Polysorbate 40 has held an important place in industrial and food applications for several decades. Chemists sought efficient emulsifiers as food manufacturing scaled up in the mid-20th century, and the ethoxylation of sorbitan esters provided a breakthrough. Rather than relying on animal-based or inconsistent natural lecithin, polysorbates—synthetic surfactants—delivered predictable, scalable properties. The original drive came from the need to stabilize processed foods in grocery distribution, helping products survive longer shelf lives and varied temperature conditions. Its adoption followed quickly after polysorbate 20 and 60 hit the market, riding the wave of post-war food technology. Over time, industries outside food—like pharmaceuticals and personal care—picked up on its versatility.
Polysorbate 40 stands as a key emulsifier, born from ethoxylating sorbitan monopalmitate. Unlike its relatives, this variant uses palmitic acid as its fatty acid core. You find it in fine powder or amber-yellow liquid form, easy to disperse in water and oil alike. This dual-loving character makes it crucial for blending ingredients that don’t naturally mix, and you’ll spot its name on ingredient lists in bakery glazes, whipped toppings, and even oral pharmaceuticals. No single manufacturer holds a monopoly; giants in food chemicals, cosmetic ingredients, and generic pharma ingredients produce it globally, each batch needing to meet consistent identity checks under food-grade and pharma-grade standards.
Polysorbate 40 shows up chemically as polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monopalmitate. It appears as a viscous, amber yellow to pale orange liquid at room temperature, though it can solidify below 20°C into a soft, waxy mass. The characteristically mild, non-irritating odor gives away its chemical nature. This property alone has helped it find a home in sensitive products. It dissolves freely in water and ethanol, while swelling oils and fats until they form stable colloids. Hydrophilic and hydrophobic sections in each molecule allow it to lower surface tension and bridge between oil and water. The saponification value lands between 40 and 50, while the hydroxyl value floats near 90 to 108. Its stability through a wide pH range gives formulators flexibility—acidic berries or alkaline cleaning agents don’t faze it.
Specifications for polysorbate 40 come down to purity, acid value, saponification range, and residue limits. Regulatory bodies from the FDA to the European Food Safety Authority demand each batch clears thresholds for heavy metals, dioxane, and ethylene oxide residues. Labeling doesn’t always use the phrase “polysorbate 40;” sometimes you’ll find “polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monopalmitate” or E434 (in Europe). Finished products must report its presence on ingredient lists, flagged as an emulsifier or surfactant. Document trails ensure tracing in production chains, so companies can respond to recalls or safety reviews with real speed. Without diligent traceability and robust quality controls, safety checks could easily slip through the cracks.
The recipe begins with sorbitan monopalmitate, itself a reaction product of sorbitol and palmitic acid. Ethoxylation then takes the stage—reacting the ester with about 20 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide under pressure and heat. Catalysts help direct the addition in orderly fashion, ensuring enough polyoxyethylene units land on the right segment of the sorbitan. Modern factories run continuous reactors, where automation tracks temperature, pressure, and conversion rates in real time. Purification removes traces of unreacted precursors and heavy metals. Factory hygiene remains strict; any chemical slip—unreacted ethylene oxide, for instance—can raise toxicity risks and land a product batch outside regulatory limits. Only with a disciplined process can the final product meet its intended safety and efficacy.
Polysorbate 40 typically keeps a low reactivity profile, which makes it dependable in stable formulations. Most chemical interactions in applications involve mild hydrolysis or oxidation under prolonged heat or acidic conditions, slowly chipping away the outer polyoxyethylene layer. Some manufacturing tweaks swap palmitic acid for other fatty acids, generating a related spectrum of polysorbates—each with unique melting, solubility, and emulsification properties. Functionalization of the oxyethylene chains remains an area of active research, but few tweaks beat the original for balance of performance and safety. Decomposition generates simple compounds (ethylene glycol, palmitic acid), which, at regulated processing temperatures, don’t accumulate at harmful levels. Preventing contamination or incomplete reactions during large scale runs matters far more than molecular side reactions in daily use.
Across markets, polysorbate 40 goes by several aliases. In food processing circles you hear E434 tossed around. Chemists favor polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monopalmitate. Sometimes labels use “Tween 40” as a trade name, part of the broader Tween series covering polysorbates 20, 60, and 80. Regional differences in nomenclature can throw off multinational buyers, but the chemical backbone remains: a sorbitan core, a single palmitic acid tail, and a hefty coat of polyoxyethylene arms. No matter what the label says, standardization bodies require detailed batch sheets and chemical identity proofs before any new shipment moves through customs or food safety channels.
Regulators expect tight controls during both manufacture and use of polysorbate 40. The FDA and EFSA set maximum residue limits and require approved tests for purity, identity, and heavy metal content. Facilities must keep written protocols on cleaning, spill response, and waste management. Workers receive regular training on correct dosing, protective gear, and accident protocols. Accidental inhalation and prolonged skin exposure in the concentrated form can cause irritation; most cases in consumer use involve negligible risk because of its heavy dilution in finished goods. Producers track every batch through records, linking test results to production and sourcing events. As product safety recalls or ingredient changes sometimes roll through the industry, these records help root out causes and shore up consumer confidence.
Polysorbate 40’s adaptability stretches far and wide. Food technologists love it for stabilizing whipped creams, bakery glazes, confectionery coatings, and salad dressings. Its ability to disperse flavors and colorants in complex processed foods keeps textures pleasing and shelf-stable. In the pharmaceutical world, chemists lean on it to dissolve difficult-to-suspend active ingredients in oral and topical drugs. Personal care producers mix it into creams and lotions for smooth texture and efficient fragrance dispersion. In industrial cleaners, it grabs onto both oil and dust, making cleaning formulations more powerful for surfaces and textiles. Even as the push for “clean label” foods grows, polysorbate 40 remains in play, as few natural substitutes consistently deliver the same results at the same scale or cost.
Industry and academic groups both dedicate research toward improving, replacing, or modifying polysorbate 40. Technologists constantly search for new blends with natural lecithin or newer “biosurfactants” that cut down foaming in dairy products or lower costs. R&D teams investigate chemical alternatives with claims of improved biocompatibility or environmental fate. Pharmaceutical companies run studies on microencapsulation, using polysorbates as coating agents to steer where and how active ingredients land in the body. Research also heads toward computational modeling, trying to predict which surfactant blends work best in new recipes. If trends toward sustainable ingredients keep building, research may speed up to find biodegradable successors to classic polysorbates. Grants and public-private partnerships fund both technical tweaks and full-fledged replacement candidates.
Safety remains the priority for any food or pharmaceutical additive. Toxicity studies on polysorbate 40 reach back over fifty years. Acute toxicity responds to very high doses, with gastrointestinal discomfort and rare allergic responses at levels far above consumer exposure. Long-term studies on animals show no cancer-causing potential and no evidence of genetic damage. Regulators set Acceptable Daily Intakes (ADI) well above normal dietary or medicinal exposure. Still, concerns occasionally surface over low-level contamination from manufacturing residues or degradants like dioxane or ethylene oxide, especially with globalization of the supply chain. Allergen concerns remain minor, as neither the palmitic acid core nor the polyoxyethylene chain triggers classical food allergies. Systematic reviews from EFSA, JECFA, and FDA continue to flag it as safe within regulatory limits.
Change keeps coming for food and pharma ingredients. Polysorbate 40 faces mounting scrutiny by consumers and trendsetters calling for “simple” and “natural” labels. Some large food brands now investigate natural alternatives—quillaja extracts, sunflower lecithin, oat proteins—but none fully matches polysorbate 40’s profile just yet. For sensitive medicine formulations, it still does a job other emulsifiers cannot. Advancements in synthetic biology may generate more biodegradable or precisely tailored surfactants. Producers adopt greener ways of manufacturing by reducing solvent usage and reusing process water. Yet, global demand for shelf-stable, easily manufactured foods and medicines suggests polysorbate 40 will stick around for years. Innovation may deliver better alternatives, but the decades-old workhorse holds its ground, serving up stability that keeps factories humming and products on shelves.
Almost every trip to the grocery store includes a walk past foods that count on additives to hold things together or improve texture. Polysorbate 40 often turns up on ingredient lists for baked goods, chocolate syrups, and even some salad dressings. It dissolves oil in water a little like soap, which helps keep products smooth and stable. As someone who loves to bake, I’ve noticed how homemade versus store-bought treats differ—a boxed cake mix often turns out fluffier and less dry. The stuff behind this? Sometimes it’s an emulsifier like Polysorbate 40 working in the background.
Shelf life matters, both for businesses and for ordinary people who don’t want to throw away food after just a few days. This ingredient helps mixes stay moist and keeps flavors mixed evenly from the first bite to the last. Technical details aside, it’s safer than some old-school options like mono- and diglycerides, which have slipped into the background because of allergies or other worries. From a safety angle, the FDA approves Polysorbate 40 for use in foods, though as with anything, there are limits on how much gets used.
Concerns over food additives keep coming up. Back in college, a nutrition class covered these compounds, and the professor laid it out: the biggest risks often come from large amounts or from rare allergies. Polysorbate 40 hasn’t raised red flags among regulators the way some color dyes or preservatives have. Still, a 2015 mouse study suggested some emulsifiers could disrupt gut bacteria. That raises fair questions, but much of the science related to the human diet remains unsettled. Research in animals doesn’t always match up with results in actual people.
People now check ingredient lists more than ever. Busy parents, vegans, and food allergy sufferers all look for names they can trust. If you’re trying to avoid additives, it means more cooking from scratch—something I’ve found brings its own flavor, but also takes more time. For those who prefer shortcuts, understanding what’s in that shortcut deserves attention. It takes practice to tell Polysorbate 40 from Polysorbate 80, and to spot what each does in your pantry.
No shortcut comes free of trade-offs. With processed foods, the benefits are clear: convenience, texture, savings. Risks, though, usually come down to patterns over decades. A single slice of cake with Polysorbate 40 won’t ruin anybody’s week, but eating mostly engineered food day in and day out might crowd out fresh fruit, fiber, or home-cooked meals. Guidance from health authorities urges balance. More real food and fewer processed extras. For companies, simpler recipes with fewer unnecessary additives could build more trust and offer better choices for families.
Polysorbate 40 does help with quality, but it’s just one part of a bigger picture. It’s worth learning what goes into food and why. Reading labels and asking questions leads to smarter, more informed choices. We all end up deciding what’s right for our own plates—sometimes the answer is homemade, sometimes it’s a familiar brand from the shelf. Either way, understanding the ingredients helps steer that decision.
You spot a new ingredient on your snack label and start to wonder if it belongs in your body. Polysorbate 40 shows up on a lot of processed foods and frozen desserts, usually for its job in mixing oil and water. It keeps sauces from separating and makes frozen treats smooth. Seeing it among the ingredients sparks a closer look at its safety.
Polysorbate 40, like its relatives Polysorbate 60 and 80, starts with sorbitol and fatty acids. Food scientists have relied on it for decades. Health authorities around the globe weighed the risks and compare data from animal and human studies. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration lists it as “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) for food use. The European Food Safety Authority and Australia’s food standards body have said the same. They set limits, making sure the average person won’t even come close to overdosing just by eating regular foods.
Years of animal testing tried to spot issues like cancer, birth defects, or trouble with the immune system. The results: no signals of serious risk at typical doses. Studies dosed animals much higher than a person would ever eat, yet major problems didn’t show up. That means a tub of ice cream, or even a pack of cookies every week, isn’t enough to put you at risk just because of this ingredient.
Despite safety stamps from health agencies, some folks worry about more subtle issues. Anything with a name that sounds chemical makes us cautious. There’s curiosity around the gut—could these emulsifiers mess with friendly bacteria or cause inflammation? A handful of mouse studies tossed up red flags. Mice eating huge amounts of polysorbates over weeks showed more gut irritation and even gained more weight. But scientists haven’t seen the same problems in people. Human bodies treat these additives differently than mice, and the doses in foods fall well below those test amounts.
Some concerns focus on allergies or rare reactions. Luckily, these cases pop up extremely rarely in medical journals. Most people can eat foods with Polysorbate 40 their whole lives without ever noticing. Still, if you run into hives, swelling, or stomach pain with packaged foods, a chat with your doctor makes sense.
I grew up in a kitchen with more fresh food than packaged goods, so I rarely ran into emulsifiers as a kid. Over time, I noticed how much easier it is to find affordable, tasty options thanks to food science. Polysorbate 40 lets manufacturers make ice cream creamy without tons of fat or keep salad dressings smooth without constant shaking. That means more people can enjoy certain foods, whether they’re on a budget or looking for convenience.
Still, nobody needs a diet packed with processed foods. The occasional snack or dessert won’t pack enough Polysorbate 40 to tip the scales. Cooking more at home puts you in charge of what goes in your meals and makes it easy to avoid additives you don’t want. For anyone with health worries, checking labels helps make informed choices.
Food scientists watch ingredients like Polysorbate 40 closely. They review safety data often and look for early signs of trouble. Some companies try to use more natural choices as customers push for simpler labels. In the meantime, the evidence says people can safely eat foods with a bit of Polysorbate 40. Just like everything else, moderation guides the way.
Walk through a supermarket and grab a packaged snack, some ice cream, or even an energy bar, and you might notice a handful of ingredients you struggle to pronounce. Polysorbate 40 falls into this bunch. As someone with a history of reading every ingredient label since my son started reacting to food dyes, I’ve run into this name more than a few times. Polysorbate 40 is an emulsifier, helping oil and water mix so food keeps its texture from shelf to table.
Polysorbate 40 doesn’t stick to one food aisle. You’ll run into it in baked goods, especially those soft, shelf-stable cakes or sweet rolls. I remember picking up a box of snack cakes that promised to stay fresh for weeks—Polysorbate 40 sat near the bottom of the ingredient list. It helps whipped toppings keep their lightness without getting watery. Go check the label the next time you reach for a scoop of creamy ice cream, or even your favorite chocolatey snack bar.
Some salad dressings, especially creamy ones, use it to keep ingredients from separating. It shows up in coffee creamers to give that smooth pour into your cup. If you eat frozen pies or pre-made dessert parfaits, odds are good you’ve tasted it without even knowing it. The widespread use shouldn’t surprise anyone: food makers value a reliable texture and longer shelf life.
I’ve spent years helping my family navigate tricky food sensitivities, so I understand the worry behind long ingredient lists. People want food that’s safe. According to the FDA and EFSA, polysorbate 40 passes safety checks for normal use in food. Still, folks point out that it’s a synthetic chemical, not something you could pick from a garden. The truth is, not everyone feels comfortable eating ingredients they don’t recognize.
Some research, including animal studies, has looked at possible impacts of large amounts over time. Scientists debate whether these findings translate to humans, but those who care about ultra-processed foods often avoid extra additives regardless. As a parent, I end up double-checking not just the total sugar or calories, but the little names that don’t sound like anything my grandma would cook with.
Transparency stands out as the real solution here. Food makers should make it easy to figure out what’s in a product—no hidden jargon, no alphabet soup of chemicals with complicated names. I’d love to see brands add clear descriptions: “Helps keep the cake soft”—so people can decide if it’s worth it.
For shoppers, reading labels turns into a smart habit. If you prefer to avoid certain additives, go for foods that use common ingredients or buy more whole foods. Sometimes, it isn’t about cutting everything artificial, but understanding what you’re eating. If you’re concerned about additives like polysorbate 40, reaching for fresh produce or minimally processed items gives reassurance.
Every meal is a small vote—for health, for clarity, for how food is made. Ingredients like polysorbate 40 probably won’t vanish overnight. But awareness grows with each shopping trip. It pays off to stay informed, ask questions, and push for labels that help families truly know what’s on their plates.
Polysorbate 40 shows up on a lot of food labels. Bread, cake, ice cream, sauces—manufacturers use it to help blend oil and water, keeping textures smooth and stable. You’ll run into it in non-foods too, like vitamins and even some cosmetics. This stuff doesn’t add color or taste, which makes it easy to ignore. Still, it matters what goes into your food, especially if you keep seeing an ingredient over and over in the grocery aisle.
People want to know if something like polysorbate 40 does harm in the long run. The FDA lists it as generally recognized as safe at typical concentrations found in foods. That means researchers and regulatory folks haven’t seen issues from regular use at low doses. But most people think about the short term—upset stomach, bloating, hives or rashes. Rare cases can pop up, like allergic reactions or intolerances, as with almost any additive.
Most published research looks at high doses in lab animals. At very high levels, studies have shown possible changes to the gut lining and local inflammation in rodents. But those levels are well above what anyone gets from eating normal food. Scientists, including groups like the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, set daily intake limits many times below where any effect would show up.
People talk more these days about gut health. Early studies have hinted that some food emulsifiers might affect gut bacteria or gut lining if used a lot. We have animal data showing some impacts at high intake, but humans usually consume far less. There’s no strong evidence from studies in real diets to suggest polysorbate 40 puts the gut at risk at the levels people actually eat.
Still, if you already have gut trouble like colitis or Crohn’s, it makes sense to pay closer attention to what’s in packaged food. Doctors and dietitians often say folks in these groups might try cutting out emulsifiers to see if symptoms improve, but again, most reactions are rare or slow to turn up.
Polysorbate 40 is only one small piece in the larger puzzle of processed food habits. Most people get far less of it than the amounts used in concerning animal studies. Still, concern persists, fueled by the rising awareness of food additives overall, and a push towards shorter, simpler ingredient lists. Food scientists and doctors agree it makes sense to limit hyper-processed snack foods in general, since these bring more sugar, salt, and questionable fats than fresh products.
You can always choose foods with fewer additives if that feels best. Reading labels, choosing whole foods, and rotating foods in your diet reduces reliance on any one ingredient—polysorbate 40 included. If you have known sensitivities or health worries, it makes sense to bring them up with your doctor or a licensed dietitian. Real answers come from keeping open conversations with health experts and using science-backed facts, not just hype or internet rumors.
Finding trusted sources is easier than ever. Major studies, government websites, and registered dietitians offer better info than forums or quick online lists. No additive is a miracle—or a poison—taken at the small, controlled amounts found in most groceries. Balanced choices keep health and peace of mind together, one label at a time.
Walking through the supermarket, I find myself picking up a new product and checking the ingredients list. Anything with a long chemical name, like “polysorbate 40,” sparks questions. I’ve been down the rabbit hole enough times to know that just because an ingredient sounds complicated doesn’t mean it’s out of bounds for vegans. Still, the way something is made matters, and that's rarely spelled out on the packaging.
Behind that intimidating name, polysorbate 40 is an emulsifier. Manufacturers use it to help oil and water mix together, making food creamy and stable. The big question: is it vegan-friendly, or does it come from animal sources? Most polysorbates, including polysorbate 40, are made by combining fatty acids with a chemical called sorbitol (which is plant-based), followed by treatment with ethylene oxide. The fatty acid in polysorbate 40 is stearic acid.
Most stearic acid on the market comes from plant oils, especially palm or soybean oil, because they’re cheap and plentiful. In theory, this should tick the vegan box. History tells a different story, though. Years ago, manufacturers sometimes used animal fats for stearic acid, especially when animal byproducts were less expensive. These days, plant-derived sources dominate. The cost difference between plant fats and animal-derived stearic acid shifted the industry, so most polysorbate 40 in food now comes from plants.
Veganism isn’t just about ingredients—it’s about how something is made. Companies rarely print the source of every single chemical on the package. That leaves consumers guessing. Even when a label says “vegan,” some folks won’t trust it unless the company offers documentation. Some food products use certified vegan polysorbate 40, but unless a company confirms it in writing, there’s always uncertainty. If you’ve tried asking big food companies this question, you know the answer can be vague or take weeks to arrive—if it comes at all.
Food safety agencies, such as the FDA and EFSA, list polysorbate 40 as safe—without animal warnings. Both the European food industry and the American manufacturers mainly opt for plant-based sources. Food manufacturers like Tate & Lyle, a global supplier, publish data showing their polysorbate ingredients are plant-derived. Still, the door isn’t locked when it comes to animal sources; the industry hasn't set legal requirements that forbid animal ingredients in these additives.
What matters to me is clarity. Companies need to communicate their sourcing clearly—plain English, no jargon. Retailers can push for transparency and carry products certified by third-party vegan groups. Digital platforms and apps that verify additives could bridge the information gap. Regulatory authorities could require labeling that spells out the source of additives for the benefit of people with ethical or dietary needs. Until then, vegans who want to steer clear of animal byproducts with certainty have to reach out to brands or choose foods with clear vegan certification.
From what I’ve seen and read, most polysorbate 40 used today is plant-based. Still, the lack of mandatory disclosure keeps the vegan community wary. Real progress will come from combining pressure from consumers and support from retailers, to make transparency the norm rather than the exception.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Sorbitan monopalmitate ethoxylated |
| Other names |
Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monopalmitate Tween 40 E434 |
| Pronunciation | /pɒl.iˈsɔːr.beɪt ˈfɔːr/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Sorbitan, monohexadecanoate, poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl) derivs. |
| Other names |
Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monopalmitate Tween 40 E434 |
| Pronunciation | /ˌpɒl.iˈsɔːr.beɪt ˈfɔːr.ti/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 9005-66-7 |
| Beilstein Reference | 2207262 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53428 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201527 |
| ChemSpider | 64719 |
| DrugBank | DB11107 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.046.742 |
| EC Number | EC 500-018-3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 1190733 |
| KEGG | C20414 |
| MeSH | D011110 |
| PubChem CID | 5351357 |
| RTECS number | TL8750000 |
| UNII | 2W3ZQV9C6O |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID2021630 |
| CAS Number | 9005-66-7 |
| Beilstein Reference | 4690862 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53425 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201542 |
| ChemSpider | 16219218 |
| DrugBank | DB11107 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.034.282 |
| EC Number | 9005-66-7 |
| Gmelin Reference | 71487 |
| KEGG | C2043 |
| MeSH | D011109 |
| PubChem CID | 5284447 |
| RTECS number | WGK3 |
| UNII | 78A5D6874E |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID1032537 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C62H122O26 |
| Molar mass | 1310 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow to orange oily liquid |
| Odor | Characteristic |
| Density | 1.05 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 1.51 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -7.2e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.454 (at 20°C) |
| Viscosity | 400 cP at 25°C |
| Dipole moment | 3.1 D |
| Chemical formula | C62H122O26 |
| Molar mass | 1284.5 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow to amber oily liquid |
| Odor | Faint, characteristic |
| Density | 1.05 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 0.87 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | ~15.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 7.5 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -9.6e-6 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.454 (at 20 °C) |
| Viscosity | 540 mPa.s at 25°C |
| Dipole moment | 2.53 D |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A06AG11 |
| ATC code | A06AD15 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause eye and skin irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, Warning, H315, H319 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: P261, P264, P272, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313, P362+P364, P501 |
| Flash point | > 185 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | > 350°C (662°F) |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (rat, oral): 41,900 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | >5000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | TRI960000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 25 mg/kg bw |
| Main hazards | May cause eye and skin irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | No signal word |
| Hazard statements | May cause eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | Health: 1, Flammability: 1, Instability: 0, Special: - |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): 41,900 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | 17.2 g/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | TRN9275000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 10 mg/kg bw |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | No IDLH value has been established for Polysorbate 40. |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Polysorbate 20 Polysorbate 60 Polysorbate 80 |
| Related compounds |
Sorbitan monopalmitate Polyoxyethylene Sorbitan ester |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 425 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |