The journey of Lactobacillus buchneri started over a century ago, as scientists explored the world of lactic acid bacteria and their role in fermenting foods and preserving crops. Its discovery traces back to the push for better silage preservation methods in agriculture. Farmers faced huge losses due to spoilage and breakdown of animal feeds. Researchers noticed some fermented crops lasted longer and fed animals better through cold months. This bacterium turned out to be one of the unsung heroes in this effort. Its knack for enhancing stability in silage reshaped farm practices, and interest soared as universities and agri-biotech labs dug deeper. Work in the late 20th century recognized how it converted lactic acid into acetic acid—a key point, since acetic acid acts as a natural preservative in silage. Thanks to advances in microbiology and bioengineering, L. buchneri made the leap from a wild microbe in farm piles to a thoroughly studied, tailored silage inoculant.
What stands out about L. buchneri-based products is how they’re marketed not just for animal feed fermentation but also for food and biotechnology applications. Multi-strain formulas hit the shelves, promising more stable storage of maize, ryegrass, and even vegetables. Companies highlight improved shelf-life, reduced spoilage, and even better animal health outcomes as core benefits. Some products are dry powders; others flow as concentrated liquids. Buyers often see a guaranteed minimum cell count per gram. Packaging and dosage info get careful attention—accuracy matters when you’re inoculating tons of feed. Top-quality preparations mix L. buchneri with other friendly bacteria for a more robust effect. These products make impressive claims, from curbing yeast and mold growth to boosting aerobic stability, which means the feed stays fresh longer and helps farms operate more efficiently.
Seen through a microscope, L. buchneri looks like short rods—never forming chains or clusters. Cultures grow best in a low-oxygen environment, typically between 25°C and 37°C, which is close to the inside of a tightly packed silage bunker. On the shelf, the dried preparations might look off-white or pale yellow, with a faint smell hinting at fermentation. The bacterial cells themselves develop a thick, peptidoglycan-rich outer wall, which lets them survive in silage’s acidic, sometimes harsh, environment. They’re extremely sensitive to heat and drying if not stabilized with certain cryoprotectants, so suppliers coat them with food-grade carriers for stability. Chemically, L. buchneri prefers carbohydrates as food, breaking them down into products like lactic acid and then further shifting this to acetic acid, carbon dioxide, and sometimes 1,2-propanediol.
Labeling for L. buchneri must follow strict global standards. Packages report the minimum viable count per unit weight, expressed as colony-forming units (CFU) like 1 × 1010 CFU per gram. Shelf-life dates matter, and so does proper storage information—extended light, moisture, or high temperature all but guarantee loss in effectiveness. In many countries, labeling rules require stating the genus and species, sometimes even the specific strain identifier. Labels mention carrier material content, especially for large-scale buyers who need to monitor non-bacterial ingredients for feed balancing. Users need a clear dosage chart, and safety warnings include instructions for handling biologics, like avoiding inhalation of dust and keeping out of children’s reach. Whenever L. buchneri is part of a probiotic food, ingredient lists reflect it though some products include it under more consumer-friendly synonyms like “lactic acid bacteria” or “fermentation agents.”
Producing a robust L. buchneri culture starts with isolating the strain from natural sources, such as well-fermented silage, dairy products, or even fermented vegetables. Scientists then purify it in a lab, using selective growth mediums that favor its survival over other microbes. Large tanks called fermenters grow the culture under tightly controlled conditions—temperature, pH, and oxygen levels get checked every few minutes. Once the bacteria reach their peak activity, the broth gets harvested. If manufacturers are drying it for commercial sale, they use freeze-drying (lyophilization) or spray drying, sometimes with food-safe sugars or starches added to protect the cells from damage. Powders then get tested for purity and viable cell count before getting scooped into bottles, sachets, or bulk containers. Each batch must pass microbiological tests for contaminants, like pathogenic bacteria or unwanted spores, before heading out to distributors.
Inside a silage pile, L. buchneri performs a unique trick: it shifts lactic acid, made during primary fermentation, into acetic acid and carbon dioxide. This secondary fermentation doesn’t usually happen unless oxygen runs low and lactic acid levels climb. The acetic acid doesn’t just preserve—researchers noticed it knocks down yeast and mold counts almost immediately, meaning aerobically unstable silage doesn’t heat up or decay as quickly when exposed to air. In labs, studies even show the organism’s genes get tweaked for robust acetic acid output while reducing unwanted byproducts like ethanol. Some biotechnologists work on metabolic engineering, aiming to optimize L. buchneri’s path from lactic acid to other valuable organic acids or polyols, which hold promise for biobased chemicals and plastics.
Throughout catalogs and scientific papers, L. buchneri might go by more than one name. Older studies sometimes called it “Lactobacterium buchneri” before taxonomic rules standardized its current nomenclature. Commercial products label it as “Lactic Acid Bacteria Inoculant” or narrow down with the strain—like DSM 13573 or NCIMB 40788—clearly shown. European and North American market leaders attach catchy trade names for feed industry appeal, but in every product description, the underlying organism traces back to the same functional biotype. In grocery and nutritional supplement aisles, the ingredient shows up as part of a multi-strain “lactic acid bacteria ferment” or even “silage stabilizer cultures.”
Few bacteria have been studied more closely for feed safety than L. buchneri. Food and agriculture authorities worldwide classify it as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS), thanks to decades of use with virtually no recorded health incidents in animals or workers. Manufacturers meet requirements set out by agencies like the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Food Safety Authority, including limits on heavy metals, chemical residues, and microbial contaminants. Workers handling the bulk product during silage application use disposable masks to cut down risk of inhaling fine particles. Sanitary controls in factories keep unwanted microbes out, so cross contamination stays minimal. For animal feeding, current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) focus on storage temperature—not allowing cultures to heat up or rehydrate before being mixed with silage, which keeps the bacteria in peak form.
L. buchneri reshapes animal feed storage across livestock sectors—dairy, beef, and even bioenergy crops like corn silage get treated with this bacterial additive. Its use nearly eliminates classic post-opening silage spoilage, keeping bunkers fresher for weeks even in hot, humid climates. Some large dairy farms report feed-out times stretching longer than ever before, meaning fewer wasted tons and improved cost controls. There’s interest building in the food processing industry, where the bacterium’s fermentation traits could aid production of plant-based cheeses, yogurts, pickles, and low-salt fermented meat products. Biotechnologists eye it for acetic acid and polyol synthesis, with researchers exploring enzyme tweaks to build robust biorefineries. Its cell wall structure even gets attention from the pharmaceutical sector, where fragments might trigger mild immune responses useful for future vaccines.
Labs across Europe, North America, and parts of Asia track thousands of L. buchneri strains. Researchers sequence entire genomes to reveal which genes give some strains an edge in harsh environments. There’s a big push to breed or edit new strains that maintain high acetic acid production even at lower temperatures or in tougher feedstocks, like high-fiber forage crops. Studies zoom in on the bacterium’s stress response genes—how it handles acid, osmotic pressure, or competition with spoilage organisms. Partnerships between seed companies and biologicals firms create full silage “starter kits” blending L. buchneri with other microbes to match specific regional crops or climates. There’s also growing interest in how L. buchneri can coexist with probiotic cultures for animal health, possibly improving gut microflora in ruminants or poultry.
Every major authority has weighed in on L. buchneri safety. Chronic toxicity studies in lab rats, livestock, and even poultry find no evidence it causes harm, even at much higher doses than seen in real-world feeding. Independent labs scan batches for traces of toxic metabolites, like biogenic amines, and rarely detect problematic levels. Veterinary journals track feedlot incidents, and despite decades of widespread use, no links to animal illness or deaths surface. Stability tests confirm the bacteria don’t mutate or transfer antibiotic resistance to gut microflora. For workers, low-level respiratory irritation surfaces only with careless handling of dry powders—a risk nearly erased with basic protective gear. These safety results boost confidence among regulators and large-scale feed users who need reassurance with each change in product or formulation.
Lactobacillus buchneri’s future shines bright as new uses and technologies pile up. More precise DNA sequencing and strain selection could produce “designer” cultures, matching specific forage, climate, or end-product needs. There’s room for improved formulations that mix L. buchneri with other enzymes or bioprotective agents, giving farmers even longer feed shelf-life and nutrient retention. Beyond animal agriculture, there’s buzz around using its fermentation power in developing plant-based and lower-salt fermented foods, where traditional lactic fermentation falls short. Biotech startups experiment with metabolic engineering, hoping to use L. buchneri’s reaction pathways for bio-based chemical production—cutting out petrochemicals in favor of green feedstocks. In animal health, long-term trials may reveal unexpected benefits for gut microbiota modulation, immune function, or pathogen resistance in livestock. Advances in probiotic delivery systems will open new doors for feed and food manufacturers. As research continues, this hard-working microbe looks set to play an even bigger role in sustainable agriculture, biotechnology, and microbial science.
Lactobacillus buchneri might not turn heads in mainstream conversations, but in the world of agriculture and food science, it holds serious weight. For years, I'd heard the name tossed around by silage experts and food technologists. I wondered what made this bacteria so valuable — especially since thousands of other microbes live on plants and in every handful of soil.
This bacterium shows its strengths in silage, specifically in the preservation of forage for cattle. Anyone who works with hay or corn knows the heartbreak of spoilage. Moisture, oxygen, and uninvited microbes steal precious nutrients from feed, draining both wallets and herd health. Silage improved with L. buchneri simply lasts longer. The bacterium helps convert lactic acid into acetic acid, which keeps molds and yeasts in check. In practice, this means feed stays fresh, even in hot climates or over long storage periods. For a dairy operation, a few weeks of extra shelf life makes a difference—less waste, more milk, and healthier cows.
Almost every jar of traditional sauerkraut or pickles brings a little bit of beneficial bacteria to the table. L. buchneri has a unique knack for slowing down spoilage, thanks to its production of acetic acid. While not as famous as L. plantarum or L. acidophilus in yogurt, this species thrives in less-oxygenated settings and can lower the risk of rogue microbes ruining food. It even finds occasional use in the craft brewing space, with some brewers exploring its role in sour beer production—giving a layer of complexity and a longer shelf life than you’d get from other strains.
Across the globe, food safety always sits on the priority list. Contaminated silage doesn’t just spoil; it can harbor pests like Listeria. Proper ensiling using L. buchneri means farmers gain some protection, and the overall nutritional profile of the feed stays more stable. Research from the Journal of Dairy Science supports these claims, pointing toward significant improvements in aerobic stability and reductions in mycotoxins.
Although its benefits are proven, adding microbial additives can seem costly for smaller operations. Education and demonstration play major roles. When I visited farms in the Midwest, skepticism softened only after side-by-side bunkers revealed obvious differences—a sharp, sweet aroma and distinct taste in the treated feed. Co-ops and extension agents can bridge this gap, offering cost-sharing for microbial inoculants or workshops to break down the return on investment
More research continues to clarify best practices. For instance, knowing exactly how much L. buchneri to use and under what moisture conditions can refine results. It’s important to remember, though, that this bacterium won’t fix sloppy harvesting or bunk management. Good silage still starts with dry matter testing, tight packing, and sealed covers.
Farmers have enough worries—weather, market prices, disease outbreaks. By using L. buchneri, they take one big risk off the table. My experience tells me that every little edge counts. Whether on a Michigan dairy or a German biogas plant, this microbe helps preserve the hard work poured into every acre of feed. More stable silage means steadier milk yields, less wasted feed, and increased profitability—a win for producers, livestock, and the families they support.
Anyone who works with livestock knows that feed quality can make or break your year. Good silage offers steady nutrition and keeps herds healthy, saving real money down the line. Yet, silage often ends up spoiled, moldy, or leaching out precious nutrients. Once I watched a reputable dairy lose weeks of feed after heating swept through the pile, turning weeks of work sour almost overnight. Bad silage stinks—literally and financially. Here’s where Lactobacillus buchneri starts to earn its keep.
Adding Lactobacillus buchneri to the mix helps tackle a perennial headache: aerobic spoilage. Every farm worker recognizes that whiff of heating, then sees the feed rejected or poorly digested thanks to yeasts and molds. Regular silage inoculants usually keep the pH down and help the first stages of fermentation, but often struggle over the long haul, particularly for high-moisture silage like corn or grass. Without enough protection, silage exposed to air quickly degrades.
Lactobacillus buchneri works differently from many of the usual starter bugs. It transforms lactic acid into acetic acid, which slows down spoilage microbes—especially yeast. A 2019 study out of the University of Wisconsin reported reductions in yeast counts of 70% or more when the right strain made it into the pile. Less yeast means less heating and less waste. That makes a huge difference in hot, humid summers. When I tried this culture on chopped whole-plant corn, the face of the bunker stayed cool, even after days of heavy feed-out.
The acetic acid profile isn’t just about keeping out spoilage either. It translates into feed that stays fresher longer after opening. That improves intake in fussy cows—a detail you’ll hear about every day from any dairy manager struggling through a long winter. More stable silage means less labor scraping out spoiled spots and fewer vet calls for upset animals. Research by independent consultants has shown improved milk yields in herds over time, as healthy rumen function stays on track with fewer feed disruptions.
Not every farm needs the maximum dose. Wet, hard-to-pack silage benefits most, but drier high-fiber forages don’t always see the same gains. You have to match bug strains to your weather and crop mix. Too much acetic acid occasionally makes feed unpalatable, so observing daily feed intakes offers early feedback on adjustments. No silver bullet exists here: skilled packing, tight seals, and routine pile management still set the groundwork.
More savvy operators have learned to mix science with experience. Lactobacillus buchneri doesn’t replace care and attention during harvest, but it offers more control over preservation. USDA data highlights improved dry matter recovery—often a 3-5% bump—the sort of margin that buffers a farm budget against tough market swings. Once you’ve dealt with a smelly, spoiled feed bunk, that’s not an improvement you forget.
Producers aiming for the healthiest livestock and best feed efficiency now see this bacteria as part of a broader plan. No shortcut replaces skill, but the right microbial partner adds staying power to a farmer’s hard work.
Lactobacillus buchneri plays a big part in silage fermentation and animal feed. Companies package these microbes in freeze-dried powders, liquid suspensions, or granules. Keeping those products alive and ready for work begins at the warehouse and stretches all the way to the farm. Temperature, moisture, and how much oxygen hangs around during storage make a difference in the shelf life and strength of these bacteria.
Research and experience both point to cold storage as critical for keeping bacteria like Lactobacillus buchneri active. Powdered or granulated products rest best at refrigerator temperatures—usually below 8°C. At room temperature, living cell counts start falling off after just a few weeks. Cold rooms or refrigerators slow down the loss, helping ensure enough live bacteria reach the silage or animal gut and do their job. Constant cycling from cold to warm shortens shelf life dramatically, so keeping these products in a stable cool spot works better than freezing and thawing over and over again.
Excess moisture wrecks shelf life. Freeze-dried and lyophilized products lose viability quickly if humidity creeps in. Manufacturers often seal these products in multi-layered foil or plastic pouches with desiccants, not just for looks but to block out water and lower the oxygen inside. Any tears, pinpricks, or even hasty resealing lets water from the room creep in, cutting months from the shelf life. Opening a large bag and scooping here and there shortens the window for use, so splitting into smaller packs can help stop waste.
Vacuum-packed or nitrogen-flushed containers stretch the shelf life further. That extra step holds back oxygen, which damages sensitive probiotics. Dark, opaque packaging helps too, since light can trigger oxidation reactions inside the bag or bottle. Even those sturdy drums on a warehouse pallet need a dry, shaded spot to keep quality up. Checking the lot and expiration dates gives a safety net for farms and feed makers who want fresh, live bugs for every batch.
Not every farm or feed mill has perfect storage. Some folks keep silage additives next to the tractor in a hot barn through the summer. In those cases, using product up quickly becomes smart practice. Short-term warming won’t always spell disaster if the starting cell count runs high—a buffer built in by many manufacturers—but weeks in a hot, sweaty building chip away at reliability. That means less certainty in boosting fermentation or animal gut health, especially for dairy and beef producers counting on every bag to perform as promised.
Many feed consultants recommend buying for short-term use and timing deliveries closer to actual feed-out. Smaller pack sizes, extra insulation on shipping routes, and clear cut-off dates for stock rotation help bridge the gap between ideal lab storage and the reality in a barn or feed store. Print the last-resort guidelines right on the bag or drum so end users get quick advice, even on a busy day.
Takeaway:Companies invest years in fermentation and freeze-drying to keep Lactobacillus buchneri potent until it hits the feed mixer. Temperature swings, high humidity, and careless packaging undo that hard work quickly. Supporting customers with clear guidance, rugged packaging, and practical delivery plans keeps these microbe products bringing real value to farms and feed businesses around the world.
Farmers have turned to microbes like Lactobacillus buchneri in silage for decades. This bacterium has a knack for improving how feed ferments and keeps, helping livestock nutrition stay steady through the winter months or dry seasons. What really draws attention is how it stops harmful molds and yeasts from taking over stored feed. That ensures less spoilage, and makes for healthier, more consistent rations for herds and flocks.
Digging through scientific journals and the European Food Safety Authority reports, safety reviews keep showing that L. buchneri doesn’t make animals sick. After its approval for use as a technological feed additive in the European Union, regulators dug deep for any trace of toxicity, antibiotic resistance, or adverse reaction. The evidence lined up: No toxic byproducts, no bacterial infection in healthy animals, and no sign that adding it to feed contributes to the wider problem of antimicrobial resistance. My own experience working with dairy and beef producers matches these findings—cows on treated silage don’t just eat better; they seem to thrive.
Lactobacillus buchneri holds up well under practical farm conditions. On many dairy farms, feed gets stored for weeks or months. Unstable silage can lead to digestive upset, decreased feed intake, and poor milk production. Farms using L. buchneri tend to see fewer such issues because the bacteria keep pH levels balanced and prevent unwanted fermentation that leads to spoilage. Healthy silage gets eaten, not left behind in the trough. That’s less feed waste and stronger returns for farmers, stacked up alongside healthier animals. In one well-cited study, cows fed well-fermented silage with added L. buchneri produced more milk without showing signs of illness or digestive disturbance.
Regulation plays a key part in building trust. Authorities around the world have run their own risk assessments. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration lists L. buchneri as “generally recognized as safe” for direct use in animal feed. The European Food Safety Authority, too, examined not just the bacteria, but also any potential byproducts left in milk or meat. Over-the-counter products go through quality controls, with safety tested at multiple steps by public and private labs.
Rarely, farm managers talk about a strange batch of silage or a dip in appetite after using bacterial additives. Each case calls for looking at overall forage quality, harvest moisture levels, and how the bacterial culture was stored and applied. Problems almost never trace directly to L. buchneri itself, but to broader management or contamination issues. For producers who monitor storage and keep bacterial cultures fresh, it’s tough to find real drawbacks.
Solid farm management ties closely to food safety down the line. Whether feeding poultry, cattle, or sheep, adding L. buchneri to silage supports healthier animals and safer meat and dairy. That crosses over to improved sustainability, fewer resource losses, and potentially even fewer greenhouse gas emissions due to better feed utilization. Keeping communication open between feed suppliers, veterinarians, and farmers ensures continual improvement in practice and peace of mind on food safety.
Anyone who’s spent a season stacking corn or alfalfa for silage knows the story: once everything’s sealed and the waiting begins, there’s always that undercurrent of worry. Mold, spoilage, and heating can eat away at the hard work and feed value. Over the years, tools like microbial inoculants—especially strains like Lactobacillus buchneri—have made a difference. I’ve seen silage piles come out in better shape, lasting longer against the early onset of spoilage, and feeding out with fewer worries.
Not all silage goes bad the same way, but oxygen sneaks in, yeasts and molds take off, and valuable dry matter turns to junk. Lactobacillus buchneri targets those spoilage organisms by producing acetic acid during fermentation. Research led by the University of Wisconsin and others keeps showing that silage treated with this bacteria resists heating for days longer. In my own experience, the face of the silage pile holds up better in warm, humid spells, and feed loss drops.
Many farmers choose between dry and liquid formats, but liquid gets the nod more often because it coats the forage particles more evenly. Application starts with a reliable applicator—most use a tank with an adjustable-rate pump that sprays the inoculant onto chopped forage as it moves along the harvester’s chute. For custom harvesters and bigger farms, this setup allows for consistent, batch-by-batch coverage.
The standard rate recommended by most manufacturers runs from 400,000 to 600,000 colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of fresh forage. Go below that, and you might not see much effect. It helps to mix the powder formulation with clean water (ideally, chlorine-free). Shake the tank for a while, so the bacteria stay suspended. If you stick with a dry product, mixing can get tricky, as powders often settle out in the mixer or blower.
One lesson I’ve learned from old-timers and researchers: inoculants only work well if the rest of your silage management holds up. Chop length needs to hit the right window—too short, and compaction suffers; too long, and packing can’t squeeze out the air. Keep harvesters in good repair so the application rate stays on target.
Once forage piles, bunkers, or bags are filled, cover right away with good plastic and weights. Don’t assume the bugs will do all the work. If you cut corners sealing, you’ll get more spoilage, no matter how good the inoculant is.
The payoff from using L. buchneri shows up most when feed stays fresh during hot feedout days. Herds get fewer digestive upsets, and the nutrition stays closer to what came off the field. On the downside, costs climb a little with inoculants, and they’re not a cure-all—overly wet or dirty forage will still go wrong.
Regular lab testing and precise record-keeping help track any gains, not just in rumen health but in bottom-line returns. Farms that dial in basic silage practices then add a science-backed inoculant stand to make each ton of forage go further. That real-world difference keeps silage predictable, and farm planning a little less risky year after year.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Lactobacillus buchneri |
| Other names |
L. buchneri Lactobacillus buchneri NRRL B-30929 Lactiplantibacillus buchneri |
| Pronunciation | /ˌlæk.toʊ.bəˈsɪl.əs ˈbʊk.nə.raɪ/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Limosilactobacillus buchneri |
| Other names |
Buchnera L. buchneri |
| Pronunciation | /ˌlæk.toʊ.bəˈsɪl.əs ˈbuːk.nə.raɪ/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 68433-16-5 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3569177 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:87714 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2096652 |
| ChemSpider | 19028095 |
| DrugBank | DB11756 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100000013701 |
| EC Number | 4.1.1.115 |
| Gmelin Reference | 89628 |
| KEGG | lbu |
| MeSH | D041738 |
| PubChem CID | 71301463 |
| UNII | UI8Z85V3PA |
| UN number | Not regulated |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID5022650 |
| CAS Number | 41617-01-2 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3589464 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:87727 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL20906 |
| ChemSpider | No ChemSpider record exists for "Lactobacillus buchneri" as it is a bacterial species, not a single chemical compound. |
| DrugBank | DB15675 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100000020037 |
| EC Number | 4.1.1.115 |
| Gmelin Reference | 591262 |
| KEGG | kegg:K02477 |
| MeSH | D015067 |
| PubChem CID | 14150186 |
| RTECS number | OD2066000 |
| UNII | N88R4V5785 |
| UN number | UN3332 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID3039243 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C6H10O5 |
| Appearance | white or off-white powder |
| Odor | Slightly acidic |
| Density | 0.50 Kg/L |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | -2.4 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 3.5 - 4.6 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 5.17 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.341 - 1.423 |
| Viscosity | 7500-8500 cps |
| Dipole moment | 4.5 D |
| Chemical formula | C6H10O5 |
| Appearance | Off-white to light beige powder |
| Odor | Slightly acidic |
| Density | 0.56 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Slightly soluble in water |
| log P | -2.2 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 4.0 - 4.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 4.7 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.3350 – 1.3550 |
| Dipole moment | 2.55 D |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A07FA02 |
| ATC code | A07FA01 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause sensitization by inhalation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: Not classified as hazardous according to GHS. |
| Pictograms | Corrosive, Health Hazard |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. |
| REL (Recommended) | 30 mg |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Main hazards | Not hazardous. |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: Not classified as hazardous according to GHS. No pictogram, signal word, hazard statement, or precautionary statement required. |
| Pictograms | Corrosive, Exclamation Mark |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Precautionary statements | Keep out of reach of children. Avoid contact with eyes, skin, and clothing. Do not ingest. Use with adequate ventilation. Wash thoroughly after handling. Store in a cool, dry place. In case of accidental exposure, seek medical attention immediately. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | NFPA 704: "Health: 0, Flammability: 0, Instability: 0 |
| PEL (Permissible) | 10 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 70 mg/kg |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Lactobacillus brevis Lactobacillus plantarum Lactobacillus fermentum Lactobacillus casei Lactobacillus rhamnosus |
| Related compounds |
Lactobacillus fermentum Lactobacillus brevis Lactobacillus plantarum Lactobacillus casei Lactobacillus acidophilus |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 241.44 J/mol·K |