a few promising leads—like prodrug forms that might release slowly. Still, these tweaks must clear strict pharmacokinetic and safety bars before anyone gives them a real-world chance.
Sulfadimidine Sodium wears plenty of hats around the world. Depending on country and supplier, it pops up as Sulfamethazine Sodium, or under trade labels like Sulmet, Seldaprim, and Ganosan. In lab registries, folks sometimes spell it as Sulphadimidine, just to keep things confusing. These aliases don’t just cause spelling headaches. Working in regulatory audits, I’ve seen how missing a product variant trips up import paperwork and blocks a shipment at the border. Knowing these names matters—nobody wants panicked calls from customs about a stalled antibiotic batch.
Handling Sulfadimidine Sodium isn’t for the careless. This isn’t some harmless white powder. During hands-on training, we geared up with gloves and proper masks, since long-term exposure can irritate lungs and skin. Lab managers drove home every day the rules hammered out by regulatory bodies—OSHA, EMA, and FDA among them. Overdosing, especially with livestock, often produces kidney or blood trouble; some animal breeds show scary reactions with little warning. Health pros monitor for rare, but serious, allergic responses in people. Disposal rules bite just as hard. Waste solution can’t go down the drain; incineration or certified chemical disposal only, to dodge environmental buildup and resistant bug problems.
Most folks run into Sulfadimidine Sodium in animal health, especially treating poultry, swine, and cattle infections. Vets often reach for it as a first-line treatment for coccidiosis in chickens, or for stubborn urinary tract issues in dogs and cats. In human clinics, its use has dropped as newer drugs took over. Still, out in rural hospitals or during supply chain breakdowns, it sometimes fills gaps for certain infections that don’t answer to other antibiotics. The experience of watching a sick animal recover after a carefully dosed treatment drives home why such drugs matter. Even if resistance makes the news more than success stories, Sulfadimidine Sodium’s real-world impact stacks up in many corners of the world.
Labs and researchers continue poking and prodding at Sulfadimidine Sodium for leads on better safety, longer action, and resistance blocking. Recent studies focus on how slight chemical tweaks alter absorption and how to combine sulfonamides with other antimicrobials to punch through bacterial defenses. On the veterinary side, field trials monitor how dosage changes affect poultry flock health, watching both the good (infection control) and the bad (drug residues in food products). Big grants chase ways to refine detection methods, so food safety inspectors can spot even traces in meat and eggs. The hunt for new antibiotics may often steal headlines, but optimizing existing workhorses like Sulfadimidine Sodium remains key, especially where resources run thin.
Nobody can afford to ignore the downside of broad antibiotic use. Toxicity data, both from years of clinical cases and controlled trials, point to some hard trade-offs. In the lab, higher doses over time strain kidneys, draw out crystal deposits, and, in unlucky cases, spark bone marrow suppression. The legacy of the sulfonamide era includes rare but deadly skin reactions and allergic storms. Watching patients (human or animal) go from mild rashes to full-blown shock underlines why safety margins deserve respect. Long-term environmental residues also stir worry: sulfonamides don’t just vanish in wastewater and can nudge soil and waterborne bacteria toward resistance. Regulators and researchers spend more time now digging into these aftershocks, in hopes of balancing medical need with ecological responsibility.
As new antibiotic resistance headlines pile up, Sulfadimidine Sodium won’t ride quietly into the past. Demand for affordable, broad-spectrum treatments keeps its name in distribution networks, especially for animal health. Research push for smarter combinations, new forms, and better regulation of residues in food chains. Policymakers may tighten rules on use and traceability, but they also weigh these controls against the reality of disease outbreaks. Each wave of research, from faster diagnostics to gene-based resistance detection, opens hope for extension of this class’s usefulness. Sharing experience and hard-won facts across borders—between farm vets, hospital pharmacists, and regulatory officials—serves everyone in the ongoing fight to protect both health and food safety.
Farm life often collides with the reality of livestock infections. Growing up helping on my grandparents’ farm, I saw how quickly a flock or herd could shift from thriving to coughing, sneezing, and dragging through their feed. Bacterial diseases in animals like chickens, cattle, and pigs don’t wait for someone to figure out a plan. A handful of sick animals left untreated can spark wider trouble, leading to food loss and hard financial setbacks for producers.
Sulfadimidine sodium steps in as one of the classic tools. It targets a range of bacteria, showing up especially in cases of respiratory and digestive infections. It’s been around for decades, picked up by veterinarians not just out of habit, but because it works where some newer drugs struggle, especially with certain strains.
In an age where antibiotics get plenty of attention, this one keeps its seat at the table, mainly because price and reliability matter as much as headlines about new medicines. Large-scale farmers, particularly those raising poultry and swine, run into outbreaks of diseases like coccidiosis and pneumonia. With pressures to keep animals healthy and to deliver meat and eggs at an affordable price, old and trusted remedies like sulfadimidine sodium often get picked over flashier, pricier options.
There’s real science backing its use. Sulfadimidine sodium, a member of the sulfonamide family, disrupts the production of folic acid in bacteria. Without that, bacteria lose their grip and the animal’s immune system stands a better chance at winning the fight. Fast action counts in livestock management, and results with this drug usually show up quickly. Experience in the field—as well as published studies—show a drop in symptoms and death rates when it’s used promptly and correctly.
Nobody working with animals wants to see antibiotics lose their edge. Using them the right way means watching out for resistance and avoiding careless dosing. From what I’ve seen, the best farms have a protocol: vets confirm the infection, select the narrowest, most appropriate antibiotic, and stick closely to clear withdrawal times so no residue ends up in milk or meat. Not following those steps risks public health and increases the threat of superbugs.
The World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization sound alarms about overusing antibiotics, but solutions don’t just fall from policy memos. It takes boots in the barn, honest record-keeping, and owners willing to invest in biosecurity. Basic prevention—like proper nutrition, hygiene, and vaccinations—makes a bigger long-term dent in disease. Antibiotics, including sulfadimidine sodium, work best as part of a broader game plan, not as a single answer.
Many consumers never hear the name sulfadimidine sodium, yet its role ripples outwards from small barns to global food systems. Safe, healthy animals mean safer food and less waste. The drug stays on the shelf not just because it’s cheap, but because, when used responsibly by skilled hands, it keeps livestock productive and helps protect the world’s food chain. Those who work the fields and barns know the value of every healthy calf, chick, or piglet; medicines like this one help keep that circle unbroken.
On the farm and in the clinic, people count on medicines that work and don’t break the bank. Sulfadimidine Sodium is one of those antibiotics that’s grabbed a regular place on the shelf. Folks in animal husbandry stick with it for good reason. For decades, veterinarians and livestock keepers have turned to this medicine when animals face bacterial trouble, especially in herds or flocks where a few sick animals can quickly mean a wider problem.
Anyone who's ever raised animals—cattle or chickens, sheep or pigs—knows that infections can sweep through fast. Sulfadimidine Sodium gets prescribed mostly for cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, and poultry. In dairy cows and beef herds, you might spot it used to tackle respiratory infections that pop up in cold or wet stretches, but people also use it when calves battle scours (diarrhea) caused by bacteria. Sheep and goats suffer many of the same problems as cattle, so the same medicine can help control outbreaks of pneumonia or enteric (gut) infections in flocks—whether out on pasture or in more confined barn setups.
Chicken farmers aren’t left out. In the crowded world of commercial poultry, diseases like coccidiosis and Salmonella can hammer broilers and layers. Here, fast action means treating whole flocks at times, not just one or two birds. Sulfadimidine Sodium gets mixed in drinking water so every bird takes the right dose without needing to round them up for individual shots. Pig owners and commercial swine farms often deal with bacterial diarrhea in young pigs or respiratory diseases in feeder pigs. In these situations, the drug can help both the piglet and the producer by reducing loss and boosting the odds of a healthy finish.
Beyond the barnyard, this antibiotic sometimes helps horses fighting respiratory infections or bacterial diarrhea, though the equine community tends to favor other drugs if there are better options. Small mammals like rabbits also see limited use, often for gut infections, but dosage and safety become bigger concerns the smaller the animal. Exotic pets and wildlife occasionally get Sulfadimidine Sodium, but always under close veterinary oversight because drug tolerance and kidney health can vary wildly.
Price and flexibility boost this antibiotic’s reputation. It has a broad action against most harmful bacteria encountered on farms and costs less than many newer drugs. In my own years working on a family farm, treating a calf or lamb early meant a few cents a dose and a real shot at getting them back on their feet. The relief from losing fewer animals outweighs almost any paperwork or withdrawal period, and those saved animals grow out healthy for market or breeding.
But every tool has limits. Overusing Sulfadimidine Sodium promotes resistance, where bacteria learn to ignore the drug. This is now a serious worry, with the World Health Organization listing it among important drugs to use prudently. Skipping proper withdrawal times before sending animals to slaughter risks leaving drug residues in meat or milk. That erodes consumer trust and puts public health on the line. Responsible dosing, supervision by a vet, and honest record-keeping create the best chance for Sulfadimidine Sodium to stay useful for generations.
Producers stay ahead by keeping barns dry and clean, choosing animal breeds with good resistance, and following strict vaccine programs. These steps help cut down on outbreaks and leave antibiotics for when they’re needed most. Sulfadimidine Sodium remains a dependable choice for many types of livestock and poultry when infections hit. With smart use, clear communication between veterinarians and animal owners, and honest respect for food safety, it’ll continue to play a crucial role in animal health—without trading long-term benefits for short-term gains.
Doctors, vets, and farmers know tuned-in dosing keeps antibiotics like Sulfadimidine Sodium both useful and safe. This isn’t just about following a chart. Figuring out the right amount brings out the drug’s healing side and tampers down on some ugly drawbacks, like resistance and unwanted side effects. My years around livestock and in clinics have shown that the line between just enough and too much defines trust between folks, animals, and the medicine itself.
This antibiotic goes into action against a lineup of bacteria. It mainly picks fights with infections in cattle, sheep, pigs, poultry, and sometimes pets. Think respiratory troubles and digestive upsets for many farm animals, but only if the bug on hand is sensitive to what this medicine brings. It’s not a catch-all fix. The veterinary world learned the hard way that generic dosing spells trouble—hard-to-treat bacteria and wasted money pile up fast.
You won’t find a single number for every critter or infection. For cattle and sheep, Sulfadimidine Sodium tends to run about 100 to 200 mg per kg of body weight for the first treatment. That dose may drop down to half for the next couple of days, especially if delivered through an injection. For pigs and poultry treated through drinking water, the typical push lands around 200 to 400 mg per kg spread across two or three days. Small animals, like dogs and cats, usually receive 55 to 66 mg per kg, repeated every twelve hours. A vet might tweak this if kidney or liver function looks shaky.
Friends who rush through instructions or guess at measuring out antibiotics often run into trouble. I’ve seen barns where folks “eyeballed” the dose, only to end up with relapses and medicine-resistant bacteria. Overdosing brings vomiting, diarrhea, even kidney trouble in severe cases. Under-dosing? Bacteria get a free pass to adapt and spread. That’s wasted work for the caretaker and reset-button for the infection.
Making sure the animal drinks enough water helps avoid kidney stones during a Sulfadimidine stretch. If the critter’s not up for fluids or looks weak, it’s time to rethink the strategy. Allergic responses—rare, but well-documented—spread rashes or cause breathing issues. That calls for stopping treatment and calling the vet. As with many “sulfa” medicines, folks handling the compound should wash up well afterward.
Misusing antibiotics isn’t a solo problem. Resistance leaps between farms, cities, pets, and even wildlife. Tools like culture and sensitivity tests let the vet pick Sulfadimidine only if the germ will respond. Saving the leftovers from one round to dose the next case—something I’ve seen even on well-run farms—only shortchanges future treatments. The best move involves tracking doses, completing the course, and checking back with a vet if things veer off-course.
Access to trustworthy dosing sheets, keeping medicine locked up, and investing in staff training would go a long way toward making Sulfadimidine Sodium as effective as possible. Farmers swapping stories or learning from hands-on classes end up protecting both herds and the broader food chain. On a day-to-day level, watching animals closely and not shying away from getting advice saves time, money, and lives down the road.
Sulfadimidine sodium belongs to the family of sulfonamide antibiotics. Farmers and veterinarians reach for it when animals face bacterial infections, from respiratory bugs to gastrointestinal illnesses. It fights off bacteria by shutting down how they make essential proteins, which keeps infections in check.
Antibiotics may be lifesavers, but nobody gets a free pass from side effects, including with sulfadimidine sodium. Speaking with vets over cups of coffee in feed stores, I've heard them share stories about animals reacting abnormally—sometimes with mild rashes, sometimes with big problems like trouble breathing. Most animals deal with it fine, but in some, life gets rough. Some common issues include swelling, diarrhea, and fever. Skin reactions show up, too, such as hives or red patches. Horses, in particular, seem prone to digestive upsets. Still, the scary stories involve kidney trouble or blood disorders, though those remain rare.
What causes these problems? Allergies set off a lot of the drama. Certain breeds—like Dobermans—seem especially touchy. Sulfadimidine can also mess with gut flora, causing gut health to nosedive and leading to secondary infections. In my years volunteering at rural animal clinics, I've watched careful vets run blood checks before and during treatment, just to catch early signs of damage. They stress the need to monitor for trouble.
Misuse of sulfonamides creates bigger headaches down the road. When antibiotics get used too often or for the wrong bug, bacteria learn how to survive. Sulfadimidine sodium isn’t immune from this risk. You see it most in poultry and cattle operations where antibiotics double as growth boosters. Years ago, I visited a large commercial farm that had to overhaul procedures—from basic recordkeeping to updated waterline cleaning—after discovering that the same drugs no longer worked as well. They learned it the hard way.
Anyone giving out this drug should read dosage labels with care. Overdoses add to the risk of kidney or liver damage, especially in older animals. Vets also pause before prescribing to pregnant or lactating animals, knowing the drug crosses the placenta and shows up in milk. I’ve met farmers who keep logs of every dose—because tracking which animals received which treatment is about more than paperwork, it means catching patterns before a bigger problem sets in.
One tip that helped me: always ask a knowledgeable vet before mixing sulfadimidine with other common drugs. Some combinations, like with certain anesthetics or diuretics, spike the odds of complications. Water intake matters too, as a well-hydrated animal clears the medicine faster, reducing harm to the kidneys. Clean water must be available at all times.
Giving animals the best shot at recovery means seeing antibiotics as one tool rather than the crutch for every cough or fever. Good hygiene, vaccination, and reducing stressful conditions on the farm go a long way. In my experience, strong support from trained professionals and solid daily habits cut back on the emergency calls in the middle of the night. Respecting the risks of sulfadimidine sodium, and using it wisely, helps preserve its value for when it’s truly needed. That approach keeps both animals and the people who rely on them in better health.
Sulfadimidine sodium, which shows up in many veterinary medicine cabinets, helps farmers tackle infections in cattle, pigs, chickens, and more. It’s a workhorse antibiotic, often used for serious cases of pneumonia or for digestive tract bugs. What plenty of folks—on both sides of the farm gate—miss is where that medicine shows up later: in the products everyone eats and drinks, like meat, eggs, and milk.
After animals get treated with sulfadimidine sodium, leftover drug can hang around in their bodies. If a producer slaughters, milks, or collects eggs too soon, that residue might end up in the food chain. Not everyone realizes that antibiotic leftovers in food can matter a lot. They don’t just disappear during cooking. Over time, small doses like this can help bacteria become more resistant, making antibiotics less effective for people and animals. The World Health Organization, FDA, and many food safety agencies track this closely for a reason.
Every country sets its own rules, but the science stays pretty close. In most places, cattle or pigs given sulfadimidine sodium require a withdrawal period of at least 10 days before slaughter (some labels suggest up to 15 days, depending on the dose and route). Milk from treated cows or goats needs to be discarded for at least 4 days after the last treatment. For laying hens, eggs should stay out of the consumer market for around 7 days after the last injection or oral dose.
Farming isn’t just about feeding the world but about trust. If I stop and talk with folks at the farmers’ market, they care deeply about what goes into their food. That’s why farmers track these dates down to the hour, scribble withdrawal times in notebooks, and sometimes even lose sleep over the record keeping. Mistakes carry real consequences. Regulatory fines, loss of licenses, consumer backlash, even health for someone at the end of the food chain—these risks hang over farms that don’t follow the guidelines.
Most producers would love to treat animals without ever worrying about residue. Modern tests can pick up antibiotic traces so tiny it seems impossible they’d cause trouble, but medically important antibiotics demand everyone be extra careful. Europe’s rapid tests, the U.S. National Residue Program, and Chinese spot inspections all show how easily residues get detected and how quickly they trigger recalls or price penalties.
Farmers asking more from their vets makes a big difference. Drug labels don’t cover every situation, and animals in tough spots don’t always follow the averages. Better communication, reminders through farm management apps, and more rapid, on-farm residue tests could plug the gaps. I’ve seen neighbors pool money to buy milk-testing kits, just for peace of mind. Some co-ops demand antibiotic logs before picking up loads for processing. Producers who aim for export markets run their own tests just to avoid nasty surprises at the border.
Clear withdrawal periods and strict record-keeping matter. That final glass of milk or morning’s scrambled egg links back to simple actions in the barn—when doses get given, how long someone waits, and why small details never feel small at all. A community that leans on transparency and responsibility sets a stronger table for everyone who sits down to a meal.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | sodium 4-amino-N-(4,6-dimethylpyrimidin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamidide |
| Other names |
Sodium sulfamethazine Sulfamethazine sodium Sodium sulfadimidine |
| Pronunciation | /ˌsʌl.fəˌdaɪ.mɪˈdiːn ˈsəʊ.di.əm/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Sodium 4-amino-N-(4,6-dimethylpyrimidin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamidide |
| Other names |
Sulfamethazine Sodium Sodium sulfadimidine Sodium sulfamethazine Sulfadimerazine sodium |
| Pronunciation | /ˌsʌl.fəˈdaɪ.mɪˌdiːn ˈsoʊ.di.əm/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 1981-58-4 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1718739 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:9246 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL21058 |
| ChemSpider | 22239 |
| DrugBank | DB00435 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.024.236 |
| EC Number | 262-504-7 |
| Gmelin Reference | 88254 |
| KEGG | C07441 |
| MeSH | D013444 |
| PubChem CID | 5238 |
| RTECS number | QT8175000 |
| UNII | WI4Z9M7NAK |
| UN number | UN2811 |
| CAS Number | 1981-58-4 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `3D model (JSmol)` string for **Sulfadimidine Sodium** (also known as **Sulfamethazine Sodium**): ``` CNc1cc(C)c(N=SO)cc1NC(=O)N.[Na] ``` This is the SMILES string representing the 3D structure for visualization in JSmol. |
| Beilstein Reference | 120707 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:9246 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2104523 |
| ChemSpider | 107658 |
| DrugBank | DB00678 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.042.848 |
| EC Number | 222-346-8 |
| Gmelin Reference | 68222 |
| KEGG | C06725 |
| MeSH | D004090 |
| PubChem CID | 5326 |
| RTECS number | WO8400000 |
| UNII | 42W8A2V3BW |
| UN number | UN2811 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C12H13N4NaO2S |
| Molar mass | 284.30 g/mol |
| Appearance | White or almost white crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.7 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Freely soluble in water |
| log P | -0.3 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 7.4 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 12.65 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -27.2×10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.54 |
| Dipole moment | 3.98 D |
| Chemical formula | C12H13N4NaO2S |
| Molar mass | 306.32 g/mol |
| Appearance | White or almost white crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.45 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Very soluble in water |
| log P | -0.09 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 7.4 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 7.85 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -40.5e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.68 |
| Dipole moment | 6.49 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 317.5 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 386.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | J01EB03 |
| ATC code | J01EB03 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed; may cause allergic skin reaction; may cause eye and respiratory irritation |
| GHS labelling | GHS05, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302: Harmful if swallowed. H319: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P273, P301+P312, P330, P501 |
| Flash point | > 224.2°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 540 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral (rat) 6600 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Oral, mouse: 8200 mg/kg |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL: Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 250 mg/kg |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed. May cause allergic skin reaction. May cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H319: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P273, P301+P312, P330, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-1-0 |
| Flash point | > 180°C |
| Autoignition temperature | Autoignition temperature: 410 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat 6600 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Oral (rat) 6600 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | RN=547-32-0 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) for Sulfadimidine Sodium: Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 125 mg/kg |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not listed |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Sulfadiazine Sulfamethazine Sulfamethoxazole Sulfapyridine Sulfanilamide |
| Related compounds |
Sulfadiazine Sulfamethoxazole Sulfapyridine Sulfathiazole Sulfacetamide |
