Ponceau 4R developed its reputation in the mid-20th century as a cheap, accessible option for the food coloring industry. Early use followed a wave of synthetic dyes derived from coal tar, which turned food brighter but also drew public health concerns. Many early synthetic dyes disappeared after regulators worried about health impacts, but Ponceau 4R hung around for decades due to ease of production and bold coloring power. Food cultures everywhere made use of this red coloring, especially confectionery, drinks, and processed foods. Over time, regulatory reviews and updated toxicological data chipped away at universal acceptance, but its widespread adoption gave it deep roots.
Manufacturers favor Ponceau 4R for its robust red shade, especially where cost matters. Produced at scale, it colors sodas, candies, bakery items, dairy, and even some pharmaceuticals. Suppliers sell it as powders or granules, easy to dissolve in water or blend into recipes. At the grocery store, you may spot it as E124 in ingredient lists, a telltale sign of processed foods aiming for a rich red hue. While many European and Asian companies keep using it, the United States doesn’t permit Ponceau 4R in foods—a stark difference that confuses travelers and multinational brands alike.
Ponceau 4R gives off a deep cherry-red appearance, easily spotted in both dry and dissolved forms. It’s a synthetic azo dye, with the chemical formula C20H11N2Na3O10S3. The powder comes out as a bright red warmth, but not blinding like some modern pigment innovations. Chemists tend to highlight its solubility: you’ll see it dissolve quickly in water, which explains its popularity for syrups and drinks. Its stability shows up in commercial mixtures—it resists fading under most lighting and doesn’t break down easily in the presence of acids typically found in fruit drinks or soft sweet treats.
Labels usually call for E124 in Europe or list it as Ponceau 4R on packaging in other countries. Codex Alimentarius and local food safety agencies set upper concentration limits based on milligrams per kilogram, reflecting caution and concern about overuse. The food and cosmetics industries must stick to purity criteria—strict maximums for toxic heavy metals or other byproducts. Detailed labeling standards ask companies to highlight its presence, especially as some consumers look to avoid synthetic colorants because of perceived health risks or sensitivities.
Synthesizing Ponceau 4R means stringing together two or more aromatic organic molecules, building a complex structure with azo (–N=N–) links. The process often relies on diazotization of sulfonated aniline derivatives, followed by coupling reactions that generate the distinctive chromophore responsible for the trademark red color. Chemical engineers manage every step—from raw materials to purification—since minor changes in processing can affect dye quality, purity, and safety profile. Commercial manufacturers deploy batch reactors and work hard to manage effluent and waste streams, a challenge in the synthetic dye sector.
During storage and use, Ponceau 4R handles mild acidic or basic environments without fuss, showing off why food chemists keep returning to it. Under strong oxidizing conditions, the azo bonds can snap, leading to smaller aromatic amines, which is a big reason researchers worry about toxicity and potential links to allergic reactions. Some research efforts explore tweaking its molecular makeup—swapping out substituent groups or modifying sulfonation patterns—in attempts to decrease toxicity while maintaining color performance, but each change must pass tough scrutiny from regulators.
Ponceau 4R picks up a surprising number of alternate names across global markets. Some call it Cochineal Red A, while others write out its European number, E124. Chemistry catalogs may refer to it as C.I. 16255 (Color Index Number) or Acid Red 18. Several older pharmaceutical references mention it as Brilliant Scarlet 4R, and cosmetics users see similar aliases. Multinational companies spend time tracking these names as local laws change or consumer preferences shift.
Looking over the safety rules, it’s clear regulators put Ponceau 4R under the microscope. Maximum use levels are usually set well below any dose thought to cause health effects. Food and pharma manufacturers monitor not only final product concentrations but also the purity of bulk material. Factories invest in dust management and proper personal protective equipment for workers handling dye powders because of concerns over inhaled particulate matter. Global regulatory frameworks often require full batch traceability, so any safety incident can be traced back to its source.
Ponceau 4R finds its way into a wide set of consumer goods beyond food. It gives jams, jellies, yogurts, and fruit-flavored soft drinks a vivid appeal—parents and children both recognize the bright red tone in lollipops, dessert toppings, and popsicles. In the lab, scientists use Ponceau 4R for protein staining in electrophoresis because it binds well and produces clear visualization. Some pharmaceutical tablets and syrups contain the dye for branding or dose identification. A handful of cosmetic brands introduce it into lipsticks and eyeshadows, adding strong red shades that last longer than many natural pigments.
Scientists and food technologists keep studying Ponceau 4R’s interactions with food matrices and human biology. Many journals highlight molecular breakdown by intestinal flora, focusing on how azo bonds cleave into aromatic amines with potential health risks. Development teams, especially in Europe, test every new food formulation for migration, binding—sometimes re-formulating candies to comply with stricter rules around artificial dyes. Drug manufacturers run analytical studies to predict product shelf life and assess colorant stability. Universities keep publishing about alternative red pigments sourced from plants or microbes, but synthetic dyes have stayed competitive thanks to consistent hue and low cost.
Concerns about Ponceau 4R peak every few years as public debate heats up around synthetic dyes and attention-deficit or allergic reactions in children. Toxicology studies reported mild allergic responses and rare cases of pseudoallergic reactions, especially when combined with aspirin or other food additives. Long-term rodent studies gave mixed results, though most did not conclusively link the dye to cancer at regulatory-use levels. Toxicologists sound alarms about possible links with hyperactivity in children, fueling bans and labeling campaigns in the UK and elsewhere. Health authorities like the EFSA set rigorous intake limits based on the latest research, often lowering recommendations as more data arrives. In many countries, bans reflect a ‘better safe than sorry’ approach.
Industry trends suggest demand for synthetic dyes like Ponceau 4R continues shifting. As natural colorants gain ground—think beet juice, carmine, or anthocyanins from purple corn—manufacturers face tough tradeoffs: synthetic options cost less, behave predictably, and offer longer shelf lives, but lose cultural and regulatory support. If plant-based pigments reach similar price and performance, the artificial reds might fade from foods in favor of “clean label” movement priorities. For now, regions with risk-based oversight will likely keep Ponceau 4R on the shelves, albeit with tighter warning labels and ongoing pressure for toxicological research. Food innovation teams explore blends of natural and synthetic colors to satisfy taste, health, and visual appeal for ever-more conscious consumers.
A quick scan through labels on candies, cakes, and even some soft drinks uncovers a familiar name: Ponceau 4R. This vibrant red dye pops up nearly everywhere in the processed food aisle. Way back in the day, vibrant colors drew kids and adults alike to certain snacks. A striking shade of red sets off a strawberry yogurt or gives a jelly a brilliant finish. Food and drink makers lean on Ponceau 4R because it grabs attention, looks appetizing, and masks color shifts in products that sit on shelves for weeks or months.
I remember as a kid picking out the colorful candies, thinking the brightest ones had the best flavor. It turns out, that’s the magic of food chemistry at work. According to the European Food Safety Authority, Ponceau 4R appears in everything from desserts and jams to seasonings and canned vegetables. This synthetic dye even finds its way into medicines and cosmetics, working as an additive to create more appealing visuals or even to identify dosages based on color.
Safety debates swirl around artificial dyes, and Ponceau 4R isn’t exempt. While regulatory agencies such as the European Union set strict maximums for the amounts allowed in foods, scientific reviews have flagged potential risks. The biggest concern emerges for some individuals—especially children with sensitivity to additives. For some, Ponceau 4R may trigger intolerance reactions, including skin rashes or asthma-like symptoms. Studies link this additive, along with other artificial colors, to hyperactivity in certain children. The British journal The Lancet ran research that supports these concerns, which led food brands in the UK to reduce or replace artificial dyes from products popular with kids.
Other places, such as the United States, treat this additive a bit differently. Ponceau 4R never made it onto the FDA’s approved list for food colorings, leading to its absence in American grocery stores. In Europe, you’ll spot warning labels that read, “May have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children.” That’s not a label parents like to see. Many shoppers don’t realize the long-term effects may go unnoticed since reactions differ from person to person. Some may never notice a thing, while others can react after consuming just a small amount.
Real-world choices come down to reading ingredients lists and understanding where bright colors come from. Food brands should share, in plain language, not only what goes into foods but also what research says about their side effects. I always advocate for clear ingredient transparency. As consumers, we carry the responsibility to question why certain colors end up in food and whether it’s worth the risk just for a more vivid candy shell or a brighter jelly doughnut.
Natural colorings like beetroot red or paprika extract often serve as workable alternatives but can cost manufacturers more and change the taste or appearance of foods. I’ve seen some companies push into this territory anyway, eager to attract health-conscious shoppers. The shift away from artificial colors shows up in store-brand products and big-name snacks, yet some makers stick with synthetics to cut costs and reach wider markets.
Banning Ponceau 4R outright has stirred controversy, especially where traditional recipes or branding come into play. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Supporting research into food additives, standardizing clear labels, and encouraging companies to try natural coloring alternatives are steps that protect consumers. Parents juggling food sensitivities can call on schools and brands to ditch risky additives. Change starts from both sides—companies that listen, and shoppers who make informed choices. That’s how products get safer for everyone at the table.
People often don’t pay attention to food labels. Grocery shopping goes faster without worrying about chemical names. Ponceau 4R reveals itself on packages as a bright red artificial dye, marked as E124 in Europe. This color makes strawberry jelly candies, sodas, or even some cake mixes look tempting. It’s easy to see why companies like this additive. Food just jumps out when it wears a bright coat.
Scientists started using synthetic dyes like Ponceau 4R in the early 20th century. Natural colors didn’t always survive the trip from factory to shelf. Synthetic colors gave reliable results. But attractive, long-lasting color often comes with a price. Researchers have been studying these ingredients for decades, looking for any signs of harm.
Over the years, some studies raised concern about artificial reds in food. Researchers often check for cancer links or problems with children's behavior. Allura Red (E129), Sunset Yellow (E110), and Ponceau 4R went under the microscope. Some research in the late 1970s and ‘80s pointed to connections between artificial colorings and hyperactivity in kids. The famous Southampton study out of the UK gave parents headaches and drove lawmakers to rethink food additives. In that mix, Ponceau 4R got flagged.
For cancer risks, animal tests at much higher doses than humans would normally eat showed a small link to tumors. That's why the International Agency for Research on Cancer put Ponceau 4R in a lower risk category—not exactly harmless, but not a full-blown red flag either.
Europe’s safety watchdog, EFSA, reviewed the scientific evidence and set a daily limit. They say 0.7 milligrams per kilogram of body weight each day won’t hurt most people. Locally, the UK and Norway prefer to steer clear, and some food companies dodge it to avoid customer worry. The US Food and Drug Administration doesn’t allow Ponceau 4R in American foods, so shoppers in the States see Red 40 instead.
Living with kids who once tore through party packs of artificially-colored candy, I watched the sugar rush and the post-snack chaos. Some countries now demand warning labels on food with certain colors, including Ponceau 4R, telling parents about possible behavior changes. Warnings help, but families rarely weigh every gram eaten—especially during busy days.
People often shrug at these topics, thinking “just a little won’t hurt.” That might be true for most. The big question is: how often does “a little” add up? Anyone with allergies, asthma, or sensitivity probably already avoids synthetic dyes. For children, unknown sensitivities can trigger unexpected reactions, and those run from skin rashes to hyperactivity.
Choices about food colorings depend on taste, trust, and personal health. Brands are already switching to beet juice, paprika, or other plant extracts in many places. Reading labels can be a pain, but for those who care about long-term health—especially for children—looking past the color and asking what’s inside makes sense. Overall, food safety often means not taking every bright color at face value.
Ponceau 4R, also labeled as E124, shows up in all sorts of colorful foods. You’ll spot it most often in products meant to look bright and fun. Walk down the candy aisle—chewy fruit-flavored sweets, jelly beans, licorice twists, marshmallows, and lollipops all rely on synthetic dyes like this one to catch attention. At a birthday party, that bright red icing on cupcakes almost certainly contains Ponceau 4R if the label lists “artificial color” or points to E124.
Pre-packaged snack cakes and pastries count on synthetic reds like this to signal “strawberry,” “raspberry,” or “cherry” flavor. Cheaper brands of jams, gelatins, and dessert mixes often skip actual berries, making up for it with strong colorants. Boxed strawberry-flavored pudding or instant dessert powders depend on this additive. That cheap sorbet pint glowing pink and that sherbet at the corner shop both frequently turn to Ponceau 4R as a go-to coloring.
Supermarkets stock sodas, sports drinks, and pre-mixed cocktail juices spiked with artificial reds. Some flavored milks, strawberry yogurts, and pink ice creams use E124, especially if they’re geared toward kids. In the European Union and parts of Asia, you’ll sometimes see it in preserved fruits, jarred cherries, and canned red fruit cocktails. Synthetic coloring feels like an afterthought, but it defines the look and appeal of sauces and condiments too. That bottle of sweet-and-sour sauce with an eye-popping red hue, some brands of chili sauce, tandoori paste, and pickled vegetables may use Ponceau 4R. Check the ingredients: you’ll find it in some gravy granules and instant noodle flavoring packets meant to replicate spicy or tomato-based dishes.
Fish processors often dip smoked haddock and trout in dyes to boost their market value. In this segment, a bright reddish appearance gets a thumbs-up from shoppers—haddock in the UK, for example, often relies on E124 for its color appeal. Certain cheeses aimed at the market that prefers a pinkish-orange tint sometimes use it too.
Most people won’t spot “Ponceau 4R” on a label unless they’re looking for it. Ingredients lists typically include “E124,” “artificial color,” or “cochineal red A.” Laws around labeling do differ. In the UK and EU, regulations call for a warning on foods containing this dye if targeted to children. Adverse reactions, such as allergies and asthma symptoms, pop up in some sensitive folks, and studies keep the debate going about possible links to hyperactivity in kids. Large-scale health reviews—like the one from the European Food Safety Authority—set acceptable limits for daily intake. Japan and the United States generally avoid using Ponceau 4R, so its presence stays limited in those food systems.
Looking at my own life, cutting down on artificial colors came after my son had a string of hyperactivity flares following birthday parties and holiday candy. We started checking labels carefully, shifting toward natural food colors and basic snacks. For families wanting to dodge synthetic dyes, that sort of vigilance at the supermarket helps. Reading “E-numbers” or watching for “artificial coloring” makes a difference. Natural alternatives like beetroot red, paprika, or elderberry extract bring color without the health questions that come with additives like Ponceau 4R.
Studies prove that people trust food that’s easy to understand, both on the plate and on the label. It’s tough to resist the flashy look of red candy or strawberry yogurt, but those labels hold the truth about what’s inside. Choosing whole fruit, unprocessed snacks, or foods with visible ingredient lists helps families avoid synthetic dyes. Food companies can answer concerns by offering products colored with plant-based ingredients and clearer labeling, making the shopping trip just a bit simpler for everyone who wants transparency at the table.
Ponceau 4R, known to many as E124, colors drinks, strawberry desserts, sauces, and candies with that signature red tone people associate with “fruit” flavors. It’s been a staple in food processing for decades, especially in parts of Europe, Asia, and Africa. Not everyone recognizes that this red coloring is made from synthetic ingredients, not from strawberries or cherries.
Reports show some folks react to Ponceau 4R in ways that go beyond taste or color. For kids, studies link this dye to hyperactivity and attention problems, especially in those with a predisposition. In 2007, Southampton University researchers performed a well-known study finding that certain artificial colors, including Ponceau 4R, may increase hyperactive behavior in children. This work led the European Food Safety Authority to recommend warning labels and rethink allowable levels in foods targeted at children.
Allergic reactions, though not common, can affect folks with an aspirin sensitivity or with certain metabolic issues. Reactions include skin rashes, hives, and in more serious cases, asthma-like symptoms. I once saw a friend break out in hives after eating a vivid red jelly, only to later find out she reacts to this food dye. These physical reminders stick much longer than the flavor that brought the initial joy.
No scientific body has proved that Ponceau 4R in low food-levels causes cancer. Still, a few rodent studies suggest there could be long-term risk if consumed in large amounts. Regulators like the European Food Safety Authority and US Food and Drug Administration have set strict limits well below those levels, erring on the side of caution. In the U.S., this color isn't used as commonly as in Europe, but the same safety thresholds apply.
Even after all these years, clarity around food additives lags behind public expectations. Labels don’t always explain where the color in a food comes from, or that synthetic dyes have a different risk profile than those squeezed from fruits or veggies. Most shoppers do not recognize “E124” or “Ponceau 4R” as anything meaningful. It takes active searching or a food allergy to start reading ingredients lists with an eagle eye. Transparency from food producers stands as one important fix, so parents know exactly what ends up in school lunches and snacks.
In many kitchens, replacing Ponceau 4R with safer or more naturally sourced colors costs more and changes the product’s look. Some companies use beetroot, paprika, or elderberry instead. These don’t bring the same neon hue, but consumers seeking a gentler choice appreciate the difference. Anecdotally, shifting households notice calmness in some sensitive children once artificial colors get removed. While this observation is personal, it echoes what population studies suggest about diet and child behavior.
Each time someone fills up a cart, votes get cast for what’s acceptable in food. Speaking as a parent, keeping snacks simple and skipping over the unnatural reds brings peace of mind. When enough families pay attention and ask food makers to take a better route, companies listen. Until governments and brands do a better job with clear information and healthier options, that’s the muscle every shopper can flex.
Ponceau 4R, also called E124, gives foods like candy, jams, and drinks that familiar bright red shade. It’s common enough that shoppers often eat it without even noticing. But behind that colorful splash lies a debate worth talking about. I remember reading ingredients on my daughter’s favorite gummies and spotting E124. Curiosity led me to dig into what makes this colorant so controversial across borders.
Rules on food colors often reflect different priorities, and Ponceau 4R stands as a perfect example. The European Food Safety Authority gives E124 a green light at levels up to 0.7 mg per kg of body weight per day. Australia and New Zealand also allow its use. It’s not the same story elsewhere. In the United States, the FDA does not permit Ponceau 4R in food. Out of curiosity, I checked Canada’s food code and found the same: no approval. This split reflects real differences in how regulators balance risks and benefits.
This dye’s safety debate grew from concerns about allergies and links to hyperactivity in children. Some older studies pointed to reactions ranging from hives to asthma, especially in people sensitive to aspirin. More recently, research raised questions about connections between synthetic dyes—Ponceau 4R included—and attention difficulties in kids. The famous Southampton Study in the UK fueled debate, and I saw several schools around me encouraging parents to limit these colors after those headlines.
Not every parent or consumer has time to check regulatory lists or read scientific papers before grocery shopping. I found myself relying on simple habits, like flipping packages over for the ingredient list and paying attention to E-numbers. In Europe, candy bags or soft drinks featuring Ponceau 4R must sometimes carry a warning: “may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children.” Seeing a warning label hits differently than just seeing a number buried among polysyllabic ingredients. For many, that’s the nudge to weigh if a food is a treat now and then, rather than an everyday snack.
More families have started looking for foods colored with beetroot, paprika, or carrot extracts instead of relying on synthetic dyes. Several manufacturers already switched their recipes in response to this rising interest in natural ingredients and fewer E-numbers. It’s not only a business decision—using alternatives brings peace of mind for parents aiming to avoid certain additives. But not every food can keep its signature shade with natural colors, so there’s a tradeoff around cost and the final look of products.
Any parent, teacher, or consumer wants to protect kids from unnecessary risks. Governments keep updating food laws as new science comes out, but information travels slowly. There’s a strong case for clearer labeling everywhere, not only in countries requiring warnings. Clear information helps families make choices in line with their values and health goals. I’ve learned to ask questions and look past marketing slogans, and I hope more shoppers do the same—red sweets included.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Trisodium 2-hydroxy-1-(4-sulfonato-1-naphthylazo)naphthalene-6,8-disulfonate |
| Other names |
Cochineal Red A Acid Red 18 Food Red 7 CI 16255 Brilliant Scarlet 3R New Coccine Carmoisine |
| Pronunciation | /ˈpɒns.oʊ fɔːr ɑːr/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Trisodium 2-hydroxy-1-(4-sulfonato-1-naphthylazo)naphthalene-6,8-disulfonate |
| Other names |
Brilliant Scarlet 3R Cochineal Red A C.I. 16255 New Coccine Acid Red 18 Food Red 7 Scarlet GN E124 |
| Pronunciation | /ˈpɒnsoʊ fɔːr ɑːr/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 2611-82-7 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1908228 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:16230 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1742759 |
| ChemSpider | 21120 |
| DrugBank | DB13451 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.025.785 |
| EC Number | E 124 |
| Gmelin Reference | 85938 |
| KEGG | C18635 |
| MeSH | D017363 |
| PubChem CID | 16218729 |
| RTECS number | BZ8882000 |
| UNII | D8M05JCZ4W |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| CAS Number | 2611-82-7 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1901241 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:16230 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL395784 |
| ChemSpider | 14131 |
| DrugBank | DB13912 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.025.477 |
| EC Number | E129 |
| Gmelin Reference | 787 |
| KEGG | C15985 |
| MeSH | D011038 |
| PubChem CID | 16218738 |
| RTECS number | GN4496000 |
| UNII | 6HZD6PDZ9Z |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C20H11N2Na3O10S3 |
| Molar mass | 604.47 g/mol |
| Appearance | Red powder or granules |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.61 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble |
| log P | -2.8 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 1.8 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 11.23 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.34 |
| Viscosity | Viscosity (20°C): 10-40 mPa.s |
| Dipole moment | 3.38 D |
| Chemical formula | C20H11N2Na3O10S3 |
| Molar mass | 496.42 g/mol |
| Appearance | Red powder or granules |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.86 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | Soluble |
| log P | -2.8 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 7.1 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 1.86 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.353 |
| Viscosity | 2-10 cP (20°C, 20% in water) |
| Dipole moment | 9.67 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 309.0 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -758.6 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -2384 kJ/mol |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 298 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -3625 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | V04CB01 |
| ATC code | JECFA食品添加剂(INS 124) |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause allergic reactions; suspected carcinogen; may cause adverse effects on activity and attention in children. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H317, H319 |
| Precautionary statements | H317, H319, P261, P272, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P333+P313, P337+P313, P362+P364 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-0-0 |
| Flash point | > 100 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat 10,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | 96 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | Not listed |
| PEL (Permissible) | 200 mg/kg |
| REL (Recommended) | 300 mg/kg |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Main hazards | May cause allergic reactions, particularly in individuals sensitive to salicylates; may cause asthma or hyperactivity in susceptible individuals. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H319: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: P261, P272, P280, P305+P351+P338, P304+P340, P312, P337+P313 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-0-0 |
| Flash point | > 215.7 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | > 400 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat 10 g/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | 25,900 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| PEL (Permissible) | 200 mg/kg |
| REL (Recommended) | 300 mg/kg |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Allura Red AC Amaranth Carmoisine Erythrosine Sunset Yellow FCF Tartrazine |
| Related compounds |
Amaranth (dye) Allura Red AC Azorubine Carmoisine Erythrosine Sunset Yellow FCF |