Polysorbate 60 emerged in the mid-20th century, a time when food processors and pharmaceutical makers looked for ways to control mixtures of oil and water. Chemists combined polyoxyethylene derivatives with sorbitan and stearic acid, turning out substances that do far more than just stir into a blend. During those first decades, regulators struggled to pin down purity standards, because ingredient quality often varied. Still, as food economies scaled up, manufacturers increasingly relied on these helpers. Today, polysorbate 60 stands as a product of long-standing technical demands and persistent know-how, shaped by needs for safer, more adaptable food and medicine making.
Polysorbate 60 serves as an emulsifier mostly found in whipped toppings, baked items, frozen desserts, and even eye drops. Chemically, it’s the product of ethoxylation: makers react sorbitan monostearate with ethylene oxide, resulting in a yellowish, oily liquid or waxy solid. In the bakery, it keeps icing smooth; in cosmetics, it brings a creamy mouthfeel or blends oil and water into lotions that don’t separate. Walk through a supermarket, and those glossy cakes or that whipped topping on the pie likely depend on it. In medicine, you’ll see it in creams, lotions, and injectables, added for its reliable solubilizing touch that keeps active ingredients well-distributed.
In the lab, polysorbate 60 feels slick and waxy between fingertips, thanks to its hydrophilic and lipophilic parts. It dissolves in water and alcohol, but not in oil. Its hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) usually ranges close to 14.9, which makes it good at both absorbing water and mixing with fats. Unlike powders, it doesn’t scatter dust but melts to form a stable phase at room temperature, melting at roughly 24°C. Its pH tends toward mild neutrality, with the 5-7 range fitting most foods and pharmaceuticals. In storage, it won’t grow rancid if kept away from heat and moisture.
Labels for polysorbate 60 must list the official name, which runs as “Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monostearate,” since the law says buyers and users need to know what’s inside. The FAO/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) places limits on lead, arsenic, and other heavy metals in any sample. Good manufacturers document the degree of ethoxylation—usually at 20 moles—which affects the product’s mixing strength and safety. On ingredient lists, you’ll also find it called “E435” in Europe, and in the US, labels follow FDA code requiring both the full chemical name and shorter synonym. Certificates of analysis often describe melting point, moisture level (kept under 3 percent), and absence of odor or taste, each detail reassuring the user about consistency and suitability.
To make polysorbate 60, manufacturers start with sorbitan stearate, itself made by reacting sorbitol and stearic acid at high heat and vacuum. They then add ethylene oxide in a controlled process, which grafts polyethylene oxide chains onto the sorbitan backbone. Adjusting conditions lets makers tailor the number of oxyethylene groups, which changes how the final product acts in fluids. After reaction, purification removes remaining impurities and any unused starting materials—no room for slack standards here, because residual contaminants can turn up in food or injectables. Each step gets tracked with chromatographic and spectroscopic checks, making sure only the desired molecular species slip through the pipeline.
Polysorbate 60 holds stable under mildly acidic and neutral conditions, but a strong acid or alkali will break its bonds, cleaving the polyoxyethylene chains or releasing stearic acid. Oxidants, especially when mixed with metal ions, may also degrade those chains, so packaging and formulation matter. Chemists sometimes tailor the molecule, changing chain lengths or the fatty acid stem, to chase new emulsifying tasks. Some research groups fiddle with the structure to boost thermal resistance; sometimes, a tweak will help dissolve harder-to-handle drug actives or pigments used in cosmetics, expanding the horizon for what manufacturers can do with the base material.
Supermarket shoppers and cosmetic buffs might never recognize “polysorbate 60” in their cleansers or cake mixes, because producers often hide behind shorthand. In Europe, look for E435, and in technical papers, you’ll stumble over “Tween 60,” a trade name from Croda International. Chemists sometimes drop the numbers and refer just to “polyoxyethylene sorbitan monostearate,” or “PEG-60 sorbitan stearate.” The global marketplace has yet to settle on a single term, so confusing arrays pop up; knowing a few of these aliases helps spot the ingredient in both government records and imports.
Food-grade polysorbate 60 carries tight safety rules. The US Food and Drug Administration and Europe’s EFSA each set maximum usage levels, especially in dairy analogs, desserts, and processed baked goods—usually around 0.5% to 1% by weight. Workers mixing large batches must guard eyes and skin, since repeated contact with undiluted product can cause irritation. Equipment gets washed and rinsed with care, minimizing leftover residue. Careful storage keeps the product dry and cool, because heat and humidity can break down the emulsifier and ruin batches. All handlers need clear, visible hazard labels; suppliers often run regular audits to check for code changes or chemical recalls. Training never slows, because the world of emulsifiers evolves with new studies—safety gets built on constant learning, not luck.
In food, polysorbate 60 keeps frostings fluffy, makes whipped toppings hold their form, and stops the unwelcome separation of oil and water in creamy dressings and sauces. Many ice creams would be disappointing puddles without it. Baked foods such as doughnuts, cakes, and muffins get longer shelf life and a better feel, thanks to tiny amounts blended into doughs. Pharmaceuticals rely on it in creams, ointments, and injectables, where its ability to solubilize troublesome drugs like paclitaxel transforms patient options. Makers of soaps and lotions lean on it for stable, frothy lathers and for merging oily scents into watery or alcohol-based carriers. In microencapsulation of vitamins or probiotics, it helps form membranes strong enough to stand up to tummy acid.
Science never stops tugging at polysorbate 60’s potential and its limits. A steady stream of research explores new food and pharmaceutical uses, strengthened by spectroscopy, chromatography, and high-throughput screening. Researchers test combinations with other emulsifiers, hoping for strong results—longer shelf life, richer taste, deeper skin absorption. They probe its interaction with proteins and enzymes, searching for ways to keep microcapsules from breaking too soon or too late. In the pharma world, pushback against animal-based emulsifiers opens the door to broader use, but each innovation brings new questions about safety, purity, and potential for allergic reaction. Researchers increasingly study biodegradable tweaks, hoping to lower ecological risk, since wastewater systems can struggle with residues from massive-scale use.
Toxicologists have drilled into concerns about polysorbate 60 for decades. Animal studies show little acute toxicity at realistic exposure, but high doses over time link to minor weight gain and statistical changes to organ weights, raising questions about metabolic effects. Human data, including FDA and EFSA findings, show almost no sign of direct hazard at levels seen in the diet or topical products; clear labeling lets allergic consumers avoid it. Regulatory panels keep background exposure under close watch, given that additives often add up across many foods. Some researchers press for more work on long-term effects, especially in infant formulas and supplements, since young children process additives differently. Emerging work on gut microbiome shifts and possible inflammation draws growing attention, showing that every additive has a story to tell inside the body, not just in a mixing vat.
Polysorbate 60 sits on the stage as additive science churns forward. Clean-label trends force manufacturers to rethink old routines, testing new natural emulsifiers while rechecking the safety data behind every batch. Some biotech groups try fermentation-based emulsifiers where yeast or algae pump out similar molecules—maybe even better ones. Food security and shelf-life pressures mean no quick goodbye, but market questions grow: Do consumers still trust synthetic additives? Can chemists tweak the molecule to make it more easily biodegradable or friendlier to gut bacteria? Regulations worldwide keep evolving; companies watch closely as research chips away at long-standing reassurances or, at times, uncovers subtle risks. No future waits for those standing still in chemistry. For anyone who relies on polysorbate 60, the smart path means watching trends, reading real science, and never shrugging off a new study or a worried voice.
Polysorbate 60 fills a surprising number of roles in products many people use daily. I remember reading food labels as a kid, mystified by the strange words on the back of the box. Most shoppers have spotted “Polysorbate 60” in the fine print without knowing why it’s there. The answer tends to be simpler than people expect: it’s a workhorse in processed foods, cosmetics, and even medicines.
Starting in the kitchen, Polysorbate 60 acts as an emulsifier. It helps water and oil mix smoothly, so whipped toppings stay fluffy and cakes turn out tender. Growing up, I learned from scratch baking that oil and water don’t like to mix—unless you invite something like Polysorbate 60 into the party. Without it, products like shelf-stable frostings split or go hard. Creamers blend nicely and don’t leave floating oil bits thanks to this ingredient. According to the Food and Drug Administration, it’s used at low levels—up to 0.5% in most foods.
Ice cream uses it, too. Cream holds air better and doesn’t get icy crystals in the freezer. Even salad dressing often relies on it, since bottled vinaigrettes can separate on the shelf. For people managing allergies, it helps keep milk proteins from clumping, making non-dairy desserts smoother.
Pick up any lotion, baby wipe, or makeup remover. Polysorbate 60 brings oil and water together there, too. Without it, moisturizers separate and become a gloppy mess. On my own bathroom shelf, I see it on the label of hydrating creams and cleansers claiming a “light, blended” texture. My skin gets the benefit of both water-based and oil-based ingredients working together.
Manufacturers choose Polysorbate 60 because it stabilizes formulas for months, not just a day or two. Skin creams, hair conditioners, and mascara don’t degrade as quickly during shipping or on a steamy bathroom counter. Sometimes it’s also there to help dissolve gentle preservatives that keep products safe.
In medicine, Polysorbate 60 helps spread active ingredients throughout ointments and creams. Some vaccines rely on it to mix their contents evenly. It also lets hard-to-dissolve vitamins and fat-based drugs stay in water-friendly solutions, making them more useful in real-world treatment. The World Health Organization lists Polysorbate 60 as a trusted ingredient in certain vaccines and oral medications.
People like to question the safety of food additives—and for good reason. After decades of research, scientists have found Polysorbate 60 safe at approved levels. The FDA gave it the green light back in the 1960s. Studies looked at whether it affected fertility, growth, or organs and found no clear risks from the doses used in processed foods and cosmetics. Some people still report sensitivities like mild skin irritation after repeated use, but allergic reactions remain rare.
Consumer demand for “clean label” foods pushes companies to find alternatives, but there’s a trade-off. Some newer plant-based emulsifiers can’t deliver the shelf-life or texture Polysorbate 60 offers. To minimize additives in daily life, people can stick to less processed foods—fruits, vegetables, home-cooked meals, and simple beauty routines. But for now, Polysorbate 60 continues to keep modern foods, creams, and medicines working as intended for the millions who depend on them.
Polysorbate 60 turns up in all kinds of processed foods: whipped toppings, cake mixes, coffee creamers, even some pickle jars in my own kitchen. Food makers use it as an emulsifier, so oil and water stick together in that creamy ranch dressing or dessert topping. Its official approval in places like the United States and Europe gives it a green light, but not everyone feels comfortable swallowing what sounds more like a chemistry experiment than a pantry staple.
Polysorbate 60 has a long history in food science. The Food and Drug Administration lists it as “Generally Recognized As Safe” (GRAS). European and Canadian regulations land on a similar verdict, outlining the highest safe levels allowed in food. Toxicology studies, some dating back to the 1950s, looked at everything from cancer risk to reproductive health. These studies did not find direct links between the additive and severe health problems at the quantities people typically eat.
Yet, no one eats just one ingredient. I know I don’t. Polysorbate 60 slips into the daily diet along with other emulsifiers. Research at universities like Georgia State has shown that heavy amounts of several emulsifiers in mice created low-grade inflammation and disrupted gut bacteria. So far, scientists have not made a direct connection between regular human eating habits and those same gut issues. Still, that raises a real question: do today’s processed foods combine to tip the scale?
A little skepticism helps. Most health authorities still treat polysorbate 60 as safe. No major warnings come from the World Health Organization or trusted cancer groups. Polysorbate 60 does not build up toxins in the body. Still, some people report being sensitive, noticing digestive discomfort after eating lots of processed foods containing similar additives. Labels don’t always spell out which symptoms to watch for beyond a long chemical name.
Whole foods have a track record most additives can’t match. The more I cook with simple ingredients, the less I think about what’s holding random salad dressings together on a shelf for half a year. I’ve worked with cooks and dietitians who push the same message: anything that makes a food look cloudier or smoother tends to be harmless in small amounts, but over-reliance never feels right. It’s easier to trust something roasted in olive oil than to pile up microwavable treats laden with mystery names.
People who want to cut back can glance over ingredient lists at the store and put the box back if the roster looks long or unpronounceable. Preparing more things from scratch always shaves off many additives—not just polysorbate 60. Families dealing with allergies need to check labels, as these additives rarely show up on “front-of-box” claims. Some new start-up food brands advertise “no added emulsifiers,” riding a wave of consumer demand for simpler foods. Nobody needs to make their diet perfect, but just staying a bit alert usually brings fewer surprises.
Polysorbate 60 doesn’t deserve panic. It’s regulated, it’s studied, and it sticks to its job in the food world. But eating mostly foods you recognize without chemical names still feels wise. Less mystery, more flavor, and usually better health in the long run.
Plenty of people find unfamiliar words on food labels unnerving. Polysorbate 60 tends to pop up in whipped toppings, cake mixes, coffee creamers, and even some pickled vegetables. Food manufacturers prize it because it lets water and oil stay mixed together. Without it, store-bought icing and creamy desserts wouldn’t look nearly as tempting. So, we end up eating trace amounts of this additive pretty often. But does polysorbate 60 come with side effects worth worrying about?
Decades of safety reviews by health agencies like the FDA and European Food Safety Authority have ended up in a thumbs up for polysorbate 60 at amounts commonly used in food. These groups looked closely at both animal studies and what happens in the real world. In those studies, researchers crank up the doses to see what might go wrong. Rats exposed to much higher levels than a person would get through normal food sometimes developed problems like organ weight changes or diarrhea. In people, though, it’s rare to see issues from the small amounts used in food.
Still, anyone with allergies or sensitivities could react. Such reactions seem rare. Some individuals report mild skin irritation or digestive troubles, but these usually relate to the much higher doses used in cosmetics or medical products.
Many folks who stick to a home-cooked diet probably avoid polysorbate 60 by default. I know several people who swear by shopping around the edges of grocery stores, favoring fresh produce and skipping processed foods. They rarely spend much time worrying about food additives, partly because they aren’t eating foods that contain them. But the average shopper, juggling work and family, leans on convenience foods plenty—and those foods tend to use additives like polysorbate 60 for texture and shelf life.
While following research, I found few convincing cases connecting polysorbate 60 straight to major health problems at ordinary dietary levels. There’s one interesting area of new research: the gut. Some scientists want to know if emulsifiers, including polysorbate 60, might upset the balance of helpful gut bacteria. Mouse studies hint at possible links between certain emulsifiers and bowel inflammation or obesity, but these don’t mean the same results will crop up in humans. Science needs better studies in people to draw clear lines.
Food labels let everyone make a call about which ingredients feel right for them. If a person wants to skip polysorbate 60, a quick scan of the label makes it possible. Cooking from scratch with whole foods naturally avoids it altogether. For those with allergies or sensitive stomachs, tracking symptoms alongside what they eat can provide clues if any ingredient feels off. Some dietitians recommend using products with fewer unfamiliar additives, not out of fear but to keep the diet simple and closer to basics.
Companies could help, too. More manufacturers now offer products with minimal additives since shoppers want transparency and simpler foods. Supporting brands that use fewer synthetic additives encourages more of these options on supermarket shelves.
Polysorbate 60 rarely causes trouble at normal levels for most people. For anyone curious or cautious, focusing on whole foods, reading labels, and paying attention to the way food feels in the body gives the most control. As research continues, everyone benefits from honest discussion about food ingredients, clearer labeling, and better science. Trust and health both grow when people have the facts—and the choices—to match their needs.
Knowing what lands on your plate starts with digging into the details. Polysorbate 60 pops up in a lot of processed foods — coffee creamers, pudding, icing, whipped toppings, and sometimes in beauty products. Its job: helping water and oil mix. Many people who check food labels have asked where it comes from and if it’s fit for plant-based or vegetarian diets.
Polysorbate 60 combines sorbitol (a sugar alcohol), certain fatty acids, and ethylene oxide. While the sorbitol and ethylene oxide come from plant-based sources or are made synthetically, the fatty acids raise questions. Chemically, these fatty acids could come from both animal fats and plant oils. Food makers in most places usually go with plant-based oils because they’re cheaper and easier to work with at scale. But here’s the snag: labeling laws don’t require food companies in the United States to say exactly where their fatty acids come from. So, without reaching out to specific manufacturers, most folks don’t get a straight answer about whether the source is always plant-based.
Groups like the Vegan Society and the Vegetarian Resource Group have looked closely at polysorbate 60. They say the ingredient can be vegan or vegetarian, but since animal-derived ingredients remain an option in manufacturing, strict vegans should ask the producer for details. My own experience with food research shows that once a product is made on a huge scale, companies take the most practical and cheap route — and for polysorbate 60, that’s often palm or coconut oil, both plant-based. Still, guarantees are tough without public certification or a company statement.
Even after years of improvement in food labeling, transparency still falls short. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration lists polysorbate 60 as safe but does not require the source of the fatty acids to appear on ingredient lists. Across Europe, the same story unfolds: manufacturers keep their recipes close to the vest. Food scientists I've spoken to admit that unless a company cares specifically about plant-based certification, they won’t bother to clarify every little source. This leaves consumers unsure, especially when balancing a vegan or vegetarian lifestyle with convenience.
More people want plant-based food these days and clear labels would help. Food companies could certify their additives, or at least state on packaging when something is completely plant-based. That would let shoppers choose without guesswork or endless emails to customer service. At the very least, requiring disclosure of animal-derived additives would help anyone following a vegetarian or vegan path.
If you’re strict about avoiding animal ingredients, it pays to reach out to brands and ask about their sourcing or stick to products labeled vegan. People have pushed big companies to clean up food labels before, and more voices will mean more changes in the long run. As someone who’s spent time trying to decode ingredient lists, I know transparency makes eating with your values a lot easier.
Anyone who reads ingredient labels on processed foods or cosmetics will spot the word “polysorbate” sooner or later. Polysorbate 60 shows up in things like non-dairy creamers, ice cream, cakes, whipped toppings, and even some face creams. It acts as an emulsifier, which helps keep oil and water from separating. The FDA considers polysorbate 60 safe for general use in food and personal care products, so it lands in lots of everyday items. But some people start to wonder if it can trigger allergic reactions.
People worry about what they eat and put on their skin, especially if they have sensitive systems. For most folks, polysorbate 60 passes through the body without much fuss. True allergies pop up rarely, but there are case reports scattered in medical literature. For example, a few people developed rashes, itching, or even hives after using topical creams or injections with polysorbates. Hospitals know to watch out for this in patients who have strong histories of allergies. Still, these incidents often end up being exceptions, not the rule.
I spent years in kitchens and with family members who live with severe food allergies. Nobody in my circle ever flagged polysorbate 60 as a troublemaker, unlike nuts or shellfish. Still, allergy specialists remind folks that just about any ingredient can become a problem for the right person. The immune system can get triggered by the most unlikely things, and the symptoms can range from skin irritation to more severe responses like swelling or trouble breathing. Most problems with polysorbate 60 seem to be skin-based and don’t go much further than mild discomfort.
Allergic reactions happen when the immune system misfires. A true allergy shows up with hives, swelling, shortness of breath, or sudden drop in blood pressure. This sort of event is rare with polysorbate 60. More common are minor skin reactions from creams or lotions. Some people blame food additives for digestive upset or tiredness, although research rarely ties polysorbate 60 directly to these symptoms.
Doctors often see far more reactions to main ingredients like dairy, wheat, or eggs than anything caused by an emulsifier. If someone suspects a reaction to polysorbate 60 in a food or product, it helps to keep a diary, save any packaging, and talk with an allergy expert. Patch testing on the skin, or supervised oral tests, can sort out what’s going on. Sometimes, the problem doesn’t come from the polysorbate itself, but from contaminants or other additives mixed in with it.
Everyone deserves to feel secure about what goes into their body. Food manufacturers must list all additives on the packaging in most countries, so reading ingredient lists gives a head start. If you react badly to polysorbate 60, it makes sense to skip products that list it or ask food service workers if foods contain it. For those who suspect a link but aren’t sure, working with an allergist can clear up confusion. Relying on science-backed facts and keeping lines of communication open with healthcare providers protects people from guesswork and unnecessary restrictions.
The upshot: most people slide by without issue, but staying mindful and informed helps those who do have genuine sensitivities avoid trouble. Science and regulation keep track of safety, and real-life stories remind us that every body can react differently.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Sorbitan, monohexadecanoate, ethoxylated |
| Other names |
Tween 60 Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monostearate E435 Sorbitan monostearate ethoxylated PEG-20 sorbitan monostearate |
| Pronunciation | /ˌpɒl.iˈsɔːr.beɪt ˈsɪk.sti/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Sorbitan, monoctadecanoate, poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl) derivs. |
| Other names |
Tween 60 PEG-60 Sorbitan Monostearate Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monostearate E435 |
| Pronunciation | /ˌpɒl.iˈsɔːr.beɪt ˈsɪksti/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 9005-67-8 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1911713 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53428 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201571 |
| ChemSpider | 10237 |
| DrugBank | DB11107 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 07-2119480724-36-0000 |
| EC Number | 500-018-3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 360619 |
| KEGG | C20447 |
| MeSH | D011110 |
| PubChem CID | 24853 |
| RTECS number | TR7400000 |
| UNII | 1MII3GDZ4K |
| UN number | Not regulated |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID8021248 |
| CAS Number | 9005-67-8 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1913507 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53422 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201562 |
| ChemSpider | 21106325 |
| DrugBank | DB11020 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03b8c71c-3e97-42e7-8e4b-3d12e03a7527 |
| EC Number | 500-018-3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 84874 |
| KEGG | C19699 |
| MeSH | D011110 |
| PubChem CID | 24856 |
| RTECS number | WL3450000 |
| UNII | 7T1F7TCM5S |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID0036582 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C32H62O10 |
| Molar mass | 1310 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white creamy paste or solid |
| Odor | Faint, characteristic |
| Density | 1.06 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 3.4 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | Approximately 4.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | pKb ≈ 15.7 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -8.8e-6 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.450 - 1.458 |
| Viscosity | 100-400 cP (25°C) |
| Dipole moment | 1.78 D |
| Chemical formula | C32H62O10 |
| Molar mass | 1310 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white pasty solid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.08 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 3.4 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | ~15.7 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.37 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -8.0e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.455–1.465 |
| Viscosity | 100–400 cP |
| Dipole moment | 1.78 D |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A20AX |
| ATC code | A06AG10 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause skin and eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS08 |
| Signal word | No signal word |
| Hazard statements | May cause eye irritation. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | > > 100°C (212°F) |
| Autoignition temperature | Approximately 400°C (752°F) |
| Explosive limits | Not explosive |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): 49,100 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | 31,600 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | RN:9005-67-8 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 10 mg/kg |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not Listed |
| Main hazards | May cause mild skin and eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | May cause mild skin irritation. May cause eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | Health: 1, Flammability: 1, Instability: 0, Special: - |
| Flash point | > 210°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 400°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): 49,100 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | 31,600 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | TRN24964 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 10 mg/kg |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not Listed |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Polysorbate 20 Polysorbate 40 Polysorbate 65 Polysorbate 80 |
| Related compounds |
Polysorbate 20 Polysorbate 40 Polysorbate 65 Polysorbate 80 Sorbitan monostearate Sorbitan monooleate |