West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China sales9@foods-additive.com 1531585804@qq.com
Follow us:



Ice Structuring Protein: Pushing Boundaries in Food and Industry Innovation

Historical Development

Decades ago, Canadian researchers pulled a wild idea out of the freezing Arctic: certain fish species didn’t freeze in bitter-cold waters, even when the thermometer said they should. These “antifreeze” proteins inside fish caught global attention. Instead of just admiring fish for beating winter in their bloodstreams, scientists started asking — what if we could use that trick ourselves? The story of Ice Structuring Proteins, or ISPs, doesn’t just stem from curiosity. Fisheries and logistics teams saw dollar signs and a route to better products. By the ‘90s, companies in the food space started hunting for efficient ways to use proteins like those that keep cod alive in icy seas.

Product Overview

ISPs aren’t just a footnote from a quirky marine biology study; they’ve marched right into pantries through ice cream and frozen bakery products. Extracted and even recreated using genetically engineered yeast or bacteria, these proteins wind up in frozen desserts, baked goods, even some biotechnical kits in the lab. Their basic selling point stays the same: controlling how ice crystals form and grow. Tiny crystals in ice cream translate to smoother scoops. For people storing organs, researchers dream of less damage in freezing. Food manufacturers rave about shelf life, texture, reduced energy costs, and fewer wasted thaw cycles. Some ISPs come from fish, others from plants, insects, or produced in fermentation tanks through recombinant technology. In each case, the market asks: does this keep water in check when the temp drops below zero?

Physical & Chemical Properties

Most ice structuring proteins kind of resemble regular proteins. They’re water soluble, form tight structures with plenty of hydrogen bonds, and show weird binding behaviors at subzero temperatures. The best-known ISPs have a molecular weight between 3.5 and 34 kilodaltons, sometimes even higher depending on the source and modifications. They stay active at minute concentrations — you’re not dumping buckets into the mix. They don’t just stop water from freezing; they also create a gap, called thermal hysteresis, between the melting and freezing points. Chemically, these molecules show loops and corners in their sequences, with certain amino acid residues repeating in a pattern that helps “stick” to ice. The attraction is more than surface-deep — these proteins physically latch onto ice crystals and stop them from growing unchecked.

Technical Specifications & Labeling

Any manufacturer who aims to use ISPs today has to face meticulous guidelines. In North America and the European Union, food-grade ISPs need high purity and must be free from contamination by the host organism. Products in the food supply or medical research require batch certificates that spell out molecular weight, purity percentage, and usually an amino acid composition breakdown. Handlers stamp ISPs packaged for food use with recipe limits — for example, no more than 0.01% final product for most commercialized versions. Labeling in retail food often boils ISPs down to “ice structuring protein” or “protein derived from [host],” depending on local regulations and source. Because some ISPs use baker’s yeast or cold-hardy fish genes, the source matters for allergen and ethical labeling as well. Some companies prefer using innocuous alternative names like “ice structuring agent,” or the specific protein’s scientific name, but in regulated environments, every acronym finds scrutiny.

Preparation Method

Harvesting ISPs starts with the source. Fish-derived versions use tissue extraction, followed by a round of chromatographic purification to isolate the protein. Recombinant ISPs, made in yeast, bacteria, or even plants, require precise genetic engineering. Technicians introduce the gene into the chosen host, then culture the microorganisms under optimal growth conditions. Cells are broken open, the soup filtered and concentrated, then purified through several steps to ensure the protein matches tight food safety standards. Most commercial ISPs end up spray-dried into fine powders for easy mixing, though solutions for lab use aren’t rare. Downstream, the final prep cleans off any by-products, stabilizes the product, and usually runs through microfiltration or cold-sterilization—no one wants stray bacteria ruining that precious protein.

Chemical Reactions & Modifications

Natural ISPs already show ice-binding ability, but bioengineers tweak the original formula to boost effect or tease apart structural “hot spots." Through site-directed mutagenesis, key amino acids swap for better binding or improved solubility. Some teams tie on fluorescent tags for research, or PEGylate the protein to extend its shelf life for medical use. Crosslinking stands out as another area, with researchers joining ISPs to other proteins or polysaccharides hoping to add new properties like increased thermal stability — a trait especially handy for industrial processes. Enzymatic modification can further focus the activity, shaving parts off the protein that aren’t needed, zeroing in on segments that grip ice best.

Synonyms & Product Names

ISPs go by many other names across technical papers, ingredient lists, and shipping labels: Antifreeze proteins (AFPs); Ice structuring agents (ISA); Antifreeze glycoprotein (AFGP); Thermal hysteresis proteins; and a string of commercial names like MaxAllure, IceStruct, and CryoPro. Companies guard some trade names closely, but standard chemical indexes still list common alternatives so regulators and scientists track what’s inside a shipment, no matter how the branding spins it.

Safety & Operational Standards

No shortcut exists in earning approval for commercial ISP use, especially if it lands in food or pharmaceuticals. Regulatory groups demand production under certified GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) and hazard checks along the supply chain. Safety evaluations in the US and EU check allergenicity, toxicity, and genetic background if the protein comes from transgenic organisms. Batches require testing for host-origin DNA, heavy metals, microbial load, and functional activity using specific ice recrystallization assays. Reporting all these results doesn’t just soothe regulators — it reassures end users, who want evidence their dessert or sample storage doesn’t come with a hidden risk.

Application Area

Ice structuring proteins first changed ice cream and sorbet, where they shuffled ice granules into smaller, smoother crystals for better mouthfeel at lower fat counts. That boost in texture and palatability translates to cost savings and shelf life. Frozen baked goods and doughs hold onto moisture longer, and bakery customers can bite into croissants that taste like they’re straight from the oven weeks after production. Outside food, ISPs help medical teams store tissue and cells, where less ice damage means more viable samples for transplantation and research. The cosmetic industry keeps an eye on ISPs as well, interested in formulating stable creams that won’t break under harsh cold-chain shipping conditions. ISPs landed a foot in agricultural tech for frost protection and drew interest from construction sectors aiming to better cure concrete in winter.

Research & Development

The science backing ISPs pulls from biophysics, chemistry, molecular biology, and engineering. Researchers race to catalog new ISPs found in plants, fungi, insects, and even bacteria. Labs in Europe and East Asia boost genetic expression yields, seeking more production with less raw material waste. Simulation studies investigate how protein variants grip onto ice surfaces, guiding the design of more potent synthetic or hybrid ISPs. Biotech startups and multinationals bank on collaborations with universities to uncover not just improved ice structuring performance, but new applications in medicine and controlled drug release. Conferences and journals buzz with updates, and more fields open up as creative minds ask, “What other problems could a precise ice controller solve?”

Toxicity Research

So far, a wide scope of safety evaluations shows little cause for alarm when ISPs are used at currently allowed concentrations in food. Tests for acute toxicity, allergenicity (especially from host organisms like cod or yeast), and chronic exposure largely return blank threat sheets in rodent and cell-culture models. Regulatory bodies still step cautiously, demanding ongoing monitoring, because any new protein in the mass food supply poses a potential for unforeseen effects or rare allergic reactions. Toxicologists work through simulation, animal trials, and population studies, alert for faint signals among the static, but most evidence thus far tags ISP as safer than many common food additives.

Future Prospects

Ice structuring proteins pulled in the attention of engineers, doctors, restaurant chains, and even climate scientists. If gene editing and fermentation get cheaper, more foods and industries will snatch up this technology. New ISP variants could lead to massively improved frost tolerance in crops, less spoilage in food chains, better shipment and storage for biomedicine — even experiments on Mars missions. Better synthetic mimics, “green” production, and greater transparency in sourcing set the pace for adoption. The next decade likely brings a long list of new uses—ISPs could end up in heat pumps, environmental sensors, or personalized health devices. Society keeps looking for ways to twist nature’s cleverest designs to our advantage; ice structuring proteins show what happens when scientists get bold and refuse to accept ice as just frozen water.




What is Ice Structuring Protein and how does it work?

Understanding Ice Structuring Protein

Ice structuring protein, often called antifreeze protein, turns winter survival into an art for some living things. You find these proteins mainly in cold-water fish, bugs, and certain plants. They help these organisms survive freezing temperatures by tinkering with how ice crystals grow. If you’ve ever seen a fish moving under thick pond ice, you’ve witnessed the quiet power of these proteins at work.

The Magic Behind the Protein

The real punch of ice structuring protein sits in its ability to stick to ice crystals. Regular water, when it freezes, starts with small ice crystals that grow bigger and sharper over time. Ice structuring protein finds those crystals early, clings to their faces, and stops them from getting any larger. By working this way, the protein blocks the full formation of damaging ice shapes. The outcome allows delicate tissues, whether inside a strawberry or a cod, to survive conditions that would destroy anything else.

From Fish to Freezers: Why It Matters

Scientists noticed that food loses a lot of taste and texture in the freezer thanks to big, nasty ice crystals breaking things apart. After studying fish living in the Antarctic, food researchers saw the potential to copy this protein’s method. By adding ice structuring protein to ice cream, frozen vegetables, or even bakery dough, manufacturers found a way to keep small crystals and hold onto that smooth texture.

Ice structuring protein made a splash in the ice cream world first because nobody likes gritty, crunchy bites in their cone. It reduced the need for more sugar and fat, too—two things that tend to hide texture flaws. In my family, store-bought pints now go softer out of the freezer and avoid turning rock-solid. As someone who likes ice cream that doesn’t chew like cardboard, that’s a real step up.

Hard Science, Real Impact

The structure of these proteins has fascinated the scientific world. Research shows they wrap themselves around the rough edges of ice, changing the way water molecules settle down and freeze. Some come from arctic fish, others from beetles that overwinter in timber. Each one sticks to different spots on an ice crystal. The market has jumped in, too: companies now make ice structuring protein through yeast fermentation, sidestepping the need to catch fish or harvest insects.

Should We Worry?

As more food brands use this protein, a few questions linger. Some people worry about allergies, especially anyone with fish sensitivities. Scientists keep testing these proteins to make sure they don’t introduce hidden risks. Regulatory bodies in the US and Europe keep watch, setting strong standards for anything added to the food chain.

What Comes Next?

If you think about rising food prices and climate swings, cutting down food waste is a daily concern. Tiny proteins like these pull their weight. They keep food tasting fresh, lower ingredient costs, and could help farmers store crops longer in unstable weather. It’s not only about frozen treats or fancy berries—ice structuring protein might one day help store new vaccines or spare transplant organs with less damage. New research keeps rolling in, pointing out ever more ways these proteins could make a difference beyond the freezer aisle.

Is Ice Structuring Protein safe for consumption?

The Science Behind Ice Structuring Protein

Ice Structuring Protein—or ISP for short—sounds futuristic, but it comes from a pretty basic idea in nature. Arctic fish developed this protein so ice crystals don’t tear up their cells while they swim in freezing water. Food scientists saw this process, thought about the challenges with ice cream texture, and decided to try it in our frozen treats. ISP keeps ice crystals small, which means you scoop out smoother ice cream or sorbet straight from the freezer.

Is ISP Natural or Synthetic?

The ISP used in most foods doesn’t come directly from fish. Manufacturers usually grow it using genetically engineered yeast. By copying the fish protein’s gene into safe yeast, they get lots of ISP without fishing in the Arctic. This process makes sense since yeast-derived products already show up in bread, wine, and a lot of everyday foods.

Are There Health Risks?

Food safety authorities in multiple countries, including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and agencies in Australia and New Zealand, have all reviewed ISP. Their scientists dug into how ISP breaks down during digestion, checked whether it could trigger allergies, and compared it to proteins people already eat. None of the reviews turned up evidence that eating ISP from yeast poses health problems. It breaks down to common amino acids just like other dietary proteins.

In the US, the FDA tagged ISP as GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) in 2003 after looking at studies and production methods. The EFSA followed up with its own review and reached the same decision in 2009. These groups know how to spot hidden risks in food additives. Their process usually includes several layers: outside scientific research, company-submitted studies, and public feedback.

Allergies and Diet Choices

People want clarity about new food ingredients, especially those made using genetic engineering. ISP doesn’t come from common allergens (like eggs, dairy, nuts, or wheat), so it hasn’t shown a link to allergies in any large groups. Regulators checked this aspect specifically and reviewed blood tests and allergy histories. So far, nothing suggests a hidden risk for folks with food sensitivities.

Those who avoid genetically modified foods might not want ISP, since its source yeast was genetically engineered. Ingredient lists have to name “Ice Structuring Protein” or “protein from genetically modified yeast,” so shoppers can make informed choices. For vegans and vegetarians, ISP usually fits their restrictions, since no animals or animal parts go in, only genetically modified yeasts.

Why This Matters for Consumers

Texture makes a big difference in the enjoyment of frozen desserts. In the past, ice cream without certain stabilizers or emulsifiers wound up icy and rough. ISP gives food makers a way to smooth the ice cream without loading up the mix with fats or gums. That’s a plus for food quality, less waste from freezer burn, and better portion control since people can serve themselves without waiting.

Some worry that anything involving gene editing or new technology needs strict oversight, especially for long-term impacts. Over the last two decades, scientists and agencies have scanned ISP’s effects through lab studies and practical use. They update their advice as new information comes in. Those who stay on top of food safety news or check in with their doctor can follow any changes.

Looking Ahead

People want math, biology, and common sense behind what lands in their dessert bowls. ISP gives smoother frozen foods, fewer ice crystals, and less food waste. Food scientists and safety regulators keep an open process, and public concerns push them to keep checking. Anyone looking to avoid ISP can check food labels. For those who care mostly about taste and safety, major food agencies back it up with testing and reviews.

What are the main benefits of using Ice Structuring Protein in food products?

Bringing Science from Fish to Freezers

Sometimes ideas from nature change how we eat. Ice structuring protein, or antifreeze protein, comes from cold-water fish that need to survive freezing temperatures. Food scientists took a close look at this natural protein and saw effects beyond what rules and machines could manage.

Keeping Frozen Food Creamy and Appealing

Nobody likes biting into ice crystals in their ice cream. This protein changed the game for ice cream makers. Before this, big ice crystals formed during storage and ruined smooth texture. With just a tiny bit, ice structuring protein controls how ice crystals grow, keeping them small and barely noticeable on your tongue—even if you store the dessert for weeks. Companies like Unilever use this technology in some of their most popular pints. Less ice means less waste. Grocers see fewer returns due to texture complaints, and everyone wins.

Clean Labels, Fewer Chemicals

Food shoppers have started to read ingredient lists closely. Many look for foods without long chemical names. Old methods to control ice involved gums or stabilizers. These can distract from flavor or make labels look complicated. By adding ice structuring protein, food makers lean less on these additives. The protein works with what’s already in the product, rather than trying to hide flaws with extra chemicals.

Energy Savings in Big Freezers

Companies spend a lot to keep frozen foods solid during transport and storage. Ice structuring protein lets products hold up through small temperature swings. Crews don’t need to run freezer trucks as cold as before, which saves energy. Better stability means less spoiled food and a lighter carbon footprint. In markets where food waste is a big problem, every saved box matters.

Helping Fruit Keep Its Shine

Frozen fruit often looks dull after defrosting. Large ice crystals break cell walls, making thawed fruit soggy and leaching color. With antifreeze protein, those crystals don’t get the chance to do as much harm. Strawberries come out of the freezer with real color and bite. Bakers and smoothie shops can put that fruit right into their recipes without apologies. That means more options for healthy meals and less produce tossed in the trash.

Cutting Sugars Without Ruining Texture

Ice structuring protein works best where there’s less sugar. Sugar stabilizes ice, so in treats with less sugar, large crystals become a risk. Thanks to this protein, ice cream makers cut sugar back without punishing diners with gritty, icy bites. For folks watching their sugar intake, that’s real progress: better-for-you desserts that don’t sacrifice the little pleasures.

Building Trust with Science and Transparency

People pay attention when new ingredients hit their food. Ice structuring protein draws extra scrutiny because it sounds high-tech. It’s crucial for producers to show the science—peer-reviewed studies, regulatory clean bills of health, and years of successful use. By opening up about the way the protein works and sharing the source (often yeast or certified-safe plants), manufacturers—or even chefs—build trust and keep the focus on positive outcomes.

Are there any allergens in Ice Structuring Protein?

What is Ice Structuring Protein?

Ice Structuring Protein, sometimes called antifreeze protein, comes from certain sources in nature like fish, insects, and even plants. Manufacturers add it to frozen food to help keep ice cream creamy or to reduce ice crystal formation in other foods. That smoother scoop of ice cream owes a lot to science, and more specifically, to these interesting proteins. There’s real curiosity from both parents and anybody with dietary concerns about what’s hiding in their frozen treats.

Potential Allergen Risks

When I started studying food additives for my own health, I became obsessed with ingredient lists. Anything from the ocean or from genetically engineered microbes got a hard look. Researchers and regulators take the same approach, especially when new technology brings proteins from non-traditional sources into everyday food. Ice Structuring Protein usually comes from a genetically modified yeast that produces a synthetic version of the protein originally found in the Arctic fish ocean pout. That’s important because the source decides the type and the chance of allergy risk.

Some people have fish allergies, and the original protein came from a fish, so it’s not a crazy question to ask if something similar could happen with the synthetic version. Scientific assessments, like the extensive review from Food Standards Australia New Zealand, say the version grown in yeast doesn’t contain any fish DNA or protein beyond what’s specifically produced. Regulators in several countries have combed through the data. They say the yeast-used version doesn’t set off the immune system in people allergic to fish.

Another important point: the yeast strain used for manufacturing has its genetic material removed before anything lands in your food. Researchers check whether the protein might mimic any of the main triggers for food allergies (such as those from shellfish, milk, eggs, soy, or wheat) by comparing structure and biochemistry. In the published expert opinions, the conclusion is pretty simple: ice structuring protein, as it’s made for food, doesn’t line up with known allergens and doesn't provoke allergic reactions in controlled studies.

Labeling and Transparency Matter

Even though current evidence shows a very low risk, trust in food comes from full transparency. On my last ice cream tub, the label listed “ice structuring protein” in the ingredients. Food law in regions such as the EU and Australia requires clear labeling if an ingredient comes from a genetically modified organism, so people can make informed decisions. That label helps consumers spot anything unfamiliar and decide for themselves.

For people with allergies or those taking care of kids with special diets, there’s never such thing as too much information. If you want to know how careful the process is, regulatory agencies like the European Food Safety Authority and the US FDA post detailed safety assessments in plain language. Checking those sources goes a long way to answering questions before bringing new foods into the house.

Pushing for Ongoing Checks

The idea of a new protein hitting the frozen aisle will always bring questions. The science behind food safety changes all the time as more people eat these updated products. Surveillance programs help catch rare reactions and verify that allergy rates don’t budge. Big wins in food safety come from honest science, well-enforced labeling laws, and agencies that keep listening as new evidence arises.

Before trusting an ingredient, people want expert answers and a history of safety in real life. As someone who watches out for allergens for my own family, I trust the process more when scientists, doctors, and people with allergies all get to weigh in and check the facts, long after something hits store shelves.

How should Ice Structuring Protein be stored and handled?

Why Proper Care Keeps Protein Useful

Ice structuring protein, often known from stories about polar fish and some leafy plants, gives engineers and food scientists a way to control ice crystal growth. If you’ve ever seen smoother low-fat ice cream or bread sticking around longer in your freezer, you’re already in touch with the results of these little proteins. Storing them properly creates possibilities; getting sloppy wastes both money and research.

Lessons Learned from the Lab Bench

This protein isn’t tough or forgiving. Once, I worked on a project that involved proteins much like these. We learned—sometimes the costly way—that even a quick rise in temperature or letting the protein sit at room temperature for just a few extra hours could make samples lose their grit and power. A protein with ice-structuring talent needs cold, dark, and consistent shelter.

Handling with Respect: Keep It Cold and Dry

A dedicated freezer set at -20°C or even lower, preferably a deep freezer around -80°C, gives the best setting. Not every fridge can provide that—not something to skimp on. A cushy lab fridge doesn’t match a specialized freezer’s consistency. If a long trip looms or a shipment crosses the globe, dry ice doesn’t just help, it forms the backbone of safe transport for ice structuring protein samples.

Sources like Sigma-Aldrich or Novozymes always put two words at the top of every handling protocol: temperature and moisture. Exposure to either kills the activity. Opening and closing the container makes that worse, since condensation or warm air can sneak in, ruining the batch before you know it. Many seasoned lab workers split a large order into small vials, so that only a bit comes out at a time. That way, the rest stays safe in the deep freeze, untouched by humidity.

Why Quality Slips Without Attention

Too much freeze-thaw ages protein fast. Anyone who has thawed chicken too many times gets how that damages even sturdy foods. Proteins like these are even more sensitive. To avoid this, keep thawed portions in a refrigerator for no longer than a handful of days—some protocols call for a limit of 48 hours. You can’t just refreeze used portions and expect the same performance.

Supporting Safety and User Health

Lab coats and gloves aren’t just for show. Protein powders, including ice structuring protein, cause allergies in some. Inhaling dust from a careless transfer isn’t a good idea. Even if the material came with a “food safe” label, care in handling prevents cross-contamination.

In my experience, tight organization saves both time and frustration. Label everything, date every vial, and track what came out and went back. It’s easy to forget which sample thawed last week by the second month of a project.

Room for Smarter Solutions

Some folks claim they improved shelf life using sugar additives or glass vials over plastic. Lately, lyophilization—a process that means freeze-drying the protein—shows promise. Dried protein doesn’t spoil as quickly, even when it has to cross warm airports or gets stuck in customs. Lyophilized samples, properly sealed, can sometimes sit safe for years in cold storage.

The simplest advice still works: colder is better, and less exposure beats convenience. Cutting corners invites headaches in the end. Whether you’re running a major ice cream brand or testing a new plant variety, respecting these proteins protects both research investment and the end product’s quality.

Ice Structuring Protein
Names
Preferred IUPAC name Antifreeze glycoprotein
Other names Antifreeze protein
AFP
Pronunciation /aɪs ˈstrʌk.tʃər.ɪŋ ˈprəʊ.tiːn/
Preferred IUPAC name antifreeze glycoprotein
Other names Antifreeze Protein
AFP
Ice-binding Protein
Frost Ban Protein
Pronunciation /aɪs ˈstrʌk.tʃər.ɪŋ ˈprəʊ.tiːn/
Identifiers
CAS Number 32760-77-1
3D model (JSmol) 3D model (JSmol) for Ice Structuring Protein is represented in the PDB as: `1OPS`
Beilstein Reference 3832316
ChEBI CHEBI:133381
ChEMBL CHEMBL2108539
ChemSpider ChemSpider does not have an entry for Ice Structuring Protein.
DrugBank DB06669
ECHA InfoCard 03bf226d-15b1-4785-93ad-330c3f8fbb6d
EC Number 3.2.1.241
Gmelin Reference 1748731
KEGG C21010
MeSH D000074627
PubChem CID 123118
RTECS number UB0173000
UNII 38LNP0X432
UN number UN number: "UN3334
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) DTXSID3020007
CAS Number 134018-18-1
3D model (JSmol) 3D model (JSmol) string for **Ice Structuring Protein** is: ``` 1HG7 ```
Beilstein Reference 3977231
ChEBI CHEBI:133912
ChEMBL CHEMBL2111518
ChemSpider 21530619
DrugBank DB11750
ECHA InfoCard ECHA InfoCard: 100000018042
EC Number EC 3.2.1.221
Gmelin Reference Gmelin Reference: 14797019
KEGG C10814
MeSH D000072661
PubChem CID 15739988
RTECS number UJ7440000
UNII K5B6A6ZN16
UN number UN3334
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) DTXSID9042843
Properties
Chemical formula C47H82N14O16
Molar mass 25950 g/mol
Appearance White to off-white powder
Odor Characteristic
Density 0.85-1.05 g/cm3
Solubility in water Soluble in water
log P 0.00
Basicity (pKb) pKb: 10.06
Refractive index (nD) 1.333
Dipole moment 0.4506 D
Chemical formula C27H48N8O16
Molar mass 285.33 g/mol
Appearance White to off-white powder
Odor Odorless
Density 1.35 g/cm³
Solubility in water Soluble in water
log P -1.6
Refractive index (nD) 1.333
Dipole moment 0.746 D
Thermochemistry
Std molar entropy (S⦵298) 284.5 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹
Std molar entropy (S⦵298) 189 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹
Pharmacology
ATC code A16AB11
ATC code A16AX10
Hazards
Main hazards No significant hazard.
GHS labelling GHS labelling: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS).
Pictograms [F,UC,PRO]
Signal word Warning
Hazard statements No hazard statements.
Explosive limits Not explosive
LD50 (median dose) LD50 (median dose): >5000 mg/kg (rat, oral)
NIOSH Not Assigned
PEL (Permissible) 120 mg/kg
REL (Recommended) 20 mg/kg
IDLH (Immediate danger) No IDLH established
Main hazards May cause allergic reactions in susceptible individuals
GHS labelling GHS labelling: Not classified
Pictograms SGH
Hazard statements No hazard statements.
NFPA 704 (fire diamond) NFPA 704: 0-0-0
Explosive limits Not explosive
LD50 (median dose) LD50 (oral, rat) > 10,000 mg/kg
NIOSH
PEL (Permissible) 120 mg/person/day
REL (Recommended) 30 mg/kg bw/day
IDLH (Immediate danger) Unknown
Related compounds
Related compounds Antifreeze protein
Thermal hysteresis protein
Type I antifreeze protein
Type III antifreeze protein
Fish antifreeze glycoprotein
Related compounds Antifreeze protein
Freeze protein
Thermal hysteresis protein