West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China sales9@alchemist-chem.com 1531585804@qq.com
Follow us:



Sucrose Esters of Fatty Acids: A Down-to-Earth Commentary

Tracing the Roots: Historical Development

Back in the late 1800s, chemists started playing around with fats and sugars in new ways. The scramble to improve shelf-life and food flavors pushed researchers into experiments with different combinations. By the middle of the 20th century, food makers realized that combining sucrose with fatty acids rocked the world of emulsification, giving foods new textures and shelf life. Japan took the lead in commercializing the process, driven by shortages of traditional emulsifiers in the 1960s. Since then, these fine-tuned additives have become common both in food and outside it. Judging from the jump in patents, scientists and companies saw something special here, especially since these compounds don’t come with loads of the baggage tied to other chemical additives.

Product Overview & Usage

Sucrose esters show up like hidden utility players in food, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals—often overlooked, but key to performance. Their main draw is making water and oil mingle, smoothing out textures, helping baked goods stay moist, and stopping chocolate from getting that weird gray bloom. They’ve found homes in instant coffee, whipped toppings, sauces, and even as anti-dust agents on fruit. These esters also star in personal care products, where they give creams a friendlier feel without clogging pores. It’s the balance between sucrose (a sugar) and fatty acids (think vegetable oils) that matters, and not every product uses the same type. Some rely on palm oil derivatives while others bank on sunflower oil or even coconut.

Physical & Chemical Properties

A lot of people mistake these compounds for simple sugar and oil mixtures, but their structure brings surprising benefits. Solid with a creamy-to-white color, they usually come as fine powders or flexible beads. Water solubility isn’t straightforward; the degree of esterification decides whether they dissolve fast or barely mix at all. High monoester content leads to greater water-friendliness, while more di- or tri-esters tend toward oil affinity. They don’t pack a strong odor or taste. Melting points vary, but most stay below 60°C, which fits food processing. Their mild chemical nature helps lessen conflicts with other ingredients, reducing the risk of flavors breaking apart in a recipe.

Technical Specs & Labeling Rules

Rules for labeling and using sucrose esters differ country by country. In the U.S., these additives fall under E473 and come with tough documentation from FDA and JECFA. In Europe, food labels require clear mention—no hiding behind “emulsifier” alone. Japan approves them for dozens of food uses but only up to certain concentrations. Most manufacturers sell several grades, labeled by their hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) and the fats used. HLB affects whether these blends suit creamy dressings or crisp candies. High transparency from makers and tight government oversight protect the end user, which makes trust possible for everyone down the chain. The need for clear, honest labels keeps increasing as more folks want to know exactly what’s in their groceries and skincare bottles.

How It’s Made: Preparation Method

Creating sucrose esters isn’t as simple as mixing sugar and fat in a bowl and hoping for the best. Most producers stick to solvent or solvent-free transesterification, where a sugar like sucrose meets up with methyl esters of fatty acids. Heating and a catalyst (sometimes potassium carbonate or sodium methoxide) drive the reaction. Since sucrose burns easily, scientists learned how to play with temperature and timing until most sugar molecules latch onto fatty acid chains just right. Water-wash purification, spray-drying, or precipitation help separate out the compounds that didn’t react or stayed stuck together. The finished product ends up much purer and more stable because of all this careful chemistry.

Chemical Reactions & Modifications

Chemists tweak sucrose esters for different goals, nudging the molecule’s structure to change properties like solubility and melting point. By playing with the chain length of the fatty acids or bumping up monoester proportions, they make the additive swing more toward water or oil. Sometimes, researchers block certain groups to prevent unwanted reactions under high heat. Physical blending adds another layer—combining different esters or mixing in protective agents lets the final product handle tough conditions, like deep-frying or freezing, without falling apart. This knack for tuning properties makes them valuable across industries, from baked goods to industrial cleaners.

Nicknames & Synonyms

Labels rarely stick to just “sucrose esters of fatty acids.” You’ll find terms like “sucrose esters,” “SEFA,” or “sucrose fatty acid esters” in ingredient lists or scientific studies. E473 pops up on European food packages. Technical bulletins go deeper, naming the exact blend or type of oil used—“sucrose stearate,” “sucrose palmitate,” and so on. Companies sometimes brand a certain blend for a signature product, which can confuse customers looking for transparency. Smart consumers look past the jargon, searching for the base ingredients to understand what sits behind each name.

Safety Check: Standards for Operations

Food safety hovers over this field more than anything else. Agencies like Codex Alimentarius and the European Food Safety Authority dive deep into safety studies, setting strict allowable limits for daily intake. Good Manufacturing Practices shape every stage, from raw material sourcing through shipping. Purity grades guarantee that no reaction leftovers or contaminants slip through. Employees must follow protective rules since hot, reactive chemicals can pose workplace hazards. Product traceability—batch records, supply chain audits, and certifications like ISO 22000 or HACCP—now form the backbone of trust among buyers, sellers, and final users.

What It’s Used For: Application Areas

Grocery shelves quietly boast foods relying on sucrose esters. Bakers toss them into sponge cakes for better rise and tenderness. Instant coffees dissolve more evenly with their help, stopping ugly oil rings on the surface. They form stable sauces, locked-in whipped toppings, and boost the mouthfeel of dairy alternatives. Candy makers count on them to keep sugar and fat layers unmixed. Big agriculture handles them as protective fruit coatings or as dispersants for pesticides. Beyond food, some pharmaceuticals use the esters to improve the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins. Creams, lotions, and toothpastes lean on them for gentler textures, and even batteries and coatings sometimes get a boost from the same chemistry.

Behind the Scenes: Research & Development

Investments in R&D don’t just improve profits—they push forward food science and product safety. Academics and industry teams dig into molecular tweaks that can open new markets: vegan chocolates, low-fat spreads, allergen-free bakery goods. Food technologists keep exploring greener, solvent-free production routes for cleaner labels and smaller carbon footprints. Each year brings new patents focused on sustainable feedstocks, smarter catalysts, or higher yields. Health-driven consumers push research into combinations that offer added benefits, like probiotics or reduced glycemic impact. The knowledge from these projects radiates outward, raising standards across food and chemical engineering.

Sizing Up the Risks: Toxicity Research

Scientists have spent decades poring over both animal and human safety studies on these compounds. Toxicologists check not just for direct harm but also for long-term impacts. Most research so far shows low toxicity—rats, dogs, and people haven’t experienced health setbacks at the levels found in processed food. Some watchdogs still stress the importance of watching for rare allergies or sensitivities, especially since processed foods end up in schools and clinics for the vulnerable. Unreacted ingredients, like leftover methanol or soap, worry regulators more than the esters themselves. That has kept quality testing in the spotlight, since nobody wants surprises sneaking into the food chain. Each new modification or production tweak draws close scrutiny from authorities before it reaches the market.

New Frontiers: Future Prospects

The market for sucrose esters keeps spreading as trends change. More shoppers look for non-GMO and palm-free labels, sending research teams looking for new raw materials. Environmental regulations drive chemical makers toward greener processes with less waste and lower energy use. Emerging food tech—like 3D printed snacks and plant-based dairy—leans on versatile emulsifiers to create novel textures. Scientists across disciplines talk about “clean label” solutions, hoping to merge food safety, consumer trust, and sustainability. As developing countries step up food processing and urban populations grow, the global need for shelf-stable, safe products links right back to flexible, reliable additives like sucrose esters. Instead of fading into the background, these compounds could help shape the next generation of foods, cosmetics, and beyond.




What are sucrose esters of fatty acids used for?

Sitting Down With Ingredients

You might not recognize the phrase “sucrose esters of fatty acids,” but check your kitchen cupboard or the back of any ice cream tub, and there they are. These ingredients pop up in foods, beauty items, and more, quietly improving the quality of products people use every day. Behind their intimidating name, they come from regular sugar and fats found in plants like palm or coconut oil.

Making Foods Taste and Feel Better

Over the years, producers have turned to sucrose esters for one big reason: improving textures that look and taste right. Start with chocolate. Chocolate can be a tricky thing to get smooth. If the particles separate, it tastes gritty. Manufacturers blend sucrose esters into chocolate to give it a silkier mouthfeel. These same molecules help oil and water stay together. That’s a big deal in ice cream, margarine, or even some snack foods, since nobody likes biting into icy, separated desserts or split spreads.

The interest in using these esters isn't all about texture. They help whipped toppings hold their volume longer, keeping desserts fresh even after sitting in the fridge. Trying to get salad dressing that pours perfectly smooth? Sucrose esters suspend all those herbs and spices in liquid, so you don’t wind up with a puddle of oil on top. In short, they tackle the age-old struggle of mixing things that don't naturally want to mingle.

Beyond Food: Everyday Helpers

It’s tempting to think their job stops at food, but they show up in face creams and lotions too. Moisturizers often contain water and oil, and every bottle label hints at how hard it is to blend the two. Sucrose esters make personal care products smoother, helping them glide across skin without feeling greasy or sticky.

Even in medicine, you’ll see these esters in certain pills and ointments, improving the way ingredients mix or dissolve, so people get the benefits doctors intend. For someone who’s ever choked down a grainy medicine or sticky cough syrup, better mixing is a blessing.

Keeping It Safe and Honest

Safety matters a great deal. Regulatory agencies like the FDA and EFSA have reviewed these ingredients for decades, setting clear guidelines on safe intake. Most people eat or use small amounts of sucrose esters without any trouble. Of course, allergies or sensitivities can crop up, especially for those with specific dietary restrictions, so it pays to check labels.

Transparency in labeling makes a difference. Some worry that words like “sucrose esters” sound too chemical, hinting at unnatural processing. In reality, their starting materials are common, and production methods are well understood. Food makers need to share clear information about what goes into their products so folks can make informed decisions. Relying on trusted sources—like registered dietitians or regulatory bodies—helps cut through confusion.

Looking at Tomorrow

There’s a big push for clean labels and simpler ingredient lists. Many companies are trying to find plant-based, sustainable sources for esters, aiming for products that match both taste and environmental ethics. This gets tricky, since finding natural alternatives that work just as well isn’t always possible. Here’s where continued research can help, developing new blends that keep foods tasty and stable but also respond to what people value—clean eating and environmental care.

Are sucrose esters of fatty acids safe for consumption?

What Are Sucrose Esters?

You’ll find sucrose esters of fatty acids in plenty of packaged foods—cakes, coffee creamers, chocolate, ice cream. They show up on ingredient lists as E473 or just “sucrose esters.” These compounds come from ordinary table sugar and fatty acids, which means their building blocks are familiar: sucrose and edible oils. Manufacturers use them to keep ingredients from separating and to give treats a smooth bite.

Safe to Eat?

I grew up reading ingredient labels out of curiosity. Sucrose esters always sounded like something straight from a lab, and I wondered whether these additives belong in food. So, I went looking for what science and health groups have to say. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) set an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 40 mg/kg body weight for E473, which adds up to over two grams per day for a child and even more for adults. In the U.S. and the European Union, food safety authorities have approved these molecules, considering the way the body handles them.

After eating foods with sucrose esters, the body splits them into plain sugar and fatty acids—nothing unusual or hard to process. Studies in animals and humans found no evidence of toxicity at normal dietary levels. Even in people with sensitive digestive systems, these esters don't trigger alarming reactions.

What About Long-Term Effects?

Food safety is about more than short-term reactions. People worry about what happens after years of eating processed products. Recent discussions around ultra-processed food have made everyone stop and think, myself included. Sucrose esters don’t supply fiber, vitamins, or anything we need for health. They just help processed food look and taste better, so they often travel with a lineup of other additives, sugars, and fats.

Too many processed foods can crowd out fresh fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. Diets heavy in packaged snacks have links to obesity, heart issues, and diabetes—problems that cost lives and put huge strain on health systems. This isn’t the fault of sucrose esters alone, but their presence signals a food started out far from its natural form.

What Could Change?

Most of us won’t see health problems from the small amounts of sucrose esters in foods, based on data so far. Still, there’s room to ask whether filling shelves with foods loaded with additives brings us closer to better health. More independent, long-term studies could ease some doubts. Full transparency from food makers helps people make better decisions about what they eat. I watch for short ingredient lists and stick with basics most of the time.

It’s worth it to return to simple home cooking. Meals built from whole foods need fewer stabilizers and enhancers. Food policy can help—meal plans in schools and hospitals can rely less on ultra-processed products and promote actual ingredients.

Think Before You Eat — and Ask Questions

Sucrose esters won’t poison us at the levels allowed in food. Yet their role in supporting a processed food system deserves a closer look. Staying curious and asking what goes into our meals keeps all of us safer and healthier in the long run.

Are sucrose esters of fatty acids natural or synthetic?

Clear Definitions Matter

A lot of folks hear words like “sucrose” and “fatty acids” and immediately think back to sugar and oil in the kitchen. Someone might think, well, if it starts with common ingredients, they must be natural. The truth isn’t that straightforward. Sucrose esters of fatty acids don’t appear by themselves in food the way, say, salt or milk do. These compounds are made by combining regular table sugar and either vegetable or animal fats in a chemical process. The outcome is a molecule with a sweet part and a fatty part, perfect for mixing oil and water in products like chocolate, coffee creamer, and even some breads.

Digging Into the Process

Growing up, I saw my grandparents cook with fats straight from the animal or vegetable. They blended what they had—no extra chemistry involved. Compare that to what goes on in food factories manufacturing sucrose esters. It starts with familiar material—sucrose from sugarcane or sugar beets, and fatty acids from sources like palm oil or tallow. These aren’t thrown into a pot. The mixture goes through carefully controlled chemical reactions, generally with catalysts or heat.

That means even if the starting points sound traditional, the end product crosses into “synthetic” by common food science standards. The body wouldn’t find these exact esters ready-made in an apple or a bottle of olive oil. Food labels must reflect this. More consumers read labels than ever before, and manufacturers need to be honest about both sourcing and processing.

Why It Matters What We Call It

People care about the difference between natural and synthetic because these words signal something about health, tradition, and food safety. Studies show shoppers increasingly look for natural ingredients and worry about additives they can’t pronounce. This isn’t just consumer anxiety. Trust in the food system shapes health choices. Food companies often use terms like “derived from natural sources,” which can blur the line between an added synthetic and a truly natural ingredient.

The World Health Organization and food regulators in Europe, the U.S., and Asia all recognize sucrose esters as safe for consumption in set amounts. No major health body claims they’re “natural.” The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives places sucrose esters firmly under the “additive” banner. In other words, they are created for a specific functional use, not picked off the plant or extracted with a simple press.

Moving Forward With Transparency

People have the right to know what’s in their meals. With allergy rates up and more chronic disease around, trust between consumers and food makers is key. Food makers need to label products clearly, and honestly describe their ingredients. Regulators could tighten definitions around “natural,” banning terms that mislead.

I always encourage friends to dig a little deeper past slogans like “all-natural.” Real transparency builds confidence. If you want less processed food, focus on simple ingredient lists and cooking methods you recognize. Sucrose esters of fatty acids do an important job stabilizing foods, but they come from a lab, not a field or farm.

What foods typically contain sucrose esters of fatty acids?

The Role of Sucrose Esters in Modern Foods

Step into any supermarket, and you’ll see shelves packed with bright packages and long ingredient lists. One name that pops up more often these days is sucrose esters of fatty acids. These show up as “sucrose esters” or “E473” on ingredient lists. If you’ve ever wondered why your creamy spread looks so smooth, or why your low-fat ice cream feels rich, there’s a good chance these esters are part of the answer.

Where Sucrose Esters Show Up Most

Processed foods rely on science to create textures and flavors people love. Bakery items like cakes, muffins, and pre-made frostings use sucrose esters because they help oil and water stay mixed. The cake stays soft longer, and the frosting doesn’t break down. In chocolate, especially the kind shaped into bars or thin coatings, these additives help give a glossy finish without a heavy waxy feel.

Ice cream makers use sucrose esters to get that dense, creamy texture while cutting back on fat. These additives keep the mix smooth and prevent icy crystals from forming. Dairy drink mixes and non-dairy creamers use them, too. The same goes for some whipped toppings and shelf-stable desserts. Even in chewing gum, they help ingredients blend, giving a smooth texture that holds together.

People probably don’t realize that some “light” spreads, margarine, and low-fat mayonnaise use these esters so the product doesn’t separate. Salad dressings—especially those labeled low-calorie—often use them to keep things creamy instead of sludgy. In the savory world, processed meats, sausage, and even some canned foods count on them for even blending and to help keep fat from leaching out during cooking or storage.

Why the Food Industry Likes Sucrose Esters

Food companies choose sucrose esters for reasons beyond just texture. They finish products with a certain shine, handle temperature swings better, and extend shelf life. These properties mean less food goes to waste as the products stay appealing longer. Some candy coatings, like those on chocolate or chewy candies, use these esters to prevent sugar bloom (that white, dusty look). For gluten-free baking, which often struggles with crumbly textures, sucrose esters can mean the difference between a satisfying bite and an unappetizing mess.

What This Means for Shoppers

Everyday shoppers face a challenge trying to understand food labels and ingredient lists. Sucrose esters of fatty acids are generally recognized as safe by agencies like the FDA and EFSA, though it’s smart for people to know which foods include them, especially if they prefer to eat fewer processed ingredients. Those living with allergies or dietary restrictions also keep an eye out. While sucrose esters come from plant oils and sugar, rare cases use animal-derived fats, so strict vegetarians or vegans check product sources or call manufacturers for details.

Looking at Food Choices Going Forward

People crave convenience and crave foods that last longer in the pantry. Industry shifts toward “clean labels” tend to push for simpler, more familiar ingredients. At the same time, a complete move away from tested, safe food science might mean shorter shelf lives for some favorites. If shoppers want foods without additives like sucrose esters, homemade baking or buying small-batch, artisanal goods offers more control. Using whole foods and home kitchens has definite appeal, even if the results sometimes lack the soft textures and smooth mixtures that big brands deliver.

Do sucrose esters of fatty acids cause allergies or side effects?

A Look at Everyday Ingredients

Sucrose esters of fatty acids pop up on the back of snack bags, chocolate, dairy desserts, even some breads. The name sounds complex, which naturally makes people pause and wonder what these additives do in the body. Food companies use them to blend water and oil, giving foods a smooth texture. But anyone paying attention to food labels these days knows that understanding what we eat brings peace of mind. At the dinner table, I’ve had more than a few conversations about how the body handles food additives, especially for those in my family with allergies or tummy troubles.

Sources and Science Behind the Additive

Created by linking sucrose (plain old sugar) with natural fatty acids, these esters show up as a white powder in food manufacturing plants. Regulatory bodies like the FDA in the US and EFSA in Europe say they’re safe up to specific limits. The digestive system breaks them down into sugar and fatty acids — both present in an ordinary diet. Human trials and decades of use in processed foods don’t turn up strong clues linking sucrose esters to allergic responses. The big studies track participants for months and years; no patterns of classic allergic reactions come up, such as hives, swelling, or anaphylaxis.

Allergies: Real Risk or Overblown Concern?

Allergies have grown more common, leading some to point fingers at food additives. The immune system tends to react to big, foreign proteins — like nuts, eggs, shellfish — not small molecules like sucrose esters. People with severe or rare metabolic diseases (like hereditary fructose intolerance) could feel symptoms related to even a small sugar shift. Yet these are outliers, not the experience for most. If someone breaks out in a rash or notices swelling after eating something new, an allergist can check for the true culprit, which is likely a protein, not an ester.

Possible Side Effects and Digestive Upset

Some folks feel bloated or have loose stools after eating foods rich in certain emulsifiers. That’s often because modern diets overload the gut with ingredients that speed up digestion or draw water into the intestines. In high doses, sucrose esters can cause mild gut symptoms. In everyday food, the amounts are low. I’ve eaten cookies, baked goods, and variety of store-bought ice creams without any issue, but everyone’s gut reacts in its own way. Sensitive individuals — like people with IBS — already keep an eye on things that provoke their digestion. Sucrose esters don’t usually land high on that list, but if a pattern shows up, it’s worth tracking.

Supporting Healthy Choices

Labels exist for a reason. Consumers want honesty from the food industry, especially after decades of hidden additives and surprises in processed goods. Putting ingredients front and center matters. It builds trust, helps anyone managing allergies, and lets families make choices that fit their needs. Researchers keep up with additive safety by running tests and publishing updates. If something changes, regulators take action or add warnings — that’s what happened with other less-safe emulsifiers in the past.

How to Handle Concerns

If someone worries about how their body reacts to any processed ingredient, keeping a food diary helps. Eat simply, adding foods one at a time, especially for kids or people with a history of allergies. Medical professionals can test for real allergies and sort fact from fear. Choosing more whole foods, fewer processed products, and reading up on new ingredients creates a safer eating environment — especially in a world where labels grow longer by the year.

Sucrose Esters Of Fatty Acids
Names
Preferred IUPAC name Sucrose fatty acid esters
Other names Sucrose fatty acid esters
Sucrose esters
Sucrose monoesters
Sugar esters
E473
Pronunciation /ˈsuː.kroʊs ˈɛstərz əv ˈfæt.i ˈæsɪdz/
Preferred IUPAC name Sucrose fatty acid esters
Other names Sucrose Fatty Acid Esters
Sucrose Esters
Sugar Esters
Sucrose Fatty Esters
E473
Pronunciation /ˈsuː.kroʊs ˈɛstərz əv ˈfæti ˈæsɪdz/
Identifiers
CAS Number 68201-46-7
Beilstein Reference 3443698
ChEBI CHEBI:53624
ChEMBL CHEMBL1201708
ChemSpider 32468
DrugBank DB11110
ECHA InfoCard EC 265-712-9
EC Number E473
Gmelin Reference 101568
KEGG C02798
MeSH D013424
PubChem CID 24765
RTECS number WNK2510130
UNII 1M47W6515J
UN number Not regulated
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) DTXSID8024265
CAS Number 68201-46-7
Beilstein Reference 1721326
ChEBI CHEBI:53689
ChEMBL CHEBI:64907
ChemSpider 71363
DrugBank DB11100
ECHA InfoCard 03f86278-7972-4db6-8fad-962988965d09
EC Number E473
Gmelin Reference 23247
KEGG C14422
MeSH D019239
PubChem CID 24717717
RTECS number WK8000000
UNII 1U10K1899Y
UN number Not regulated
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) DTXSID3047085
Properties
Chemical formula C28H54O11
Molar mass 789.01 g/mol
Appearance White or off-white powder or pellets
Odor Odorless
Density 1.10 g/cm3
Solubility in water Soluble
log P -2.7
Vapor pressure Negligible
Basicity (pKb) 8.1
Magnetic susceptibility (χ) -6.6E-6 cm³/mol
Refractive index (nD) 1.451
Viscosity Viscosity: 70 mPa·s (10% solution, 25°C)
Dipole moment 2.81 D
Chemical formula C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁·(CₙH₂ₙ₊₁COOH)ₓ
Molar mass 706.92 g/mol
Appearance White or light yellow powder
Odor Odorless
Density 1.1 g/cm3
Solubility in water soluble
log P -6.0
Vapor pressure Negligible
Basicity (pKb) 13.5
Magnetic susceptibility (χ) '-7.7E-6 cm^3/mol'
Refractive index (nD) 1.451
Viscosity Viscosity: 10-40 mPa·s (20% solution, 60°C)
Dipole moment 2.39 D
Thermochemistry
Std molar entropy (S⦵298) 1174.9 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹
Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) -1797 kJ/mol
Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) -17630 kJ/mol
Pharmacology
ATC code A16AX14
ATC code A16AX14
Hazards
GHS labelling Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to GHS (Globally Harmonized System).
Pictograms GHS07
Signal word Not classified
Hazard statements Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)
NFPA 704 (fire diamond) NFPA 704: 1-1-0
Autoignition temperature > 375°C
LD50 (median dose) LD50 (median dose): Rat oral >5,000 mg/kg
NIOSH SN4290000
REL (Recommended) 30 mg/m³
GHS labelling Not classified as hazardous according to GHS.
Pictograms GHS07
Hazard statements Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS).
Precautionary statements Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). Handle in accordance with good industrial hygiene and safety practice.
NFPA 704 (fire diamond) NFPA 704: 1-1-0
Autoignition temperature > 400°C
Explosive limits Not explosive
Lethal dose or concentration LD50 (oral, rat): >5,000 mg/kg
LD50 (median dose) LD50 (median dose): 29,700 mg/kg (rat, oral)
NIOSH GNWW4990
PEL (Permissible) Not established
REL (Recommended) 30 mg/m³
IDLH (Immediate danger) Not Listed
Related compounds
Related compounds Sucroglycerides
Sucrose acetate isobutyrate
Related compounds Sucroglycerides
Sucrose Fatty Acid Esters
Mono- and Diglycerides of Fatty Acids
Polyglycerol Esters of Fatty Acids
Sorbitan Esters
Lecithin
Polysorbates
Stearoyl Lactylates