Maltitol’s history starts in the 1960s, a time when sugar substitutes began drawing interest because people were waking up to sugar’s health consequences. Chemists searched for sweet alcohols that could replicate sugar’s taste with fewer negative effects. The food industry soon discovered maltitol, a hydrogenated form of maltose derived mostly from starch. Its high similarity to sucrose flavor and texture offered something new. By the 1980s, large-scale production started, and companies in Europe and Asia established commercial plants. The sweetener proved valuable in diabetic diets and fitness-conscious food trends. Maltitol became a favorite sweetener in chewing gum, chocolate, and baked goods, where reducing calories is always a selling point. This product owes its place on shelves to a few decades of persistent chemistry and evolving public health standards.
Maltitol crystal stands out in the bulk sweetener category. It belongs to the sugar alcohol family, known as polyols. Extracted mostly from wheat or corn starch, it offers a clean, sweet taste that very closely matches table sugar, coming in at about 80-90% of sucrose’s sweetness. Its lack of aftertaste gives it an edge over other alternatives like aspartame or stevia. The fine, white crystals blend easily into food mixtures. Manufacturing teams appreciate its resistance to browning, which helps keep snack bars and candy visually appealing for longer. When melted, the texture remains smooth, so chocolatiers can mimic the mouthfeel of full-sugar confections. Many households unknowingly consume it in "sugar-free" labels on treats, as the product maintains indulgence while keeping calories in check.
Maltitol’s defining physical features include its bright, colorless crystals that dissolve quickly in water. It melts at 148-151°C, much like regular sugar, which makes it straightforward during candy-making. The sweetener absorbs heat from its environment to dissolve, creating a slight cooling effect — think breath mints and some syrups. Chemically, its formula is C12H24O11, and the molecule counts two hexose rings, both fully hydrogenated. Maltitol sits solid through a range of climates and holds up against fermentation, which keeps it from breaking down as quickly as regular sugars. It resists crystallization in some dairy and bakery mixes, so it avoids grittiness that can spoil texture. Its low glycemic index, typically 36, draws health-conscious consumers, especially as it digests much slower than sucrose, reducing blood sugar spikes.
Industries grade bulk maltitol according to purity, moisture content, and heavy metal residues. Most commercially available forms offer at least 98% purity, with moisture levels kept below 1%. Some products appear either as pure crystalline powders or as part of blended sweetener mixes including xylitol or erythritol. Food-grade maltitol comes specifically labeled according to Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) and Codex Alimentarius standards. Labels must call out “polyol” or “sugar alcohol,” and in many regions, packagers must include a warning about potential laxative effects in excess, following regulatory guidance. For the food scientist, technical specification sheets detail melting range, hygroscopicity, and recommended pH stability.
Getting maltitol crystal from starch is a two-step industrial dance. The biotech process begins with enzymatic hydrolysis of starch, breaking it down to maltose-rich syrup. Chemical engineers then steer this syrup into hydrogenation reactors under high pressure, using nickel catalysts to transform maltose into maltitol. The process separates out impurities and residual catalysts, using filtration and ion-exchange treatments. Vacuum evaporation and controlled crystallization yield pure, food-grade crystals. Quality control checks for contaminants, residual catalyst, and assigns lots based on purity before packaging. These steps have grown more energy-efficient over the years through better reactors and advanced enzyme strains.
Maltitol’s molecular stability gives it an advantage over many simple sugars. Its hydrogenated rings resist Maillard reactions, so bakers find less unwanted browning in their products. In water, maltitol dissolves readily and forms hydrogen bonds, but doesn’t break down under normal baking or storage conditions. Its chemical backbone allows certain modifications — chemists can esterify maltitol to tweak its solubility for pharmaceuticals or cosmetics. Glycosylation and oxidation open the doors for synthesis of new derivatives, though most food uses rely on the unmodified crystal. Rarely, food technologists blend maltitol with stabilizers or bulking agents, producing tailored properties for candy, gum, or ice-cream inclusions.
On labels and ingredients lists, maltitol hides under several names. Its chemical designation reads “4-O-α-glucopyranosyl-D-sorbitol,” but most folks encounter the terms “maltitol,” “E965,” or “maltitol syrup” if the form is liquid. In European ingredient panels, look for “Polyglycitol syrup (INS 965).” Popular brand names include Maltisweet®, SweetPearl®, Lesys™, and many house brands offer non-proprietary blends. Some dietetic foods feature “hydrogenated maltose” or “maltitol powder” in the fine print. Worldwide naming doesn’t wander far from these roots, though specifics sometimes shift with legal and dietary regulations.
Food safety experts keep a close eye on maltitol production lines. Global food codes like those set by the FDA, EFSA, and JECFA place limits on heavy metal content, pesticide residues, and microbial contamination. Factories employ Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) to keep standards tight, relying on regular batch testing and process monitoring. Employees use protective gear and precise instrumentation when operating under hydrogenation pressures and catalyst-handling environments. Finished maltitol batches need to test free from nickel catalyst residues, and every outgoing shipment faces documentation checks. For foods containing more than 10% maltitol, some jurisdictions enforce warning labels to inform sensitive consumers about possible digestive discomfort, especially at high doses. Research groups continue to watch for allergy triggers or unknown contaminants, though decades of evidence mark maltitol as safe for intended uses.
Bakeries, confectioners, and manufacturers slot maltitol crystal into sugarless chocolates, candies, chewing gum, cookies, and soft baked snacks. Its taste profile supplies sweetness without the sharp aftertaste sometimes left by other alternatives. Ice cream makers appreciate its ability to yield smooth, scoopable products that don’t freeze as solidly as those with regular sucrose. Maltitol doesn’t feed oral bacteria the way sugar does, so dental experts consider it tooth-friendly. Diabetic food markets especially value its low glycemic impact — it lets consumers enjoy sweet treats with less worry about blood sugar spikes. Pharmaceutical manufacturers rely on maltitol as a binder and humectant in lozenges and chewable medications, and cosmetic labs tap it as a humectant for skin creams and lotions. Food engineers keep exploring its versatility, especially in texturizing and extending shelf life.
Ongoing research paints maltitol as more than just a sweetener. Nutritional scientists study its role in prebiotic fiber blends and observe its behavior in gut microbiomes. Food technologists push boundaries with new chocolate recipes, seeking perfect mouthfeel and slow melt, and optimize crystal size for even layering in bars or biscuits. Environmental engineers strive to shrink the carbon footprint of maltitol’s life cycle, examining enzymatic efficiency and renewable energy inputs. Several labs in Europe and Asia examine hybrid sweeteners — mixing maltitol with stevia, sucralose, or allulose — aiming for improved health profiles or unique flavor delivery. Some R&D teams look at advanced encapsulation, controlling release and masking any residual cooling effect.
Regulators and health professionals check every sweetener for safety. Long-term studies on rats and humans have not detected carcinogenicity or organ toxicity with maltitol at customary consumption levels. The major caution surfaces around digestive tolerance. Human bodies absorb maltitol slowly and incompletely, so high intakes (usually above 40g daily in adults) can lead to flatulence or laxation, particularly in those unaccustomed to polyols. Label warnings respond to documented studies linking excessive doses to GI effects. Allergic reactions remain extremely rare, with only scattered case reports over decades. To date, no evidence suggests risks for pregnant or breastfeeding women, children, or elderly people within normal dietary boundaries. Global toxicology panels, including the World Health Organization, review new studies every few years to check emerging evidence, and current double-blind trials keep the “generally recognized as safe” status intact.
Rising concern over metabolic health opens fresh opportunities for maltitol. The surge in sugar reduction pushes food giants and startups to test maltitol alongside next-generation sweeteners. With the climate crisis fueling attention toward sustainable supply chains, producers invest in energy-saving fermentation and starch conversion. Consumer demand for natural ingredients may nudge research toward “clean label” maltitol production, improving transparency and traceability. Nutritionists push for more evidence detailing polyol impact on gut flora, as scientists know only part of the prebiotic puzzle so far. Environmental watchdogs want circular processes and zero-waste in sweetener manufacturing. Growth in Southeast Asian and Latin American markets, where diabetes and obesity are pressing concerns, will likely expand maltitol’s global footprint. More partnerships between ingredient creators and food scientists promise a broader selection of snacks and staples featuring maltitol, serving both pleasure-seekers and patients striving to maintain their wellbeing.
Maltitol crystal comes from starch, usually corn or wheat, processed to create a sugar alcohol. It looks and tastes a lot like table sugar, but it packs fewer calories and gives sweets a pleasant, mild flavor. This ingredient finds its way into everything from sugar-free chocolate bars to chewing gum. For years, people have tried to tame sugar’s role in our diets, especially with diabetes and obesity rates rising. Sweeteners like maltitol offer a direct answer to those larger health concerns.
Manufacturers reach for maltitol crystals because the taste feels familiar. There’s barely a noticeable aftertaste. Unlike some artificial sweeteners, it doesn’t leave that chemical tang. I’ve noticed this first-hand when biting into a sugar-free cookie—the taste and crunch closely match homemade ones full of cane sugar. It gives bakers and confectioners the chance to create lower-calorie treats without asking people to compromise flavor.
For people watching their blood sugar, this ingredient provides a safe bet. Maltitol digests slower than sugar, which helps keep blood glucose from spiking sharply. That feature matters for diabetics, but also for anyone seeking steadier energy from their snacks. According to research published in the journal Food Chemistry, maltitol has about half the calories of regular sugar and a lower glycemic index, which means it won’t create rapid shifts in energy or mood.
Bite into most “sugar-free” candies, you’ll probably find maltitol on the ingredient list. Companies use it to keep chocolate creamy and hard candies bright-tasting. Its texture works great in ice cream, fudge, or even protein bars that benefit from just a hint of sweetness. You also see it in pharmaceuticals and toothpaste because it balances sweetness with safety.
Plenty of people running marathons or tracking calories appreciate what maltitol offers. It feels satisfying, so folks don’t need to pile sweets onto their plates to feel content. After years of running and watching friends on strict diets, I've noticed maltitol has given people more flexibility, letting them enjoy simple pleasures without heavy guilt.
Not everything about maltitol is sunshine. Some people get bloating or digestive discomfort after eating snacks with lots of this sugar alcohol. It doesn’t absorb in the gut as quickly, which causes gas in sensitive folks. There’s clear guidance from health organizations: start with small amounts and see how your body reacts.
Many shoppers assume “sugar-free” equals “healthy” or “calorie-free”—not quite. Maltitol brings down calories, but not to zero. Overeating products with maltitol can still lead to weight gain or stomach trouble. For anyone managing health through nutrition, checking the back of the package and recognizing ingredients like maltitol can help avoid surprises.
People look for ways to enjoy familiar foods without piling on risks. Maltitol offers that bridge—enough sweetness to keep desserts appealing, and fewer health drawbacks than regular sugar. Transparency between food companies and shoppers will help. Clear labeling, education, and portion control let more people enjoy the benefits while sidestepping common traps.
Walk through any grocery store, pick up a “sugar-free” chocolate bar, and the label likely lists maltitol among the sweeteners. Companies often market maltitol as a healthier swap for regular sugar. For those living with diabetes or trying to manage blood sugar, it helps to know if this popular sugar alcohol truly fits the bill.
Maltitol comes from starch—usually corn or wheat—and gets used because it tastes sweet like sugar, but with fewer calories and a milder impact on the glucose rollercoaster. Regular sugar hits a glycemic index (GI) of 65, while maltitol crystal usually clocks in at around 35. It spikes blood sugar less than table sugar, but more than some alternatives like erythritol or stevia, both coming in closer to zero.
Skeptical taste buds often notice maltitol popping up in treats promising “no sugar added.” Before grabbing a handful, it’s important to know that, unlike non-nutritive sweeteners, maltitol still gets absorbed in the gut—just more slowly. I’ve looked up studies and even experimented with a glucose meter after sampling bars and cookies. For me and many others with diabetes, maltitol-containing foods brought smaller blood sugar jumps compared to pure sugar, though the effect wasn’t as minimal as with stevia-sweetened snacks.
Maltitol shows up with a catch. Eat more than a few small servings, and digestion can protest. Many people report bloating or discomfort. The body only partially absorbs maltitol in the small intestine, so leftover sweetener moves along to the colon and provides a meal for gut bacteria. The gas that comes from this process is part of the reason many products carry a warning about possible laxative effects.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration lists maltitol as generally recognized as safe. Long-term studies don’t link it with cancer or kidney damage, which supports its continued use in plenty of products. Still, those living with diabetes need to look at net carbs, not just the word “sugar-free.” Net carbs consider how much carbohydrate the body actually absorbs—which affects blood sugar. Maltitol adds some digestible carbs to the tally, making it best treated with caution for those measuring carbs tightly.
Maltitol crystal offers a compromise: fewer calories, less sugar, and a taste close to the real thing, with some trade-offs. If a sweet tooth strikes, a small maltitol-sweetened treat may work for some folks, especially if timed with a meal to help blunt a possible glucose jump. Tracking or wearing a continuous glucose monitor can help catch personal trends—one person may sail through with barely a bump, while another sees a bigger spike.
Alternatives on the shelf, including monk fruit extract, erythritol, and allulose, don’t send blood sugars upward much at all. People with diabetes can test and see which sweetener fits best with their bodies and lifestyles. No sweetener makes or breaks a healthy approach to diabetes—they’re tools that need individual testing and honest label reading. For me and many others who want safe, satisfying desserts, the answer to maltitol’s role in diabetes-friendly foods comes down to moderation, monitoring, and reading up on what works best.
Walk down the snack aisle and you’ll spot plenty of treats with “sugar-free” on the label. Many of them swap regular sugar for maltitol crystal. Candy, gum, protein bars—maltitol pops up often, promising a sweet taste with fewer calories than the real thing. This appeals to folks cutting down on sugar, managing diabetes, or watching their weight.
Maltitol, part of the sugar alcohol family, shares similarities with xylitol and erythritol. It keeps food moist, bulks up the texture, and tastes pretty close to sugar. The FDA marks it as generally recognized as safe, so on the surface, it looks like a win-win. But using a sugar alternative doesn’t mean free reign—people respond differently, and not all reactions are positive.
Eat a piece of chocolate sweetened with maltitol and you might not notice anything. Eat more, and your stomach might let you know. The chief complaint—gas, bloating, cramping, or even diarrhea—comes from the way our guts handle sugar alcohols.
Unlike ordinary sugar, maltitol doesn’t fully break down in the small intestine. Part of it makes its way to the colon, where bacteria go to work, fermenting what’s left. The result often means gas and, for sensitive people, a fast trip to the restroom. The European Food Safety Authority noted that consuming more than 20 grams of maltitol per day can start bringing on these uncomfortable signs.
It’s not uncommon for people eating several maltitol-sweetened candies or nutrition bars in short succession to notice stomach rumbling, especially if they’re not used to sugar alcohols. For children and people with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), these symptoms might show up at even lower amounts.
Maltitol has less of an effect on blood sugar than table sugar, but the difference isn’t as large as many hope. Its glycemic index sits higher than xylitol or erythritol. Someone with diabetes switching to maltitol should pay attention: blood sugar still climbs, though not as fast or high as with sucrose.
In real terms, swapping sugar for maltitol can help lower calorie intake and slow the rise in blood sugar. Still, it doesn’t let you off the hook if you’re counting carbs for medical reasons. A 2016 study in the journal Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology said that maltitol causes a moderate increase in glucose, especially when eaten in larger portions.
Plenty of people enjoy foods made with maltitol with few problems, especially in small servings. Problems usually crop up with heavy snacking or high use. Looking at nutrition labels and knowing your own limits makes a real difference. Someone sensitive to bloating or irregularity might do better with other sugar alcohols, which create less gas.
Food manufacturers could help by listing the amount of maltitol per serving—some already do—so shoppers can make smart choices. Eating slowly and spacing out portions may also help avoid the digestive rollercoaster.
If you’ve had bad experiences with “sugar-free” sweets, pay attention to which sugar alcohols are in the mix. Maltitol stands out as a good sugar substitute in moderation for most people but comes with a clear warning for those prone to stomach issues. Just like anything else, a little attention to labels and your body’s messages goes a long way.
Plenty of folks want sweetness without the guilt. Sugar sits in everything: desserts, drinks, sauces, even bread. With health concerns growing louder, the food world has cooked up alternatives. Maltitol crystal stands out as a sugar substitute showing up in everything from sugar-free chocolate to chewing gum. But swapping out sugar for maltitol isn’t always straightforward, especially for taste and calories.
Ask anyone who bakes or enjoys snacks: taste matters more than almost anything else. Maltitol shares a surprising sweetness with sugar—usually rated at about 70 to 90 percent as sweet. That’s almost enough to land it a place in candy bars without sending chocoholics running. Sweets like sugar-free cookies hold up pretty well because maltitol melts, browns, and behaves like sugar under heat.
Some people, especially those with a sharp palate, notice maltitol tastes just a bit “cooler” than cane sugar. Chewing gum and lozenges use this to their advantage: the cool finish actually feels refreshing. But you can’t always fool a sharp tongue. In cakes and caramels, the drop in sweetness might stand out, so bakers bump up quantities or blend with other sweeteners.
I’ve tried sugar-free chocolate bars sweetened with maltitol. Once you get past the whisper of “cool” on the finish, you’ll feel plenty satisfied. Artificial aftertaste doesn’t slam your tastebuds the way some older sweeteners do, which helps people stick to their diets or health goals longer. Still, nobody will confuse maltitol for that sunny, straightforward sugar buzz.
Many folks think “sugar-free” means “calorie-free.” Maltitol crystal shakes that thought up a bit. Regular table sugar clocks in around 4 calories per gram—enough to add up if you love sweets. Maltitol comes in lower, hovering at about 2.1 to 2.4 calories per gram, less than sugar but nowhere near the zero-calorie mark.
Switching to maltitol can trim the calorie load, but not erase it. If your goal is weight loss, swapping sugar for maltitol helps, but portion control still matters. I’ve watched friends with diabetes or ketogenic goals trust maltitol in moderation, but not treat it as a get-out-of-jail-free card.
There’s also the digestive angle—eat enough maltitol, and those unabsorbed carbs travel to your gut, drawing water and inspiring a bit too much movement. Some “sugar-free” chocolate bars come with a warning for a reason. Anyone who’s gone overboard catches on fast: moderation is not a bad policy.
Cutting down on sugar brings real benefits, from better blood sugar control to improved dental health. Maltitol crystal serves as a useful alternative, especially for people who need a sweet touch without as many metabolic swings. Still, not every sweetener works for every body. If digestion becomes uncomfortable, erythritol or stevia may fit the bill better. Researchers continue to analyze each sweetener’s impact, looking at everything from insulin response to gut health.
The food industry can help by offering more transparency on labels. Precise numbers for sugar alcohols, clear serving sizes, and digestive warnings give people information to decide what feels right for them. As science and recipes keep advancing, the line between “sugar” and “sugar substitute” keeps getting a little easier to cross—without sapping the pleasure from every treat.
Maltitol crystal has built a reputation among bakers and cooks looking to reduce sugar. You can spot it in plenty of “sugar-free” cookies and chocolates at big grocery stores. What catches the eye about maltitol is its sweet taste, which lands pretty close to regular sugar, yet does not spike blood sugar at the same rate. I’ve noticed that some brands reach for it over stevia or erythritol, probably because there’s not much aftertaste. That appeals to anyone who’s baked with other sugar substitutes and ended up disappointed by the slightly bitter or cool finish.
I’ve tried using maltitol crystal in brownies and shortbread. Swapping out white sugar resulted in treats that kept almost the same texture and browning. Maltitol crystals melt and behave a lot like sugar when exposed to heat, so baked goods brown close to what you’d expect. Cookies still turn golden, and cakes stay fluffy. The sweetness measures about 70-90% of white sugar, so things taste a hair less sugary—a bonus for people hoping to avoid cloying desserts.
Bread baking is less forgiving. Yeast feeds on sugar to help rise, and maltitol can’t quite replace that function. Loaves might end up a bit denser. In caramel or hard candy, maltitol’s melting point doesn’t match sucrose, and sometimes candies do not set up firmly. My experience suggests it’s better used for cakes, soft cookies, sweet breads, and fillings, but it will frustrate you in toffee or spun sugar creations.
Anyone using maltitol has probably felt a bit off after eating too many sweets. Even experienced bakers get caught off guard. Studies show that maltitol is a sugar alcohol that only partly digests in the gut. When used in large amounts, it can lead to bloating or diarrhea for some folks. This shows up most often if someone eats more than 30-40 grams a day. It might help to let people know on baked goods’ labels, since not everyone has the same threshold.
Maltitol isn’t calorie-free. Each gram brings about 2.1 calories, about half of what sugar does. But it’s not a zero-impact substitute like sucralose or monk fruit. Diabetics should use caution, since it can raise blood sugar—less than sucrose, but more than some other substitutes. In my own home, relatives balancing insulin resistance take care with anything baked with maltitol. Checking blood sugar and using portion control make sense in those cases.
For folks just starting out, there’s value in mixing maltitol with other sugar substitutes. I blend some erythritol or monk fruit in recipes that need extra sweetness without extra carbs. Taste and gut tolerance seem to benefit from this combined approach. Those baking for family or customers who want to avoid sugar but not sacrifice flavor find real use for maltitol crystal. Labeling treats honestly and keeping serving sizes clear helps reduce the digestive risks. Maltitol works best as one tool on the shelf—great for chewy cookies, passable in muffin batters, questionable for candy making. Choosing the right job for this ingredient saves frustration and lets home cooks keep sharing sweets without regret.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 4-O-α-D-Glucopyranosyl-D-glucitol |
| Other names |
Maltisweet Hydrogenated maltose Maltitol powder 4-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-D-sorbitol E965 |
| Pronunciation | /ˈmæl.tɪ.tɒl ˈkrɪs.təl/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 4-O-α-D-Glucopyranosyl-D-sorbitol |
| Other names |
Maltisweet Hydrogenated Maltose Maltitol Powder 4-O-α-glucopyranosyl-D-sorbitol |
| Pronunciation | /ˈmæl.tɪ.tɒl ˈkrɪs.təl/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 585-88-6 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `/showmol.cgi?sid=31479&molid=1` |
| Beilstein Reference | 12090711 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:15551 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1231538 |
| ChemSpider | 72522 |
| DrugBank | DB11132 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 03d1b065-9da2-4b41-bb2b-d0bc57232ece |
| EC Number | E965 |
| Gmelin Reference | 159625 |
| KEGG | C01381 |
| MeSH | D016251 |
| PubChem CID | 439327 |
| RTECS number | OP4834000 |
| UNII | 78Y029D8S5 |
| UN number | UN number: Not regulated |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID0026812 |
| CAS Number | 585-88-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3669077 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:15552 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1657738 |
| ChemSpider | 5091 |
| DrugBank | DB11111 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 03-2119440125-56-0000 |
| EC Number | E965 |
| Gmelin Reference | 61955 |
| KEGG | C00794 |
| MeSH | D016443 |
| PubChem CID | 439260 |
| RTECS number | OPU1500800 |
| UNII | YW6F2NH98G |
| UN number | UN number: Not regulated |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID10739902 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C12H24O11 |
| Molar mass | 344.31 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.55 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | -5.0 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Basicity (pKb) | 12.2 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.445 – 1.455 |
| Viscosity | Solid |
| Dipole moment | 3.65 D |
| Chemical formula | C12H24O11 |
| Molar mass | 344.31 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.55 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | -5.0 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Basicity (pKb) | 7.5 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.4450-1.4650 |
| Dipole moment | 1.8706 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 439.5 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -1627.3 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -4225 kJ/mol |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 510.2 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -2067 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -1640 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A07AX09 |
| ATC code | A07AX01 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Not hazardous according to GHS criteria. |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: Not classified as hazardous according to GHS. |
| Pictograms | Keep Dry", "Protect from Sunlight", "Food Grade", "Recyclable |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Not a hazardous substance or mixture. |
| Precautionary statements | May cause a laxative effect if consumed in large amounts. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0-0 |
| Autoignition temperature | 430°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): >10,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 15,000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | Not listed |
| REL (Recommended) | 70% |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). |
| Pictograms | GMO-free, Allergen-free, Gluten-free, Halal, Kosher, Vegan, Vegetarian |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Precautionary statements | May cause laxative effect with excessive consumption. |
| Autoignition temperature | > 430°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat 15,900 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Rat oral >10,000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | No results found. |
| PEL (Permissible) | 10 mg/m3 |
| REL (Recommended) | 40g/day |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | No IDLH established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Maltitol syrup Hydrogenated starch hydrolysates Sorbitol Xylitol |
| Related compounds |
Maltitol syrup Isomalt Sorbitol Xylitol Lactitol |