Polysorbate 80 has roots going back to the creative days of synthetic surfactant research in the twentieth century. The early chemical industry searched for agents to handle emulsification and solubilization, especially for food and pharmaceutical needs. Chemists managed to develop compounds from sorbitol and esterified fatty acids and started creating what we now call polysorbates. Over decades, the use grew beyond pharmacies to foods, personal care, and vaccines. Scientists and regulators watched its adoption in major regulated markets, steering research and standards for safety and efficacy. That long arc shaped polysorbate 80's reputation as a reliable emulsifier, building a history of episodes where safety, formulation, and industry trust played important roles in expanding its application.
Polysorbate 80 belongs to a family of nonionic surfactants created from the combination of ethoxylated sorbitan with oleic acid. Its commercial variety carries the chemical signature of polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate. A pale yellow, viscous liquid in its common presentation, it shows characteristic solubility in water and various organics. Producers and users see in this product an option that manages the greases, oils, and waters that tend to separate if left unaided. For decades, factories, laboratories, and kitchens have used it for bringing together ingredients that wouldn't otherwise cohabit. Its role often turns silent but critical in end products that demand a stable mixture, soft mouthfeel, or safe delivery of active compounds.
Polysorbate 80's feel lies somewhere between syrup and light oil. Its molecular weight sits close to 1300 g/mol, a value that points to the chain length and the process used to make it. It offers hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) values around 15, a detail important for those who need oil-in-water emulsification. Water and alcohol accept it gladly, whereas mineral oils and vegetable oils treat it as a compatible cousin. Its chemical structure includes repeating ethylene oxide units tied to sorbitan, creating a multifunctional surface-active molecule. Manufacturers analyze physical characteristics like acid value, saponification value, and hydroxyl value to ensure product specifications hold tight batch after batch.
Tight industry controls call for listed specifications. Food-grade and pharmaceutical-grade polysorbate 80 bring requirements such as purity above 98%, low heavy metal content, low acid and saponification numbers, and transparency to the source of fatty acids. Labeling rules demand the use of specific International Nomenclature (INCI) or European or United States Pharmacopeia standards. Trade regulations push for descriptions of function—usually emulsifier, solubilizer, dispersant, sometimes stabilizer. Anyone who works with it must know the difference between technical, food, and pharmaceutical grades since interchange can put safety at risk or run afoul of traceability audits.
Factories make polysorbate 80 through a two-step process. Chemists first react sorbitol with ethylene oxide, producing a polyoxyethylene sorbitan backbone. This backbone then undergoes esterification with oleic acid—commonly from vegetable sources like olive or soybean oil. Batch or continuous reactors adjust conditions to control chain length, ratio of ethylene oxide units, and degree of esterification. Downstream, the crude product faces multiple purifications: washing, decolorizing, filtration, and final vacuum drying. Each step matters for removing impurities and meeting purity specs essential in food and pharma contexts. The process still leaves a product that reflects variable natural inputs, so quality assurance never ends.
Polysorbate 80 reacts in mild conditions as a nonionic surfactant. Its chemical core resists strong acids and bases, a quality that preserves integrity in many formulas. Under harsh hydrolysis, especially with strong base, fatty acid esters break apart, leaving polyoxyethylene sorbitan and free oleic acid. Oxidative conditions can attack unsaturated bonds on the fatty chain, so storage in light and air must be controlled. Chemists occasionally modify polysorbate 80 for specialty uses, tweaking the degree of ethoxylation or changing the fatty acid involved. Such tailoring aims for performance in targeted applications—sometime for faster emulsification in lotions, other times for more predictable behavior in drugs. These changes show how small shifts at the molecular level ripple into performance differences that affect consumer experience on a daily basis.
The chemical world loves a surplus of names, and polysorbate 80 proves the rule. Its most formal name is polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate, but users often just say Tween 80, especially in lab settings. Regulatory documents and international sales call it E433, a number assigned in the European Union food additive code. In pharmacopoeias, it may read as Sorbitan mono-9-octadecenoate, poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl) derivatives, or go by defined numerical identifiers such as CAS 9005-65-6. Recognizing its synonyms makes a difference in global trade, to avoid mistakes in documentation and harmonize buying, selling, and regulatory clearance.
Safety underpins every industrial and consumer application of polysorbate 80. Regulatory agencies such as the FDA, EFSA, and WHO issue detailed limits for intake and use. Factory safety focuses on skin and eye contact—direct exposure may cause mild irritation in concentrated form. Manufacturers provide PPE guidance, proper storage, and limits for worker exposure. Product specs for pharmaceutical use include endotoxin limits and absence of harmful degradation products. Production lines often conduct batch release testing for microbial contamination and chemical purity. In research settings, awareness of impurities, especially those from starting materials, gets close attention because of links to rare allergic reactions and inflammatory responses in sensitive populations.
Polysorbate 80 works in areas most people interact with daily, usually without noticing. Its best-known job comes in ice cream, where it stabilizes fat molecules and prevents gritty textures. Salad dressings, coffee whiteners, and many processed foods list it quietly as an E-number ingredient that keeps oil and water together. The pharmaceutical sector relies on it for injectable drugs, vaccines, and oral liquids, helping dissolve otherwise insoluble drugs and ensuring homogenous delivery. Cosmetic companies use it in creams, lotions, and shampoos to produce consistent feel and shine. Biotech research depends on it for cell culture, enzyme stabilization, and protein extraction. Veterinary science, paint, textiles, and even photographic processes grab it for similar reasons. Every field that tackles mixtures with incompatible phases finds practical help in polysorbate 80.
Research into polysorbate 80 doesn’t just sit on shelf studies. Scientists explore how trace impurities affect highly sensitive biological formulations, especially biologic drugs prone to forming particles if exposed to oxidized surfactant. Analytical chemists push for new detection methods to quantify degradation products, hoping to set even stricter specs for injectable medicines. Green chemistry efforts keep looking for ways to make polysorbate 80 from renewable sources, perhaps with improved biodegradability. Formulation scientists in food and pharma continue to test combinations with other surfactants to beat old problems like creaming, phase separation, or poor drug absorption. Regulatory science investigates allergenic potential, especially in populations with chronic exposure—like those on parenteral nutrition or with rare immunoallergic predispositions. The research focus shows no sign of fading, as complex new products keep stretching the boundaries of what surfactants must do.
In decades of toxicological study, polysorbate 80 generally yields results showing low inherent toxicity at dietary and therapeutic use levels. Rodent studies at high dosages (often above practical human exposures) show limited systemic toxicity. In practical food and pharmaceutical exposures, most independent reviews point to its relative safety. Questions linger about rare hypersensitivity reactions, especially with repeated injections or high concentration formulas, prompting continued vigilance in formulation settings. Some older studies pointed to possible adverse reproductive effects in animals, but regulatory reviews account for study flaws and tend not to raise alarm at relevant dosages. Safety margins for humans remain wide, but the drive for transparency pushes research into impurities, long-term exposure, and the possible role in rare adverse responses.
Demand for clean-label products and more natural ingredients challenges polysorbate 80 to either justify its continued use or morph into a “greener” equivalent. Some food producers already search for alternatives from lecithin or saponins, especially where consumers distrust long chemical names. In pharma and biotech, reliance on polysorbate 80 may shift toward next-generation surfactants designed to resist oxidation, slow aggregation, and offer lower toxicity after years in storage. Ongoing advances in analytical detection will likely drive even tighter specs, pushing both bulk manufacturers and formulators to control impurities. Industry shifts toward sustainability put pressure on chemical supply chains to map sources and eliminate palm oil and petroleum derivatives where possible. Despite the changes, its range and versatility mean polysorbate 80 stands likely to remain useful for many industries as a backbone excipient for modern manufacturing—unless a truly superior alternative steps in.
Walk down any grocery store and chances are you’ll spot Polysorbate 80 in the tiny print on the back of a carton or bottle. This ingredient steps in when food makers try to mix oil and water. Salad dressings, ice cream, coffee creamers—if it looks creamy and doesn’t separate on the shelf, Polysorbate 80 is likely helping out. It’s known for keeping mixtures smooth, so you don’t end up with clumps or separated layers.
Pharmaceutical shelves make big use of Polysorbate 80. Folks who’ve ever needed a vaccine or picked up liquid medicine have probably had a taste of this emulsifier. Vaccine developers add it to spread the active ingredients evenly through the liquid, making sure every shot delivers the right dose. In IV medications, it carries drugs through the body’s waters without letting them clump up.
Shampoos, lotions, and makeup use Polysorbate 80 to merge oils and water. So those face creams glide on smoothly instead of leaving a greasy streak. The bottles on my bathroom shelf all use it for exactly that reason—it keeps products looking and feeling the same day after day. This is more than cosmetic; it’s about skin health and comfort.
Plenty of people spot chemical-sounding names and get nervous about eating them. I used to feel the same, so I dug around in studies and government reviews. The FDA and European Food Safety Authority both allow Polysorbate 80 in foods and drugs. Researchers who track health effects have found it’s safe to consume in low amounts, and the body handles it pretty well. Over the years, a few studies have looked at gut bacteria and high-dose effects, but the routine levels in food or medicine don’t seem to create problems for healthy folks, according to recent reports.
I think it matters to keep an eye out for any new scientific findings. Our health stands to gain from honest questions about food ingredients. If you live with a condition that makes you sensitive to emulsifiers or food additives, reading labels and talking with a doctor makes sense.
Some critics want fewer additives in their meals. Food companies have started shifting recipes, and that trend is worth attention. I like seeing shorter ingredient lists, and many people feel more comfortable knowing what’s in their food. A practical step for anyone concerned about emulsifiers is to stick with fresh or minimally processed foods. Cutting back on packaged snacks and frozen desserts will naturally lower Polysorbate 80 in your routine.
If you don’t see any gut trouble or allergic reactions, there’s not much evidence to worry about moderate amounts. Science doesn’t rest, though, and bigger, longer-term studies on how modern food additives interact with our health could help clear up today’s questions.
As the world’s food habits keep changing, so does demand for clean labels and safer ingredients. Polysorbate 80 plays a role now, and honest conversation about its use and safety isn’t going away. I support clearer labeling, open science, and plenty of choices at the store. That way, everyone can decide what works for their health and peace of mind.
Just about anyone who’s eaten ice cream or salad dressing has probably tasted polysorbate 80. It pops up in all sorts of packaged foods. Bakers use it to keep bread spongy. Dairy companies use it to help milk and cream blend smoothly without separating. Druggists put it in medicines and some vaccines so ingredients mix properly. On ingredient lists, it goes by the name “emulsifier” or its number, E433.
Health watchdogs keep a close eye on food additives. Since the 1950s, researchers and regulators have dug into the safety profile of polysorbate 80. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration calls it “generally recognized as safe” for use in food at specific amounts. The European Food Safety Authority reviewed it again in 2018 and found nothing alarming about average daily intake.
Lab tests in rodents, using amounts far higher than a person would ever eat, did not show signs of cancer, birth defects, or immediate toxicity. Toxicologists haven’t found strong evidence of harm at the levels eaten in an everyday diet.
People have worried about possible links between food additives and health problems. Some studies with lab animals showed that very high doses of emulsifiers, including polysorbate 80, might disrupt gut bacteria or trigger mild changes in the guts of mice. But animal guts are not human ones. Those studies used levels much higher than what’s found in real food.
Doctors also keep an eye on kids or adults with sensitive immune systems. There are reports of rare allergic reactions, but these are so uncommon they almost never come up in population-wide food safety reviews. Most folks eat foods with polysorbate 80 for decades with no sign of harm, but for people with gut conditions or a history of reactions, cautious label reading can make sense.
For people who spend a lot of time in supermarkets or on meal planning, ingredient lists give a glimpse into what goes into food. Seeing long lists of unfamiliar names can be unsettling. That worry often comes from not knowing what those things do or how they’re regulated.
No one really needs a steady diet of packaged foods. Most nutritionists say a varied diet with mostly whole foods supports stronger health than one loaded with processed snacks, regardless of the particular emulsifiers inside them. The best approach is picking up knowledge about what goes into food, scanning labels when allergies or sensitivities are a concern, and remembering that the dose makes the poison. Even water can harm in huge amounts.
I think it helps to keep a critical but calm eye on science. For folks who feel unsure, talking with a dietitian or doctor who understands food chemistry goes a long way. Many of us now ask food companies to use simpler ingredients. Food makers have heard the message, and some brands already steer away from additives when they can.
If solid new research points toward risks, large health agencies can update rules easily. Until then, the choice rests with us. Reading up on food, enjoying meals packed with plants, and watching those recommendations is a practical way to put health first.
Polysorbate 80 shows up in a surprising number of things we use daily—ice cream, vaccines, salad dressings, eye drops. The name sounds intimidating, but it works as an emulsifier, helping oil and water mix. Most people have eaten or injected small amounts of it many times without ever noticing. Used properly, it keeps products stable and does not change their taste or effectiveness. Still, questions keep coming up about safety, especially since some people worry about artificial-sounding chemicals in anything they eat or inject.
Safety agencies like the FDA and the European Food Safety Authority have reviewed polysorbate 80 over and over. They continue to call it generally safe for humans at low doses. Research backs this up. People with allergies rarely react, unless they're already hypersensitive to ingredients related to sorbitan or polyethoxylated compounds, but that's rare. Swallowing moderate amounts in food did not raise health alarms—even during studies looking for long-term effects.
Here’s where facts matter. Sometimes, people receive vaccines or medications that include polysorbate 80, and they worry about allergic reactions. Large-scale vaccine rollouts, like recent COVID-19 shots, made a few people question side effects. Scientists tracked reactions carefully. Out of millions, only a tiny handful had true allergic responses. Most symptoms—arm pain, mild rash, itchiness—actually related to the medicine, not the emulsifier. Severe allergies do happen, but almost always among people with a track record of reacting to many drugs or food additives.
A few animal studies suggested polysorbate 80 could irritate the gut. In mice, large amounts increased gut permeability, sometimes referred to as “leaky gut.” People with inflammatory bowel diseases, such as Crohn’s or ulcerative colitis, told doctors they wonder if food additives contribute to their flare-ups. Scientific reviews found no clear proof that the amounts in human diets cause these effects. Still, research keeps digging, since people eat processed foods more than ever before. Out of caution, some health professionals suggest people with preexisting gut conditions cut back on processed foods, but not because of scary proof against polysorbate 80 itself.
As a parent, I notice more parents reading food labels, sometimes putting things back on the shelf once they see a long ingredient list. Food companies hear this, and some work to use less artificial-sounding ingredients as a selling point. For some recipes, plant-based gums or lecithin might offer alternative ways to keep food textures smooth. In medicine, though, finding an easy swap that guarantees safe injection, long shelf life, and no new allergy risk isn’t always possible. Testing new ingredients takes years, and sometimes, the alternatives have their own risks.
Most doctors recommend people check with their primary care provider before avoiding ingredients found in regulated foods or medicines. Patients with long lists of allergies deserve a careful look at everything in their prescriptions. What works for one person may not be needed for the next, so personal history matters. In hospitals, teams track unexpected reactions closely and record them to help researchers and public health agencies spot trends quickly.
Staying informed makes sense. Ingredient safety reviews change as science learns more. Companies and regulators usually adapt faster when everyday people ask tough but honest questions. If you think you have reacted to a food or injection, write down what happened and talk directly with a doctor or pharmacist. Transparency and open dialogue move real safety forward faster than online rumor ever will.
Polysorbate 80 crops up in countless foods, medicines, and beauty products. This slick-sounding ingredient works as an emulsifier—basically helping oil and water stick together, making your ice cream creamy and your salad dressing smooth. The question about where it comes from, though, still leaves many confused. Some folks worry about animal origins—especially vegans, vegetarians, and those with dietary restrictions rooted in faith or allergies. Others look for information about plant-based alternatives because they want more transparency about what they consume.
The source of Polysorbate 80 depends mainly on the origins of one key component: sorbitol. This sugar alcohol typically starts with corn syrup, a plant-based material. The fatty acids that link with sorbitol and ethylene oxide during production often come from vegetable oils like coconut or palm, though they can, in rare cases, originate from animal fats. Many big manufacturers now rely on plant sources to keep up with demand from food and pharma companies that serve all kinds of diets.
Standing in a grocery store aisle, I’ve studied ingredient lists for ages, wishing companies would spell it out—plant-based or animal-based. Unfortunately, most packaging sticks to the generic “Polysorbate 80,” and companies rarely specify the animal or vegetable source. That gap creates trust issues. Shoppers want clear facts, and it shouldn’t take a biochemistry degree to figure out if a lipstick, capsule, or cupcake fits someone’s vegan lifestyle.
Food certification groups have pushed to change that, requesting supply chain audits or third-party verifications before awarding vegan or kosher stamps. This works for bigger brands that want to show off their credentials, but I’ve seen plenty of no-name brands skate by, quietly using whatever base material they can source inexpensively. There’s no federal rule in the U.S. to force disclosure. The result: customers often resort to emailing or calling companies for straight answers.
People avoid animal by-products for a lot of reasons. Some want to protect animal welfare, some follow religious guidelines. Others need to dodge allergens linked to animal derivatives, and a few worry about ethical concerns surrounding global palm oil production. Transparency in sourcing helps people vote with their dollar, a principle that keeps companies honest and opens up more plant-based options.
Major suppliers have started providing plant-only versions of Polysorbate 80, often certified by organizations like the Vegan Society or Orthodox Union. Brands paying attention have begun labeling accordingly—sometimes highlighting “vegan-friendly” on the box. Short-term, companies can push for third-party certifications and update packaging for easy reading. Long-term, government action would help. Official labeling requirements and regular inspections encourage consistency and stop confusion at the source.
Real change only comes from pressure and knowing your options. I’ve gotten used to sending a quick email or checking with advocacy groups before putting something new in my cart. If more people start asking, manufacturers start listening. The supply chain gets cleaner and labeling gets clearer—not just for Polysorbate 80, but for everything else hiding in tiny print.
Walk down the aisle of almost any pharmacy or grocery store, and you’ll spot plenty of products—foods, creams, vaccines—listing Polysorbate 80. This ingredient helps mix oil and water, which sounds simple, but there’s more to think about, especially for people with allergies. I remember reading labels with my mother as a kid because of her food allergies. Each long, tricky ingredient caught our attention, especially those that didn’t look like food.
Polysorbate 80 starts as sorbitol (a sugar alcohol from fruits), then gets mixed with plant-based fatty acids, usually from oils like coconut or palm. Once it hits shelves, it doesn’t look anything like the original ingredients. For most folks, it doesn’t cause any problems. It isn’t a common allergen like peanuts, milk, or wheat. Still, stories circulate about hives or swelling after exposure, raising concerns.
Science tells a different story. Research, such as studies looking at vaccine ingredients, rarely finds evidence of Polysorbate 80 itself causing allergic reactions in people with food allergies. Most reported issues seem connected to reactions to tiny leftover proteins from the source plant oils. The risk seems lowest in refined products, but for someone who had a severe allergy attack before, even a “rare chance” feels personal.
Allergy risk with Polysorbate 80 isn’t equal for everyone. People with a history of anaphylaxis from injected medicines or vaccines have rung alarm bells, especially if they’ve reacted to another similar compound called polyethylene glycol (PEG). Both are part of the same chemical family, so if a doctor ever flagged PEG as dangerous for you, talk about it before using something with Polysorbate 80.
In my own work with patients, the real risks come out in direct face-to-face conversations. Reading about a rare reaction is one thing. Watching a loved one have trouble breathing after exposure—that changes how you see every ingredient on a package.
The best advice comes from medical specialists who’ve seen these reactions up close. If you know you have a severe allergy—especially to ingredients produced using soy, peanuts, or tree nuts—it’s worth asking your doctor if hidden traces in Polysorbate 80 worry them. For example, the FDA does not require allergy warnings for this ingredient, but not every company can guarantee zero trace contamination.
Talk openly with healthcare providers before vaccinations or starting a new medicine or cream, especially if you’ve reacted badly to other injectables. Keep a list of known allergies in your phone. If you’ve had a serious reaction in the past, consider carrying an epinephrine auto-injector and wear a medical alert bracelet.
Staying safe means getting clear answers and knowing how to read labels. If you ever react to a product containing Polysorbate 80, contact an allergist for testing. Companies like to say their products are hypoallergenic, but only you and your doctor truly know your risk. I tell loved ones—and patients—to trust their gut, do research, and never feel embarrassed to ask what’s actually inside what they’re using or eating.
Science moves forward, but nothing beats a cautious eye and an honest conversation with someone who’s trained to help sort out what’s actually risky from what just looks strange on a label.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate |
| Other names |
Tween 80 Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate E433 Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate Twin 80 Sorbetan polyoxyethylene monooleate |
| Pronunciation | /ˌpoʊ.liˈsɔːr.beɪt ˈeɪ.ti/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate |
| Other names |
Tween 80 Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate POE (20) sorbitan monooleate E433 Sorbitan mono-9-octadecenoate poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl) derivative |
| Pronunciation | /ˌpɒliˈsɔːrbeɪt ˈeɪti/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 9005-65-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 4210558 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53423 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201473 |
| ChemSpider | 21114 |
| DrugBank | DB11021 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 07b6c6d7-c8f8-4d51-b417-b18cbaaab0bf |
| EC Number | 203-082-7 |
| Gmelin Reference | 60752 |
| KEGG | C1454 |
| MeSH | D011110 |
| PubChem CID | 5281955 |
| RTECS number | WGK3 |
| UNII | HNZ8RIL7T3X |
| UN number | Not regulated |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID3028205 |
| CAS Number | 9005-65-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1761124 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:5348 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201477 |
| ChemSpider | 16424 |
| DrugBank | DB11020 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03f8e4e4-647c-4ebf-838a-b748844a2b11 |
| EC Number | 9005-65-6 |
| Gmelin Reference | 2085687 |
| KEGG | C01745 |
| MeSH | D011110 |
| PubChem CID | 5281955 |
| RTECS number | TR7400000 |
| UNII | 6OZP39ZG8H |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | C013947 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C64H124O26 |
| Molar mass | 1310 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow to orange oily liquid |
| Odor | Characteristic |
| Density | 1.06 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 4.29 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | ~16 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.3 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -7.2e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.453–1.455 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 2.99 D |
| Chemical formula | C64H124O26 |
| Molar mass | 1310 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow to orange oily liquid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.06 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | logP = 1.78 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | ~15.1 (Estimated, alcohol OH) |
| Basicity (pKb) | 7.5 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -7.1e-6 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.466 – 1.478 |
| Viscosity | 300 - 500 cP |
| Dipole moment | 3.87 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 472.90 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 607 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A06AD15 |
| ATC code | A04AD15 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause mild skin and eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS05, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Polysorbate 80 is not classified as hazardous according to GHS (Globally Harmonized System). No hazard statements. |
| Precautionary statements | Keep container tightly closed. Store in a cool, dry place. Avoid contact with eyes, skin, and clothing. Wash thoroughly after handling. Use with adequate ventilation. |
| Flash point | > 230°C (446°F) |
| Autoignition temperature | 400°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): 25,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Rat oral 25,000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | TRC246087 |
| PEL (Permissible) | No OSHA PEL established |
| REL (Recommended) | 25 mg/kg bw |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | No IDLH established |
| Main hazards | May cause mild skin and eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS08 |
| Signal word | No signal word |
| Hazard statements | Not a hazardous substance or mixture. |
| Precautionary statements | IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
| Flash point | > 210°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 400°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 Oral Rat 25,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (oral, rat): 25,000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | TRN0082820 |
| PEL (Permissible) | No PEL established. |
| REL (Recommended) | 25 mg/kg body weight |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Sorbitan monooleate Polyoxyethylene Polysorbate 20 Polysorbate 60 Polysorbate 40 |
| Related compounds |
Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monopalmitate Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monostearate Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan trioleate Polysorbate 20 Polysorbate 40 Polysorbate 60 |