West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China sales9@alchemist-chem.com 1531585804@qq.com
Follow us:



Sucralose: A Commentary on Its Journey, Science, and Safety

Historical Development

Sucralose wouldn’t exist without a fortunate laboratory accident in 1976. Scientists at Queen Elizabeth College in London set out to develop a new insecticide, but a misheard instruction led Shashikant Phadnis to taste the compound, not test it. To their surprise, it tasted profoundly sweet—about 600 times sweeter than sugar. Researchers realized they’d stumbled on a new artificial sweetener, setting the stage for a product that would soon reshape the artificial sweetener market. After years of rigorous testing and development, Tate & Lyle and Johnson & Johnson came together to commercialize it under the name Splenda. The FDA gave its nod of approval in 1998, and by the early 2000s, yellow packets filled restaurant tables and coffee counters everywhere.

Product Overview

Sucralose stands out from the crowd of sweeteners, not just for its sweetness but for its baking resilience and stable flavor. Anyone who’s baked with aspartame knows that high heat ruins it—cakes taste odd and cookies lose their appeal. Sucralose doesn’t have that problem. The trade name Splenda heads up the household brands, but many bulk sweeteners and beverage mixes around the world declare sucralose as their sweetening hero. Sugar-sweetened soda faced growing pressure from public health campaigns, and sucralose offered an answer for manufacturers looking to satisfy the sweet tooth with fewer calories.

Physical and Chemical Properties

Look up close and sucralose appears as a white, crystalline powder, almost indistinguishable from the sugar it tries to replace. Unlike sucrose, the molecule swaps out three hydroxyl groups for chlorine atoms during synthesis. That swap changes everything: it’s why digestive enzymes can’t break it down, so sucralose passes through the body without adding measurable calories. Sucralose dissolves easily in water, holds up through the heat of baking, and doesn’t have a bitter aftertaste, setting it apart from saccharin and others. Chemically speaking, it shares some structure with the original sugar molecule, which tricks taste buds but—not metabolism.

Technical Specifications & Labeling

Food regulations around sucralose set strict purity benchmarks—typically 98% or higher—to keep unwanted residues out of the supply chain. Product specifications detail granular size, melting point, and solubility. Most regulatory agencies require the product label to list sucralose by its E number (E955 in Europe), and in North America, the FDA mandates ingredient listing simply as “sucralose.” People with dietary concerns, diabetes, or those looking to cut calories get straightforward information, but some distrust remains due to suspicion over artificial ingredients. Information transparency and accurate, readable labeling help build trust with consumers who want to know exactly what goes into their drinks or favorite desserts.

Preparation Method

Turning sugar into sucralose relies on a multi-step chlorination process. Refined sucrose undergoes selective chlorination in a controlled environment, swapping out those three specific hydroxyl groups with chlorine atoms. This chemical choreography keeps the sweetness but blocks the human digestive tract from recognizing the compound as a fuel source. The end process requires multiple purification steps to strip away unreacted reagents and byproducts, underlining the need for tight quality control in the production plant. Manufacturers test every batch rigorously to meet standards before the sweetener moves onto blending, packaging, and shipment.

Chemical Reactions & Modifications

Chlorination is the keystone chemical modification in making sucralose. This reaction doesn’t just enhance the sweetness; it alters stability and digestibility. Unlike ordinary sugar, sucralose doesn’t caramelize the same way, so it behaves differently in high-temperature cooking. In acid conditions or during long storage, sucralose might eventually break down, but under most food preparation environments, it stays put and keeps sweetening. Research around further modifications like encapsulation or co-crystallization aims to tailor solubility or resistance to specific food matrix challenges, reflecting the ongoing push for innovation in the food science world.

Synonyms & Product Names

Around the globe, sucralose goes by various names in ingredient decks and retail packaging—E955, Splenda, Nevella, Candys, and Cukren, to name a few. Some brands blend it with fillers like maltodextrin or dextrose so it matches table sugar’s volume, making it an easy cup-for-cup swap in recipes. The proliferation of synonyms, along with local language adaptations, can make it confusing for some shoppers, but savvy consumers know to scan ingredient lists for clues.

Safety & Operational Standards

Over four decades of research tracked sucralose’s safety profile. The FDA, EFSA, Health Canada, and World Health Organization cite numerous studies showing that sucralose doesn’t affect blood sugar, doesn’t damage DNA, and has no links to cancer in approved doses. I’ve seen debates on social media spark new worries, especially as new animal studies occasionally surface in the headlines, but regulatory authorities review all relevant data before deciding. The acceptable daily intake (ADI) for sucralose stands at up to 5 mg per kilogram of body weight each day, a threshold set with a wide margin of safety. Adherence to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) guarantees that production stays within strict safety envelopes, covering raw material sourcing, handling, and final product release.

Application Area

Sucralose features in an astonishing variety of products—diet sodas, yogurt, chewing gum, frozen desserts, and tabletop sweeteners. The food service sector leans heavily on it for low-calorie beverages. Sports nutrition brands blend it into protein powders and bars. As a parent looking for options to cut back the sugar content without a full mutiny at the breakfast table, sucralose granules sometimes fill the sugar bowl for cereal and coffee. Pharmaceutical firms mix it into liquid medicines to make bitter pills easier for kids to swallow. Toothpaste and mouthwashes, products requiring pleasant taste but no fermentable sugars, quietly use sucralose behind the scenes.

Research & Development

Recent years brought a surge of interest in learning how sucralose behaves with other food ingredients and within the gut. Researchers investigate whether it impacts human microbiome composition, interacts with natural flavors, or provides function as a bulking agent. Food technologists keep pushing boundaries—developing bakery blends that mimic the mouthfeel of real sugar, tuning flavor release in chewing gum, or even exploring new encapsulation methods to refine release in targeted products. Investment in R&D signals an ongoing commitment by both academic and industry groups to refine and understand this sweetener’s wider uses and nuances.

Toxicity Research

The debate over toxicity and metabolic effects never goes away for sweeteners. Sucralose cleared all the major toxicology hurdles: multi-year rat studies, genotoxicity screenings, reproductive health checks, and human trials. Critics often point to fresh research looking at sucralose and microbiome shifts—some rodent studies note modest changes, but scientists debate the translation to real-world impacts in humans. Other groups investigated heat-induced breakdown products, which, in extreme cooking conditions, might raise concerns, but everyday household cooking doesn’t approach those thresholds. In my own searches through journal articles and health authority reviews, I’ve yet to see robust evidence that sucralose, at commonly used levels, causes harm.

Future Prospects

The future for sucralose blends consumer demand for lower-calorie products with a sharper focus on health and ingredient transparency. Companies invest in research to answer lingering questions about gut health and long-term impacts. Those who follow dietary trends see plant-based and “clean label” products picking up speed, which prompts sweetener companies to rethink marketing and even synthesize alternatives to match shifting tastes. Sucralose has staked out a solid spot thanks to its versatility, taste, and safety record, but ongoing public scrutiny means science must keep proving itself. Education, transparent labeling, and continued independent research will shape whether this sweetener remains on top for decades to come.




What is sucralose and how is it made?

Understanding Sucralose

Sucralose turns up in a lot of drinks and snacks labeled “sugar-free.” What’s on the label doesn’t always clear things up, though. People reach for sucralose because it promises sweetness without sending blood sugar through the roof. As someone who once counted every calorie and carb, I know the hunt for satisfying swaps never really ends. Sucralose delivers the taste of sugar at a fraction of the calories, and that grabs attention for good reason.

The Making of Sucralose

Sucralose isn’t just picked off a plant or squeezed from fruit. Chemists start with real sugar—table sugar, or sucrose—and rework the molecule. Through a process called chlorination, they swap out three hydrogen-oxygen groups with chlorine atoms. This change tricks the taste buds into sensing something incredibly sweet, but the gut doesn’t break it down for energy like it does with regular sugar. Most sucralose travels straight through the body without hanging around or getting stored as fat.

Laboratory processes let companies make sucralose in large amounts and with consistent taste. It’s stable under heat, so it survives baking, cooking, and even hot drinks, unlike some other artificial sweeteners that fall apart when the temperature rises. As a baker, switching to sucralose at home did mean minor tweaks to recipes, but the end results stuck closer to the originals than with other low-calorie options.

Why It Matters for Health

Some people switch to sucralose to watch their weight, and others turn to it because managing blood sugar takes priority. Studies reviewed by major bodies like the FDA and EFSA support that sucralose doesn’t affect blood glucose or insulin levels in the way table sugar does. This makes eating and drinking a bit more flexible for folks managing diabetes or aiming to cut calories.

Long-term use raises some questions. Reports from organizations like the Center for Science in the Public Interest push for more studies to pin down possible risks. In 2023, research popped up showing potential effects on gut bacteria, which opens up another conversation about how sweeteners fit into everyday life. It’s worth choosing sucralose as just part of a broader approach to nutrition, not as a license to indulge in endless “diet” foods with little nutritional value.

Environmental and Social Impact

Most people think about what these sweeteners do inside the body, hardly ever about what happens after. Studies show traces of sucralose drifting through rivers and soils after leaving wastewater plants, not breaking down easily. As cities keep growing and processed foods become common, this brings up tough questions about the long-term environmental tradeoffs for all sweeteners made this way, not just sucralose. More research and better filtering technology could help address those traces for a cleaner water supply.

Looking Ahead: Choices at the Table

People keep driving demand for sugar substitutes because the desire for sweetness never fades. Sucralose offers a practical choice within a crowded market. Food makers get sweet, low-calorie flavor that stays stable during processing, and consumers gain options for diet management. From personal experience, the balance comes from checking labels, eating a colorful variety of foods, and not leaning too heavily on one substitute for health. More straightforward information about how ingredients are made and what that means for body and environment deserves a bigger place in the conversation—both in the kitchen and at every dinner table.

Is sucralose safe for daily consumption?

The Diet Soda Dilemma Hits Home

Coffee shop cash registers and supermarket aisles keep pushing the same thing—zero-calorie sweetness. I’ve watched friends order a tall coffee with “just one pack of sucralose” almost every morning, all chasing that guilt-free sweetness. The question still nags: do these yellow packets slide under the radar, or are we ignoring something that deserves more attention?

What Scientific Studies Tell Us

Sucralose first appeared in the 1990s and quickly gained attention by promising taste without calories. American, European, and Australian food safety authorities all reviewed its safety before giving thumbs up for general use. Most of the science comes from studies lasting up to two years, focusing on rats, mice, and human volunteers. Each test found sucralose didn’t damage genes or mess with fetal development. Stomach problems showed up only at massive doses—far beyond what anyone sprinkles into their morning coffee or tea.

Regulators, including the FDA, stuck to a daily intake limit higher than any average person expects to reach—a sweetener fan would need to drink around thirty cans of diet soda just to get close to that line. Scientists keep looking for cancer links or long-term problems but haven’t found evidence tying moderate daily use of sucralose to health risks.

The Gray Area: Gut Health and Newer Research

Some newer research highlights possible changes to gut bacteria after a steady stream of sucralose. In a 2023 study, mice on very high doses saw differences in their gut microbiome, but translating mouse data to humans never tells the full story. From personal experience and friends’ stories, stomach upset or bloating only pops up with much higher use than a cup or two of sweetened coffee. Still, other scientists found that short-term sucralose use leaves gut bacteria—and blood sugar—mostly untouched.

In other words, the most rigorous studies point to general safety at reasonable daily dosages. No respected diabetes or heart health organizations recommend ditching sucralose. In fact, for diabetics and those working hard to shed pounds, artificial sweeteners can help knock out added sugars without bringing on extra calories. I’ve seen friends with type 2 diabetes manage cravings using sucralose instead of sugar, leading to better numbers at check-ups.

Real-World Choices and Solutions

There’s always a trade-off. For those already eating balanced meals—with nuts, veggies, fermented foods and fiber—swapping sugar for a zero-calorie option looks like a smart move, not a hazard. Relying on sweeteners in processed foods and drinks for every snack, though, skips real nutrition and pushes more fake stuff into your day. Food companies need to get real about portion sizes, keep reviewing longer-term safety, and stop pushing ultra-sweet tastes to kids.

The straight answer? A few packets in coffee or tea haven’t shown any real risk. Ignoring fruits, whole grains and real food while leaning on sweeteners does nobody any favors. Science keeps tracking long-term effects, and food safety groups set limits based on big data, not just one-off cases. Moderation wins, and honest eating habits matter more than chasing the newest “safe” trick. I’ll keep my sucralose for coffee, but not for every meal—and anyone nervous should talk to their doctor rather than follow internet panic.

Does sucralose have any side effects?

The Truth About Sucralose in Everyday Life

Scan the ingredient list on a pack of sugar-free gum or a “zero calorie” soda, sucralose pops up everywhere. The promise looks straightforward: a sweet fix without the calories of sugar. I’ve poured those yellow packets into my morning coffee too, chasing that guilt-free sweetness. It makes sense for people wrestling with diabetes or anyone trying to cut extra sugar from meals. The whole story, though, stretches beyond a calorie chart.

What Science Shows About Health

After years of research, no solid proof suggests sucralose causes cancer or birth defects. The FDA approved it back in the late ‘90s based on tests in both animals and people. Sucralose isn’t broken down much by the body; most of it passes right through. That might sound reassuring. But reality tends to be complicated.

Studies have raised questions about sucralose’s impact on gut health. Pieces of research out of Europe and North America show sucralose can change the balance of good bacteria in our digestive systems. These bacteria influence everything from mood to immune response. In my experience, even small gut issues can snowball, causing bloating, discomfort, or irregularity just when you least expect it. While these studies usually involve high doses, risk climbs with high and regular use.

Real Concerns For Everyday Users

I’ve noticed friends who drink diet sodas every day complain about headaches and a weird aftertaste. Some chalk it up to individual sensitivity. A few studies link large, frequent sucralose intake to possible migraines or allergic reactions — hives, skin itch, and rarely, wheezing. The scientific jury is still out, but these patterns keep turning up in certain people, often the same folks who react to other artificial additives.

Another issue sticks around low-calorie sweeteners in general: blood sugar and appetite. The expectation says these substitutes help control blood glucose. Some short-term studies report sucralose barely nudges blood sugar, especially in healthy adults. People with obesity or insulin resistance might not fare as well. Their bodies could react differently, possibly with higher insulin whenever taste buds register “sweet.” Over the long haul, there’s speculation that sweeteners chip away at appetite control, making it tough to judge real hunger. I know how one “diet” snack can trigger cravings for something else, leading to a full-on eating spiral.

What Can We Do About It?

The safest play? Read labels. Limit both sugar and its substitutes. Keeping a food diary can spotlight sneaky sources of sweeteners hiding in processed snacks or drinks. Most people don’t need to run from sucralose altogether. For those who feel off after using it, switching to herbs like stevia or simply using less sweetener might calm things down. Doctors can run checks if headaches, digestive trouble, or other symptoms pop up regularly after eating “sugar-free” foods.

It helps to focus meals around whole foods — fruit, nuts, plain yogurt, and vegetables — which train taste buds to crave less sweet overall. Supporting gut health matters too: think fiber, fermented foods, and active movement. Step by step, we regain control, finding a path away from the artificial and back to foods that nourish with every bite.

Can sucralose be used in cooking and baking?

What Happens to Sucralose in the Kitchen?

People trying to cut back on sugar often turn to sucralose. You find it in those yellow Sweet’N Low or Splenda packets at the diner. The claim: it sweetens without calories. In my house, family members with diabetes rely on it for their daily coffee. It’s tempting to take that next step and use it in actual recipes for cakes or cookies—especially for kids, seniors, anyone watching blood sugar.

Sucralose’s biggest selling point is that it handles heat better than other artificial sweeteners. Many like aspartame simply break down, leaving a weird aftertaste and not much sweetness. Sucralose hangs in for the bake. It keeps its sweetness during the mixing, beating, and oven time. According to the FDA, sucralose works in recipes that call for temperatures up to 450°F.

Does Sucralose Bake Like Sugar?

You don’t switch from sugar to sucralose without seeing changes. Texture and color matter almost as much as taste. In regular sugar baking, the grains help cookies spread and brown, cakes rise and stay moist. Sucralose lacks those structural powers. My own banana bread, when I swap all the sugar for the yellow stuff, doesn’t caramelize or rise in the same way. The result comes out a shade paler and can’t hold that same moisture.

Bakers report that sucralose sometimes leaves a faint metallic note, especially at high concentrations or in very simple recipes. Sweetener manufacturers recommend using Splenda or similar products as a sugar substitute in quick breads, muffins, puddings, and sauces—in places where structure comes mainly from flour, eggs, or fruit, not just from sugar.

Is Sucralose Safe for Hot Foods?

Health remains at the top of people’s minds. Sucralose got the green light from organizations like the FDA, the European Food Safety Authority, and Diabetes Canada. Studies have looked at its safety from many angles. Still, in the past decade, concerns popped up about whether heating sucralose creates chlorinated compounds that can harm the body. Research from 2018 out of Europe found traces of these new compounds when pure sucralose met high, dry heat—well above most cookie and cake recipes. The evidence today says the risk remains low when baking at everyday temperatures. If you want to be extra-cautious, using sucralose in sauces or stovetop applications, or only in low-to-medium temp recipes, lowers the heat even more.

Can Sucralose Be Part of a Balanced Kitchen?

People living with diabetes or folks counting calories look for ways to enjoy food without spikes in glucose or pounds. Sucralose gives some options, but home cooks hit a wall if they expect a sugar clone. For better results in texture, some mix sucralose with a little real sugar. If you still crave that golden chewy effect in cookies or crisp tops on muffins, a half-and-half approach might work. For jams or jelly, stick with recipes labeled “for artificial sweeteners.” Commercial food scientists spend years tweaking ratios and thickeners; home bakers may need some trial and error.

Real-world cooks should keep an open mind and remember: sweeteners all have quirks. Sucralose definitely helps people with special dietary needs, but experience teaches that flavor, texture, and the feel of homemade baking change. There’s nothing wrong with running your own kitchen experiments, swapping and tasting until you land on that sweet spot for your health and your tastebuds.

Is sucralose suitable for people with diabetes?

What Sucralose Brings to the Table

Sucralose shows up in a lot of food these days. Whether it’s in your morning coffee, a can of diet soda, or a protein bar, you’ll find it. Folks reach for sucralose because it comes with sweetness without calories. For people living with diabetes, the pitch feels simple: here’s a way to enjoy sweet foods without sending your blood sugar on a roller-coaster ride.

Blood Sugar and the Real-World Track Record

Doctors and dietitians often say that sucralose doesn’t push blood sugar higher the way that regular table sugar does. The American Diabetes Association points out that non-nutritive sweeteners like sucralose won’t cause blood sugar spikes in healthy adults or people with diabetes, assuming they’re part of an overall balanced diet. The FDA, too, stamps sucralose as safe. Years of laboratory studies have given us more than enough numbers to show that sucralose leaves blood sugar mostly untouched if you don’t mix it with carbs.

Personal experience muddles the picture. Some people say they notice cravings get worse after using artificial sweeteners, even though blood sugar doesn’t jump right away. Others stick with diet drinks containing sucralose and don’t feel any different. Research hasn’t found firm evidence linking sucralose to diabetes complications or dangerous spikes, but the science continues to dig deeper.

Gut Health and Other Concerns

One point keeps popping up in research circles: the gut microbiome. Sucralose passes mostly unchanged through the digestive tract, but some animal studies show it may shift the balance of gut bacteria over time. Some researchers worry that these changes could link up with trouble managing blood sugar in the long run. Human studies haven’t proven any direct harm yet, but this area deserves close watching.

Real Food and Reading Labels

As a person who grew up watching relatives manage diabetes, I know the reality isn’t just about number-crunching. On paper, sucralose looks like a fix because it lets you have dessert without worrying so much about insulin or metformin dosages. Yet plenty of foods using sucralose still come loaded with processed flour or starch, which hit blood sugar quickly. It’s easy to lose sight of what matters most: eating smart by filling your plate with real, whole foods as often as possible.

Artificial sweeteners like sucralose can help people with diabetes cut back on sugar, but they don’t work magic. They offer a tool, not a solution. Anybody using them should watch out for extra ingredients—hidden carbs, fat, or sodium—that aren’t friendly to long-term health.

Where to Go from Here

Science shows sucralose itself seems safe and doesn’t push blood sugar higher for most people with diabetes. A registered dietitian can help sort through food labels and find sweetener options that match up with personal health goals. Real improvement means looking at your plate as a whole—all the nutrients, not just the numbers.

So, sucralose can be a useful swap when cravings for sweetness won’t quit, but it works best alongside fresh vegetables, lean proteins, healthy fats, and fiber. If you decide to use sucralose, pay attention not just to what it leaves out but also to what the rest of your food brings in.

Sucralose
Names
Preferred IUPAC name 1,6-dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside
Other names E955
Trichlorogalactosucrose
Splenda
Chlorinated sucrose
Pronunciation /ˈsuː.krə.loʊs/
Preferred IUPAC name 1,6-dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside
Other names E955
trichlorogalactosucrose
chlorinated sucrose
splenda
Pronunciation /ˈsuː.krə.ləʊs/
Identifiers
CAS Number 56038-13-2
Beilstein Reference 1718981
ChEBI CHEBI:45562
ChEMBL CHEMBL1232880
ChemSpider 5368
DrugBank DB11175
ECHA InfoCard 200-559-2
EC Number E955
Gmelin Reference 808877
KEGG C14316
MeSH D050110
PubChem CID 71485
RTECS number TR1180000
UNII 3B8E4GVM60
UN number UN3077
CAS Number 56038-13-2
Beilstein Reference 3581032
ChEBI CHEBI:45514
ChEMBL CHEMBL1231683
ChemSpider 21541120
DrugBank DB02724
ECHA InfoCard 03d1a1e1-6bda-4c7b-84e5-7376caf0cdae
EC Number E955
Gmelin Reference 58827
KEGG C11703
MeSH D049590
PubChem CID 71485
RTECS number TQ5510000
UNII 6BXS4YW8QS
UN number Not regulated
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) DTXSID9022814
Properties
Chemical formula C12H19Cl3O8
Molar mass 397.64 g/mol
Appearance White to off-white, crystalline powder
Odor Odorless
Density 1.375 g/cm³
Solubility in water Soluble in water
log P -1.7
Vapor pressure Vapor pressure: Negligible
Acidity (pKa) ~12.3
Basicity (pKb) 12.5
Magnetic susceptibility (χ) Diamagnetic
Refractive index (nD) 1.553
Dipole moment 4.98 D
Chemical formula C12H19Cl3O8
Molar mass 397.64 g/mol
Appearance White to off-white, crystalline, odorless powder
Odor Odorless
Density 1.375 g/cm³
Solubility in water 28.2 g/L (20 °C)
log P -1.64
Vapor pressure Negligible
Acidity (pKa) 12.5
Basicity (pKb) 12.3
Magnetic susceptibility (χ) Diamagnetic
Refractive index (nD) 1.553
Viscosity Viscous liquid
Dipole moment 3.62 D
Thermochemistry
Std molar entropy (S⦵298) 428.2 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹
Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) -1875 kJ/mol
Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) -5640 kJ·mol⁻¹
Std molar entropy (S⦵298) 339.0 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹
Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) -2066 kJ·mol⁻¹
Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) -5745 kJ/mol
Pharmacology
ATC code A16AX17
ATC code A07AA21
Hazards
Main hazards Not a hazardous substance or mixture.
GHS labelling GHS labelling: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS).
Pictograms GHS07
Signal word Warning
Hazard statements Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS).
NFPA 704 (fire diamond) 1-0-0
Autoignition temperature 450 °C
Lethal dose or concentration LD50 (rat, oral): 15,000 mg/kg
LD50 (median dose) 27,000 mg/kg
PEL (Permissible) Not Established
REL (Recommended) 15 mg/kg bw
Main hazards Not a hazardous substance or mixture.
GHS labelling GHS labelling for Sucralose: "Not classified as a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS).
Pictograms GHS07
Hazard statements Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)
Autoignition temperature 450 °C
Lethal dose or concentration LD50 (oral, rat): 15,000 mg/kg
LD50 (median dose) 10 g/kg
NIOSH WN6507
PEL (Permissible) 15 mg/m³
REL (Recommended) 15 mg/kg bw
Related compounds
Related compounds Sucrose
TCA (Trichloroacetimidate)
Chlorodeoxy sugars
Aspartame
Stevia
Acesulfame potassium
Saccharin
Cyclamate
Related compounds Sucrose
Fructose
Glucose
Lactose
Aspartame
Saccharin
Acesulfame potassium
Steviol glycosides
Cyclamate