Magnesium ascorbyl phosphate didn’t just pop up overnight. This stabilized vitamin C derivative came from continued attempts to solve a classic problem: how do you deliver vitamin C to skin without it breaking down? Ascorbic acid itself works wonders for skin health, but it degrades fast—sunlight, oxygen, and water all take their toll. In the late 20th century, researchers looked for ways to protect this precious molecule. They found that by adding a phosphate group and binding it to magnesium, vitamin C stayed stable and spread more easily in water-rich creams. Investment in further research sharpened understanding of practical benefits and how to mass-produce stable, reliable versions. With each step, the ingredient picked up momentum among formulators eager for skin brightening, antioxidant, and anti-aging effects.
Magnesium ascorbyl phosphate shows up as a white or near-white solid powder. It dissolves best in water yet doesn’t get along with non-polar solvents. Water-based serums and gels welcome it, while fat-based products tend to leave it out. Labs measure purity by high-performance liquid chromatography and check for clear solubility profiles to rule out undissolved grit. This compound keeps a steady pH between 6.0 to 7.5, helping finished products balance skin friendliness without spoiling before their time. Labels must honestly report the concentration, usually between 2% and 10% for both efficacy and safety. Packaging also lists shelf life—often capped at two to three years if kept dry and cool. Standards like ISO 22716 for cosmetics manufacturing demand controls so buyers don’t get a guesswork blend but a product you can count on batch after batch.
Synthesizing magnesium ascorbyl phosphate means starting with good old vitamin C. Manufacturers dissolve ascorbic acid in water, tweak the pH upwards, then introduce phosphoric acid and magnesium chloride under exacting conditions. The reaction turns the vitamin C into a phosphate ester and binds it to magnesium ions. Filtering and drying produce the crystalline powder used in countless products. Researchers keep exploring ways to boost yields, reduce byproducts, and cut unnecessary steps out of the process. Chemical tweaks allow for a bit more stability or solubility, although major deviations from the established molecule tend to lose the original benefits. Industry sometimes experiments with different counter-ions or alternative phosphate donors, but the underlying reaction—making vitamin C more durable and skin-accessible—sticks to a proven path.
Anyone who tries to read cosmetic ingredient lists long enough stumbles over synonyms. Magnesium ascorbyl phosphate wears a few hats—sometimes it’s called MAP, or Vitamin C magnesium salt. Brands use their own names, but under the International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients, the term “Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate” makes it easy for regulators, buyers, and chemists to know what to expect. This transparency matters, since substitution or mislabeling undercuts both trust and results. Pharmaceutical and research catalogs stick to the established nomenclature so cross-references work across studies and supplier chains.
No ingredient gets into brand-name skin creams or clinical use without answering tough questions on safety and consistency. Magnesium ascorbyl phosphate falls under the scope of major regulatory bodies including the FDA in the U.S., the EU Cosmetic Directive, and various national safety boards. Guidelines shape limits on source material impurities and allowed concentration. Checklists for heavy metals or allergens protect users from unexpected side effects. Product batches face microbe tests and must clear review for stable preservation with or without added parabens or phenoxyethanol. If these standards get skipped, companies risk quick recalls, lawsuits, and lasting customer distrust. Industry analysts watch for steady supply chain stewardship as much as ingredient purity, because a trusted ingredient only stays that way if nothing slips through the cracks on the way to store shelves.
Magnesium ascorbyl phosphate isn’t just an obscure laboratory compound. Skincare companies turn to it for products where vitamin C’s brightening or antioxidant action matters but shelf-life can’t be compromised. Face creams, serums, gels, and lotions all use it. Some over-the-counter powders let users mix a fresh vitamin C solution every morning. Dermatologists opt for the substance in topical treatments designed for people with sensitive skin or conditions like hyperpigmentation, since pure ascorbic acid gets too stingy and unstable for many. In the nutrition world, less use appears—absorption in the gut doesn’t favor this stabilized form as much as the skin does. Research communities, too, use the compound to probe antioxidant activity in cell cultures, helping unravel stress and aging in skin cells.
Using anything in or on the body invites careful study. Researchers looked for acute and long-term toxicity after both high and routine doses of magnesium ascorbyl phosphate in topical use. Results so far support broad safety. Clinical studies monitor for red flags—rash, stinging, or systemic effects through absorption—but these rarely show up at common product concentrations. Animal studies failed to show carcinogenicity or significant organ-wide exposure. Even so, journals continue to publish work keeping an eye on possible rare interactions or effects in population subgroups. Evidence tallies up far better safety than many other skin actives, but regulators and researchers keep testing to add assurance and address any gaps in old data.
There’s steady growth in interest around magnesium ascorbyl phosphate, mostly because users want vitamin C’s benefits without the trade-off of quick spoiling or irritation. Formulators spend long hours hunting ways to blend it further into new kinds of emulsions or mix it with probiotics and plant-based extracts. Personal experience in testing lotions and serums shows that users often notice long-term results, like brighter tone or reduced uneven spots, without the common sting of higher strength ascorbic acid. At the same time, the search is on for new tweaks—nanoparticles, microencapsulation, and hybrid delivery formulas that push absorption deeper and work through skin obstacles. Supply chain predictability and cost remain hurdles, especially for brands pushing affordable versions in global markets. Still, both researchers and end users keep betting on magnesium ascorbyl phosphate, showing that a smart tweak to an age-old vitamin can keep new possibilities alive both in science and in daily life.
Magnesium ascorbyl phosphate, or MAP, brings vitamin C into the skincare world in a gentle, stable form. Under the microscope, regular vitamin C can act unpredictably: it breaks down fast when exposed to light and air. MAP stays strong for much longer, which makes it more practical for people looking to brighten skin, fade dark spots, or fight signs of aging without dealing with irritation or the fuss of unstable ingredients.
People who struggle to use pure vitamin C often find MAP a welcome alternative. Regular ascorbic acid forms can sting or cause redness, but MAP feels smooth and doesn’t spark the same irritation. I tested a vitamin C serum in my own routine and faced a tingly, red reaction after just a few days. Switching to a MAP-based formula, that uncomfortable sensation disappeared, but my skin still showed signs of glow and clarity. For anyone with reactive skin types or a history of irritation, this ingredient becomes a real game-changer.
Dark spots and uneven skin tone bother a lot of people, usually from sun exposure, hormones, or breakouts. MAP steps up as a reliable option for tackling these issues. Published dermatology studies back up MAP’s ability to help lighten dark areas over time by blocking melanin production, which causes those stubborn spots. Using MAP in my morning skin routine, along with sunscreen, I noticed my post-acne marks faded faster, and new ones didn’t set in so deep. Many dermatologists recommend MAP for this exact reason—strong enough to make a difference, but it won’t overwhelm fragile skin.
Daily life exposes skin to stress from pollution and sun, which ramps up the production of free radicals. These nasty molecules can speed up signs of aging and weaken skin’s natural defenses. MAP acts as a strong antioxidant, soaking up free radicals before they can cause much damage. On days I walked through city streets or spent time outside, sticking to a routine with MAP seemed to help my skin recover faster—less redness, fewer dry patches, and an overall calm complexion. Multiple academic studies highlight MAP’s antioxidant power, showing it supports healthier skin function in polluted environments.
MAP brings more than just brightening or protection—its gentle touch works well even for those battling dry skin. It attracts moisture to the surface and helps lock it in, which means skin stays feeling soft and comfortable. In my own experience, switching to MAP during winter months meant fewer struggles with flakes or tightness. Paired with a basic moisturizer, the results amplified even further.
MAP offers flexibility across many routines. It rarely conflicts with other common ingredients. People living with concerns about skin thinning or irritation from strong actives appreciate how MAP fits into morning or evening routines without much fuss. Product labels in stores almost always spell out if MAP is included, often as a main vitamin C form in creams and serums.
Anyone searching for healthier, brighter skin might want to consider this ingredient. Combining MAP with sunscreen presents an easy, smart route for steady results. More brands continue to add MAP to their formulations, which means it’s easier than ever to experiment and see what this gentle powerhouse can do—without risking discomfort or sensitivity setbacks.
Vitamin C attracts so many fans in the skincare world, but not every type of vitamin C goes easy on skin. Some people find pure ascorbic acid too strong. It stings, it tingles, and sometimes leaves redness behind. Magnesium ascorbyl phosphate (MAP) enters the scene as a gentler option. The idea is simple: deliver antioxidant and brightening benefits without that spicy feeling on the skin.
MAP stands apart because it’s made to play well with sensitive complexions. Unlike pure vitamin C, MAP mixes with water, creating a form less likely to upset your skin’s barrier. Research backs this up—several dermatology journals point out MAP’s lower irritation rates when compared to ascorbic acid. People with rosacea or fragile complexions often share stories about using MAP creams and serums without the burning, flaking, or itching that comes with other vitamin C products.
I’ve tried both sides. Pure ascorbic acid always got my skin bright but left my cheeks blotchy. Switching to MAP felt different. No burning, no sudden dryness. For six months, I used a lightweight lotion with 5% MAP twice daily. The dryness vanished and my skin tone looked more even, especially around an old patch of sun damage. Ingredients matter, but so does the way a product fits into real routines. MAP helped me stick to vitamin C longer, so I reaped the benefits without the discomfort.
Sensitive skin means more than just the occasional itch. It often involves a thinner barrier, which allows irritants to get in faster. MAP acts as an antioxidant, soaking up free radicals from the environment that can make skin more fragile. At the same time, it supports collagen—a key factor for skin that handles daily stress better. Unlike many acids or classic vitamin C, MAP refuses to break down into compounds that harm the barrier.
Several clinical studies confirm MAP helps fade dark spots. It brightens dull patches and brings antioxidants to the skin surface. These benefits show up without the high rates of reaction seen with stronger acids. Dermatologists often suggest MAP for those recovering from peels or dealing with chronic redness. According to the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, most people tolerate MAP in concentrations up to 10%.
Every product deserves a patch test, regardless of a gentle reputation. MAP rarely causes issues, but allergies are always possible. Those with extremely reactive skin might pair MAP with barrier creams or use it every other day. Look out for unnecessary fragrance or harsh preservatives in your serum, because these do more harm than the vitamin C itself.
Sensitive skin pulls people into a complicated search for ingredients that work without backlash. MAP offers a chance to enjoy the trusted effects of vitamin C—brighter, stronger, more even skin—without the risk most people associate with classic ascorbic acid. For anyone hesitant about diving into vitamin C, MAP stacks up as a reliable, science-supported way to get the benefits and avoid the burn.
Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate (MAP) comes up often in conversations about skincare. This form of vitamin C doesn’t sting like some of the stronger acids, so people with sensitive skin feel a lot more comfortable using it. I remember the first time I switched from ascorbic acid to MAP—a noticeable difference. My cheeks quit burning and the redness simmered down after just a couple weeks.
Many dermatologists suggest MAP for good reason. Traditional vitamin C breaks down in water and air, losing strength in many creams before you even use them. MAP stays stable. This means you swipe it on in the morning, and it keeps working, guarding your skin from pollution or UV rays as you go about your day. Some studies show it not only brightens the skin, but it also helps fight the kind of cellular wear-and-tear that causes spots and lines over time.
MAP wants a spot after you wash your face, before you seal up your skin with heavier creams or oils. Clean skin soaks up the serum or lightweight cream form of MAP quickly, so those vitamins can work deeper instead of just sitting on top. Those with acne-prone skin appreciate that MAP doesn’t clog pores or ramp up breakouts. It's water-soluble, so it doesn’t leave a greasy finish, which means anyone who sweats a lot during the day still stays comfortable.
A lot of people get confused about layering their products. I ran into that myself, especially adding something new to my usual sunscreen or moisturizer. The dermatologist I trust once explained: use products from thinnest to thickest. Cleanser, then serums (like MAP), then moisturizer, then sunscreen as the top layer if it’s the daytime. Believe me, this order helped my skin feel less sticky and made the active ingredients work harder for me.
One thing you notice with MAP: results don’t come overnight. Unlike the strong tingle people sometimes chase with pure vitamin C, gentle options like this work slowly but leave skin less irritated in the long run. Clinical studies back this up. Researchers tracking MAP users found skin looked brighter and less blotchy after about two months. Brown spots faded, and skin felt a bit more elastic.
I always recommend keeping expectations realistic. If your skin has deeper pigment or sun damage, MAP can take six months or longer to make a dent. Some mix it up with niacinamide, since both target uneven tone and support the skin barrier. That combo worked for me the winter I struggled with dullness and dry patches.
Look for MAP listed among the first ingredients on the label to get enough of it in each dose. Typical strengths range from 3% up to 10%. Some brands combine MAP with other antioxidants or hyaluronic acid, boosting hydration and protection against daily stressors. Safety studies confirm MAP works for most skin types, including those on prescription retinoids or with rosacea.
Don’t skip sunscreen just because you use an antioxidant. Even a powerful formula can’t block all sun damage. I learned the hard way after forgetting to reapply sunscreen on a beach trip—dark spots popped up, even with a solid skincare lineup. Consistency counts: MAP works best used once or twice a day, every day, year-round.
Adding Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate as the vitamin C step made my routine a whole lot easier. My skin feels less reactive, and the steady improvements in tone keep me reaching for it each morning. Choosing the right product and sticking to that order—cleanse, MAP, moisturize, protect—keeps things simple. That’s a relief in a crowded beauty industry always promising a miracle.
Magnesium ascorbyl phosphate, often shortened to MAP, shows up on more ingredient lists every year. It comes from vitamin C and offers claims of brightening skin and fighting free radical damage. Vitamin C itself turns unstable in water-based products, especially with light and air. MAP gives brands a more stable alternative, and it’s less likely to sting compared to pure ascorbic acid. None of this means it’s a free pass for everyone.
Few people talk about reactions to vitamin C derivatives like MAP, but side effects can still pop up. Skin irritation usually ranks as the first noticeable problem. Redness, mild burning, or itching follow on the heels of any new skincare product for some folks. Sometimes this happens because the formula pairs MAP with other active ingredients, or the product packs in unnecessary fragrances and fillers. On rare occasions, someone gets hives or more severe inflammation. Allergic reactions to MAP specifically look pretty rare, but sensitive skin types can still have rough patches—literally and figuratively.
I’ve tried MAP creams and serums, and one summer my cheeks felt tight and itchy after a switch. Turning the bottle around, fragrance and a low pH (around 6) popped out on the ingredient list. It turned out my skin preferred a simpler, more basic formula, proving even “gentle” derivatives can backfire without careful matching.
Dermatology clinics have pointed out that MAP doesn’t seem to worsen photosensitivity the way pure vitamin C can. For me and many others, that’s a big relief—worrying about sun sneaking in and undoing all the hard work is no fun. Still, even these “gentler” forms can’t fix every skin issue or work for every person.
People with ultra-sensitive or allergy-prone skin should patch test MAP products before slathering them over the entire face. If eczema, rosacea, or contact dermatitis shows up in your medical history, a test patch belongs behind your ear or on your jawline. Even drugstore products can give trouble, since MAP occasionally shows up with preservatives like parabens or phenoxyethanol, both of which have caused clogged pores or breakouts in some users.
No proven link ties MAP to long-term skin thinning or scarring, but too much exfoliation in combination with MAP can cause dryness and flaking. That’s often what people mean when they say a product “gave me red patches.” Mixing with retinol or acids might magnify this, so stacking multiple actives can lead to more trouble than results.
Simple routines carry fewer risks. Patch testing on clean skin helps weed out irritants early. Keep an eye out for products with short, straightforward ingredient lists. Fragrance-free or hypoallergenic formulas reduce the chances of a reaction, especially for those of us fighting unpredictable breakouts or rashes.
If trying MAP for the first time, starting with a lower concentration and building up makes sense. Most side effects show up after the first few days, if they’re going to appear at all. Watching out for redness, new bumps, or a burning sensation can help spot trouble before it spirals.
Dermatologists at places like the American Academy of Dermatology typically rate MAP as safer than harsh acids or alcohol-heavy toners. Medical research—like articles from the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology—backs this up. MAP seems gentler on skin than many antioxidants. Still, safe doesn’t mean risk-free. Even so-called gentle ingredients can surprise you, proving that patch testing and a bit of patience go a long way. For most people, careful, consistent use brings out the best in MAP without many headaches.
Walk into any skincare aisle and you’ll find plenty of products boasting vitamin C. Most people know vitamin C from oranges and cold remedies, but on your skin, vitamin C matters for brightening, defending, and keeping things looking fresh. Here’s the real catch: not all forms of vitamin C get along equally with your skin or your daily routine.
Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate, or MAP for short, stands out among vitamin C options. In my own years using and researching skincare, I’ve noticed MAP wins fans thanks to its stability. Where pure vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid) tries to turn brown or lose punch when mixed with air or water, MAP keeps a cool head. That helps the average person avoid the endless frustration of tossing out cloudy, separated serums.
MAP also plays nice with more skin types. Some forms of vitamin C demand low pH (think tart, acidic formulas) and often bring stinging or redness to sensitive faces. MAP works at a friendlier, neutral pH, sidestepping that sting and irritation. Whether someone battles dry skin or simply prefers a milder morning routine, MAP steps up.
It’s true, pure L-ascorbic acid gives fast results in the lab—brighter skin, less dark spots, stronger environmental defense. But it breaks down quickly, even inside sealed bottles. MAP absorbs slower because it converts to ascorbic acid in the skin, but it hangs around longer, keeps its potency, and doesn’t spark as much drama.
From years of trying vitamin C products, I’ve found that patience with MAP pays off. Spot-fighting and glow come more gradually, yet they stick around without angry red patches. For folks who want simple, gentle, and lasting benefits, MAP covers those bases.
Some brands shout about high percentages of vitamin C. Pure L-ascorbic acid at 15% or higher often grabs headlines, even though that often brings higher costs—skin and wallet alike. MAP works in a sweet spot, with studies showing real results at lower concentrations (sometimes around 5%) without risking burning or tingling.
For the numbers-minded, research published in the Journal of Dermatological Science points to MAP helping with skin hydration and antioxidant action at around those levels. This shows you don’t always need to chase the strongest recipe to see clear results.
MAP gives peace of mind. People with sensitive skin or post-laser treatment can use it with less worry. Fewer complaints pop up about stinging or overwhelming that delicate barrier. For skincare fans juggling routines full of acids and retinoids, MAP easily fits in without causing a chemical wrestling match.
Formulators love MAP because it blends into creams and lotions without special handling. This means more reliable products finally arrive on shelves—no more surprises like separation or graininess at the bottom of a bottle. Less waste, less mess.
Choosing a vitamin C form depends on your history, your skin goals, and how much effort you want to put into product care. MAP offers balance: gentle but real brightening, stable storage, low side effects. Those who've struggled in the past with harsh treatments or rapid spoilage will likely find it a relief.
MAP might not blitz away sun spots overnight, but for people seeking long-term improvement with little hassle, it brings a steady hand. If your skin likes a smoother, less reactive relationship with actives, give MAP a serious look.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | magnesium [(2R)-2-[(1S)-1,2-dihydroxyethyl]-4,5-dihydroxyfuran-3-yl]methyl phosphate |
| Other names |
L-Ascorbic acid, mono(di-hydrogen phosphate), magnesium salt Magnesium ascorbate phosphate MAP |
| Pronunciation | /mæɡˈniːziəm əˈskɔːrbɪl fəˈsfeɪt/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | magnesium;[(2R)-2-[(1S)-1,2-dihydroxyethyl]-3,4-dihydroxy-5-phosphonooxypyran-2-yl]oxyformate |
| Other names |
MAP L-Ascorbic acid, magnesium salt Magnesium L-ascorbyl-2-phosphate Magnesium ascorbate phosphate |
| Pronunciation | /maɡˈniːziəm əˈskɔːrbɪl fəˈsfeɪt/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 113170-55-1 |
| Beilstein Reference | 14617063 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:131189 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL3184772 |
| ChemSpider | 21565078 |
| DrugBank | DB11477 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.112.253 |
| EC Number | 80693-89-4 |
| Gmelin Reference | 1521493 |
| KEGG | C15662 |
| MeSH | D017366 |
| PubChem CID | 3034393 |
| RTECS number | TA3675000 |
| UNII | L6R0901Z8E |
| UN number | Not regulated |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID6022979 |
| CAS Number | 114040-31-2 |
| Beilstein Reference | 87377 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:59736 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2105951 |
| ChemSpider | 2331611 |
| DrugBank | DB11221 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03cbc9e7-ea9c-4282-92d6-ef3d3cdb6782 |
| EC Number | EC 222-093-9 |
| Gmelin Reference | 74187 |
| KEGG | C14363 |
| MeSH | D010780 |
| PubChem CID | 114632 |
| RTECS number | TA3250000 |
| UNII | 46P2J2I95A |
| UN number | Not regulated |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C6H6MgO9P |
| Molar mass | 222.49 g/mol |
| Appearance | White or almost white crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | Bulk density: 0.40~0.60 g/mL |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | -4.2 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 7.0 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 12.20 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.56 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 2.81 D |
| Chemical formula | C6H6O9PMg |
| Molar mass | 222.49 g/mol |
| Appearance | White or almost white crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.7 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | Slightly soluble in water |
| log P | 0.9 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 7.0 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 9.6 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.56 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 2.87 D |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A11GA04 |
| ATC code | A11GA04 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Causes serious eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling for Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate: "Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). |
| Pictograms | ☀️💧🧴 |
| Signal word | No Signal Word |
| Hazard statements | Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P280, P301+P312, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0-✨ |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): >5,000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | RN 114040-31-2 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 100 mg/kg |
| Main hazards | Not hazardous according to GHS classification. |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling for Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate: `"Not classified as hazardous according to GHS"` |
| Pictograms | 🚫🔥💧 |
| Signal word | No signal word |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P280, P301+P312, P305+P351+P338, P330, P337+P313, P501 |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): >5000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | NA |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 20% |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not Listed |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Ascorbic acid Sodium ascorbyl phosphate Ascorbyl palmitate Magnesium ascorbate Calcium ascorbate |
| Related compounds |
Ascorbic acid Sodium ascorbyl phosphate Magnesium ascorbate Calcium ascorbate Ascorbyl palmitate |