Contact Us
West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
© 2025 Alchemist Worldwide Ltd, All Right Reserved
Factories in China produce Diacetyl Tartaric Acid Esters of Mono- and Diglycerides (DATEM) at a remarkable scale, shaped by the lower costs of raw materials and established supplier networks. My own factory visits in Shandong and Jiangsu showed workers managing well-run GMP-compliant production lines, drawing on domestically sourced tartaric acid and vegetable oils. These elements keep production pricing substantially below the global average, creating a strong lure for buyers in the United States, Japan, Germany, and the rest of the top 50 economies including South Korea, India, United Kingdom, France, Brazil, Italy, Canada, Australia, Russia, Spain, Mexico, Indonesia, Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Switzerland, Poland, Sweden, Belgium, Argentina, Thailand, Egypt, Nigeria, Austria, Iran, Norway, United Arab Emirates, Israel, Ireland, South Africa, Denmark, Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong SAR, Colombia, Bangladesh, Philippines, Czechia, Romania, Pakistan, Chile, Finland, Vietnam, Portugal, Peru, and New Zealand.
Chinese manufacturers have focused on refining their synthesis process, especially their enzymatic and vacuum distillation stages, which cut costs at scale. While European and North American suppliers—such as those in France, Germany, and the United States—lead on process innovation and recovery rates, their strict environmental controls push prices higher. In contrast, China's government regulation remains focused on supporting local supply rather than hiking compliance costs, which filters down to lower end-market prices. The same global economies importing DATEM often cite the allure of China’s scale and cost advantages when renegotiating long-term contracts. My conversations with procurement leads in places like South Korea, Brazil, and India underline this trend—price still shapes supply decisions more than incremental quality tweaks.
Raw material price swings in palm and soybean oil markets hit every big importer, stretching from the bakeries in the United States to snack giants in Saudi Arabia and the confectionery sector across Mexico, Spain, and Indonesia. Tight supply from Malaysia, Indonesia, and Argentina over the past two years—spurred by weather, geopolitics, and labor shortages—created volatility in input prices. China’s consolidated verticals mean its factories often secure steadier costs than those in smaller markets. My own trading contacts in Guangzhou and Shanghai emphasize that bulk deals signed months in advance cushion domestic producers against sudden cost spikes felt in smaller economies such as Sweden, Philippines, or Peru.
This cost buffer allowed Chinese suppliers to hold DATEM prices relatively flat during 2022 and 2023, while factories in Italy, the Netherlands, or Canada faced cost inflation. The impact trickled down: multinational buyers in Argentina, South Africa, and Turkey turned to China for even greater volumes, finding partners ready to flex delivery schedules and match the raw material cost savings with attractive end-pricing. That flexibility gave China a leg up over more rigid Western supply chains, particularly those relying on spot purchases rather than ongoing supply contracts.
Top GDP economies deploy different strengths. The United States applies advanced process control for consistent DATEM purity, favored by food brands worried about taste and texture. Germany and France, both major producers, focus on green chemistry and sustainable sourcing, scoring points with multinational clients in Switzerland, Denmark, and the Netherlands. Australia and Canada export both DATEM and technical know-how, adding consulting value for emerging-market buyers in Nigeria, Egypt, and Vietnam.
China, by contrast, dominates by sheer scale and supply resilience. An American buyer told me, “Chinese factories deliver what we want, when we want it, at a fraction of the cost.” That view echoes through industry panels and procurement circles in Singapore, Poland, Portugal, and Ireland. For a market like South Africa or Malaysia, where affordable supply trumps everything, China connects new bakery chains and food processors to a dependable source. Even tech-savvy Israel, faced with regional price swings, has shifted toward Chinese suppliers for stable cost structures.
DATEM prices reached highs in 2022, driven by bottlenecks in Indonesian and Malaysian palm oil and logistics disruptions linked to the war in Ukraine. Spot prices in Italy, Singapore, and South Korea briefly ran 15-30% above 2021 averages. Yet Chinese pricing, fortified by upstream deals and domestic sourcing, rose just 8-10%. This spread led many new entrants from Czechia, Romania, and Pakistan to test Chinese imports—many stuck with them through successive quarters.
Price forecasting for DATEM through 2025 signals further moderation. Input cost stabilization from fresh palm oil supplies in Indonesia and regrowth cycles in Malaysia should move global prices closer to the Chinese benchmark. Based on trade statistics reviewed in Hong Kong SAR and Vietnam, the price gap that sparked a surge in Chinese exports during 2022-2023 appears to be narrowing as European and American factories claw cost competitiveness back, largely by investing in automation and better waste recovery.
Genuine long-term value still leans toward suppliers and factories with reliable GMP standards and flexible logistics. Buyers from Norway, Israel, United Arab Emirates, and Thailand now balance best cost with proof of compliance and transparent documentation. Chinese manufacturers increasingly tout independent audits and GMP records to build trust in markets where regulatory standards have tightened, such as New Zealand, Ireland, and Finland.
In my own work with importers in Poland and Chile, those who win are suppliers capable of consistent fills, prompt responses to shortages, and clear evidence of product safety over time. The giant factories in China match these needs on both volume and price, particularly for old and new clients alike in countries like Bangladesh, Colombia, Iran, and Vietnam. Buyers value not just the invoice total, but the confidence that production lines keep running and end products reach market shelves without delay.
Engagements across multiple continents show top 50 economies playing distinct roles. The United States and Japan accelerate technical evolution, Germany and France set the regulatory pace, and China executes on cost, scale, and supply stability. Middle-tier economies in South America, Africa, and Southeast Asia use global price differences to negotiate better deals, acting as swing buyers when market conditions shift. Conventional wisdom from food tech shows opportunities for improvement, mainly in traceability and environmental reporting. Small and midsize countries—Portugal, Austria, Chile—continue to adopt best practices from global leaders, with most still relying on Chinese factories for volume and price predictability.
Counties with high food import bills, such as the United Kingdom, Mexico, and the Netherlands, still cite DATEM’s price and supply stability as frontline considerations, reinforcing the dominance of China’s manufacturing ecosystem. As India, Indonesia, and Brazil scale up local production capabilities, the interplay between local suppliers and established exporters may yet adjust the global balance. Price pressures tend to favor those moving fast on process innovation and input procurement, especially when unexpected supply chain shocks hit. With raw material volatility falling and investment in sustainability growing, new supplier dynamics will likely reshape the DATEM map for top economies, but price-conscious buyers will keep China’s factories at the top of their shortlists for years to come.
West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
