Nothing rings of summer quite like the scent of ripe strawberries, but synthesizing that note took decades of trial and error in chemical labs. Strawberry aldehyde, or Ethyl methylphenylglycidate, appeared on the scene in the early twentieth century as chemists searched for flavorful substitutes that could bring the taste of fruit into foods and perfumes. The compound initially took root in the fragrance industry, with flavorists quickly seeing its potential in confections and bakery items. As chemistry unlocked more about molecular structures behind scent and taste, the door opened to reproducible flavor solutions, which led to widespread production of synthetic fruit profiles. What started as lab curiosity soon made its way into soda pop factories and candle companies, bridging the gap between the field and the factory.
Strawberry aldehyde, known preferentially in labs as Ethyl methylphenylglycidate, is a popular synthetic aroma chemical used to capture strawberry in everything from candies to personal care products. Its characteristic sweet, fruity, and slightly floral scent tricks the brain into fresh berry mode almost instantly. Industries lean on this compound because real strawberry essence can be pricey and variable by harvest. Strawberry aldehyde steps in with consistency in every batch, holding flavor profiles steady during product launches and regulatory inspections. Bottled and sold as either concentrated liquid or incorporated into blended bases, manufacturers depend on predictable, long-lasting aromas in their production lines.
This compound catches attention for its clear to pale yellow liquid appearance, packing a pronounced strawberry odor even at low concentrations. Its boiling point hangs around 285°C and this aldehyde features a density just under 1.1 g/cm³. Technically an epoxy ester, Strawberry aldehyde leans toward oil-like solubility, barely dissolving in water but mixing easily with alcohols and other organic solvents. One reason the food and fragrance industries love this molecule lies in its low vapor pressure and relative stability under standard processing conditions. Chemically, it resists breakdown during typical pasteurization or baking, holding its signature note even through heat or storage cycles. On a molecular level, its structure includes an aromatic ring, a side ethyl group, and an epoxy group, factors that help deliver the specific strawberry essence.
Manufacturers and importers label Strawberry aldehyde according to regional regulations, usually listing its Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) number, purity percentage, and main synonyms for regulatory clarity. Liquid preparations typically come at 97% purity or higher, with trace contaminants tightly controlled. Labels note whether the compound is natural-identical or fully synthetic, important for allergen and vegan declarations in food products. Detailed safety instructions, batch numbers for traceability, and recommended storage conditions follow strict guidelines, keeping staff and consumers informed from lab to shelf. Buyers look for clarity about presence of solvents or carriers in the finished material, a detail affecting everything from flavor impact to blending behavior.
Industry-scale Strawberry aldehyde production kicks off with a reaction between ethyl phenylglycidate and methyl iodide in the presence of suitable bases, often using catalytic amounts to speed things up. The process draws from classic organic synthesis steps involving nucleophilic substitution and careful temperature control to guide yield and purity. This pathway allows precise management of reaction conditions, driving the methyl group attachment and minimizing byproduct creation. Purification occurs through distillation under reduced pressure or solvent extraction, stripping out impurities and yielding the concentrated aroma. High yields, cost effectiveness, and streamlined scale-up sit at the core of modern plant design, letting producers meet global demand at reasonable price points.
Strawberry aldehyde’s structure offers solid stability under food processing, but creative chemists have explored modifications to boost certain nuances. By tweaking the aromatic ring or swapping side chains, flavorists create bespoke variations tweaking fruit intensity, sweetness, or longevity. Acidic or basic hydrolysis can open up the epoxide, producing derivatives sometimes used in crafting related berry or floral notes. In fragrance research, chemists use selective hydrogenation or alkylation to push the aroma in specific directions. Some companies develop blends marrying strawberry aldehyde with other esters and lactones to mimic wild or jammy berries for use in yogurts or lollipops. The base aldehyde serves as a platform for these inventive chemical transformations, each tailored to consumer preferences changing from season to season.
Strawberry aldehyde hides behind a cabal of names on global labels. Its formal name, Ethyl methylphenylglycidate, gives way to shorter commercial handles like “Strawberry Glycidate” or “Artificial Strawberry Flavor.” In regulatory paperwork and safety data sheets, you’ll see other monikers: FEMA 2462, and as a mainstay in aroma chemical suppliers’ catalogs worldwide. These alternates help regulatory authorities and procurement managers cross-reference ingredients and avoid confusion about what’s in a drum or bottle. Some perfume houses assign it trade names echoing its sweet potential, further demonstrating how a single compound can serve many industry roles across borders and brand portfolios.
Safety teams and plant operators keep a sharp eye on exposure risks with Strawberry aldehyde. Handling large quantities calls for gloves, goggles, and careful ventilation because high concentrations may cause eye or skin irritation. Food use follows global standards set by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), which reviews data about safe intake levels in finished products. Storage involves cool, dry, and tightly sealed environments to limit oxidation or accidental spills. Labels highlight flammability risk and the need to keep material away from open flames. Manufacturers train workers on spill response, proper disposal, and personal hygiene, aiming for zero-incidence tallies on shop floors and in shipping warehouses. Compliance with REACH, FDA, or EU flavor directives shapes quality programs and continuous training cycles.
The real-world use cases for Strawberry aldehyde sprawl across multiple industries. Food technologists build its aroma into candies, ice creams, sodas, and syrups, giving products a reliable burst of strawberry that withstands shelf life and transit. Beverage makers use it to back up fruit juice or mask off-notes in lower-cost blends. Beyond food, perfumers slip it into body sprays, shampoos, and lotions to cue nostalgia. Scent manufacturers feature it in home fragrance oils or scented candles, capitalizing on its ability to evoke the sense of freshly picked berries on a summer morning. Pharmaceutical creators sometimes turn to it to mask medicinal tastes in syrups and chewable tablets. Its lasting power and friendly aroma make it a favorite for anyone looking to craft sweetness in products that range from luxury to affordable convenience.
Research outfits and commercial labs keep pushing boundaries on Strawberry aldehyde. Universities focus on greener synthesis routes, cutting down waste and reliance on harsh reagents. Patents filed in the past decade tackle ways to dial up flavor release or to embed the aroma in encapsulated powders, allowing gradual flavor development in products from chewing gum to protein shakes. Consumer research looks at how people perceive flavor profiles made with this compound, seeking balance between sweetness and authenticity. Flavorists keep searching for new blends which match specific regional fruit profiles, leading to custom-made versions that cater to trends in Asia, Europe, and North America. Machine learning technologies enter the arena, modeling human perception and predicting new modifications even before test batches roll through the plant. The R&D challenge revolves around meeting changing consumer expectations, regulatory shifts, and cost hurdles, all while ensuring product safety and labeling honesty.
Toxicologists investigate Strawberry aldehyde’s safety focusing on ingestion, inhalation, and skin contact. Longstanding animal models and recent in vitro studies lay out a profile suggesting low acute toxicity at concentrations used in food and fragrance. Regulatory bodies like the FDA include it in their generally recognized as safe (GRAS) lists for use as a flavor ingredient within defined limits. Some reports note that very high concentrations can cause mild irritation or trigger allergic reactions in sensitive individuals, pointing to the importance of careful formulation. Repeated-dose testing confirms the compound does not accumulate in the body or pose reproductive toxicity concerns at prescribed use levels. Ongoing international research tracks possible synergistic effects with other food chemicals and long-term exposure, maintaining up-to-date risk assessments which inform labeling and worker safety instructions.
Demand for Strawberry aldehyde keeps growing, driven by rising global appetite for authentic-tasting plant-based foods, natural identically labeled products, and novel confectionery launches. Scientists seek to fine-tune its sensory qualities to unlock even more true-to-fruit experiences and are chipping away at ways to synthesize it from renewable feedstocks or via biotechnology routes. Smaller carbon footprints and fine control over trace contaminants headline wish lists for upcoming generations of food and fragrance engineers. Consumer scrutiny around synthetic additives spurs calls for greater transparency and documentation about ingredient origins and purity. In this landscape, makers who adopt advanced analytics, sustainable production models, and real-time monitoring score high marks on regulator and consumer scorecards. The story of Strawberry aldehyde will keep unfolding, shaped by shifting tastes, scientific breakthroughs, and tough questions about what it means to call something “natural” in the products we eat, smell, and use on our skin.
Step into almost any grocery store, pass through the yogurt aisle or grab a pack of chewy sweets, and you're likely to spot an ingredient that's not always called out by name. Strawberry aldehyde, also labeled as ethyl methylphenylglycidate, gives that unmistakable strawberry aroma you pick up in flavored foods that don’t actually contain a single berry. This chemical gets poured into foods, drinks, perfumes, and household products to trick the nose and palate into thinking something is bursting with strawberries—without needing any fresh fruit at all.
Few people realize how far-reaching synthetic flavors travel. Food manufacturers have leaned into strawberry aldehyde since real strawberries spoil quickly, cost more, and deliver inconsistent flavor after processing. If you’ve ever tasted strawberry milk, breakfast cereal, or gum and noticed the flavor seemed slightly exaggerated, that’s likely the handiwork of this compound. Synthetic versions, like strawberry aldehyde, help brands keep flavors stable between batches.
I remember pre-pandemic grocery shopping, watching my children stuff their faces with neon-pink yogurts and candy. As a parent, I looked up ingredients, and strawberry aldehyde came up repeatedly. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and the European Food Safety Authority review flavoring agents before allowing them on the shelves. Most evidence so far points to strawberry aldehyde being safe when used as a food additive in small amounts, though too much of almost anything will raise concerns. Researchers and toxicologists keep tabs on these substances through studies and regular safety reviews. Consumers need strong oversight like this for peace of mind.
A quick sniff of potpourri or a scented candle can reveal that this familiar smell travels beyond food. Strawberry aldehyde pops up in body sprays, shampoos, and even cleaning products. The idea is simple: scents improve the experience. Nobody argues with a soft strawberry aroma in a shower gel after a tough workout. This ingredient helps mask strong chemical smells or simply makes products more enjoyable.
Real strawberries contain more than three hundred volatile compounds, weaving together lots of flavors and aromas. Synthetic flavors like strawberry aldehyde cover only a slice of what nature does. Still, the consistency synthetic flavors bring is hard to replace. I’ve run into bakeshops trying to make strawberry frosting year-round. Without a compound like this, they’d be out of luck waiting for the next crop.
Sometimes consumers want to know what’s inside their snack or shampoo. Ingredient transparency matters. Producers legally must label flavorings, but not always the exact name. Reading up on what’s inside, not just trusting the label, helps families make informed choices about what to buy and what to leave on the shelf.
Synthetic flavors deserve clear labeling, stronger oversight, and ongoing research, especially as demand for 'natural' options grows. Shoppers driven by concerns over allergies, sensitivities, or just wanting fewer artificial additives can look for foods that use real fruit or natural extracts. As more people tune in to the conversation, companies can double down on quality, safety, and honest labeling. In a world saturated with options, knowing what’s behind that sweet strawberry scent can help everyone feel more confident about what they pick up at the store.
Strawberry aldehyde, known in labs as ethyl methylphenylglycidate, gives food and fragrance products that familiar, mouth-watering scent. Food scientists love this compound for a reason: it tricks the brain right into thinking about freshly picked berries. Candy makers, bakers, and even cereal companies rely on it. Anyone who’s ever walked past a shelf of pink-frosted cookies has probably inhaled its perfume. But people ask questions when they see “chemicals” in food. So, is it safe or not?
Calling something a “chemical” sometimes sets off alarm bells, mostly because the word sounds sterile and foreign. In reality, chemicals fill the world. Our bodies run on chemical reactions, and every natural fruit, including strawberries, overflows with complex compounds that scientists break down and name in the lab.
Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) require strict testing before anything lands in a cookie. They approve strawberry aldehyde for food and flavoring in set amounts. European regulators added it to their safe-use lists for food, too. The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives gave it a thumbs up, so food companies use it without sneaking around. In most cases, traces land in the finished product in amounts far lower than amounts seen in toxicity tests.
People have a right to feel wary about unusual names. My own relatives often ask whether "flavorings" on package labels are safe. I tell them about daily exposure limits and toxicology reports. Scientists study how the body reacts to high doses in animals—sometimes giving them thousands of times more than a regular diet would ever include. At amounts found in foods, there’s no evidence pointing to risk in healthy adults or children.
Some folks worry about synthetic flavorings simply because they're not “natural.” But strawberries in the wild contain hundreds of molecules, many of which labs can recreate. Synthetic and natural versions of strawberry aldehyde share the same chemical structure. Bodies treat them the same way. More danger lies in consuming too much sugar or dyes that often go along with strawberry-flavored snacks, rather than the aldehyde itself.
People with allergies or sensitivities do exist, but issues almost always tie to broader flavor complexes, not the aldehyde compound specifically. Anyone with a diagnosed condition like phenylketonuria ought to check labels, but for the average person, strawberry aldehyde at approved levels doesn’t pose danger. The FDA recalls or restricts ingredients when new data shows harm, which it hasn’t done with this flavor compound.
Consumers crave clarity. Seeing big words on a label shouldn’t be scary. Companies and food regulators both need to keep publishing research results and ingredient safety explanations in plain language. Parents looking out for their kids appreciate transparency, not just assurances. Right now, most people interact with strawberry aldehyde through bites of cake, sips of flavored milk, or a scent in a new body lotion, never realizing its presence.
If anyone feels unsure, they can look for brands using real fruit purees instead of synthetic blends, though both types meet the same safety standards. Flavor labs, food scientists, and public health officials have to keep pressing forward with rigorous studies and openness. Trust grows out of evidence and open conversation, not just “it’s safe because the label says so.”
Strawberry aldehyde, often labeled as Ethyl methylphenylglycidate in the world of food and fragrance, plays a big part in that scent and taste many recognize as “strawberry.” As someone who has worked in product development for small bakeries, I’ve seen this ingredient listed on bottles and flavoring packets countless times. So many foods—especially candies, yogurts, and ice creams—benefit from its reliable, fruity boost.
Its main ingredient, Ethyl methylphenylglycidate, has a chemical structure that brings out a strong, sweet, and fruity aroma. This substance delivers that distinct “strawberry” character, which isn’t always easy to pull from nature alone. One sniff, and you know it. It doesn’t grow on strawberries; scientists created it in labs during the early 1900s and it stuck around because it’s both safe and powerful.
Products don’t stop with only Ethyl methylphenylglycidate. Blends for food use usually combine this with vanillin for creamy notes, maltol to round out the sweetness, and occasionally some real fruit extracts to bring things closer to the flavor found in the wild. Manufacturers focus on these extra components in order to mask the chemical edge and build a fuller, more appealing taste profile.
Some batches use minute portions of natural compounds from strawberries such as methyl cinnamate, furaneol, or even small traces of ethyl butyrate. These aren’t the star players, but they help the main flavor agent feel more balanced and real. In my own kitchen experiments, even a drop of vanilla or a touch of caramel can take a synthetic “strawberry” and turn it into something warmer and more convincing.
Ingredient transparency has always been something people seek out, especially when allergies or sensitivities enter the picture. The rise of clean label foods and concern over artificial flavors means anyone working in food or even scent creation owes it to their customers to be clear about what’s on that ingredient list. Studies from 2021 show public demand for honest labeling continues to grow, driven by better awareness of health and diet.
Some people have raised questions about the safety of these synthetic ingredients. Ethyl methylphenylglycidate, the backbone of strawberry aldehyde, passed multiple food safety reviews from the FDA and the European Food Safety Authority. At the typical levels used for flavoring, the available science supports its safety. This does not mean consumers should ignore what goes in their food. Every kitchen can benefit from a habit of double-checking sources and tracking how much gets added.
Companies seeking safer, more “natural” profiles sometimes reach for biotechnological routes—employing fermentation or enzyme-based methods to create flavor molecules instead of pure chemical synthesis. This work draws attention from health-focused brands who want to blend science and tradition without losing consumer trust.
Open discussions between regulators, producers, and end users should always drive improvements in labeling and sourcing. If more manufacturers use traceable, sustainable, and rigorously tested sources, everyone benefits. No one wants an unpronounceable label scaring them away—or feeling like a mystery flavor lurks in their strawberry ice cream.
Putting in care at this ingredient level creates safer, tastier, and more honest products. The goal: let people eat, cook, and live with confidence, knowing exactly what flavors their favorite treats contain.
Strawberry aldehyde brings that familiar fruity note to everything from soft drinks to perfume. As much as I love the aroma, there’s more to think about than the sweet scent. Improper storage really damages both safety and product quality. Just leaving it on a shelf invites headaches—literally—from strong vapors, and a bottle left open will lose its punch. Chemical integrity isn't a luxury; it protects health and keeps the product effective.
From my own time handling flavor chemicals, keeping volatile compounds out of direct sunlight and away from heat sources goes a long way toward protecting freshness. Strawberry aldehyde prefers a cool, dark location. At my last lab, we always assigned a drawer or a cabinet with a stable temperature, well below typical room temp, staying near 15°C to 25°C. Temperature swings kickstart unwanted reactions, changing aroma and even producing off smells. Sunlight doesn’t just heat the room—it can actually break down the very molecules that create the strawberry note.
No one stores this stuff in a plastic soda bottle and expects it to stay the same next week. Use airtight glass containers, preferably amber-colored to filter out stray light. A tight seal blocks both air and moisture, two big enemies in aroma chemistry. Oxygen can oxidize and dull the scent, while humidity can cause the compound to degrade or even develop mold when poorly sealed. Stainless steel also works for larger volumes being used in manufacturing, just as long as the gaskets and seals are up to the job.
More than once, I’ve seen confusion because someone grabbed the wrong bottle. Always label containers with both the chemical name and the date received. Too many labs and factories run into cross-contamination problems—they’ll accidentally store aldehyde with strong acids or bases, sometimes even next to peroxides that trigger dangerous reactions. In my experience, setting up separate shelves or spaces for reactive ingredients cuts down on accidents and mixing mistakes.
Even a small leak fills a room with a strong, sometimes cloying aroma. Good ventilation keeps air clean and makes the workplace safer. I learned quickly to use a dedicated fume hood or storage room with proper airflow; strawberry aldehyde’s strong odor makes it obvious when the air gets stale. If there’s a spill, disposable gloves and goggles shield hands and eyes from irritation. A spill kit nearby, stocked with absorbent pads, saves headaches and wasted product.
Everyone in charge of storage should keep inventory logs updated. Chemicals expire, and this one loses both flavor and safety over time. Disposing of old or degraded stock means partnering with hazardous waste handlers, never pouring anything down the drain. On visits to large production facilities, I’ve seen firsthand how quick action on expired chemicals keeps both staff and the environment better protected.
Working with strawberry aldehyde gets simpler with good habits: label everything, store out of the light, seal containers tight, check stock often. These steps come from real-world experience and strong science. Simple changes can safeguard everyone’s health, ensure high-quality flavors, and make the whole process run smoother.
Straight from my years working in food development, I’ve seen people react to ingredients you’d never expect. Strawberry aldehyde, or ethyl methylphenylglycidate, sits on the label of many “strawberry”-flavored foods, drinks, and even perfumes. It’s a synthetic compound with a smell and taste that screams strawberry, even if it never touched the actual fruit. So, does strawberry aldehyde cause allergic reactions?
Most people worried about allergies want to know if a product contains nuts, dairy, gluten, or a chemical that sets off hives or breathing trouble. Science gives some answers here: strawberry aldehyde itself doesn’t come from strawberries and doesn’t carry typical fruit proteins. It isn’t a known allergen by EU or FDA labeling standards. Multiple allergy organizations and regulatory bodies keep it off their official lists. Still, that doesn’t guarantee it won’t cause problems.
I’ve worked with chefs and flavorists who mention rare cases of contact dermatitis or mild irritation after direct skin exposure to synthetic flavor chemicals. In rare moments, some people might feel sensitivity or even headaches after strong exposure, especially in concentrated flavor compounds like those found in the cosmetics or perfume industry. A 2022 toxicological review in the Journal of Food Science notes that while the main population enjoys strawberry aldehyde without trouble, those with fragrance allergies or sensitive skin should watch for reactions. Trace impurities in the manufacturing process—unstable byproducts, tiny contaminants—may be to blame for isolated reactions. Someone with a history of fragrance allergies or multiple chemical sensitivities should probably take it slow.
Food labels rarely call out “strawberry aldehyde.” The phrase “natural and artificial flavors” covers a lot. Regulatory systems like those run by the FDA and the European Food Safety Authority require ingredients with known allergens to be flagged, but not this one. Because of that, someone wondering if that strawberry candy or yogurt will cause trouble must look for more information. Health-conscious shoppers often reach for simple ingredient lists, and for a good reason. Knowing how to decode “flavor blend” listings helps prevent unwanted surprises.
For most, strawberry aldehyde means a big strawberry punch without actual berries. For people with chemical sensitivities, there’s wisdom in doing a patch test on the skin if using a fragranced product or trying a tiny bite of a new food. Healthcare professionals like allergists stand ready with guidance for anyone who’s run into problems with flavored products in the past.
Real food advocates often push for clearer labels and more transparency about what’s in our food and beauty products. By keeping communication open between food makers, regulators, and consumers, we can keep people both safe and informed. Recognizing the risk doesn’t mean living in fear. It just means giving people the information and support they need to make smart choices for their own bodies.
| Names | |
| Other names |
C9 Aldehyde Aldehyde C-9 Nonanal Pelargonaldehyde Nonanaldehyde |
| Pronunciation | /ˈstrɔːˌbɛri ˈæl.dɪ.haɪd/ |
| Other names |
Ethyl methylphenylglycidate Ethyl 3-phenylglycidate |
| Pronunciation | /ˈstrɔːˌbɛri ˈældɪhaɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 104-67-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1280728 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:31344 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL31853 |
| ChemSpider | 18718 |
| DrugBank | DB11256 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.005.483 |
| EC Number | 203-397-1 |
| Gmelin Reference | 16668 |
| KEGG | C07085 |
| MeSH | D000787 |
| PubChem CID | 638098 |
| RTECS number | WL5078000 |
| UNII | JEC92O2N1T |
| UN number | 1197 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID7020181 |
| CAS Number | 104-67-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1869253 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:87109 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL31804 |
| ChemSpider | 22246 |
| DrugBank | DB11289 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.009.246 |
| EC Number | 4.4.1.4 |
| Gmelin Reference | 520622 |
| KEGG | C01354 |
| MeSH | D000072455 |
| PubChem CID | 31248 |
| RTECS number | WL6835000 |
| UNII | K4NBP2A4M6 |
| UN number | 1194 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID7020186 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C10H12O |
| Molar mass | 150.18 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Odor | Fruity, sweet, strawberry |
| Density | 1.01 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 2.62 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.001 mmHg (25°C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 17.22 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 12.07 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -7.55×10⁻⁶ |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.4740 |
| Viscosity | Mobile liquid |
| Dipole moment | 2.75 D |
| Chemical formula | C10H10O2 |
| Molar mass | 150.17 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Odor | fruity, strawberry, green, pineapple, fatty |
| Density | 1.045 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | insoluble |
| log P | 2.5 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.009 mmHg (25°C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 16.57 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 13.48 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.48900 |
| Viscosity | 8 cP (20°C) |
| Dipole moment | 3.07 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 349.2 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -342.7 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -2332 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 347.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -277.0 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -1808 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | '' |
| ATC code | V03AB32 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed. Causes skin irritation. Causes serious eye irritation. May cause an allergic skin reaction. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H315: Causes skin irritation. H319: Causes serious eye irritation. H335: May cause respiratory irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: P261, P280, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-3-1 |
| Flash point | > 93 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 285 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat 6400 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 500 mg/kg (oral, rat) |
| NIOSH | WIthdrawn |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible): 50 ppm (OSHA) |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.005 ppm |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Unknown |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed. Causes skin irritation. Causes serious eye irritation. May cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: H315, H317, H319, H411 |
| Precautionary statements | P210, P233, P264, P273, P280, P301+P312, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313, P403+P235 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-2-0-ALC |
| Flash point | > 93 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 285 °C |
| Explosive limits | Explosive limits: 1.1–6.4% |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): 5000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 640 mg/kg (oral, rat) |
| NIOSH | RN: 104-67-6 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.5 mg/m³ |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Unknown |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Cinnamaldehyde Benzaldehyde Isoamyl acetate Ethyl maltol Vanillin |
| Related compounds |
Vanillin Ethyl maltol Ethyl vanillin Heliotropin Maltol Benzaldehyde Cinnamaldehyde Coumarin |