Maltito hasn’t always been a household name, but its roots dig deep into the food science era of the early twentieth century, right alongside the explosion of interest in sugar alcohols for food technology. It grew out of a genuine need: make sweeteners that don’t hammer teeth or spike blood sugar. In the 1960s, European food researchers found they could refine wheat or corn starches and coax them into polyols, and Maltito emerged as a versatile alternative. By the time shelf-stable baked goods and sugar-free snacks became possible in the late twentieth century, Maltito found itself in everything from candies to fillings. Suddenly, countries from Japan to the United States had product lines advertising “reduced calorie” or “no sugar added,” and Maltito was the engine under the hood. My own walk through food aisles over the past few decades shows: its role only keeps growing as manufacturers search for ways to meet health-conscious trends without giving up sweetness or texture.
Maltito offers the clean, balanced sweetness of traditional table sugar, but with about 70–90% that intensity. Sourced mainly from starches, especially corn or wheat, it goes through a two-step process—enzymatic hydrolysis followed by hydrogenation. The outcome is a crumbly white powder or a syrup that dissolves like a dream. Its slightly cool taste suits chewing gums, chocolates, and snack bars where both moisture control and mouthfeel matter. Maltito never feels like an afterthought; it gives sugar-free sweets their satisfying bite. Walk into any candy factory, and there’s a good chance a bin or tank holds Maltito, blended or ready to go. The base ingredient—maltitol—keeps that familiar taste without the calories or glycemic impact of cane sugar.
This compound presents a crystalline structure that absorbs water from the air if left open, so storage matters; otherwise, you’re left with clumps in your pouch or tank. It melts between 145–151°C, holding up under the heat of baking without caramelizing like regular sugars. Solubility ranks high: roughly 210 grams dissolve in 100 milliliters of water at room temperature, making it easy for food technologists to mix in all sorts of applications. Its chemical formula, C12H24O11, shows the close relationship with maltose, but the critical change is in the addition of hydrogen through the manufacturing process. Maltito resists browning reactions—no Maillard effect here—so it gives products a whiter, unchanged appearance, an advantage in confections and pharmaceuticals.
Every kilo of Maltito powder or syrup on the commercial market carries tight controls: minimum purity above 98%, monitored moisture, specific optical rotation, and clear labeling. Regulations in Europe and North America demand mills and food plants note the presence of polyols and the laxative effect that can come with overconsumption. Labels often display “E965” or “INS 965,” with nutrition panels highlighting total polyols. Kosher and Halal certifications are typical for big suppliers, as demand stretches across various dietary needs. In my own research, quality assurance teams constantly check the batch-to-batch consistency, keeping microbial contamination, heavy metals, and residual solvents below recognized thresholds.
Crafting Maltito starts with starch—usually corn or wheat—broken down to maltose with alpha-amylase and pullulanase enzymes. The next trick is the hydrogenation process, where the maltose bathes in hydrogen gas under a metal catalyst, often nickel. This step turns the double bonds into single ones, converting maltose to Maltito. After this, filtration, decolorization, and concentration step in to purify and fine-tune the syrup or dehydrate it into powder. Big factories scale this synthesis up in stainless steel reactors, controlling temperature and pressure, tweaking conditions to get the highest purity. Regular maintenance and care in catalyst use keep contamination and byproducts low.
Maltito’s backbone opens some doors for modification. Mild oxidation changes the degree of sweetness, while blending with other sugar alcohols tailors mouthfeel or sweetness. Enzymatic tweaking can yield mixtures that match the texture of sucrose more closely or resist crystallization. In the lab, chemical engineers experiment with encapsulation for slower flavor release or coating. Maltito generally sidesteps reactive pathways that would build aldehydes or ketones, so it avoids the off-flavors of caramelizing sugars, making it a safe player in heated processes. Its structure also resists microbial fermentation, stretching shelf life in moisture-prone candy and baking applications.
Walk through a trade show or read the backs of candy bar wrappers, and you’ll spot “maltitol,” “maltit,” and “E965.” Famous product lines often drop catchy trade names like SweetPearl, Maltisweet, and C*Sorbidex. Pharmaceutical formulations use names such as Maltisorb, especially for chewable tablets and oral suspensions. Natural food stores prefer “corn polyol syrup” to emphasize plant origins. Whatever the alias, the substance gives the same result: a sugar-like texture without tooth decay worries.
Production lines for Maltito run with strict protocols: enclosed reactors, precise catalyst handling, and regular environmental checks. Global manufacturers follow ISO and HACCP safety plans. Europe’s EFSA and the U.S. FDA both list maltitol as GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) for consumers, though warnings about excessive intake appear on many packages. Taste panels test every lot for off-flavors, and every bag passes checks for dust, allergens, and metal contaminants. Even on a small scale, factories separate it from high-allergen ingredients to avoid cross-contact, especially for goods marketed as gluten-free or nut-free. Workers run routine health and hygiene checks to prevent microbial outbreaks.
These days, Maltito sweetens most “sugar-free” treats. Hard candies, chocolates, marshmallows, baked snacks, gums, and even cough drops benefit from its stability and sugar-like melt. It bulks up low-calorie jams and ice creams, and pharmaceutical companies blend it into syrups, chewable pills, and lozenges for stability without bitterness. Dairy products like flavored yogurts use Maltito for both sweetness and smoothness, especially in health-oriented lines. The rise in diabetic diets and demand for tooth-friendly snacks pulled Maltito out of specialty circles and into everyday stores worldwide. As food allergies spread, brands tap Maltito for hypoallergenic shakes and gluten-free baked goods—one more reason it’s hard to picture sugar-free aisles without it.
R&D teams push Maltito further with each passing year. Labs tweak crystal size for smoother chocolates, blend with high-intensity sweeteners for better flavor, and investigate microencapsulation to avoid gritty textures in powdered drinks. Researchers explore using Maltito in prebiotic blends since it resists breakdown in the mouth and small intestine but ferments in the colon, supporting healthy gut flora. Innovations in the feedstock—moving from traditional corn or wheat starches to pea or tapioca sources—seek to tap niche markets concerned about GMOs or allergens. Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical industry tests Maltito in new slow-release tablets and flavor-masking systems. Each success brings more market flexibility.
Science backs up Maltito’s reputation for safety within recommended levels. Studies over the years show Maltito doesn’t spike blood sugar the way regular sucrose does, making it safe for most diabetic diets. Tests in rodents and humans failed to turn up carcinogenicity or organ damage even at high doses, though excessive consumption—typically over 40–50 grams in a sitting—often leads to gas or a laxative effect, something product labels have to warn about by law in most regions. Dental health data supports Maltito use for cavity control, given bacteria in the mouth can’t ferment it the way they do sucrose. Consistent monitoring, plus regular review of toxicological evidence, keeps Maltito’s safety well documented for both consumers and regulators.
Looking ahead, Maltito stands poised for growth as consumers look for ways to satisfy a sweet tooth with fewer risks. Product developers invest in mixes with sweeteners like stevia, monk fruit, or sucralose, trying to find that “just right” combination of taste and texture. Potential breakthroughs in biotechnology could deliver Maltito from novel plant sources or streamline hydrogenation steps, lowering energy use and expanding supply. Clean-label trends in the food sector continue to raise the bar: transparency in both sourcing and processing drives R&D. With increasing awareness of metabolic health and lifestyle diseases, food makers lean ever closer to solutions like Maltito. Expect its role in personalized nutrition to grow, with blends tailored to individual gut microflora, low-glycemic indexes, and specific food sensitivities. For now, Maltito remains a centerpiece of the sugar-free revolution, with science and innovation continuing to expand its reach.
Maltito, or maltitol, pops up in low-sugar treats, chewing gum, and even in some protein bars. I first noticed the ingredient when cutting back on sugar for health reasons. The taste surprised me—it was sweet, but not harsh like some sugar substitutes. Born from wheat or corn starch, maltito belongs to the sugar alcohol family. It’s not just another sweetener. You’ll spot it in many “sugar-free” or “low-carb” products on today’s grocery shelves.
People like maltito because it acts and tastes close to regular sugar. Melt a square of “sugar-free” chocolate in your mouth—maltito’s likely in there, keeping the taste true to the real thing. Manufacturers can rely on it to keep foods moist, prevent crystallization, and support that satisfying bite you expect from snacks. Candies and baked goods made with regular sugar don’t work the same way if you completely swap in alternatives like stevia or sucralose. Maltito bridges the gap by giving both texture and sweetness, which keeps the finished product enjoyable and familiar.
Many of us worry about blood sugar spikes. Compared to sucrose, maltito has a much smaller impact on blood glucose. For folks with diabetes or anyone tracking carbs, this is key. Maltito clocks in at fewer calories than sugar—about 2.1 calories per gram instead of four—so it helps lighten the calorie load without gutting the enjoyment. My own experience with sugar substitutes often came with odd aftertastes or a strange cold sensation on the tongue, yet maltito seemed smoother and more “normal.”
Eager snackers sometimes eat more low-carb treats, thinking they’re guilt-free. But the body digests maltito differently. If you eat a lot of it in one go, stomach cramping and gas might follow. One bar is usually fine, but two or three in a sitting can catch you off guard. Labels often warn about this, but it’s not always front and center. I learned the hard way while reaching for more snacks during a movie night.
Sweeteners like maltito don’t offer a free pass to eat unlimited candy, but they do give people more control. For families facing blood sugar management, maltito opens up more options. I’ve found my kids ask fewer “Can I have that?” questions since I brought home snacks labeled “no sugar added.” Maltito doesn’t cause tooth decay like regular sugar, which gives parents peace of mind. The American Diabetes Association recognizes maltitol as an option for diabetics, but stresses moderation—not abandoning mindful eating.
Learning to read labels has helped me make better choices. Keeping intake reasonable and mixing maltito products with other wholesome foods can limit stomach issues. Dietitians recommend treating sugar substitutes as bridges, not replacements for fruits, whole grains, and unprocessed foods. Kids see the “sugar-free” label and think endless treats, so guiding portion sizes and reading ingredient lists becomes part of everyday life. In a world full of sugar-laden options, maltito can be useful, but health stays grounded in big-picture habits and honest conversations.
Maltitol comes up in almost every conversation I’ve had with friends looking for ways to enjoy sweet flavors without blowing up their blood sugar. It’s a sugar alcohol, found in plenty of low-sugar or sugar-free snacks. You’ll notice it in protein bars, ice creams, even some chocolates that claim to be “diabetic friendly.” That sounds pretty good at first glance, especially when the alternative is plain white sugar. But does “sugar-free” always mean “a free pass”? For folks managing diabetes every day, those details matter.
Manufacturers reach for maltitol because it’s about 70% as sweet as sugar and has fewer calories. The real question, though, is blood sugar. Maltitol doesn’t spike glucose like regular sugar, but that doesn’t mean zero effect. According to studies, it has a glycemic index (GI) around 35, which falls in the middle ground. For comparison: table sugar scores about 65, while true alternatives like stevia or erythritol usually stay at or near zero.
I remember testing maltitol-sweetened snacks with my diabetic father. We noticed his glucose climbed—not as much as after a slice of cake, but more than after stevia-based treats. Science backs this up: research published in the British Journal of Nutrition tracked higher blood glucose and insulin responses with maltitol, though still less than sucrose or glucose. The American Diabetes Association recognizes that sugar alcohols aren’t a magic bullet, echoing stories like my dad’s.
Blood sugar isn’t the only thing to think about. People often overlook how sugar alcohols like maltitol hit the gut. Too many maltitol-sweet snacks can send anyone racing for the bathroom. Bloating, gas, and discomfort all crop up at higher doses. Food labels warn that “excessive consumption may cause a laxative effect”—anyone who’s overdone sugar-free gum knows this all too well.
Grocery aisles throw “sugar-free” and “diabetic-friendly” claims at you, but labels need a closer look. Maltitol often shows up in foods labeled as having “reduced sugar.” After hearing from people in my community, it’s clear many think these foods have almost no impact on blood sugar. The truth is, maltitol can still add up, especially with multiple servings, and folks sometimes eat more than they planned because the label feels safer. This can lead to unexpected spikes and frustration—no one wants surprises in their self-care routine.
Leaving maltitol off the shopping list isn’t always necessary. Moderation and understanding go a long way. For those with diabetes, checking serving sizes and reading nutrition panels often helps sidestep surprises. I’ve found that using a continuous glucose monitor provides personal feedback that cuts through marketing noise. If a maltitol-sweetened bar makes blood sugar jump, it provides a lesson labels won’t spell out.
Many people find better luck mixing in more reliable sweeteners—stevia, monk fruit, or erythritol—which tend to have a smaller glucose impact. Brands have started to catch on, adjusting their recipes for people serious about blood sugar control.
Making informed decisions is what counts. People with diabetes deserve straight answers, not just big promises from food packaging. A little knowledge—plus some hands-on tracking—can turn confusion into confidence at snack time.
Walking down the supermarket's snack aisle, it's easy to spot “sugar-free” treats that list Maltito—a common name for maltitol—among their ingredients. For people diagnosed with celiac disease or who have gluten sensitivity, questions about this sweetener often pop up at the checkout. Maltitol comes from starch, and wheat is one of several crops that can become starch for commercial production. That makes the question about gluten in Maltito bit more than just trivia—it’s about health and peace of mind.
Most maltitol on the market comes from corn or wheat starch. In the case of wheat, there’s a concern that the original protein (gluten) could sneak its way into the final sweetener. The reality looks more reassuring. Manufacturing processes for polyols such as maltitol break starch molecules away from gluten proteins. Several scientific studies and regulatory checks—particularly in the EU and the United States—find that the finished product contains either undetectable or trace gluten, often well below the safety threshold of 20 parts per million set by gluten-free food standards.
From personal experience helping friends with celiac scan ingredient lists, I've noticed that big-name brands do tend to call out wheat derivatives. Some packaging will have a gluten-free stamp, while others leave the story untold. If in doubt, contacting the company or looking up a batch’s origin helps. Not everyone in the food supply chain is equally careful, so cross-contamination is a risk—small but present.
Sugar substitutes used to send us running for the bathroom as much as the snack aisle. Beyond gluten, allergies keep many wary. Maltitol itself, according to major allergen databases and regulatory agencies such as the FDA, rarely causes allergic reactions in people who don’t specifically have sensitivities to corn or wheat.
Here’s the tricky part: some brands may blend maltitol with other sweeteners like sorbitol, xylitol, or even artificial flavors that could trigger allergies. I've seen product labels quietly mention “contains soy” or “manufactured in facilities that process tree nuts,” especially on chocolates and chewy candies. For sensitive individuals, that’s a dealbreaker.
I keep track of new recalls and labeling policies, noticing more food makers adopting strict allergen testing. Food safety science has made real progress, but the human element—reading carefully, calling companies, participating in support groups—still makes the choice safer. Maltitol’s reputation as a generally safe ingredient stands on firm ground when sourced from reputable companies that communicate openly about allergens.
There’s room for manufacturers to improve. Pinning down the exact crop origin on every package would help. Clear gluten-free and allergen statements, not just fine print buried in ingredient lists, would go a long way. Technology already exists that lets companies test down to a few ppm of gluten; more frequent use could build trust.
Crowdsourcing, mobile apps, and store-level transparency are becoming new allies in the fight against accidental exposure to allergens. Shoppers with celiac disease, wheat allergies, or sensitivities shape the way food companies approach Maltito and every other sweetener. Direct dialogue, robust transparency, and a science-backed approach mean more people can reach for treats on the shelf without worry.
Understanding the journey from raw starch to sweetener puts the real story of Maltito in context—not just for those counting carbs, but for every person who reads a label hoping for certainty.
I keep seeing maltitol in protein bars and sugar-free treats lining grocery store shelves. The draw comes from its sweet taste, pretty close to table sugar, with fewer calories and a lower impact on blood sugar. Food makers love it. It bulks up candy and cookies without sending glucose readings through the roof. For people living with diabetes or those tracking calories, maltitol can feel like a game changer.
Sit down with a bag of sugar-free gummy bears loaded with maltitol, and the results can get uncomfortable. I’ve learned—both from others and personal trial—that maltitol can cause bloating, stomach cramps, and urgent trips to the bathroom. The human gut only absorbs part of the maltitol eaten. Bacteria in the colon feast on what’s left, releasing gas and drawing water into the bowels. This process explains why many report gas, diarrhea, and a rumbling stomach after a heavy snack session.
Clinical studies back up these stories. The European Food Safety Authority confirms that high doses—mostly over 40-50 grams in one sitting—make digestive problems more likely, especially for kids. Single cookies or a couple of small candies usually won’t wreak havoc, but several servings in a day push most people past their comfort zone. Food labels in some countries must even warn of a laxative effect.
Blood sugar management is a big reason people choose maltitol-based snacks. Compared to regular sugar, maltitol raises blood sugar more slowly. But maltitol is not as mild as some other sugar alcohols, like erythritol. I looked at research showing that maltitol’s glycemic index is around 35, which is higher than xylitol and way above zero-calorie substitutes like stevia. Anyone aiming for strict glucose control—especially people with diabetes—should keep this in mind. Babies and young kids process these substitutes differently, making them more likely to run into problems even from smaller amounts.
Moderation stands out as the simplest approach. For those prone to stomach problems, spacing servings through the day, reading nutrition labels, and mixing things up with unsweetened snacks can help avoid discomfort. If you are new to sugar alcohols, start with just a small bite at home. Notice how your body reacts before trusting a full serving while out and about. People with diabetes should check their blood sugar after eating cases with maltitol, just to see how they respond. Parents can keep children’s portions extra-small and watch closely for any stomach upset.
More people want sweet treats while cutting back on sugar and calories. Maltitol pops up as a tempting option, but it comes with real side effects that don’t fit everyone’s needs. Talking with a registered dietitian or healthcare provider can help sort through food options for those with sensitive stomachs or health concerns. Product developers and manufacturers could make labels clearer and offer consumer-friendly facts, which would help shoppers make informed choices. Building a practice of label reading and body listening can help find sweet balance in daily eating.
Maltito—often known as maltitol—has shown up in everything from sugar-free chocolate to low-calorie chewing gum. As a sugar alcohol, it carries a sweet punch with fewer calories and less impact on blood sugar compared to table sugar. Folks watching carbs or calories tend to run into it in processed foods, but sometimes you want to buy it for home baking or specialty recipes.
Most people searching for maltitol will start online. Amazon and Walmart’s websites list maltitol powder and syrup, usually sold in bags or bottles for home cooks, bakeries, or small food businesses. These platforms offer customer reviews and ratings, which can help you decide which supplier feels trustworthy. European brands also pop up since maltitol turns up more in European candies, baking mixes, and diabetic-friendly foods.
Health food shops, especially chains focused on weight loss, diabetes, or keto diets, sometimes keep maltitol in stock. Staff at these stores tend to know a thing or two about sugar substitutes, so you can talk over your needs before making a choice. Local baking supply shops can also surprise you with specialty sweeteners tucked away on the shelves. If you're in a big city, international grocery stores may carry it, especially if they import sugar-free or reduced-calorie foods.
Prices swing depending on where you shop and how much you buy. A one-pound (about 454 grams) bag on Amazon might run from $8 up to $15 USD, depending on the brand, purity, and whether it's marketed toward bakers or casual cooks. Bulk orders—usually 5 pounds or more—bring the price down per pound, sometimes below $5 per pound when you commit to a larger bag. Buying from specialty wholesalers, you might spot steep discounts but may need to meet a minimum order.
Maltitol syrup lands in a similar price range, sometimes a touch higher due to more involved processing. For reference, Splenda (sucralose)—another common alternative—costs a bit more per serving, so maltitol competes on price with other sugar replacements. Catching sales or using subscription services with regular online orders helps trim costs, especially for folks using sweeteners daily.
Not all maltitol powders work the same. Purity and processing methods shape the taste and texture. Some cheaper maltitol can leave an aftertaste or gritty feel in your mouth, spoiling baked goods. If you plan to use maltitol in chocolates or candies, check the brand’s food safety certifications. In my experience, calling a supplier directly opens up a real conversation about sourcing and quality—especially important if you’re buying in bulk or for a small business. Look for suppliers who are transparent about factory testing, packaging, and expiration dates.
All sugar alcohols, maltitol included, can cause digestive discomfort if eaten in large amounts. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and similar regulators in Canada and Europe require warning labels if a product contains enough maltitol to possibly cause problems. Not everyone reacts the same, but starting with small amounts helps. If you’re shopping for people with celiac disease or allergies, scan product labels for gluten- or allergen-cross contamination warnings. Allergens sneak into shared packing lines more than you’d think.
Shopping for food ingredients online can feel like a leap of faith. Real reviews, clear return policies, and feedback from other buyers help, especially if you’re buying sweets for health reasons. Watching your sugar or calorie intake means trusting that the label matches what’s really in the bag. Reach out to brands if you have questions—they’ll often email you test results or certificates. Doing a little digging pays off when you want tasty results and peace of mind.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 6-O-α-D-Glucopyranosyl-D-glucitol |
| Other names |
Maltitol Maltite Hydrogenated Maltose E965 |
| Pronunciation | /ˌmælˈtiːtoʊ/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 4-O-α-D-Glucopyranosyl-D-glucitol |
| Other names |
Maltitol Maltite E965 |
| Pronunciation | /ˈmæl.ti.toʊ/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 585-88-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1911315 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:16849 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1232262 |
| ChemSpider | 32953 |
| DrugBank | DB02136 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 03-2119474884-26-0000 |
| EC Number | 9544121 |
| Gmelin Reference | 8984 |
| KEGG | C01379 |
| MeSH | Corylus Plant Extracts |
| PubChem CID | 107905 |
| RTECS number | WK4890000 |
| UNII | YC5R5YRN1W |
| UN number | UN number: Not regulated |
| CAS Number | 585-88-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 11039845 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:16805 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1233554 |
| ChemSpider | 5284352 |
| DrugBank | DB02112 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 02a93af9-bc38-4c72-ab48-e884b8070c9e |
| EC Number | 223-415-7 |
| Gmelin Reference | 94984 |
| KEGG | C01360 |
| MeSH | C0069673 |
| PubChem CID | 107821 |
| RTECS number | WN5066000 |
| UNII | 31T1GH1OTY |
| UN number | UN3209 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C12H24O11 |
| Molar mass | 344.31 g/mol |
| Appearance | Light brown powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.05 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 0.11 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 12.07 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 3.6 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.465 |
| Viscosity | 16000-25000 cP |
| Dipole moment | 1.98 D |
| Chemical formula | C12H24O11 |
| Molar mass | 344.31 g/mol |
| Appearance | Maltito is a light brown, fine, free-flowing powder. |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.05 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 0.11 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 12.1 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 13.6 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.445 |
| Viscosity | 4700 – 5100 cP |
| Dipole moment | 1.98 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 323.3 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -2060 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -4181 kJ/mol |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 444.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -2065.8 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -3763.8 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A16AX01 |
| ATC code | A16AX10 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Causes serious eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07 |
| Pictograms | Gluten-Free, Suitable for Vegetarians, No Added Sugar |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: If you are not used to consuming maltitol, excessive consumption may cause a laxative effect. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
| Flash point | 120°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | > LD50 (oral, rat): 28,400 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 15,900 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | NIOSH-116599 |
| PEL (Permissible) | 15 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.90 |
| Main hazards | May cause a laxative effect if consumed in excess |
| GHS labelling | GHS07 |
| Pictograms | Contains gluten, Contains milk and its derivatives, Contains soy and its derivatives, May contain peanuts and derivatives, May contain tree nuts and derivatives, May contain egg and derivatives |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statement |
| Precautionary statements | Keep out of reach of children. Store in a cool, dry place. Close the lid tightly after use. In case of accidental ingestion, seek medical advice. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
| Autoignition temperature | The autoignition temperature of Maltito is **430°C**. |
| Lethal dose or concentration | Lethal dose or concentration: LD50 (oral, rat): > 15,800 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | 21 g/kg |
| NIOSH | A1TC3 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible) of Maltito: 100 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 12 |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | No IDLH established. |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Mannitol Sorbitol Isomalt Lactitol Xylitol |
| Related compounds |
Maltitol Sorbitol Xylitol Isomalt Mannitol Lactitol |