Monocaprylin didn’t just pop up in the lab overnight. For decades, researchers dove into the world of monoacylglycerols, drawn by their usefulness in foods and personal care. Oils like coconut and palm kernel oil naturally contain caprylic acid, so chemists quickly figured out ways to pull out and tweak its monoester form, monocaprylin. The push to understand medium-chain fats in nutrition and antimicrobial applications fueled efforts throughout the 20th century. Many laboratories once leaned on tricky saponification and careful fractionation, making each batch a real test of patience. Over time, better enzymes and safer chemical processes helped, opening the door for more consistent supplies and serious research into new uses.
Monocaprylin stands out as a fatty acid monoester, tying a single caprylic acid to a glycerol backbone. You’ll find it in creamy lotions, food stabilizers, and as a stealthy antimicrobial. Comfort with both water and oil means it bridges gaps in emulsions and leaves products feeling smooth. Food scientists often nod to its E-number E477, and multinational companies tuck monocaprylin into ingredient decks on processed snacks, sauces, and more. In the world of health, this molecule's gentle utility gets attention for being kinder to skin and guts compared to harsher preservatives or emulsifiers.
Monocaprylin walks the line between solid and soft liquid at room temperature, showing up as a faintly sweet, almost waxy substance with a mild aroma. Hydrophobicity leads to water resistance, but the hydroxyl part of the glycerol keeps it just polar enough for clever chemists to play with. Melting ranges rest between 30 to 34°C and a molecular weight near 218.3 g/mol. It keeps stable in the pantry if shielded from heat, light, and moisture, but it will hydrolyze with excess water or strong acid. This balance makes it a nimble fit for shelf-stable foods or stable pharmaceutical creams.
Listing monocaprylin on packaging isn’t just a courtesy; regulations demand it, often under “mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids” or more scientific names like glyceryl octanoate. Purity, acid value, and saponification value top the checklists for technical grade monocaprylin. A solid sample clocks in at over 90% purity, with moisture content tightly capped—lab tests look for minimal free fatty acids. Labels in the food industry comply with guidance from the EFSA and FDA, while cosmetics and pharmaceuticals demand extra scrutiny to spot any lingering contaminants or by-products like diacylglycerides.
Older schoolbooks described a process mixing raw glycerol with refined caprylic acid, then pumping in a strong base or an enzyme catalyst. Enzymatic synthesis shoots for greener chemistry, where immobilized lipases swap out caustic soda, trimming down waste and by-products. With careful temperature control and vacuum distillation, monocaprylin settles out, ready for further purification. These tweaks in method give suppliers some pride, since higher yields and better purity mean fewer headaches in the formulation lab down the line. No matter the scale, good old solvent extraction and column chromatography help polish off the final product.
Monocaprylin lends itself to new functions through simple, practical chemistry. Saponification with alkali makes soaps, changing its gentle emulsifying ways to full-blown cleaning power. Acylation throws another fatty acid at the glycerol backbone, making mixed esters for specific textural tweaks. Hydrolysis with enzymes or acids, on the other hand, rolls back the clock, splitting the molecule and freeing up caprylic acid—handy for controlled delivery in nutrition. UV oxidation doesn’t treat it kindly, prompting breakdown into smaller carboxylic acids, so most product designers shield monocaprylin behind opaque packaging.
Products rarely use one name. Look for “glyceryl mono-octanoate,” “octanoic acid monoglyceride,” or the E-number E477. Some manufacturers reach for trade names or proprietary blends, branding it for specific applications in food, cosmetics, or pharma. Not all labels are clear, and regional language differences add a layer of mystery for anyone sifting through international ingredient decks. Companies that supply blends often tuck monocaprylin into master-batch names, pairing it with other mono- and diglycerides for so-called “performance” solutions targeting bakers or dairy producers.
Handling monocaprylin doesn’t take a hazmat suit, though gloves and goggles make smart sense during large-scale syntheses. Routine quality checks look for heavy metals, residual solvents, and microbial growth, especially since the ingredient often lands in food or pharmaceutical products. Regulatory bodies clear it for use in small amounts but cap daily intake to keep things safe over time. Companies in Europe nod to REACH and EFSA rules, while North American producers report to FDA and Health Canada. Documentation trails matter—audit teams want to see every step, from raw feedstock down to shipment records.
Monocaprylin wears many hats, moving quietly from food factories to hospital supply chains. Bakers and snack producers value its effect on dough texture and foam stability—treating it as a gentle workhorse compared to synthetic surfactants. In personal care, it slips into moisturizers for a fatty emollient boost, sometimes doubling as a solvent that helps dissolve fragrance and actives. Pharmaceutical scientists take a keen interest in how it can form soft gels or even deliver drugs directly through the gut, thanks to its ability to cross lipid barriers. Its antimicrobial traits also make monocaprylin a candidate in non-prescription throat sprays and oral rinses—enough power to fend off certain bacteria and viruses, yet mild enough to avoid burning sensitive tissues.
Developers continue to hunt fresh ways to tweak monocaprylin for new uses. Lab teams study combinations with other medium-chain monoglycerides, chasing subtle shifts in melting points and rheology. Microbiologists fine-tune concentrations to keep product preservation robust without impacting flavor or skin feel. Nutritional research increasingly watches how monocaprylin contributes to gut health, tracing its role in fat absorption and microbial balance. Meanwhile, material scientists dig deeper into its film-forming abilities, dreaming up edible coatings for fruit or controlled-release capsules for medications. Demand for plant-based and “clean label” alternatives means green chemistry isn’t a fringe practice—companies see real value in using lower-energy enzymatic syntheses over fossil-fueled saponification.
Safety gets special attention, as monocaprylin ends up on our plates and sometimes even in our mouths as part of dental care. Toxicologists lean on animal models and controlled studies, reporting that it generally passes acute toxicity tests in rats and rabbits, with high doses showing only mild gut irritation. Chronic exposure studies turn up little actual risk, so regulatory agencies in Europe and North America put it on lists of “generally recognized as safe” up to certain intake thresholds. Human clinical trials have explored how well infants, elderly, and those with gut disorders tolerate this medium-chain fat—no alarming outcomes reported so far. Most issues crop up only if products contain impurities like free caprylic acid or carryover solvents, giving manufacturers extra incentive to keep refining their isolation and purification steps.
Monocaprylin won’t recede into obscurity as the world craves greener, safer solutions for food and medicine. Trends in functional foods and cosmeceuticals put molecules like monocaprylin in the spotlight, especially as synthetic emulsifiers lose favor among shoppers. Clean labels and vegan claims push producers to tweak their sourcing routes—coconut-derived monocaprylin fits that bill nicely and tricks nobody with animal or synthetic protein. The molecule’s blend of taste neutrality, texture enhancement, and antimicrobial benefits keeps it relevant during reformulation efforts. Researchers map out new drug delivery paths and biodegradable packaging where monocaprylin’s solubility and barrier-forming skills solve problems- staying one step ahead of old-school additives like parabens or hard fats. With emerging pressure to reduce microplastics and synthetic residues, molecules derived from natural oils find strong support. Innovation marches on, with monocaprylin sticking around as both workhorse and problem-solver, bridging supply chain uncertainty and growing consumer awareness about what really goes into daily essentials.
Most people probably haven't heard of monocaprylin, but flip over enough ingredient labels and the name will eventually pop up. This single-molecule diglyceride plays several behind-the-scenes roles, especially in personal care, pharmaceuticals, and food, and the story underneath that chemical name offers a closer look at how ingredients connect to real-world outcomes.
Monocaprylin is well-known among researchers and formulators for stopping the growth of bacteria and fungi without many of the side effects seen with harsh preservatives. I remember reading a study out of Denmark showing that this compound can even reduce certain hospital-based infections. Caprylic acid—its fatty acid foundation—has been used in natural wellness for years, and monocaprylin brings it into a more precise, predictable form for commercial use.
You might spot monocaprylin in wound ointments or mouthwashes. These products rely on its ability to break down microbial membranes. Unlike alcohol or heavy-duty biocides, monocaprylin manages to kill germs gently enough for sensitive skin. One pharmacist I talked to praised formulations containing it for lowering reported irritation without compromising safety.
Absorbing active ingredients through skin or mucous membranes can be tricky. Monocaprylin acts as a penetration enhancer. It loosens up the fatty layers that make up our outer skin so that vitamins, hormones, or painkillers can actually get in. This remains a hot topic in research because smarter absorption equals lower doses—and fewer side effects.
Think about topical creams for muscle pain or hormones. Monocaprylin has enabled more consistent results in transdermal patches, a big step for people who hate pills or struggle with swallowing. This ingredient’s role in helping the right stuff get where it’s needed—without costly complications—shouldn’t be underrated.
Food producers have caught on too. Consumers keep demanding “cleaner” labels, and monocaprylin stands out because it comes from coconut or palm oil, rather than a synthetic lab creation. It extends shelf life by keeping bacteria and molds away. Food-grade applications turn up in baked goods, sausages, even cheese—products with higher moisture levels that usually attract spoilage organisms.
Research shows monocaprylin leaves flavor and texture alone, while keeping food safer for longer. Considering food wastage statistics, this alone deserves more attention. In a world where about a third of food never even reaches the table, preserving nutrition without the off-flavors of old-school preservatives matters both for health and the environment.
Monocaprylin holds up to safety checks by bodies like the FDA and EFSA when used at recommended levels. Studies repeatedly show low toxicity in animals and limited irritation to skin or mucous membranes. I personally prefer seeing it on ingredient lists over less-researched or controversial alternatives.
Transparency counts for a lot. As more companies switch to clear labeling and invest in ingredient safety, monocaprylin provides a path that supports food integrity and public health. Strategies for the future mean more investment in well-understood ingredients—tested by real-world science and tracked by regulatory authorities. With all the ways monocaprylin helps keep our everyday essentials safer and more effective, its rise in use seems anything but accidental.
Monocaprylin, a compound derived from caprylic acid and glycerin, shows up in plenty of skin care formulas. From my own dive into ingredient labels, it pops up in moisturizers, lotions, and sometimes even in baby skin products. Cosmetic chemists go for it because it helps break down bacteria on surfaces and supports the absorption of other ingredients.
My skin tends to get red or itchy with harsh ingredients. Ingredients like alcohol or artificial fragrance deliver irritation in no time. Monocaprylin registers as pretty mild in comparison. After a patch test with a cream containing monocaprylin, I noticed little to no reaction. Other users on dermatology forums also mention it rarely causes stinging or blotchiness, even for people with eczema or rosacea.
Cosmetic safety experts at the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) panel examined monocaprylin years ago. Their research teams poured through animal and human studies. Daily use in respectable amounts did not produce toxicity or skin allergies. A study published in the International Journal of Toxicology confirmed that monocaprylin, even at concentrations above what most brands use, did not provoke skin reactions in healthy or compromised skin.
European cosmetic regulators list monocaprylin as a safe preservative and emollient. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recognizes it as generally safe for skin contact. Brands opt for monocaprylin in natural or hypoallergenic lines because its safety record classifies it among the gentler preservatives.
Consumers grow wary of chemical preservatives. Terms like “paraben-free” and “clean beauty” fill the shelves. Monocaprylin offers a middle ground. It resists mold and bacterial growth without the backlash associated with older preservative systems. Fewer recalls trace back to contamination when products use this kind of backup.
The cosmetic world faces a challenge: keep products fresh without irritating skin. Fungal and bacterial contamination in cosmetics harms more people than gentle preservatives ever could. From my professional experience researching ingredients, formulas including a touch of monocaprylin last longer on bathrooms shelves and protect customers’ skin.
No ingredient checks every box for every person. Rare allergic responses can happen, though monocaprylin doesn’t rank high as a sensitizer. Overuse or combining it with other strong preservatives may increase the risk of dryness or flaking for sensitive people. The best way to know if your skin tolerates monocaprylin? Patch testing is your friend. Smear a little on your inner arm and watch for 24 hours.
Infants and people with severely compromised skin barriers should consult a doctor before trying new products, no matter how safe the ingredient sounds.
Clear labeling from brands supports consumer trust. Too many products skimp on ingredient transparency and leave users guessing. As a regular reader of clinical journals, I appreciate companies listing not just “glyceryl caprylate” or vague “preservatives,” but the specific monocaprylin content.
Dermatologists also recommend pairing any new preservative-containing product with a solid moisturizer. This strengthens the skin’s protective barrier against daily stress. If trouble develops, switching to single-ingredient oils or fragrance-free formulas gives irritation-prone people a safe reset.
Trust grows from honest ingredient education. Sharing clinical findings and helping consumers patch-test before full-face use makes monocaprylin–like most cosmetic ingredients–as safe as possible for almost everyone.
People scan the back of a cosmetic bottle and see a list of unpronounceable names. Monocaprylin stands out among those tongue-twisters. It’s a molecule combining glycerin and caprylic acid, and quite a few cosmetic chemists lean on it for its performance rather than marketing.
Shoppers care about safety, especially with products for the face. Monocaprylin has a well-established safety profile. Cosmetic Ingredient Review experts and the US Food & Drug Administration both recognize it as safe for topical use. Brands take this seriously; nobody wants a recall or scary headlines about reactions. You’ll find monocaprylin in a corner of the formula because it simply doesn’t spark explosions of allergies or irritation.
It’s not just about feeling good; monocaprylin serves an important role in protecting products from going bad. Anything water-based builds a playground for bacteria and fungi. Monocaprylin disrupts the cell walls of certain bacteria, starving them before they become a problem in a moisturizer or cleanser. Many formulators look for “mild” preservatives, and this ingredient gives an option that doesn’t drop harsh chemicals into a daily routine. It can reduce the need for traditional preservatives like parabens and formaldehyde releasers, which some people avoid for peace of mind.
Take dry, flaky cheeks or elbows: monocaprylin works behind the scenes as an emollient and skin conditioner. It softens dry patches and blends well with other natural fats. Glycerin, at its core, attracts water, so monocaprylin helps hold onto moisture after a shower or cleansing. It makes skin look less stressed and supports that all-important barrier, which keeps pollutants and irritants out. As someone with sensitive skin who’s spent years battling mid-winter dryness, it does feel different compared to oils that just sit on top.
Nobody enjoys a greasy or sticky face after applying skin lotion. Monocaprylin avoids that problem. It slips into formulas that aim for a lightweight and smooth finish. There’s a direct link between how easily a serum disappears and how likely people are to keep using it. Monocaprylin gives an elegant slip and helps disperse active ingredients. In foundations and tinted moisturizers, it keeps pigment from looking patchy or caked-on, which anyone who’s rushed through their morning routine will appreciate.
Decoding ingredient lists has become a sport for plenty of shoppers. As more people demand “less is more,” monocaprylin lets brands cut down the additives without losing shelf-life or performance. No need to pack a serum with twelve different stabilizers if one can do the job. For those worried about breakouts, it brings purity without being comedogenic or clogging pores. It’s plant-derived as well, so the vegan crowd can stay in the game.
Forty years ago, only scientists paid attention to these details. Online reviews, influencer guides, and transparent labeling changed everything. With real research behind it, monocaprylin gives personal care brands a way to bridge peace of mind, safety, and a better daily experience. At the end of a long day, skin often tells the truth—ingredients chosen wisely show through.
Go to any grocery aisle and you’ll find ingredient lists getting shorter, cleaner, and easier to understand. As shoppers look for fewer chemicals and fewer mysterious names, companies respond by searching out new options—monocaprylin finds itself in this spotlight. It’s a simple fat molecule, derived from coconut and palm oils, and lends a gentle touch compared to traditional preservatives.
Food and cosmetics don’t last forever, no matter what anyone promises. Spoilage, bacteria, and mold can slip in quickly, especially if something sits on a shelf or travels far. Preservatives step in, slowing down rancidity and protecting against nasty bugs like Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli. Without good preservation, health risks jump—anyone who’s suffered from food poisoning understands this cost. Smaller businesses in particular get squeezed. They want clean labels for customers but can’t afford products that spoil faster and draw headaches with every batch.
Monocaprylin stands out as a monoglyceride. Found as a natural part of milk and healthy oils, it’s less alien-sounding compared to common choices like sodium benzoate or parabens. Researchers have noticed its knack for fighting off harmful microbes. In lab settings, it can punch holes in microbial membranes, stalling the growth of both bacteria and some fungi. That unique ability matters—I’ve seen friends in small-scale food production use monocaprylin to stretch out product life in chutneys and sauces while keeping labels understandable.
Unlike some harsh preservatives, monocaprylin’s safety profile reads clean. Studies so far suggest low toxicity and skin irritation, a breath of fresh air for companies who don’t want regulators or demanding parents knocking on the door. The FDA ranks it as GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe), though that’s not a free pass for reckless use. Responsible sourcing and steady handling remain crucial.
Research backs up monocaprylin’s promise. A review in the Journal of Food Science highlighted monocaprylin’s ability to curb the growth of Listeria in cheese and slow spoilage by Pseudomonas in yogurt. Some researchers also blended monocaprylin with other natural hurdles—lower pH, fewer sugars, or cold storage—for even firmer results. These combinations kept foods safe without causing odd flavors.
Personal care products haven’t been left out, either. Brands pushing for natural formulas lean on monocaprylin to guard lotions and creams from yeast and bacteria. The molecule dissolves easily in oils, so it spreads well within creams, balms, and even wipes.
No ingredient solves every challenge. Monocaprylin works best in combination with other strategies. Hot climates, moisture-rich conditions, or products loaded with water handle preservation differently than drier, denser items. Over-relying on monocaprylin without checking stability and shelf life in each batch risks quality. Cost factors also come into play. While not the most expensive ingredient, monocaprylin isn’t as cheap as some old-school preservatives.
Testing remains key. Companies developing new foods or creams face fewer regrets if they pair monocaprylin with smart formulations. Think of combining it with citric acid or rosemary extract in a marinade, or mixing it into natural deodorant sticks alongside essential oils. Meanwhile, regulations keep shifting. Global markets don’t always interpret safety and shelf life the same way. Education and transparency will help, especially as fans of natural preservatives press for cleaner products.
Skincare gets complicated fast. If you've found yourself in the aisle, squinting at ingredient lists, you're not alone. Monocaprylin has started popping up in cleansers, creams, wipes, and even baby care products. When skin reacts to everything, it can be hard to trust new ingredients. So does monocaprylin pass the test for those with delicate, reactive skin?
Monocaprylin, a derivative of caprylic acid found in coconut and palm oil, acts mainly as an emollient, sometimes a mild preservative. It keeps bacteria at bay and helps products last longer on the shelf. This ingredient stands out because brands often chase gentler alternatives to harsher preservatives that tend to trigger breakouts or burning sensations.
There’s research backing monocaprylin’s safety as a skincare additive. A 2022 report in the International Journal of Cosmetic Science looked at its function and safety profile, showing it rarely irritates or triggers allergies. Dermatologists who pay close attention to ingredient sensitivity usually highlight monocaprylin’s favorable record next to well-known triggers like parabens or some essential oils.
As someone who’s struggled with unpredictable rashes for years, the label “safe for sensitive skin” rarely inspires confidence. Patch tests became routine after too many letdowns. When I tried a moisturizer containing monocaprylin during a spell of eczema on my neck, I watched closely for signs—redness, tingling, patches. Nothing flared up. Instead, the product felt easy on irritated areas, and the emollient effect helped repair that rough, papery texture I get in winter.
Peer reviews back this up. Many in patient advocacy groups look for monocaprylin when their kids’ skin can’t tolerate typical preservatives. Some parents in eczema support forums mentioned good luck with creams containing monocaprylin, saying it didn’t sting on broken skin. The lack of known allergens in the ingredient gives it a genuine shot at gentle care.
Of course, skin can surprise you. Nothing guarantees a perfect reaction. Even gentle substances have caused issues in rare cases. People with coconut or palm oil allergies might experience responses, though monocaprylin is purified in processing, which cuts that risk down quite a bit. It’s always safer to sample a new product on a small patch.
Another angle: monocaprylin on its own doesn’t moisturize as deeply as something like petrolatum, but it fits into balanced formulas. It helps prevent microbial growth and gives a silky feel without lingering heaviness—something those with oily yet reactive skin appreciate.
Many dermatologists recommend looking for shorter, simpler ingredient lists for sensitive skin. Seeing monocaprylin near the top isn't cause for concern in most cases. Choose fragrance-free, minimal products. If irritation keeps cropping up, keep a diary of what you use—patterns might emerge that lead to a clearer answer about triggers.
Sensitive skin needs all the help it can get. Ingredients like monocaprylin carry the promise of gentle care, which feels rare in a market full of harsh chemicals and mystery blends. Still, personalization wins the day—a patch test, talking to your dermatologist, and listening to your skin matter more than any label or marketing claim.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 2,3-dihydroxypropyl octanoate |
| Other names |
Glyceryl monocaprate Glycerol monocaprylate Monocaprylate glycerin 1-Mono-octanoyl-rac-glycerol 1-Glyceryl caprylate |
| Pronunciation | /ˌmɒn.oʊ.kəˈprɪl.ɪn/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 2,3-dihydroxypropyl octanoate |
| Other names |
Glyceryl monocaprylate 1-Monooctanoin Glycerol monocaprylate Glycerin monocaprylate |
| Pronunciation | /ˌmɒn.oʊˈkæprɪlɪn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 26402-26-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 2040608 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53233 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2010540 |
| ChemSpider | 61495 |
| DrugBank | DB11255 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 03e6b295-c11a-4f49-a73c-97e7fa05afd7 |
| EC Number | 536-46-9 |
| Gmelin Reference | 7889 |
| KEGG | C11844 |
| MeSH | D008624 |
| PubChem CID | 68072 |
| RTECS number | RH0300000 |
| UNII | V3P0U3A14T |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| CAS Number | 33038-00-7 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1710569 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:77785 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL165974 |
| ChemSpider | 10898 |
| DrugBank | DB11285 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 03b139af-77f2-4db7-95d8-1b89b80a5360 |
| EC Number | 'EC 204-664-4' |
| Gmelin Reference | 1366777 |
| KEGG | C14146 |
| MeSH | D003258 |
| PubChem CID | 5459403 |
| RTECS number | GU4375000 |
| UNII | 68Y4CF58BV |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C11H22O4 |
| Molar mass | 330.54 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless liquid or crystalline solid |
| Odor | Faint odor |
| Density | 0.933 g/mL at 25 °C(lit.) |
| Solubility in water | Slightly soluble in water |
| log P | 2.8 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 14.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 14.00 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.441 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 2.52 D |
| Chemical formula | C11H22O4 |
| Molar mass | 302.48 g/mol |
| Appearance | Clear, colorless or pale yellow liquid. |
| Odor | faint fatty odor |
| Density | 0.930 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | Slightly soluble |
| log P | 3.9 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 13.81 |
| Basicity (pKb) | pKb ≈ 15.7 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.435 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 2.67 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 547.1 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -626.2 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -5647.7 kJ/mol |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 350.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -661.6 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -5111 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A07AX30 |
| ATC code | S02AA30 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause eye and skin irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, Warning |
| Pictograms | GHS05,GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H315: Causes skin irritation. H319: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | Wash ... thoroughly after handling. IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0-N |
| Flash point | > 182 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 530°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (rat, oral): > 5,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose) of Monocaprylin: 5000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | RM4220000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL for Monocaprylin: Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 5000.0 |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Unknown |
| Main hazards | Not a hazardous substance or mixture. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07 Warning |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
| Precautionary statements | IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0-N |
| Flash point | > 150°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 406 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (rat, oral): >5000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): >5 g/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | RN 26402-26-6 |
| PEL (Permissible) | 100 mg/m3 |
| REL (Recommended) | 100 mg/L |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Caprylic acid Capric acid Monolaurin Glycerol Diacylglycerol Tricaprylin Glyceryl monooleate |
| Related compounds |
Monolaurin Monocaprin Glyceryl monostearate Glyceryl monooleate |