Polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer’s journey started in the early twentieth century. Driven by textile and detergent industries reaching for surfactants that solved problems stubborn old soaps couldn’t, chemical engineers looked at ethylene oxide and propylene oxide for their ability to yield something both stable and adaptable. Over the decades, BASF and Dow shaped much of the work, patenting recipes and setting product standards. The post-war years put this chemistry on a commercial fast track as new fields like pharmaceuticals and coatings demanded safer, more efficient chemicals. In the 1960s, these copolymers cropped up beyond the lab: industrial cleaning, cosmetics, oil recovery. Consumer brands like Pluronic and Synperonic stuck in industry minds, each tweak of formulation stretching into more specific uses. The substance left its mark in everyday products as much as in labs. Its evolution stands for more than scientific progress—it tracks the shifting hopes and needs of our industrial world.
Anyone who’s worked with polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer in manufacturing notices how it affects the raw mix on contact. Produced as creamy pastes, waxy solids, or clear liquids, this compound meets tasks that plain polyethylene glycols can’t handle. Its power comes from a segmented block structure—parts that attract water, parts that resist it. Adjusting the length of each segment lets chemists tune the compound for tough scenarios. In pharmaceuticals, one version may keep medication dissolved where water alone would fail; another might stop a frothy disaster in a brewery. Under the microscope, those block segments do the real work. They grab oily grit, break it up, and keep it floating until it’s washed away. This simple, flexible structure lets the copolymer blend cleaning, dispersion, and lubrication in a way few chemicals manage at the same time.
Physical properties swing with the recipe. Some grades pour like light syrup; others hold their place like soft wax, making shelf-handling and mixing a matter of picking the right type. Melting points tick up with more polyoxyethylene, down with more polyoxypropylene. Solubility tells a similar story—more ethylene oxide gives a water lover, propylene oxide pushes it toward oil. Surface tension drops sharply in dilute solutions, which explains the material’s role smoothing out everything from creams to power-plant cooling water. Chemical stability runs high under storage conditions, apart from strong acids, bases, or oxidizers. In my time working with coatings for electronics, we chased product consistency by dialing in moisture content and testing pH shifts after every raw material delivery. Knowledge of technical data, not just headlines, made the difference between solid product yield and costly rework.
Polymers like this live and die by technical specifications. Manufacturers publish typical ranges for molecular weight, hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB), and active content. On the floor, operators check labels for grade names (e.g., Pluronic F68 or L61). Those names clue in savvy technicians about structure—higher numbers mean more ethylene oxide, softer textures, greater water compatibility. Ingredient lists sometimes hide these behind E-numbers or generic “non-ionic surfactants.” End users doing procurement—especially in food, pharma, or cosmetics—ask for certificates of analysis and check for compliance with ISO or national safety lists. In daily factory operations, keeping technical sheets close at hand stops accidental mix-ups that only show up later as failed tests or costly call-backs. The labeling might look simple, but it’s shorthand for months of development and safety checks.
Production follows a clear line of steps, even if the reactors change scale from lab bench to giant plant. Technicians start with purified propylene oxide and ethylene oxide. They run these into an initiator—most often a simple alcohol—under atmospheric pressure or, for some specialties, in controlled pressure vessels. Each oxide adds blocks in a fixed sequence under tight temperature and pH control, using catalysts like potassium hydroxide. Once the reaction ends, workers strip out leftover monomers and unreacted alcohol, often using vacuum and heat. In my experience, safety never took a backseat, since both monomers demand respect due to toxicity and the risk of runaway reactions. Purity checks, SDS tracking, and scrupulous cleaning routines define the daily work. Each batch gets tested for composition, moisture, and performance in the end-use application. Production may look automated, but human oversight keeps standards high from start to finish.
Industrial chemists like to tinker, always searching for better blends. Polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers play along well. Basic backbone reactions include further ethoxylation, adding extra ethylene oxide chains to shift solubility, or propoxylation for more foaming control and oil compatibility. Many applications ask for end-capping with small functional groups—acetate, sulfate, or phosphate—changing biological behavior or improving resistance to hard water. In paint production, adding glycidyl groups pre-empts unwanted reactions in final storage. Research crews often cross-link these polymers with isocyanates to turn a simple surfactant into a foam stabilizer or tough adhesive. This chemistry is no secret to anyone who’s had to troubleshoot gunky hoses or off-spec emulsions. Any modification brings both better performance and new handling headaches, especially regarding storage or dust hazards.
Industrial jargon spins a web of product names and keywords. In the United States, most chemists recognize “Pluronic” (BASF) or “Poloxamer” for pharmaceutical grades. In the UK and Europe, “Synperonic” appears on safety sheets, while “Lutrol” and “Emkalyx” represent others. Regulatory bodies list the basic material as “polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene block copolymer” or simply “poloxamer.” Ingredient lists on personal care products sometimes refer to codes—Poloxamer 188, 407, 331—demarking subtle differences many end users miss. In specialty cleaning and coatings, these appear only by function (“non-ionic wetting agent”, “emulsifying compound”), making a chemist’s eye on the MSDS crucial for precise selection and safety.
Manufacturing and using these chemicals always means staying on top of safety data. Polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers carry relatively low acute toxicity compared to early surfactant families, but skin and eye irritation crop up at higher concentrations. National and international standards—REACH in Europe, TSCA in the US—set purity thresholds, established reporting triggers for hazardous byproducts, and created strong guidelines for storage and spill response. Lab workers and operators stick to gloves, masks, and splash goggles to avoid contact, especially during pump maintenance or drum loading. Quality systems in regulated industries (like pharma) count on batch traceability, cleaning validation, and detailed transfer logs to preempt recalls or contamination. On a plant tour last year, I watched teams run drills for spill containment—clean-up crews with dedicated media, neutralizers, and evacuation maps. Safety doesn’t just come from policy—it’s built into the daily culture.
Polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers stretch across industries for good reason. In cosmetics, they turn lotions into smoother, longer-lasting blends. Dealing with pharmaceutical injectables, sterile filtration, and solubilization of stubborn drugs, these materials handle both the mixing and the bio-compatibility with proven records. Hospitals lean on Poloxamer 188 as a blood substitute component; dentists mix it in mouthwashes and pastes. Textile processing, agrochemical spraying, adhesives, paint leveling—each field demands a tweak, but the copolymer brings ease of blending and gentle effects on sensitive colors and active ingredients. The coatings world uses these copolymers to control pigment dispersion, stop gelling, and lengthen shelf life. My work with industrial cleaners saw the copolymer jump from a supporting role to the frontline in tackling oil spills and degreasing food plants, thanks to unique emulsification and rinsing power.
Research storms ahead, whipping up new grades and finding safer, greener ways to make and use copolymers. Academic labs partner with environmental agencies to chase biodegradable alternatives that match performance. Some teams explore adding bio-based initiators to cut the fossil footprint, while others try grafting on sugar residues to improve environmental breakdown. Formulation scientists test copolymers in drug targeting, slow-release medicines, or as carriers for gene therapy. Safety and purity always come up: high-sensitivity techniques like mass spectrometry and NMR dig deeper into trace impurities and stability under stress. Drug makers fund long-term tests for compatibility and storage, since unpredictable behavior during a 5-year shelf life can ruin an otherwise winning formulation. My own brushes with R&D labs always circled back to real-world problems—getting the same result, batch after batch, from factory to final customer, no matter the recipe tweaks.
Toxicologists, regulators, and end users ask tough questions about what sits in their products and what it leaves behind. Polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers rank low on acute toxicity charts, and lab tests since the 1970s showed little evidence for mutagenicity or buildup in tissues at common use levels. Long-term ingestion and environmental runoff receive more scrutiny as use widens. There’s concern for aquatic toxicity with huge spills, since breakdown products may affect fish or attack beneficial bacteria. Manufacturers work to cut residual monomer levels, track batch purity, and publish up-to-date hazard data. End users in pharma and food sites test for sensitizers—never assuming that “low hazard” means “risk-free.” My experience on customer support lines proves that most complaints about allergy or irritation link to mismanagement of concentrations or contamination by unrelated ingredients. Staying honest about risks, and keeping communication open, goes a lot further than public relations efforts ever could.
Human needs keep changing, and this chemical keeps finding new jobs. Environmental pressure pushes manufacturers to crack the code for faster biodegradation and lower resource extraction. Pharmaceutical researchers spin new uses—microencapsulation, mRNA vaccine stabilization, targeted chemotherapy delivery. Crop scientists borrow surfactants to boost plant protection and unlock new soil treatments. Next-generation polymer blends, born from old copolymer chemistry, tackle electric vehicle batteries, 3D printing, and water purification. Each benefit brings responsibility. Industry must prove safety with new data, adapt to tighter controls, and share best practices openly. From my seat, working with everyone from line operators to R&D leads, I see the future not as a hand-off to automation or AI, but as a call for new collaboration—humans reading, testing, adjusting, and learning side-by-side with their technology.
Step into the world of everyday products and you’ll see ingredient lists full of names most people can’t pronounce. One that pops up a lot: polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer. This chemical blend seems a mouthful, but it’s working behind the scenes far more than folks realize. In my own experience as both a consumer and a writer looking closely at ingredients, I’ve watched these copolymers quietly shape modern life.
Big companies pack this copolymer into all sorts of things—shampoos, lotions, floor cleaners, even some pills. It helps oil and water mix so products don’t separate or get gloopy. Picture an old bottle of salad dressing: look at the blobs floating around after it’s sat for a while. Now think about shampoo or lotion. Without some help, that same mess would show up in your morning routine.
This chemical blend reduces surface tension in liquid mixes. In practical terms, it lets dirt and oil wash away more easily. That’s why you’ll find it in some dish soaps and laundry detergents. If you use a stain remover or a spot cleaner on your carpet, you’re likely rubbing in a bit of copolymer magic along with it.
Pharmaceutical makers use this copolymer a lot. It helps them blend drugs into water or fat-based mixtures. It’s even found in things like injectable medications and laxatives. The copolymer’s reliability means pharmacists and nurses can trust it time after time. Its safety track record—supported by lots of toxicology work—means both consumers and healthcare providers have some peace of mind. Regulatory groups like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency keep an eye on how it’s used, setting limits to make sure it stays safe for people and the planet.
Some folks worry about chemical residues in the things they use every day. Studies of this copolymer show it breaks down in water treatment plants, but there’s debate over what happens in the wild. No clear danger has popped up in humans at the amounts found in normal products, but some environmental scientists push for more research, especially about long-term water quality.
Anyone who wants to cut down on chemical exposure can watch for these names on labels: “poloxamer,” “PEG-PPG,” or similar numbers. Picking products with short ingredient lists or natural alternatives can help, though it takes some time and a lot of careful label reading.
More transparency from companies would help people make informed choices. Brands could do better at explaining why they use these substances and what they do. Regulators might set clearer rules, making sure every new use of the copolymer gets a strong safety check. Research groups and watchdogs could keep testing how these chemicals behave in rivers and lakes.
People are already hungry for clean, clear labels. Companies listening to this demand could shift to plant-based or biodegradable substitutes as science catches up. Everyone—consumers, health experts, environmental scientists—has a part to play in watching what happens next. From kitchen and bathroom shelves to hospital carts, this unglamorous ingredient shapes the safety and comfort of daily routines. Understanding and questioning what’s in our products gives power back to everyday people, not just chemists or CEOs.
Polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer sounds like something best left in a chemistry lab, but it crops up in everyday products: lotions, shampoos, detergents, and even some foods and pharmaceuticals. These copolymers do the heavy lifting as surfactants, helping oil and water mix—so a lotion doesn’t separate, so ice cream feels creamy, or so a pill holds together. Seeing these ingredients on a label often raises questions most shoppers won’t find on the back of a bottle.
Regulators in the United States and Europe have cleared many versions of these copolymers as safe for use in consumer products. Toxicology reviews over decades back this up, mainly because they break down in the body and don’t build up over time. Researchers at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for instance, have looked into things like how much people absorb through their skin and what happens if small amounts are swallowed. That research gave companies the green light to include these ingredients in lotions, cosmetics, and even certain medications.
People with sensitive skin or a history of allergies might feel a sting or itch after using a product with this copolymer, especially if it’s mixed with other chemical surfactants. Some medical journals note rare cases of contact dermatitis, but this isn’t unique to polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer—many surfactants can set off problems in a small group of users. If you have allergies or chemical sensitivities, a patch test or talking to a dermatologist beats guessing from a label.
Sometimes, knowing what’s in a product and how it was tested feels even more important than the long chemical names themselves. Most manufacturers list copolymers as “Poloxamers” or “Pluronics” on ingredient panels, but some products leave consumers guessing. Easy-to-read, clear ingredient labels make the difference for those trying to steer clear of additives or for people managing health concerns. The more companies provide third-party safety data or explain sourcing, the more I trust them.
Personal experience tells me that education makes a difference: teaching teens and young adults how to read ingredient lists helps them watch out for allergies and stand up for personal preferences. It’s never wasted effort. I know a couple of parents who only picked safe artists’ face paints after doing a deep dive on what “polyoxyethylene” really means. That’s one more way families protect themselves from mild but annoying allergic reactions.
Not every regulatory standard moves as quickly as new formulations hit the shelves. Continual research bridges that gap. Independent toxicology groups and watchdogs reviewing long-term data hold companies accountable when new trends surface. As more people demand cleaner, clearer products, it pushes companies to reformulate, invest in alternative surfactants, or cut back on unnecessary additives.
Safer products come from the pressure of informed choices, backed by well-done research. Choosing a familiar brand with transparent practices means fewer surprises, especially for families or those with allergies. If a rash or irritation pops up after using a product, the copolymer could play a role—but so could fragrances, preservatives, or other hidden ingredients. Gathering information, opting for patch tests, or consulting professionals brings peace of mind.
Polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer has found its way into many everyday products. This chemical stands out for its ability to mix water and oil, a tricky job in countless formulations. Think of shampoos and conditioners. When I’m dunking my hands in soapy water or smoothing conditioner into my hair, this compound helps blend everything into a creamy mixture that rinses out cleanly. It matters because just a handful of ingredients can create smooth, consistent results that don’t separate on the shelf or leave a greasy residue.
Pharmaceutical labs rely on this copolymer to carry drugs in certain types of medicines. I once spent time in a research lab, watching how tablets get made. Mixing active ingredients with liquids that don’t naturally blend can turn into a long and expensive process. This is where the copolymer saves the day, giving scientists a way to combine them properly. It plays an important part in some injectable medications and controlled-release drugs, helping carry ingredients so they get absorbed in the body at the right speed.
In food manufacturing, this molecule shows up in ice creams and coffee whiteners. These foods need a smooth texture that feels good on the tongue and doesn’t break apart. I remember one summer job at an ice cream plant. We’d run taste tests, searching for that creamy scoop that didn’t form ice crystals or weird separation. The copolymer kept everything stable in massive cold tanks so each bite tasted right every time.
Household and industrial cleaners often rely on this ingredient. Mixers and tubs filled with foamy detergents clean cars, offices, and kitchens. The copolymer helps trap dirt and grease in water so floors actually get clean and soapy film easily lifts away. It always surprises people to know that the same compound pops up in engine degreasers and dishwashing liquid. This flexibility keeps costs low and cleaning power high.
In moisturizers, sunscreens, and makeup, brands trust this copolymer to keep each bottle looking and feeling consistent. Without it, oil-based and water-based ingredients would separate in the tube. That smooth feel, the way a sunscreen spreads without piling up on the skin or turning streaky — these are proven, reliable effects. Consumer safety is a big deal in this field, with companies closely watching each chemical's track record for skin irritation or allergic reactions. The copolymer’s history of safe use across decades adds reassurance for both shoppers and regulators.
Health regulators keep a close eye on where and how this ingredient gets used, whether for injection or topical products. Foods and pharmaceuticals have strict guidelines so that any batch meets safety and allergen standards. Manufacturers must clearly label these additives to help people make informed choices. Studies point to low rates of irritation or allergic response, strengthening its place in daily products. But safety reviews won’t stall — they grow stronger as more research and data come in.
Some manufacturers are taking steps to lower the environmental footprint of these chemicals. There’s a growing demand for versions that break down faster in wastewater, lessening their long-term impact. Waste treatment plants already monitor runoff for residues that might linger in nature. Switching to greener varieties helps companies meet stricter laws and satisfy eco-minded customers. Whether it’s cleaning up a kitchen or formulating a safer medicine, being thoughtful about chemicals like polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer shapes both health outcomes and the world we share.
Polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer isn’t a term you throw out in casual conversation, unless you work in a lab or spend way too much time reading ingredient labels. Under the microscope, you’re looking at a molecule built from two repeating parts: oxyethylene units and oxypropylene units. Chemists call them “blocks” because they stack up in a kind of chain, linked together in patterns that decide how the copolymer acts in real-world products.
The backstory here starts with two raw materials. Ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, both small gaseous molecules, are strung together in the presence of a catalyst. Polyoxyethylene (–CH2CH2O–) and polyoxypropylene (–CH2CH(CH3)O–) each lend their own quirks. That extra hand, the methyl group on propylene oxide, throws a kink into the chain, making it less likely to hold onto water compared to a smooth polyoxyethylene stretch.
The final “shape” of these copolymers depends on how many ethylene and propylene units get stitched in and in what order. Maybe you spot a molecule that looks like EEEPPPPEEE (E for ethylene, P for propylene), or one with hefty blocks of each stacked end-to-end. Scientists call these block copolymers, and the proportions of each group matter a ton. Make it mostly ethylene and you’ve got something that loves water, mixes easily, and helps other stuff blend in. Load up on propylene and you get a chunk that’s more into oil and grease. This is why these chemicals turn up in everything from cold creams to solvents to cutting-edge drug delivery.
Back in school, drawing one means etching out a backbone of alternating carbon and oxygen atoms for both types. The ethylene oxide portion keeps it simple, just two carbons and one oxygen. Add propylene oxide, and a methyl group juts out from the backbone, a detail that really does affect how the molecule wraps around itself and interacts in a solution.
On paper, this modular structure lets chemists fine-tune an ingredient for the job. In practical terms, companies can dial up or down the wetting, foaming, or emulsifying punch. These polymers power many products most folks never think about: shampoos, peptide drugs, antifreeze, even food-grade defoamers. The basic chemistry unlocks all kinds of uses, making it a foundation for both industry and medical science. That matters for people dealing with sensitive skin, or manufacturers hoping to replace older, harsher chemicals.
Safety questions get some attention here too. Not every blend is biodegradable, and some older types raised eyebrows for producing byproducts like 1,4-dioxane. Regulations and consumer demand now push for eco-friendlier, better-studied variants. I’ve seen scientists rework these molecules, introducing tweaks that break down easier or skip the controversial leftovers—showing how a single chemical blueprint ends up adapted to the needs of the day.
The story of polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer isn’t just a chemistry lesson. It’s a lesson in how molecular detail shapes the things we rely on. The balance between those oxyethylene and oxypropylene stretches—measured out by specialists behind the scenes—can turn a pile of atoms into an ingredient that cleans better, feels gentler on skin, or passes stricter safety tests. No one ingredient solves every challenge, but understanding the structure opens doors for cleaner, safer, and more effective solutions across the board.
Polyoxyethylene-Polyoxypropylene Copolymer shows up in all sorts of products, from cosmetics and foods to medications. People often know it by names like Poloxamer, and its main job is to help blend ingredients that usually don’t mix well. Seeing this ingredient on a label can spark questions, especially about safety. I’ve seen parents worry over diaper cream or people trying to figure out an ingredient list on toothpaste. Safety matters, especially when it’s something you’re using every day or rubbing on a child’s skin.
For most people, this copolymer doesn’t trigger a reaction after brief contact. That said, working in the hospital, I’ve noticed that even so-called mild ingredients still bother folks with sensitive skin. There have been instances where someone ends up with mild irritation, especially after repeated exposure to something like a cleansing wipe or hand sanitizer. For people with eczema or a history of contact dermatitis, this irritation can feel much worse. The US Cosmetic Ingredient Review panel gave the green light to copolymers in rinse-off and even leave-on products at certain concentrations. Still, they warned that higher concentrations, or usage over broken skin, can increase the risk of discomfort or even a rash. If you’ve ever run into redness or stinging after using a new shampoo, this kind of ingredient might be why.
Food safety researchers studied poloxamers and found them low in toxicity, so they appear in many food additives and oral drugs. Ingesting a typical amount through food or medicine didn’t set off any alarm bells in large population studies. But inhaling any cleaning product or aerosol containing this compound isn’t wise. Cleaning staff who repeatedly deal with fine mist or sprays sometimes report breathing discomfort. According to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), exposure in large quantities or over long periods can cause coughing or sore throat. It’s smart to make sure good ventilation is available, or protective masks are used in industrial settings.
Most people never pause to consider what happens once these chemicals reach water systems. Poloxamers aren’t flagged as persistent organic pollutants, but like other surfactants, they can still throw off the balance of local aquatic life if dumped in huge amounts. I’ve followed some recent research showing that high concentrations in water treatment plants might slow the breakdown of waste and put stress on harmless bacteria. The Environmental Protection Agency doesn’t rank it as an urgent threat, but reducing chemical runoff makes sense, especially as personal care product use keeps climbing. Solutions here could include investing in better wastewater treatment technology wherever possible and encouraging large manufacturers to limit releases.
From my own time working with both kids and adults managing allergies, checking labels helps. Anyone with known allergies or a tendency toward irritation should steer toward “fragrance-free” and “sensitive skin” products, which often have lower concentrations of these copolymers. If irritation lasts or spreads after starting a new lotion, stop use and talk with a health professional. In work settings where contact or inhalation risks rise, proper ventilation and protective gear aren’t optional—they’re basic safety steps.
Everyday exposure doesn’t seem to threaten most people, but a little vigilance never hurts, especially for those with sensitive skin or breathing conditions. And the bigger picture—mindful manufacturing and wastewater treatment—remains a shared responsibility.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane |
| Other names |
Poloxamer Polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene block copolymer Block copolymer of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide Pluronic |
| Pronunciation | /ˌpɒliˌɒksɪˈiːθəliˌpɒliˌɒksɪprəˈpiːliːn ˈkoʊˌpɒlɪˌmɜːr/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | α-hydro-ω-hydroxy-poly(oxyethylene-co-oxypropylene) |
| Other names |
Pluronic Poloxamer PEO-PPO block copolymer Polyethylene-polypropylene glycol copolymer PEG-PPG Pluronic F68 Poloxamer 188 Pluronic F127 Poloxamer 407 |
| Pronunciation | /ˌpɒliˌɒksɪˈɛθiːnˌpɒliˌɒksɪˈprɒpɪliːn ˈkəʊpəˌlaɪmər/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 9003-11-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1308004 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:60741 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201478 |
| ChemSpider | 123441 |
| DrugBank | DB06766 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 07-2119474874-33-0000 |
| EC Number | polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer" does not have a specific single EC Number, as it refers to a class of compounds. However, a common trade form, Poloxamer 407, is registered with the EC Number "500-004-7". |
| Gmelin Reference | 91370 |
| KEGG | C100070659 |
| MeSH | D010952 |
| PubChem CID | 71829 |
| RTECS number | TR4550000 |
| UNII | 9U5FAD9ME6 |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID8021987 |
| CAS Number | 9003-11-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1309183 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:60004 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201487 |
| ChemSpider | 5096409 |
| DrugBank | DB06728 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.130.619 |
| EC Number | 500-246-8 |
| Gmelin Reference | 88337 |
| KEGG | C18540 |
| MeSH | D010031 |
| PubChem CID | 24853 |
| RTECS number | TR2320000 |
| UNII | D6D3T7SRJ7 |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTW2XC22LL |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | (C₂H₄O)x(C₃H₆O)y |
| Molar mass | 3700 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to light yellow transparent liquid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.06 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 0.6 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.2 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.451 |
| Viscosity | 250-650 cP (25°C) |
| Dipole moment | 0 D |
| Chemical formula | (C2H4O)x(C3H6O)y |
| Molar mass | 6900 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to light yellow liquid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.06 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 0.35 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Basicity (pKb) | > 4.5 (pKb) |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -7.0e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.450 |
| Viscosity | 250-310 cP |
| Dipole moment | 1.23 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 2.38 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -527.8 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -44.82 kJ/g |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 2.92 J/mol·K |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -4593.8 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A06AD15 |
| ATC code | A06AG60 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Causes serious eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, Warning, H315, H319, H335 |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS05 |
| Signal word | No signal word |
| Hazard statements | H319: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P280, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
| Flash point | > 220 °C (428 °F) |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 Oral Rat: 22,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | 26,950 mg/kg (Rat, Oral) |
| NIOSH | RX9540000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 17 mg/m³ |
| Main hazards | Causes serious eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS05 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H319: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
| Flash point | > 200 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 Oral Rat 2,700 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 2,700 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | RN:RXF1RZ3S5Q |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 17 mg/m³ |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Polyethylene glycol Polypropylene glycol Poloxamer Poloxamine Polyoxyethylene Polyoxypropylene |
| Related compounds |
Polyethylene glycol Polypropylene glycol Poloxamers Pluronics Polysorbates Poloxamine Polyoxyethylene oleyl ether |