Looking back on the evolution of food additives, sorbitan monopalmitate shows up as a product of two scientific worlds colliding: the drive for better food stability and advancements in organic chemistry. During the early and mid-20th century, production increased as industrial bakers and confectioners tried to tackle challenges of blending fats and water in their recipes. Sorbitan monopalmitate’s creation traces back to the work of food chemists who sought to unlock softer textures in bread and creamier consistencies in spreads—without a slew of artificial ingredients. What stands out is how quickly industries adapted this emulsifier in their processes. Its journey reflects a time when ingredient innovation meant fewer compromises on food texture and quality, putting it in the toolbox of large-scale food production for decades to come.
Sorbitan monopalmitate comes from the chemical reaction between sorbitol, a sugar alcohol, and palmitic acid, a common fatty acid gained from vegetable oils. The result is a waxy, yellowish powder or bead used to blend water and oil in food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical products. In everyday terms, this additive quietly sidelines oily streaks in chocolate spreads and muddy textures in margarine, letting these products hold together despite temperature changes or long sits on store shelves. Consumers and manufacturers know it by several names—E495 is the regulatory shorthand in Europe, and labeling laws often place it right after lecithins and mono- and diglycerides on ingredient lists. No hype surrounds this compound; its real weight lies in how it keeps familiar foods reliable and appealing.
Understanding what sets sorbitan monopalmitate apart means looking at its physical resilience and chemical simplicity. In the lab, it comes across as a water-insoluble substance with mild odor, melting between 52 and 55°C, and showing true durability against heat and pH swings. It stands out for improving mouthfeel by distributing fats more evenly across textures—in everything from icing to dairy substitutes. Chemically, sorbitan monopalmitate holds several hydroxy groups, which give it the ability to connect with both water and fat molecules. This molecular structure explains its power as a go-between for hydrophobic and hydrophilic ingredients, quietly resolving their tendency to separate.
Specifications matter for anyone sourcing or working with food ingredients, and sorbitan monopalmitate must meet rigorous standards. Manufacturers check acid values, saponification numbers, and ensure absence of impurities from the vegetable oil origins. Regulatory bodies in Europe, the United States, China, and Australia approve its inclusion up to specified limits (often under 10 grams per kilo for baked goods and confectionery). Labeling differs by region, but requirements ensure consumers can spot the presence of E495 or “Sorbitan Monopalmitate” among a product’s components. Food safety inspectors push for consistent batch quality—checking everything from moisture residue to proper packaging, because unnoticed flaws cause headaches for both brands and end users.
Making sorbitan monopalmitate centers on a straightforward process: catalytic esterification. Technicians heat sorbitol and palmitic acid, sometimes with an acid or base catalyst, then distill off the water formed during the reaction. Monitoring temperature, ratios of reactants, and reaction times proves crucial. Any slip leads to off-flavors or unreacted reactants that affect final product stability. For big manufacturers, tweaking steps for large-batch consistency—without drifting from food safety guidelines—shows the balancing act behind creating industrial additives that act invisibly in finished foods.
This molecule’s chemical adaptations offer broader use. Through partial ethoxylation, sorbitan monopalmitate turns into polysorbate 40, which acts as a stronger emulsifier in creamy products like ice creams and salad dressings. These tweaks use ethylene oxide to swap hydrophobic groups for hydrophilic chains, boosting performance in cold products and acidic conditions. Secondary reactions also open doors for new textural qualities, like supporting foams in whipped toppings or improving shelf-stability in meal replacement bars. Each change taps the original scaffold of the molecule, creating compounds tuned for specific industrial demands.
Walking through ingredient catalogs or regulatory filings, vendors list sorbitan monopalmitate under a tangle of names: E495, Span 40, sorbitan hexadecanoate, SO-MP. Chemical suppliers often sell variants with names blending “sorbitan” and “palmitate,” but the end product stays much the same. This naming tangle challenges new researchers as they cross-check technical literature, with resources in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food science sometimes relying on their favored synonyms.
Food scientists and manufacturers keep a sharp eye on safety protocols in ingredient handling. Sorbitan monopalmitate holds a long track record of safety under reviewed conditions. Toxicological studies—backed by both government and independent labs—generally agree this compound doesn’t pose risks at approved usage levels. Manufacturing plants follow guidelines from groups like the FAO/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). Workers use basic personal protection, monitor dust generation, and follow cleaning procedures since the material, while proven safe in food, isn’t meant for inhalation or open skin exposure in raw form. Food inspection authorities look for documentation on raw material purity, absence of animal-derived contaminants, and batch traceability down to the manufacturer lot code.
Sorbitan monopalmitate shows up in bakeries, confectionery plants, and industrial mixing rooms. It keeps sandwich bread soft over days on the shelf, stops chocolate spreads from separating, and helps “whipped” dessert toppings hold their texture through shipping and store displays. Its reach even extends to cosmetic creams, lotions, and some pharmaceutical formulations, smoothing out textures and acting as a blending agent in oil-and-water mixtures. Regulations set usage levels, often far below any toxic threshold, allowing manufacturers to shape texture, moisture retention, and shelf life while maintaining compliance. In my experience, product developers sometimes rely on this emulsifier when newer alternatives cost too much or disrupt familiar product performance, making it a mainstay even in recipes that have otherwise modernized.
Researchers keep circling back to sorbitan monopalmitate as food science pivots to cleaner labels and non-synthetic ingredients. Though established, it stands at the crossroads of tradition and change—challenging product developers to reduce additive load without sacrificing quality. Studies compare its performance with lecithins, mono- and diglycerides, and emerging biopolymer-based emulsifiers, probing for blends that cut costs or chemical complexity. Recent university trials investigate replacement sources for palmitic acid—shifting toward more sustainable or locally available oils, which could lower the carbon footprint. Laboratories work to track even tiny impurities, driving advances in analytical chemistry techniques that spot contaminants below the parts per million threshold.
Animal feeding studies and long-term dietary exposure trials guide safety limits for sorbitan monopalmitate. Past papers show little to no evidence of carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or reproductive impact in rodents, even at doses far above real-world consumption levels. Modern toxicology keeps refining assay methods—ensuring even subtle changes in ingredient manufacturing stay tracked. Global monitoring includes batch sampling and cross-country data sharing, with regulators requiring immediate reporting of any adverse reactions. Some recent focus on allergenicity and cross-reactivity has produced no flagged concern for typical consumers, though watchdog groups push for ongoing vigilance as ingredient blends proliferate in newer markets and applications.
Sorbitan monopalmitate’s story isn’t over; as plant-based foods explode and consumers push for recognizable ingredient lists, demand for multi-functional, legacy emulsifiers holds strong. A new wave of research hopes to engineer the molecule from alternative feedstocks, cutting out reliance on imported fats. Others see opportunity in fine-tuning blends with other bio-based surfactants to mimic performance in vegan, non-GMO, or minimally processed foods. Regulatory frameworks may tighten around source tracing and sustainability, raising the bar for ingredient transparency. In industry circles, developers speak about swapping or supplementing the emulsifier not out of safety worries, but to win over shoppers craving “cleaner” pantry staples. Food scientists run side-by-side tests to pin down what gives the same softness in gluten-free bread or mouthfeel in non-dairy desserts, using sorbitan monopalmitate as their benchmark. This ingredient, rooted in the earliest days of industrialized food, faces its future as a reference point for both safety and performance in a constantly shifting marketplace.
Almost everyone I know has eaten something processed in the last week. Pick up a loaf of store-bought bread, a tub of ice cream, maybe even that frozen pizza, and you’re likely to spot a long list of ingredients on the label. One of those names I keep seeing is sorbitan monopalmitate. That’s a word most people won’t recognize, but it shows up everywhere in processed foods.
Sorbitan monopalmitate helps oils and water mix together. It’s a type of emulsifier, keeping textures smooth so products don’t separate. I’ve baked a fair bit as a hobby, and I know for a fact that oil and water just don’t blend on their own. Food companies use ingredients like sorbitan monopalmitate to keep salad dressings silky and ice cream creamy, even after sitting out on the dinner table a little too long.
Some brands put it in baked goods to hold moisture or make products feel fresh longer. There’s a practical side to this — nobody wants dry muffins from the supermarket or chocolate that’s dry and crumbly. This is why the food industry leans so heavily on emulsifiers like this one.
The conversation around food additives gets complicated fast. Not every chemical in foods deserves a bad reputation, but people deserve straight answers about what’s in their food. Sorbitan monopalmitate passes safety checks by groups like the FDA and the European Food Safety Authority. They base their approvals on research that looks at toxicity and possible side effects from heavy consumption over a lifetime.
Still, some studies have linked high levels of emulsifiers with gut discomfort and shifts in the bacteria that live in our intestines. There’s been talk about additives driving inflammation or changing the way our bodies respond to certain foods. I keep an eye out for research on these issues, since so much of our diet now comes from processed foods rather than home cooking. Actual risk in real-world diets remains pretty small, but the concern sticks with many shoppers, especially folks who eat a lot of packaged foods throughout the week.
Clean labels attract plenty of attention now. Food makers get pressured to explain what every unusual-sounding ingredient does. Parents and people with stomach sensitivities especially want to know what’s in their food and how it was made. That’s fair. Most shoppers don’t want surprises in their lunch boxes or on their plates. The ordinary consumer should feel empowered to flip over a box, read that ingredient list, and decide what belongs on their family’s kitchen table.
Food science has given us amazing convenience, but there’s wisdom in pushing for simpler products and more openness about ingredients like sorbitan monopalmitate. Companies need to keep sharing studies and details in plain language. Regulators should continue to check and update their data. Education at the grocery shelf builds both trust and healthier choices, which benefits all of us.
Every trip to the supermarket introduces a few unfamiliar words on food labels. Sorbitan monopalmitate often comes up, especially on snacks, baked goods, and spreads. It's an additive with the purpose of binding oil and water together, preventing the dreaded separation in salad dressing or margarine.
Most folks just want to know one thing: is it really safe to eat? The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) both recognize sorbitan monopalmitate as safe for human consumption under current guidelines. EFSA’s most recent review, published in 2017, searched for risks but found no evidence of toxicity at levels commonly found in food. Regulators have capped daily intake far above what most diets provide.
Long ingredient names can sound intimidating, but that doesn’t automatically spell danger. In my own kitchen, I trust products based on scientific consensus because experts dig into a lot more details than most headlines. Sorbitan monopalmitate is made by combining sorbitol, a sugar alcohol from fruit, with fatty acids from natural oils. Companies have used it for over 70 years in familiar foods like creamy chocolate and bread.
It's been tested again and again for things like allergies, cancer links, or changes to organ health. No evidence ties reasonable, regulated consumption to any of these outcomes. My own family prefers products with simple, clear lists, and I’ve noticed many natural brands opt for similar emulsifiers.
Even though research gives sorbitan monopalmitate the green light, nobody can claim a 100% guarantee when it comes to food safety—every human body reacts a little differently. In rare cases, some individuals experience mild digestive discomfort from emulsifiers, especially when eating a lot of processed foods in one sitting. Those with sensitive stomachs or allergies should keep an eye on their own reactions.
In the bigger picture, ultra-processed foods tend to contain more than just sorbitan monopalmitate. While the emulsifier itself appears safe, eating a diet packed with processed items links to problems like obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. The trouble isn’t the additive alone—it’s the total package. I’ve always found that eating whole grains, fresh fruits and veggies, and less packaged food keeps my energy and mood steadier.
Food technology keeps evolving. Researchers keep a close watch on popular additives like sorbitan monopalmitate and update their advice as evidence grows. Consumers have more choices now, and the clean label trend pushes companies to rethink every ingredient. Some bread and spreads use alternatives like lecithin from sunflower or soy. For anyone aiming to limit all additives, cooking from scratch remains a solid route.
Curiosity about food is a good thing. Reading labels and understanding the role of each additive helps people make their own calls about what lands in their grocery cart. Listening to your body, reading credible sources, and talking with a registered dietitian can shape a safe, satisfying diet without unnecessary worry.
Shoppers pick up products, scan the label, and run into ingredients like sorbitan monopalmitate. A name like that barely hints at anything edible, let alone its origins. People who follow vegan or vegetarian diets don’t always have the luxury of assuming, for good reason. The uncertainty creates real barriers at the grocery store, and it pays to understand what’s inside that bread, chocolate, or plant-based margarine.
Sorbitan monopalmitate is an emulsifier made by combining sorbitol, a type of sugar alcohol, with palmitic acid. Sorbitol almost always comes from plant starches—corn, wheat, or potatoes. Palmitic acid is where things get tricky. Manufacturers can extract it from different sources, including both plants like palm oil and animal fat.
Most often, the food industry chooses palm oil. It’s a cheap, abundant source, and companies like keeping a consistent supply of raw materials. In Europe and North America, regulations require producers to disclose animal-based additives in products meant for vegetarians unless the source is plant-derived. That makes palm oil the popular choice. But not every country enforces clear labeling, and some food companies don’t disclose whether the palmitic acid in their products comes strictly from plants.
In theory, sorbitan monopalmitate can slide right into vegan diets—if it’s made from plant sources. No animal byproducts, no animal suffering, and it skips the environmental toll of raising livestock. In practice, though, the lack of transparency leaves plenty of room for doubt. Some manufacturers still rely on animal fats, especially in parts of the world where palm oil isn’t the most cost-effective source.
It’s not uncommon for companies to source from the cheapest supplier. For instance, some small-scale food manufacturers in regions with access to animal rendering plants may use animal-derived palmitic acid without labeling it as such. This creates a real challenge for shoppers who try to uphold vegan or vegetarian values. Past experiences have taught me to call or email food companies for a direct answer; sometimes I’ve found that even their quality control department isn’t sure.
Being vegan or vegetarian is rooted in trust—not just trust in labeling, but trust in systems that put honesty before profit. Many people I know spend hours researching, writing to customer service, and scanning ingredient databases. I’ve watched friends set products back on shelves for lack of clarity. Nobody wants to compromise on their ethics by accident.
Unfortunately, regulations around food labeling still lag behind the needs of this growing community. The plant-based movement attracts millions, and the demand for honesty grows stronger every year. According to the Plant Based Foods Association, the U.S. plant-based market hit over $8 billion in sales in 2022, with a third of American households now choosing plant-based options regularly. The pressure is mounting for consistent, reliable ingredient sourcing and full disclosure.
Food producers have the chance to lead by example. Vegan certification marks and clear statements about plant-based sourcing take the mystery out of shopping. More government oversight would mean less confusion for everyone trying to do the right thing. Until that happens, the best advice is to look for vegan logos and reach out to brands directly about sorbitan monopalmitate’s origin. Pushing for better standards protects not just vegans, but anyone who cares what goes into their food.
Sorbitan monopalmitate shows up on a lot of food labels, usually hiding in tiny print. It’s an emulsifier, often found in baked goods, desserts, chewing gum, and margarine. In kitchens and factories alike, it does the job of blending oil and water, keeping foods from separating and giving products their smooth feel. But even something so common raises questions—especially on safety and side effects, which deserve honest answers.
Curiosity about what goes into food keeps growing. Health-conscious folks want as few unwanted surprises as possible. Sorbitan monopalmitate, approved by food safety agencies like the FDA and EFSA for use in limited amounts, is no stranger to scrutiny. People wonder if its widespread use leads to health risks, be it now or in the future. That uncertainty often comes from its synthetic production, which makes people ask what happens once it’s inside the body.
Through research and years of consumption, serious side effects seem rare where sorbitan monopalmitate is used as intended. The most commonly discussed complaint relates to digestive upset. Some people—especially those sensitive to sugar alcohols or emulsifiers in general—report mild bloating or gas if they consume processed foods often. I’ve even noticed this myself after eating packaged snack cakes on road trips. The volume of emulsifiers in a single serving usually stays small, but eating lots of heavily processed foods can pile up these additives.
Allergic reactions almost never surface, but some individuals may develop skin rashes or itchiness due to sensitivities. One study in rodents showed increased liver size with excessive intake, but humans don’t come close to those lab levels in a regular diet. Both the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives and the European Food Safety Authority reviewed available data and set acceptable daily intake far above what most people would ever reach.
The bigger issue involves overall diet, not one single ingredient. A diet built on cakes, fast food, and processed snacks—packed with many types of emulsifiers and not just sorbitan monopalmitate—can hurt gut health, according to some animal studies published in journals like Nature. Long-term exposure to high levels might nudge the gut bacteria in ways that promote inflammation, but it’s tough to blame any one emulsifier, and real-world diets rarely provide enough to reach trouble zones.
Anyone concerned about food additives can limit exposure by cooking more from scratch, relying on whole foods and checking ingredient lists. Manufacturers could be more transparent by stating reasons for use and any source allergens, like palm oil. The science community keeps updating acceptable limits as new data arrives. Food regulators haven’t flagged this ingredient for everyday eaters, but people who react poorly to emulsifiers might want to keep a food diary. Knowledge, not panic, helps most—keeping an eye on patterns, tuning in to personal health, and balancing processed foods with fresh choices.
Products with sorbitan monopalmitate rarely cause issues for most people, though anyone with a sensitive gut knows their own limits. Progress means choosing foods that bring both enjoyment and ease of digestion—which often puts home-cooked meals and fresh snacks in the spotlight.
Shoppers stroll through the grocery store, filling carts with ice cream, bread, chocolate, or packaged snacks, often unaware of some mouthful words on those ingredient lists. Sorbitan Monopalmitate—sometimes shortened to E495—shows up in a surprising number of foods lining supermarket shelves. As someone who checks labels out of habit, I see this ingredient turn up again and again. So what foods actually include it, and why does it matter?
Ice cream often gets cited first because nearly every mainstream brand uses emulsifiers to keep that creamy texture, and Sorbitan Monopalmitate helps ensure the blend holds together through transport, storage, and multiple trips in and out of the freezer. It appears right along with other emulsifiers, making sure those ice crystals stay fine instead of turning into an icy mess.
Chocolate is another place to spot it. Many commercial chocolate bars and even baking chocolate use Sorbitan Monopalmitate to keep cocoa butter and cocoa solids from separating, especially during shipping and on warm days. Texture—smooth, not gritty or oily—matters quite a bit for chocolate, and this ingredient gives manufacturers that extra bit of control.
People may not expect to find Sorbitan Monopalmitate in bread, but factory-made loaves often use it along with other emulsifiers to keep slices soft. Over the years, bread in supermarkets has started to last longer in the pantry. Emulsifiers keep bread from going stale so quickly, which seems convenient until you think about how far that loaf traveled to reach the store.
Processed snacks, especially those with coatings or fillings, use Sorbitan Monopalmitate to keep ingredients from separating. Crackers with cheese filling, frosted toaster pastries, even some types of microwave popcorn rely on it.
Packaged foods aren’t the only sources. People may see Sorbitan Monopalmitate in margarines and spreads, dairy alternatives, creamers, and ready-to-drink beverages. Some nutritional supplements and even a few types of chewing gum include it, drawing from the same need to maintain consistent texture.
Sorbitan Monopalmitate has approval from major food safety agencies, with researched safe daily limits. Still, the fact that scientists and regulators keep a close eye on it reflects ongoing questions about consuming multiple emulsifiers regularly. Evidence shows some emulsifiers might affect gut bacteria or digestion, but the science continues to develop.
Checking food labels gives people useful information. Most of us grew up tossing food in the cart without reading fine print, but ingredients like Sorbitan Monopalmitate show why it pays to slow down. Swapping some packaged treats for simpler items—making bread at home, trying chocolate from smaller makers using basic ingredients, or keeping to plain ice cream—makes a difference.
A balanced diet has always come back to eating more whole foods, fewer things from boxes and bags. For families worried about what goes into their bodies, awareness stands out as the first step. Sorbitan Monopalmitate usually means a food has taken extra steps to stay soft, smooth, or shelf-stable. That hint offers shoppers a chance to rethink what lands in the cart.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 2-O-hexadecanoylsorbitan |
| Other names |
Sorbitan palmitate Span 40 |
| Pronunciation | /ˈsɔː.bɪ.tæn ˌmɒn.oʊˈpæl.mɪ.teɪt/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 2-O-palmitoylhexane-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexol |
| Other names |
Sorbitan palmitate Sorbitan monopalmitic acid ester Span 40 |
| Pronunciation | /ˈsɔːrbɪtæn mɒnəʊˈpæl.mɪ.teɪt/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | [26266-57-9] |
| Beilstein Reference | 3440722 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:5353 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2107848 |
| ChemSpider | 19621 |
| DrugBank | DB14042 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.127.168 |
| EC Number | E495 |
| Gmelin Reference | 217730 |
| KEGG | C17564 |
| MeSH | D013526 |
| PubChem CID | 10786 |
| RTECS number | WYU4000000 |
| UNII | YU19H48M64 |
| UN number | UN number: "UN1197 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID5051804 |
| CAS Number | 1338-39-2 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3761449 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53422 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL3582882 |
| ChemSpider | 151104 |
| DrugBank | DB11107 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.015.318 |
| EC Number | EC 204-015-5 |
| Gmelin Reference | 60755 |
| KEGG | C20739 |
| MeSH | D012804 |
| PubChem CID | 8588 |
| RTECS number | WL3430000 |
| UNII | P88FY92F3S |
| UN number | UN1197 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID3021323 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C22H42O6 |
| Molar mass | 430.62 g/mol |
| Appearance | Pale yellow to yellow waxy solid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.991 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 2.9 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | ~14.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 11.52 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -7.07e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.4520 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 1.98 D |
| Chemical formula | C22H42O6 |
| Molar mass | 430.62 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow to yellow-brown, oily liquid or semi-solid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.03 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 2.62 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Basicity (pKb) | 7.88 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -79.0e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.4540 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 2.12 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 751.3 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -18040 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -1884.7 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A20F0007 |
| ATC code | A05FA01 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. |
| GHS labelling | Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
| Precautionary statements | IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | > 220°C |
| Autoignition temperature | > 360°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): > 16,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 29,600 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | NJ01750 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 300 mg/kg |
| Main hazards | May cause mild skin and eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | No signal word |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
| Precautionary statements | IF INHALED: Remove person to fresh air and keep comfortable for breathing. IF ON SKIN: Wash with plenty of water. IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | > 225 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (rat, oral): > 36,400 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (oral, rat): > 16,000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | TR0266000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Sorbitan monostearate Sorbitan monooleate Sorbitan monolaurate Sorbitan trioleate Sorbitan tristearate |
| Related compounds |
Sorbitan monostearate Sorbitan monooleate Sorbitan monolaurate Polysorbate 40 Sorbitol |