Starch acetates have a longer story than most folks realize, coming from kitchen tables and moving into the heart of advanced industry. It all began with simple starch and a question: how do you make this humble plant material last longer, hold up better, and work in more ways? Folks in the early 20th century figured out that by treating starch with acetic anhydride, the properties changed—water didn’t soak it up as much, it held together under heat, and new uses popped up. Back then, scientists probably didn’t know how far-reaching their tinkering would become. They just noticed the material wouldn’t degrade as fast, stayed stable, and kept food and products looking and feeling right. These changes led straight into food processing, textile sizing, and eventually into pharmaceutical carriers and even green packaging solutions. Each decade nudged the boundaries a little more, with research in the 1950s pushing for greater consistency and improvements steering regulatory guidance. Starch acetate started as an offshoot of classic chemistry, growing more relevant as society leaned away from petroleum toward biodegradable solutions.
Starch acetate isn’t just starch dressed up with a fancy label. It’s regular starch molecules that have small acetyl groups tacked on, usually coming from sources like corn, potato, or wheat. This change lets it perform where native starch can’t handle the job. If you’ve eaten a ready-to-eat meal with a silky sauce or noticed a pill that breaks down just right, odds are someone chose starch acetate for its predictable texture and controlled breakdown. This product pops up in foods as a thickener and stabilizer, in papermaking for stronger coatings, and in industrial applications where regular starch loses its touch. It’s a workhorse, able to slip between roles. Some uses take advantage of its resistance to retrogradation, which stops products from going stale or gritty. Others need that particular mouthfeel, turning otherwise ordinary foods into something smooth and appealing. The main idea—take regular starch, give it more reliability, and you get a material that fits into today’s demanding supply chains.
What sets starch acetate apart comes down to details in its structure. The appearance often impresses as a fine, almost creamy powder. It absorbs less water than typical starch. Heat doesn’t mess with it as much, and it resists jelling up in weird ways, which is a big win for folks developing instant soups or no-bake desserts. Chemically, those acetyl groups perform magic tricks—they block some of the spots where water likes to sneak in, lowering gelatinization temperature and helping the material disperse more smoothly. Solubility can shift depending on the degree of substitution, with light acetylation keeping it familiar and high acetyl numbers creating more plastic-preferred properties. This manipulation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic balance turns simple grains into a flexible base for food science, medical needs, and beyond.
Makers and users of starch acetate keep an eye on certain numbers. Typical food-grade materials carry a degree of substitution (DS) around 0.01 to 0.2. For packaging and tech jobs, DS creeps higher, sometimes well above 2. Every batch undergoes moisture content and bulk density checks, which tell a technician how the powder will handle, store, and process. You’ll see labeling requirements that spell out source (corn, potato), and most regions demand clear allergy and origin statements. Recent years brought tougher food labeling laws, and today’s consumer wants clean, honest declarations. For pharmaceuticals and bioplastics, regulatory files often run for dozens of pages, spelling out everything from ash content to microbial limits. It’s the price of reliability—each stakeholder wants to know the material will act the same from start to finish.
Starting with native starch, processors introduce acetic anhydride or vinyl acetate in the presence of an alkaline catalyst. The reaction heads down a pathway that replaces a fraction of the naturally occurring hydroxyl sites with acetyl groups. This isn’t a gentle kitchen process—it asks for industrial mixers, controlled pH, and temperature vigilance. Getting a consistently modified product takes know-how, not just recipes. After the reaction, neutralization, filtration, and extensive washing pull out excess reagents and byproducts. Drying cycles cap off the preparation, pinning down moisture content and securing a shelf-stable powder. Some specialists go further, tweaking reaction times or using organic solvents to get very specific DS ranges. In recent years, pushback against harsh reagents has nudged research into greener methods, like using acetic acid straight from fermentation or tweaking biological catalysts to encourage acetylation.
Adding acetate groups doesn’t have to stop at one level. Scientists experiment by tacking on other functional groups—phosphate, succinate, even hydrophobic chains—either alongside or after acetylation. Each modification brings a change in swelling behavior, thermal response, or solubility. For packaging, they’ll push for hydrophobicity and barrier properties. For foods, milder substitutions keep digestibility and taste top of mind. Synergy shows up when different modifications combine; one set of characteristics can balance out another’s drawbacks. The chemical playground stays open, with constant innovation in blending old tricks with new green chemistry drives. Right now, hybrid approaches—enzymatic, solvent-free, or microfluidic—lead cutting-edge research. As these methods catch on, expectations rise for safer processes and more tightly controlled end products.
On product labels, starch acetate appears under a spectrum of names. You’ll see “acetylated starch,” “E1420” on European ingredient lists, or “modified food starch” in the US. Technical supply sheets sometimes mention “CAS 9045-28-7.” The food sector leans on these identifiers, as does the pharmaceutical world, but common language varies across continents. Alternative naming can sometimes trip up suppliers or regulators, especially as modified starches multiply with slight structural changes. Keeping reference codes and careful documentation helps prevent mix-ups, especially as import-export markets grow more complex.
Working with starch acetate calls for the right gear and procedural discipline. In most facilities, gloves, masks, and dust control equipment keep airborne fibers at bay. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EFSA line up strict residual solvent caps and bacterial count limits. Cleaning protocols and batch tracking protect the supply chain from contamination and ensure each sack or drum follows the same standards. For pharmaceuticals and direct food applications, Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) serve as the backbone, auditing from raw grain to finished product. Storage in cool, dry spaces away from reactive chemicals stops degradation before it starts. As with any powdered material, attention to explosion risk shapes facility design, with regular air-filtration and fire suppression checks. These routines create reliability for downstream users—nobody wants a recall because of a missed standard or oversight.
Starch acetate slips into a staggering number of everyday products. In food, it resurfaces everywhere from salad dressings and puddings to instant noodles and gluten-free bread. Each demands different properties—a clean label or just a soft, never-gummy mouthfeel. Pharmaceutical folks value how precisely it controls tablet breakdown, enabling better-delivered medicines and new dosage forms. Across paper and textiles, it gives better strength and printability, outshining old-fashioned sizing agents. Emerging fields turn to high-DS acetate for biodegradable films, packaging, and agricultural coatings meant to dissolve at the right time in soil or water. With supply chains evolving and green credentials moving into the spotlight, this adaptable material finds new ways to replace less sustainable competitors, thus reducing dependency on petroleum-based plastics. During COVID-19, demand for food and pharma-grade starch acetates spiked, putting further attention on quality, traceability, and sourcing ethics.
Lab teams push into fresh territory each year, finding ways to further tailor and ‘green’ production. Chemical engineers test out new acetylation catalysts, targeting reduced toxin production and waste. Academic groups research how blending starch acetate with biopolymers like PLA or cellulose leads to new composites for packaging, wound dressings, or slow-release fertilizers. In the food world, collaborations with sensory scientists uncover how different DS levels affect flavor, color retention, and shelf life across cultures. Current patents chase improved extrusion performance, better resistance to cold/thaw cycles, and antimicrobial surfaces. Funding keeps flowing from public and private sources, especially as global policies push for renewable, non-toxic, and home-compostable materials. The challenge comes in scaling these breakthroughs affordably and proving safety that regulators, brands, and shoppers all trust.
Extensive studies back starch acetate’s safety, confirming that typical dietary or packaging exposures don’t pose short- or long-term health risks. Investigations focus on ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact. Results consistently show rapid digestion and excretion when consumed. Animal feeding trials, plus human clinical data, demonstrate good tolerance, steering authorities to greenlight its use at specific levels. Concerns do pop up around certain impurities, like residual reagents or byproducts, especially when processing isn’t tightly controlled. Researchers keep a close watch for changes in gut microbiota or allergenicity tied to wheat or corn origins. The push for high-DS materials in non-food uses raises new toxicity questions—especially regarding environmental breakdown and microplastic formation—driving studies that follow end-of-life pathways back through soil, water, and food chains. It falls on each manufacturer to stick to the cleanest, most-transparent processes, as even a minor misstep can undermine public confidence.
Starch acetate faces a crossroads, pulled by stricter regulations, climate goals, and rapid consumer shifts. Green chemistry opens doors for less-hazardous production, and smarter manufacturing lowers the carbon footprint. As major brands scramble to cut plastics and bring biodegradable materials up to scratch, starch acetate looks well-positioned—it carries credibility, flexibility, and a big safety portfolio. The catch comes in pricing and competitive performance, especially as other bio-based materials chase the same shelf space. Instead of expecting a single winner, the scene looks primed for ongoing partnerships between research labs, processors, and brands. The best outcomes will grow from transparency, scientific rigor, and investment in recycling and circularity, lifting starch acetate from a simple modified starch to a backbone of cleaner, smarter industry solutions for the years ahead.
Anyone who’s spent any time in a kitchen knows what regular starch does. It thickens sauces, gives structure to baked goods, and helps make food a little more satisfying. Regular starch often shows up as corn starch, potato starch, or tapioca starch. Each kind comes from a plant, then gets cooked down, dried, and ground into a fine powder. That powder is the same white stuff that clouds the bottom of grandma’s gravy boat when someone overdoes it.
The main problem with regular starch shows up under heat or acid. It can break down, lose its thickening power, and even start turning a sauce watery all over again. Freezing and thawing mess with it, too—think freezer-burned sauce with pools of water floating above gooey bits.
Starch acetate starts its life the same way as any other starch, but takes a short detour in the processing plant. Manufacturers treat it with a common food ingredient called acetic anhydride, which changes how the amylose and amylopectin molecules in the starch act. This simple tweak helps starch acetate stand up to heat, acid, and even freezing without breaking down or turning slimy.
Instead of weeping water when reheated, starch acetate holds its texture. That matters in frozen meals, ready-to-eat sauces, or foods that get shipped long distances. With starch acetate, the final dish comes out the way it should, instead of looking like it’s survived a flood.
Processed foods—frozen dinners, salad dressings, and canned soups—rely on starch acetate all the time. Companies turn to it for products that must sit on shelves, travel across countries, and land on dinner tables in a state close to “homemade.” Starch acetate scores points for being stable, so food makers don’t have to fret about breakdowns as temperatures swing.
The World Health Organization and the FDA have given the green light for starch acetate’s use in food. Food science research from major institutes backs up its safety. Safety testing, published in peer-reviewed journals, confirmed that the body digests starch acetate much like ordinary starch, breaking it down to simple sugars.
Choosing between regular starch and starch acetate isn’t as simple as “pick the new thing.” For foods eaten fresh, plain starch can do the job. Home cooks won’t find many reasons to use starch acetate because regular starch shows up everywhere and works fine in small batches.
Businesses looking to streamline production and reduce waste have plenty of reasons to switch. No scrambling to fix watery sauces in a factory. Less spoilage means less food pulled from stores, which helps fight waste and keeps prices lower for everyone.
If you’re concerned about processed foods, reading ingredient lists remains the best line of defense. Most packs list starch acetate as “acetylated distarch.” Sticking with whole foods and scratch cooking puts you in the driver’s seat, but for those trying to balance convenience and quality in today’s busy world, food science—starch acetate included—fills in the gaps.
Starch acetate sounds technical, but it’s basically plant starch (like corn or potato) tweaked a bit to improve its properties. It enters common foods as a thickener or stabilizer, which helps sauces, gravies, or ready meals feel smooth and creamy. Food manufacturers like this ingredient because it keeps products consistent, doesn’t easily break down during heating, and helps food last a bit longer on shelves.
Safety becomes a real concern whenever food gets modified. You want confidence in what’s on your plate. Reputable health organizations have put starch acetate through several safety checks. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) both looked at available data, including long-term animal studies and results from how the body processes the substance.
These agencies haven’t found evidence that starch acetate harms people when eaten in amounts allowed in foods. The substance does not build up in your body or mess with how you take in nutrients. After eating, enzymes break down starch acetate much the same as regular starches. Once it enters the digestive tract, the body handles it as normal carbs, converting it eventually into simple sugars for energy.
Some folks hear “modified” and worry. That skepticism makes sense, especially with food allergies and additives topping headlines in recent years. If you’re allergic to the original plant (such as corn or potato), then caution with any kind of starch product is well advised. Symptoms can pop up if your body recognizes the base ingredient, no matter what tweaks came later.
Food additives sometimes face extra criticism because of confusion over synthetic chemicals versus slight modifications to natural ingredients. Food-grade starch acetate goes through a straightforward chemical process using acetic anhydride. After this treatment and repeated washing, no harsh chemicals should stay in the finished product at levels that cause concern. Regulatory authorities keep limits in place for good reason.
Clear labeling makes all the difference. Ingredients like starch acetate should always appear on packaging as “modified starch” or “acetylated distarch acetate.” If you follow a restricted diet, or you react to certain foods, checking ingredient panels pays off. Better awareness gives you more control at the grocery store. The rise in whole-ingredient diets has pushed many brands to highlight modified starches separately or explain the source, easing minds and avoiding potential reactions.
While most people digest starch acetate without problems, keeping an open dialogue with medical professionals matters, especially if you have allergies, digestive conditions, or questions about processed foods. Companies must stick to health authority guidelines, keep food labels honest, and share details about what goes in the box.
Everyone deserves transparency and safety in what they eat. Open research, honest labeling, and clear rules help maintain trust and let shoppers decide what feels right for their health. Food additives like starch acetate aren’t going away, but with proper oversight and education, worry gives way to more informed choices.
Starch acetate rarely racks up headlines, but anyone who has opened a pouch of ready-to-eat soup, spooned out instant pudding, or sliced into a soft loaf of gluten-free bread has probably tasted its work. Food companies depend on this modified starch to shape the texture, stability, and shelf-life of all sorts of products. Years of experience in food science have made it clear to me: little details like starch acetate determine both the first bite and the last.
People expect their instant mashed potatoes to feel creamy, not gluey. They want a pudding that juggles firmness and silkiness, even after sitting chilled for days. Starch acetate rolls up its sleeves here, delivering a texture that sidesteps gumminess and gritty mouthfeel. Factories switch over to starch acetate in soup mixes and sauces for this very reason—it can take a beating from industrial cooking, freeze-thaw cycles, and reheating at home, all while retaining just the right thickness.
Freezing, reheating, and months on the shelf break down many starches. Standard starches collapse, weep, or break apart under all that stress. Acetylated starch holds strong, keeping dressings creamy and sauces thick from the moment they leave the plant to the moment they land on a plate. This backbone explains why so many brands pick starch acetate for products like ready-to-serve gravies, stews, and even baby food.
Allergy-friendly and plant-based foods surge in popularity each year. Cooks and companies hunting for egg-free or gluten-free options often lean on starch acetate. It brings the moisture and structure missing from baked goods that skip wheat or animal-based binders. A gluten-free bread or cake can wind up dry and crumbly, but starch acetate helps keep the crumb tender. Plus, it stays tasteless and invisible—chefs rely on that.
Nobody likes a watery stew or a split pudding after a week in the fridge. Starch acetate blocks this from happening by holding onto water and resisting spoilage. Food doesn’t separate so easily and often stays fresher for longer. Companies see real savings by cutting down on production losses and customer returns due to texture issues. From my own experience, using modified starches like this saves headaches for both producers and shoppers by ensuring what lands on the table matches what’s advertised.
Corn, tapioca, and potato can all become sources for starch acetate, so manufacturers pick the base that fits their recipe and climate. More companies now demand solutions relying on local crops, both to shrink their carbon footprint and to support regional farming. By opting for starches that work with a wide array of raw materials, developers build stable food lines that can pivot if supply chains or consumer demands shift. Smart sourcing, supported by modified starches, looks like an investment in both resilience and taste.
Customers come back for brands they trust, especially when flavor and texture never disappoint. Starch acetate might not grab attention like a new flavor does, but its reliability in jams, sauces, and prepared meals keeps satisfaction high. The peace of mind is hard to forget in food manufacturing: small changes in formulation often mean big changes in the eating experience. Starch acetate keeps that experience right where it should be—pleasant, predictable, and satisfying every time.
Starch acetate shows up on plenty of ingredient lists, but most people don’t know much about it. I’ve learned from reading ingredient labels for family with celiac and food allergies that you can’t take a name at face value—you have to dig deeper. Starch acetate starts off as regular starch, which usually comes from plants like corn, potato, or wheat. The manufacturer then takes this starch and treats it with acetic anhydride, a kind of vinegar derivative, to make it more stable in recipes.
In North America, most commercial starch acetate comes from corn or potato. These sources don’t bring up gluten issues, but Europe and parts of Asia sometimes use wheat because it’s cheap and easy to process. That makes it tricky for folks with celiac disease, wheat allergy, or gluten intolerance. The label “modified starch” doesn’t automatically mean gluten-free or safe for all.
If the starch acetate started from wheat, there’s a real risk of gluten. Even heavy refining can leave behind gluten traces. The Codex Alimentarius says a food called “gluten-free” must test below 20 parts per million (ppm) gluten. Some companies can prove that, but others may not bother unless pressed by regulations or consumer demand.
I know parents who call companies, grill the customer service rep, and read every email response two or three times just for peace of mind. The challenge is real because not every manufacturer reveals the starch’s source. Some EU countries expect clear allergen labeling—so “wheat” must go on the package if present—but other places use less precise language. Certified gluten-free logos and third-party lab tests help, but unless you see that clear sign or certification, it’s reasonable to worry if wheat entered the recipe at the factory.
People looking out for other allergens—such as soy, dairy, or tree nuts—can generally relax when it comes to starch acetate. Unless the modified starch comes from an unusual source, these common allergens don’t pop up during normal manufacturing. That said, cross-contact happens in shared plants. If a factory runs breaded items, breakfast cereals, and starches on the same lines, you can’t always count on a truly allergen-free product. Trained staff swabbing machinery and strict cleaning routines help lower risk. Still, I have seen recalls from companies who found out weeks later that their “safe” line actually got hit with wheat flour dust from another product in the warehouse.
Avoiding risk often means favoring brands with strong transparency. I always recommend searching for a wheat-free or gluten-free claim—preferably from a celiac support association or government agency. Some grocery stores keep lists of trusted brands, and online groups share real-life experiences with various foods. When in doubt, I’ve picked plain corn starch or potato starch straight from the bag, skipping modified versions, just to dodge upset stomachs at dinner. Cookbooks and allergy-friendly blogs sometimes offer recipe hacks where you can swap pure starch and make your own safe thickener or binder. This hands-on approach removes the guesswork about hidden gluten and allergens. Real food safety rests on honest labeling and careful sourcing, something shoppers deserve and advocates keep fighting for every day.
There’s a weird kind of detective work that kicks in while examining packaged foods. Skimming the ingredients, certain names call for a double-check — “starch acetate” among them. Food makers love these modified starches for the texture and shelf life they offer. For folks shopping with allergies or sensitivities, the way these things show up on a label makes a real difference.
Manufacturers often use the term “modified starch” to dodge the long chemical names, but laws in most countries nudge them for clarity. In Europe, starch acetate sometimes appears as “E1420.” In the US and Canada, it lands under “modified food starch,” although some brands write “acetylated distarch acetate” to spell it out. Most of the time, unless the starch comes from an allergenic source — like wheat or corn — the label doesn’t mention the origin, which can feel like a hidden claw for anyone who has to avoid gluten.
Here’s where the label game gets tricky. People who eat gluten-free, those with celiac disease, or anyone with food intolerances need to play food detective. In the US, the FDA only expects allergen sources like wheat, soy, or corn to be disclosed. That means a potato-based starch acetate could slip into a gluten-free product without raising flags. In the EU, the rules come with more teeth — the label has to identify the plant source if it’s a notable allergen, which helps folks steer clear of risk.
Pick up a jar of sauce, a box of frozen waffles, or even a tub of yogurt, and there’s a good shot you’ll spot “modified starch” somewhere in the mix. When scanning those lists, starch acetate turns up for a reason: it thickens and keeps things stable after freezing or reheating. It holds up in acidic foods, opens possibilities in plant-based recipes, and delivers the chew we expect from packaged treats. In my kitchen, gluten-free baking depends on trustworthy starches. The confidence that a “modified starch” won’t sneak in gluten matters more than a scientific breakdown.
People deserve to know exactly what’s in their food. Industry shortcuts — generic names and minimal info — fuel suspicion and frustration. I’ve seen parents in the grocery aisle flipping bags, pulling out phones, rummaging for safe snacks. Ingredient transparency goes beyond compliance. It’s about trust. Even if most folks don’t care about every detail, the ones who do — the families managing allergies, the people juggling intolerances — get left behind by vague labeling.
Tighter requirements on ingredient declarations would help. Listing plant origins every time and using clear, standardized ingredient names across all products would level the playing field. Formulators have a mountain of starches to pick from. Giving shoppers an easy way to tell the difference between potato, wheat, and corn would skip the guesswork. Food safety and honesty can’t run on loopholes.
Starch acetate is part of convenience food’s invisible infrastructure. It shouldn’t stay hidden on an ingredient list. With so many depending on full information, the small extra work for clear labeling pays back in loyalty and peace of mind. It's a simple fix that brings everyone to the table.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | **Acetic acid starch** |
| Other names |
E1420 Acetylated starch Acetyl starch Modified starch (E1420) Starch ethanoate |
| Pronunciation | /ˈstɑːrtʃ əˈsiːteɪt/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | acetylated starch |
| Other names |
E1420 Acetylated Starch Starch, acetylated |
| Pronunciation | /ˈstɑːrtʃ əˈsiːteɪt/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 9045-28-3 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3529366 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:13190 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1208416 |
| ChemSpider | 12648608 |
| DrugBank | DB14156 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.117.429 |
| EC Number | 2.7.7.27 |
| Gmelin Reference | 149500 |
| KEGG | C02445 |
| MeSH | D013019 |
| PubChem CID | 16211299 |
| RTECS number | **GM5090000** |
| UNII | 0V0D15JZ4Q |
| UN number | UN1988 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID5025146 |
| CAS Number | ["9045-28-3"] |
| Beilstein Reference | 3618731 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:140126 |
| ChEMBL | CHEBI:134134 |
| ChemSpider | 15733838 |
| DrugBank | DB14157 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 088a4a4d-44fa-40cc-b460-27d8f8d03431 |
| EC Number | 4.2.1.41 |
| Gmelin Reference | 8697 |
| KEGG | C02437 |
| MeSH | D013020 |
| PubChem CID | 10486589 |
| RTECS number | TF5950000 |
| UNII | 7XI45C222W |
| UN number | UN1814 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | (C6H10O5)n(C4H6O3)x |
| Molar mass | Variable |
| Appearance | White to off-white powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.3 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 0.01 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 11.5 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.505 |
| Viscosity | 400 - 1200 mPa.s |
| Dipole moment | 0.84 D |
| Chemical formula | (C6H10O5)x(C4H6O3)y |
| Molar mass | Variable |
| Appearance | White powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.5–0.7 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | “log P: -3.7” |
| Acidity (pKa) | 12.4 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 12.0 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.50 - 1.52 |
| Viscosity | Viscosity: 45-65 mPa·s |
| Dipole moment | 0.142 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 590 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 405 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | −2017.73 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -4190 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A11GA04 |
| ATC code | A11AA03 |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | Not classified as hazardous according to GHS. |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. |
| Precautionary statements | P264; P270; P301+P312; P330; P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
| Flash point | > 260 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 250°C |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 10 g/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | Not Listed |
| PEL (Permissible) | 15 mg/kg |
| REL (Recommended) | 24 |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not listed |
| Main hazards | Dust may form explosive mixture with air. |
| GHS labelling | Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) |
| Pictograms | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Signal word | No signal word |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P301+P312, P330, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | > 249.6 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 210 °C |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 10 g/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | WA2450000 |
| REL (Recommended) | 130mg/kg |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Starch Cellulose acetate Hydroxypropyl starch Phosphated distarch phosphate Acetylated distarch adipate |
| Related compounds |
Cellulose acetate Dextrin Hydroxypropyl starch Starch phosphate Starch octenyl succinate |