Monolaurin owes its discovery to exploration of coconut fat in the early twentieth century, when scientists in food chemistry set out to understand how certain tropical oils resist spoilage better than animal fats. Researchers locked onto lauric acid—a saturated fatty acid abundant in coconut and palm kernel oil. Through studies, they identified the compound formed when lauric acid bonds to glycerol. Pharmacologists and microbiologists in the sixties saw that monolaurin, unlike lauric acid or simple glycerol alone, blocked the growth of some bacteria and viruses in vitro. During the 1970s and 1980s, as concerns over antibiotic resistance spread, interest in monolaurin picked up in the United States, both in hospitals and livestock feed operations. The ingredient later found a second life in the dietary supplement world thanks to findings about its role in supporting microbial balance, and the connection to traditional foods from Pacific island cultures that valued coconut for wellness.
Manufacturers today offer monolaurin mostly as an off-white, waxy powder or small pellets. Most commercial monolaurin comes from splitting palm kernel or coconut oil, isolating the lauric acid, and esterifying it with vegetable-derived glycerol. Dietary supplements, infant formulas, cosmetics, and even pet products contain monolaurin. The food industry names it as an emulsifier and preservative. Ingredient labels sometimes show “glycerol monolaurate” instead. Some companies pitch it for immune support or gut health, but for the average person shopping in a Vitamin Shoppe or looking up studies online, clear consensus on health benefits can still be hard to find.
In its pure form, monolaurin presents as a solid with a melting point around 43–48°C, slightly lower than plain lauric acid. It dissolves well in organic solvents, not water, and gives off a faint soapy scent. Its molecule consists of a glycerol backbone linked by an ester bond to a single lauric acid tail. The chain length—twelve carbons—gives it both fat-like and alcohol-like traits. This lets it disrupt lipid membranes, a fact behind its antimicrobial action. Unlike lauric acid, monolaurin does not form crystals at room temperature, so the texture in end uses like foods or capsules stays more stable. Because it resists oxidation well, it holds up better on shelves compared to polyunsaturated fats.
Manufacturers set strict quality specs for monolaurin content, checking for at least 90% purity by HPLC. Residual solvents, heavy metals, and microbes must meet low thresholds, following food or supplement grade standards. Labels should list monolaurin, its concentration, and origin, whether coconut or palm. Regulatory bodies in the US like the FDA recognize it as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) when used within set limits. Ingredient lists sometimes mention “glycerol monoesters of fatty acids,” which includes monolaurin among others, making transparency a challenge for buyers tracking sensitivities or sourcing. Facility GMP certification and third-party testing help support safety.
Large-scale suppliers produce monolaurin by direct esterification. They heat lauric acid and glycerol under vacuum, with acidic or enzymatic catalysts speeding the reaction. The process runs at 100–150°C, with constant removal of water byproducts. After formation, technicians cool the reaction mix and filter out excess glycerol. Some run a second step with molecular distillation to bump purity. To boost yield and cut waste, some facilities favor enzyme-catalyzed reactions under milder conditions, a plus for clean-label formulas. After processing, the manufacturer tests for acid value, moisture, and color before packaging.
Chemists sometimes tweak monolaurin to broaden its use. One route blends it with other partial glycerides for a softer texture or stronger emulsifying function. Another modifies the lauric acid tail, swapping in shorter or longer saturated fatty acids to tweak melting properties. These chemical modifications alter antimicrobial profiles, which can help food producers target spoilage organisms common to their products. On an industrial level, some plant extract suppliers study enzyme-catalyzed routes to make the process more sustainable, using immobilized lipases to cut chemical waste. The backbone of monolaurin’s antimicrobial punch remains its ability to insert into cell membranes and break up the lipid layer, so even with modifications, the basic action stays similar.
Monolaurin shows up under several names in scientific and commercial contexts. Glycerol monolaurate appears in food and cosmetic ingredient lists. Chemists label it as 1-monolaurin, monolauroylglycerol, or glyceryl laurate. The food industry calls it E471, referring to the monoglycerides of fatty acids in general. Shoppers might spot private-brand names, trademarked by supplement vendors. In research libraries and older patent files, blends of monoglycerides from coconut oil often get lumped together, so documentation can read muddy unless the label specifies the C12 monoglyceride. This wide swath of names sometimes causes headaches for regulatory agencies and academics searching for clear data.
Most data supports monolaurin as safe for oral and topical use within recommended dosages. The FDA places monolaurin and related monoglycerides on the GRAS list when used as food additives. Supplement brands stick to 300–3000 mg daily in adults, but researchers point out not enough data exists for sustained high intakes in children, pregnant women, or those with chronic illnesses. Production lines follow GMP and HACCP protocols, including allergen checks for nut or palm traces, and maintain sanitized stainless equipment since monolaurin resists but doesn’t block all microbial growth. End-users, especially in dietary supplements, call for more clarity on cross-contamination, especially as nut allergies grow common and consumer watchdogs flag ingredient fraud.
Applications for monolaurin stretch from preservative in foods, deodorant in personal care, to immune supplement in natural health markets. Bakeries look to it for mold control without synthetic chemicals—a big selling point with clean label shoppers. Cosmetic chemists use it in creams and washes to keep bacteria from spoiling formulas and triggering breakouts. In hospitals and animal barns, monolaurin solutions act as gentle surface cleansers or feed supplements to limit staph and E. coli. Supplement brands highlight its reported antiviral and antifungal effects. Some companies stretch claims, so regulation lags behind marketing, yet the compound’s broad antimicrobial profile earns it real trust from hands-on users, especially in climates where spoilage means food waste. Consumer feedback often notes GI relief during cold season, though scientists call for larger-scale human studies to separate hype from genuine immune benefits.
Academic labs dig into monolaurin’s mode of action—how the molecule inserts itself into the fatty coats of various pathogens. Research papers from veterinary schools document feed supplementation that reduces diarrhea outbreaks in piglets, raising questions about antibiotic alternatives. Food safety groups test its value against Listeria or Salmonella in ready-to-eat meats and cheeses. Early pilot studies look at skin creams for acne, where monolaurin keeps P. acnes counts down with less stinging than traditional antimicrobials. Researchers at microbiology institutes in Asia and Europe compare monolaurin’s results to those from essential oils, seeking combinations to extend shelf life and cut down microbial contamination hazards. The biotech sector, facing resistance issues, eyes monolaurin as part of combo therapies to weaken the cell wall of antibiotic-tolerant bugs. The catch remains standardizing clinical methodologies, since supplement formulas, test microbes, and dosing ranges vary so widely between labs.
Data from animal models and cell cultures suggests monolaurin, at doses far higher than one finds in food, rarely triggers toxicity symptoms. Feeding trials in rodents place the LD50 above 5 grams per kilogram. Chronic tests show liver and kidney values stay in range at lower dosages similar to human supplement use. Dermal application, common in baby wipes and wound dressings, rarely causes rashes barring a history of coconut allergies. Some findings hint at digestive upset with very large, isolated doses, particularly in fasted animals, likely due to the sudden fat load. Toxicologists push for more data on monolaurin’s impact on the microbiome, given postbiotic research linking saturated glycerides to shifts in gut flora balance. For now, human data remains limited, but over fifty years in food and supplement chains back up its safety, with the rare issues tracked back to impurity or adulteration, not monolaurin itself.
The future looks active for monolaurin as food chains and pharma companies look to cut synthetic preservatives, and concerns over antimicrobial resistance grow louder in public health debates. Synbio startups focus on refining the production pathway, hoping to use engineered yeast or bacteria to churn out monolaurin with less palm oil dependence, since palm sourcing contributes to deforestation headaches. Food scientists eye monolaurin as a hurdle agent in plant-based meat products, where clean label antimicrobials keep shelf life up without synthetic chemicals. Supplement makers will likely keep featuring monolaurin in gut, immune, and skin products, though tougher labeling rules and outcome-based research may separate the best products from overhyped blends. Pet food and livestock operators want solutions to bacterial outbreaks without resorting to drugs that ride to consumers in the food chain. If more robust human clinical trials provide stronger proof for key conditions like acne, oral health, or infection control, monolaurin might climb from niche supplement to household ingredient. Progress, though, depends on transparent sourcing, third-party testing, and steady science that puts public health before quick wins.
Shoppers walk through supplement aisles, eyes darting across labels that promise immune boosting, viral defense, or clean energy. Monolaurin sits on these shelves, stealing glances from the curious. It doesn’t enjoy the same mainstream attention as vitamin C or zinc, but its imprint stretches beyond mere marketing trends. I've watched integrative doctors and nutritionists turn to monolaurin, sharing stories of fast recoveries and hard-won lessons with frequent winter bugs.
Monolaurin comes from lauric acid, a component of coconut oil. For years, coconut oil stood as a kitchen staple, jumping into coffee mugs and frying pans. Scientists identified lauric acid as one of the ingredients that made coconut oil compelling. When lauric acid is combined with glycerin, it forms monolaurin, which steps up as a supplement for immune support. Studies have shown monolaurin’s ability to break down the protective fat layer many viruses and bacteria wrap themselves in. This detail drew early attention from researchers, especially as superbugs challenged what old-school antibiotics could handle.
No parent wants their kid laid up with sore throats every other week. Folks want to stay energized through flu season without draining their wallets at a clinic. Thanks to several lab studies, monolaurin pops up in conversations about defending against things such as Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and some common viruses. Research at the University of Minnesota found that monolaurin disrupts the lipid membranes of several viral strains, causing pathogens to lose their punch. That’s why some herbalists and integrative physicians recommend it in rotation with other immune allies.
Personal stories come in. My neighbor, who works in a preschool, relies on monolaurin during cold months, swearing she catches fewer runny noses. While these experiences don’t replace clinical trials, they point to a hunger for accessible wellness solutions.
People deserve accurate information. Monolaurin hasn’t earned approval as a treatment for specific diseases. The best evidence comes from lab tests, sometimes on animal models, with fewer controlled studies on people. A 2013 paper in the Journal of Medicinal Food outlined monolaurin’s positive effects in disabling several herpes viruses and certain bacteria, but gaps still exist. Reports suggest most folks take monolaurin without issues, but sensitive stomachs sometimes grumble, especially on higher doses. Pregnant women and kids ought to check with health professionals before trying any supplement.
Supplements promise magic bullets, but personalized guidance beats scattershot approaches. Health professionals who keep up with emerging science can steer patients through safe, evidence-based ways to try monolaurin. Cheaper over-the-counter options, paired with transparent labeling, help people avoid wild claims online. Clearer studies—those that include real people in real-world settings—would help solve current blind spots. If grocery stores, clinics, and households can all make informed choices, wellness becomes a team effort rather than a shot in the dark.
Until then, curiosity—grounded in facts—serves as the best tool for sifting through supplement claims. Monolaurin may not be a cure-all, but for those who want a possible edge against daily microbes, it earns a place on the shelf, next to the science still growing around it.
Monolaurin, a compound found in coconut oil, gets a lot of hype for its immune-boosting claims. People talk about it like a secret weapon for everything from warding off colds to balancing gut bacteria. Usually, supplements come in the form of capsules or powders, promising support for the immune system and general wellness. The appeal makes sense. People want simple answers for staying healthy, especially with so many mixed messages out there.
Scientists have taken a closer look at monolaurin’s antibacterial and antiviral properties. Test tube studies show that it can break down the cell walls of certain bacteria, yeast, and viruses. For example, research out of the University of Minnesota points out that monolaurin inactivate Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans in the lab. But these results often come from high concentrations far beyond what people get from a typical supplement.
Human trials are thin on the ground. Most evidence involves animals or cell cultures, not real-life humans going through everyday stress and exposure. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recognizes monolaurin as “generally regarded as safe” when added to foods as an emulsifier. That status comes from its use in small amounts and doesn’t guarantee safety or effectiveness as a supplement taken daily at higher doses.
Safety matters just as much as any benefit. Even though coconut oil appears in lots of foods, monolaurin supplements concentrate the compound far beyond a normal daily diet. People sometimes report mild side effects like upset stomach or loose stools. Allergies to coconut or palm can also cause trouble for a few folks, though that’s rare.
Larger worries come up for people with immune system disorders, pregnant women, or those with underlying health issues. No one has run long-term safety studies in these groups. Some researchers warn that spike doses of immune boosters could possibly trigger unwanted effects. Sticking to established sources like coconut milk and oil in cooking seems a safer bet unless a doctor suggests otherwise.
Part of the temptation comes from supplement marketing. Slogans promise resilience and protection for everyone, but those claims do not always match the facts. Supplements are not checked by the FDA to the same standard as regular medications, so purity can vary. Not every label guarantees what’s really inside the bottle.
Relying on whole foods, good sleep, regular exercise, and vaccination stands as the best-supported strategy for immune health. Adding something new? It pays to talk with a physician, especially if taking other medications. Interactions happen, and doctors see the bigger picture.
Instead of reaching for daily monolaurin supplements based on online chatter, it makes sense to follow established advice. Taking a balanced approach protects against fads and unproven claims. In my experience, checking independent lab testing results or third-party certifications helps spot quality products, but it never replaces checking in with a qualified healthcare provider.
Reliable information matters. So does a healthy dose of skepticism and personal responsibility for what goes into our bodies. People deserve solid facts, not quick fixes. Informed choices—not buzz—build real, lasting health.
Plenty of folks reach for supplements like monolaurin because they aim to boost immune health or fight recurring viruses. This substance comes from coconut oil and lauric acid, and some small studies suggest it disrupts the lining of certain bacteria and viruses. So far, no mainstream medical organization in the U.S. gives monolaurin a green light for routine use, but curiosity runs high.
Most people tolerate monolaurin without trouble—still, stories pop up on health forums about stomach discomfort. Users sometimes report nausea, mild diarrhea, or feeling bloated after taking the capsules, especially at higher doses. The way a body processes fats like lauric acid varies quite a bit, so some experience loose stools or a bit of cramping. These issues rarely stick around, but they can put someone off supplements altogether.
A phrase that circulates in wellness communities is the so-called Herxheimer, or "die-off," reaction. It describes a rush of symptoms like headaches, fatigue, or body aches that show up after starting a supplement like monolaurin that targets yeast or bacteria. Here’s the idea: when microbes die, they let off toxins the body has to clear out, which can spark temporary discomfort. Whether this is a real medical reaction still stirs debate. For people with weakened immune systems, even mild "die-off" could stir up bigger issues and always deserves medical advice.
Coconut allergies are uncommon, but they can cause trouble in rare cases. Because monolaurin comes from coconut oil, anyone with a coconut allergy should skip it. Swelling, hives, or breathing problems signal a serious issue that needs urgent medical care. Even for those without known allergies, a new rash or odd reaction after a new supplement always counts as a red flag. It’s wise to read ingredient lists and stay cautious.
Research hasn’t shown direct drug interactions with monolaurin, but little data exists. People taking prescription medication or dealing with chronic conditions like immune disorders should talk with their healthcare provider before adding any supplement. This holds especially true for anyone on immune suppressants or antiviral medications. Too little is known about how monolaurin changes the way other drugs get absorbed or broken down.
No clear guidelines set out how much monolaurin works best or safest for the average adult. Manufacturers suggest wildly different dosages, from 300 mg to a few grams daily. Without strong research, it’s anyone’s guess how much could trigger side effects or long-term harm. Supplements in the U.S. skip strict pre-market testing, so pills from different brands won’t always match in quality or strength.
If someone chooses to use monolaurin, starting slow makes more sense than jumping to high doses. It also helps to track symptoms and pause if any stomach upset or other problems crop up. Healthcare professionals and pharmacists can steer users around pitfalls, look for interactions, and offer advice based on medical history. No one should trade medical care or prescribed treatment for over-the-counter supplements—research always lags behind claims when it comes to products like monolaurin.
Monolaurin, a compound made from lauric acid, has a loyal following among people who want extra help with their immune system. Coconut oil and breast milk both contain lauric acid. Monolaurin itself stands out for its ability to disrupt the membranes of certain viruses and bacteria, according to lab research published in journals like the Journal of Medicinal Food. Some folks, especially during cold and flu season, hope it will give them an edge. I first learned about it from nutritionists who recommended it for immune system support, especially for frequent travelers or families with small children at home.
Monolaurin usually comes as capsules, pellets, or loose powder. Capsules win for convenience—each serving gets measured, and you don’t have to guess. Pellets dissolve quickly in your mouth or water, so they fit well for people who dislike pills. I’ve tried both. Capsules feel easier, especially for travel or work routines. Some people start at 300 mg two or three times a day and bump up gradually to 1200 mg at each dose. No one dose fits all, and the best plan comes from talking with your doctor—especially if you take prescription medicines or have serious health issues. Many health professionals with experience in supplements recommend starting low, watching for side effects like upset stomach or headaches, and adjusting as needed.
Monolaurin works well with or without food, though some people report stomach discomfort on an empty stomach. Eating a meal or at least a snack can help reduce that risk. In my experience, pairing it with breakfast or lunch made the most sense when I wanted to avoid stomach complaints. Consistency pays off: keep to a regular daily schedule, much like vitamins or other common supplements. If you work shifts or travel, set alarms on your phone to help stick with it.
All supplements face quality concerns. Not every bottle from the drugstore shelf meets high standards. I look for brands that test batches with third-party labs and clearly explain ingredients on their label. Avoid products with unnecessary fillers or additives. If you see odd sweeteners or mystery binders, switch brands. In 2022, ConsumerLab and Labdoor found differences across products, so shopping from companies with transparent sourcing wins big points. Or ask your doctor or dietitian—they often know which ones to trust.
Monolaurin draws plenty of interest, but science hasn’t proven it works as a stand-alone treatment for infections or serious illness. Think of it as a possible helper, never a replacement for antibiotics, antivirals, or vaccination. Folks with compromised immune systems, pregnant or breastfeeding individuals, and young children deserve medical guidance before starting new supplements. If you run into rash, swelling, or trouble breathing, stop right away and get medical help.
Safe supplement use means open conversations with your healthcare providers. Monolaurin can play a part in some wellness routines, but each person’s circumstances shape what works best. Follow label directions, track your symptoms or progress, and keep your doctor in the loop. With so many new products out there, informed choices protect both health and pocketbook.
Monolaurin comes from lauric acid, which shows up in coconut oil and human breast milk. These foods stick around in kitchens and diets worldwide, hinting that nature relies on certain fats for our well-being. That connection pulled me in early during my search for natural immune boosters—the food we regularly eat may carry more power than many realize.
Research shows monolaurin can break down the lipid coating around certain viruses. Viruses like herpes simplex and some influenza types use that coating as armor, so anything that weakens it deserves attention. In vitro studies highlight monolaurin’s potential to disrupt these coats, causing the viruses to lose their structure and infectious punch.
Yet, laboratory work only takes us so far. Taking monolaurin supplements doesn’t instantly guarantee you’ll dodge a cold or recover faster from the flu. I’ve looked into what clinical trials and doctors say, too. Early studies involve small groups, sometimes healthy adults, other times groups fighting viral illnesses. Results appear mixed—some people feel better, while others notice little difference. Multiple medical experts often point out that proper, large-scale studies still haven’t settled the question.
Public interest in monolaurin isn’t surprising. Antibiotic resistance rises year by year. Viral outbreaks spread quickly through travel and urban crowds. People wind up frustrated with the few effective tools doctors can offer. Pharmaceuticals targeting viruses often cost a lot, and not everyone tolerates them well. So it’s natural that many turn toward simpler, food-based approaches, trying to stack every card in their favor.
I have relatives who swear by coconut oil for a whole list of common ailments. Their stories sound convincing, especially during winter months when sniffles and coughs travel from kid to parent and back again. But just like with any supplement, what helps one person may not help another. Physical makeup, other health issues, and what else you eat all play a part.
No supplement fixes everything. Monolaurin isn’t magic, even if a handful of news stories make it sound like a hidden cure. Possible side effects include mild stomach upset at higher doses. Long-term uses haven’t been fully checked out in a rigorous way. Federal regulations don’t treat supplements with the same strict standards reserved for prescription medicine, so what’s on the label may not match what’s inside the bottle.
Doctors who use monolaurin in their practice usually recommend it as a helper, not a replacement. Eating a mix of fruits, vegetables, proteins, and healthy fats creates a stronger foundation. Proper sleep, exercise, and vaccines play a larger role than any over-the-counter capsule or powder ever could.
Investing in more clinical research would settle many of these lingering questions. Public health guidelines built on that kind of solid evidence serve everyone better than guesses. Until then, open conversation with healthcare providers stays key, especially for people juggling chronic health conditions or taking other medication. Curiosity for new solutions keeps medicine moving, but critical thinking protects us along the way.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Glyceryl 2-dodecanoate |
| Other names |
Glycerol monolaurate Glyceryl laurate Lauric acid monoglyceride Monolaurate Monolauryl glycerate 1-Lauroyl-glycerol |
| Pronunciation | /ˌmɒn.oʊˈlɔːr.ɪn/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Glyceryl 2-dodecanoate |
| Other names |
Glycerol monolaurate Glyceryl laurate Lauric acid monoglyceride 1-Lauroyl-glycerol Monolaurate |
| Pronunciation | /ˌmɒn.əˈlɔːr.ɪn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 2720-73-2 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1911345 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:5367 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1232018 |
| ChemSpider | 4436568 |
| DrugBank | DB11156 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 03b7e996-e325-434c-8fb6-c2279ee5d149 |
| EC Number | EC 3.1.1.3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 81856 |
| KEGG | C14826 |
| MeSH | D000899 |
| PubChem CID | 85886222 |
| RTECS number | OGG7X6SX8W |
| UNII | 6Z5F85YD6Y |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| CAS Number | 2720-73-2 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1722205 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:32397 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1239373 |
| ChemSpider | 20809 |
| DrugBank | DB11145 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 06e7f6e2-2c80-4dd1-8980-2aab5c67c629 |
| EC Number | EC 3.1.1.23 |
| Gmelin Reference | 67686 |
| KEGG | C02356 |
| MeSH | D000876 |
| PubChem CID | 8548 |
| RTECS number | OGX8410N2M |
| UNII | G16KI3515G |
| UN number | UN3254 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C15H30O2 |
| Molar mass | 346.57 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.033 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 4.3 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 14.0 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 4.63 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.448 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 3.55 D |
| Chemical formula | C15H30O3 |
| Molar mass | 346.57 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.255 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 5.92 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 14.32 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 14.00 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.448 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 4.84 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 323.4 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 224.7 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -1548.1 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A07AX90 |
| ATC code | A07AA11 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Not hazardous according to GHS classification. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
| Precautionary statements | Keep out of reach of children. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking any medications or have any medical condition, consult your doctor before use. Discontinue use and consult your doctor if any adverse reactions occur. |
| Flash point | > 220°C (428°F) |
| Lethal dose or concentration | Not established |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 24 g/kg |
| NIOSH | Not Listed |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 800 mg |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Main hazards | Not hazardous. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
| Flash point | > 220°C |
| Autoignition temperature | Autoignition temperature: 390°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | Not Established |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose) of Monolaurin: "18,800 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | Not Listed |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 2400 mg per day |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Glycerol monostearate Lauric acid Glycerol monolaurate Diglycerides Fatty acids Monocaprin |
| Related compounds |
Lauric acid Glycerol monostearate Monocaprin Glycerol monolaurate Monomyristin |