Sifting through the roots of the food and beverage industry brings up many surprises, and Glycerol Ester of Wood Rosin (GEWR) stands out as one of those unexpected finds. Early gum rosin from pine stumps met human hands centuries ago, mainly for adhesives and varnishes. During the 20th century, scientists started digging deeper into pine trees for more than just timber. As beverage makers searched for a way to keep citrus flavors from separating in sodas, the transition from raw resin to refined esters promised a better solution. GEWR emerged from lab benches and wood pulp mills, shaped by both American ingenuity and European resourcefulness. Instead of settling for just any emulsifier, companies recognized the value in marrying glycerol with purified wood resins. These efforts led to large-scale production by the 1950s, especially as global cola demand soared. This story matters because it shows the back-and-forth between industrial need, chemistry, and nature’s offerings, reminding us how even soda’s “cloud” has a history.
GEWR might sound technical, but anyone who’s sipped a lemon-lime soda has probably tasted its work. The substance looks like glassy flakes or a pale, tacky solid. Its main use centers on stabilizing flavors in citrus-based soft drinks, stopping essential oils from separating and floating. Beyond sodas, confectioners turn to it for gum bases and food coatings. The reason isn’t just technical magic — it bridges oily citrus flavors and water, making the drink look and taste the same from the first pour to the last. Companies have come to rely on it, making GEWR a quiet yet important player in snack foods, beverages, and even chewing gum production.
GEWR sits in a unique spot among food additives because its makeup combines natural and engineered features. As a light-yellow solid, it softens around 80–88°C. It dissolves in oils but resists water, a key trait for its stabilizing job. Chemically, it comes from glycerol reacting with purified resin acids from pine. The backbone is mostly abietic acid, with some capric and dehydroabietic acid in the mix. Rigorous distillation and purification strip away volatile impurities. The resulting molecule contains both fatty and acidic parts, allowing it to blend oil and water. What’s special here is the balance between oil-loving (lipophilic) and water-hating (hydrophobic) segments, driving its function in citrus drinks and oily confections.
Regulations help draw a line between safe additives and questionable ones. Most GEWR on the market meets FCC and JECFA standards, which demand purity above 90%, limits on ash, and specific acid numbers. Each batch must test free of heavy metals and solvents. US and European Union law asks for clear labeling on food packages, often as “Glycerol Ester of Wood Rosin”, “INS 445”, or “E445”. Labels direct attention to both source and processing methods, helping consumers avoid allergens and identify the product’s origin. This clarity answers growing demands for transparency in food safety, echoing a larger push in global labeling laws.
Preparing GEWR is equal parts tradition and controlled reaction. The journey starts with aging pine stumps, which supply wood rosin. Producers distill the raw rosin to capture the pale resin acids, filtering out unwanted color and sulfurous smells. The purified rosin tumbles into reactors with food-grade glycerol. Careful heating and agitation drive the esterification reaction, sometimes with a splash of catalyst to speed up the process. Skilled operators watch water vapor leave the mix, signaling progress. After cooling, manufacturers grind the glassy mass into flakes or small pieces for shipment. These details show why reliable production depends on experience; managing heat and purity at every step protects both quality and consumer safety.
Chemists rarely leave good enough alone. With GEWR, the basic reaction joins glycerol’s hydroxyl groups to the acid groups in rosin, forming sturdy ester bonds. Some producers tweak the rosin before esterification, hydrogenating it to reduce color or alter taste. Different ratios of glycerol to rosin shift final properties, such as softening point or solubility. Other modifications blend GEWR with natural antioxidants or plasticizers, targeting shelf-life or specific textures. These chemical fine-tunings change how the additive performs in fizzy sodas versus sticky candies. Underlying every choice is a push for efficient blending, durability under shelf conditions, and the ability to comply with new regulations.
GEWR appears under various names depending on region, market, or purpose. The food industry labels it as “E445” in Europe and “INS 445” worldwide. Chemists might call it “Glyceryl abietate” or “Ester gum”. Some manufacturers refer to specific brands, which sometimes leads to confusion among buyers or formulators. Regardless of the label, the underlying chemistry stays consistent, rooted in the bond between pine rosin and glycerol. Consumers benefit from knowing which synonyms to look for, especially if they track food allergies or follow certain dietary rules. Transparency in naming forges a clearer path through the thicket of global food additives.
GEWR’s wide use has drawn the eye of safety watchdogs. Regulatory groups including the FDA in the US and the European Food Safety Authority have run toxicological studies, looking at digestion, metabolism, and long-term exposure. They’ve set acceptable daily intake limits at levels far above typical consumption, a decision backed by animal and human studies. Production plants must follow HACCP standards, traceability guidelines, and sanitation procedures to protect against cross-contamination. Workers handle the esters with gloves and ventilation, recognizing that while safe in foods, dust from bulk handling can irritate skin or lungs. A track record of few reported consumer reactions supports the product’s reputation for safety. Still, keeping a close watch ensures ongoing compliance as recipes and exposure levels change.
GEWR rarely headlines ingredient lists, yet its reach stretches across aisles in grocery stores. Citrus sodas lean on it to keep drinks clear and uniform, making sure flavors don’t form oil slicks. Chewing gum gets its bouncy base from the flexibility of GEWR mixed with latex and other resins. Chefs and food technologists appreciate it for stabilizing color and flavor in confections. The cosmetics world uses it as a film former or binder in certain makeup and personal care products, banking on its oil resistance. A few paint companies tap GEWR for varnishes and coatings, where clarity and flexibility outshine cheaper alternatives. Each use connects back to the tricky challenge of blending oil with water or keeping flavors locked in.
Academic and industry labs have rarely stood still, especially as consumer expectations for “natural” ingredients mount. Researchers explore modified rosin mixes, hunting for ways to reduce color, cut down on unwanted odors, or raise purity with less energy. Today’s R&D teams test new extraction methods, including supercritical CO₂, to draw out resin acids without harsh chemicals. Other projects look for plant-based alternatives that mimic the function of GEWR, spurred by vegan and allergen-free food trends. Recent studies examine blending GEWR with bio-based antioxidants, offering better shelf life without synthetic additives. Each research line answers the same demands — safer, cleaner, greener food additives without a trade-off in flavor or stability.
Since the mid-20th century, toxicity studies have guided how much GEWR ends up in foods. Animal tests on rodents and dogs examined metabolism, showing most esterified acids break down and exit the body without building up. Long-term studies failed to link the additive to cancers or genetic damage. The JECFA and EFSA looked at birth defects and found no evidence of harm in the doses used for foods and drinks. Rare cases of skin sensitization in factory workers have shaped handling rules. Still, consumer groups and scientists continue feeding new data into risk models each year, making sure public trust never relies just on tradition. Parents, teachers, and health professionals all expect ongoing openness around the safety of food additives in kids’ diets.
Looking ahead, the future for GEWR brushes up against big changes in food science and chemistry. Sustainability waves across forestry and chemical engineering push producers toward smarter sourcing. Automation enters the picture with new sensors and real-time analytics adjusting every reaction, mastering batch after batch with fewer waste streams. Plant-based and allergen-free diets create pressure to share sourcing details and develop new versions, possibly from alternative botanicals. Environmental standards demand cleaner solvents and energy use, so today’s methods could give way to bio-refineries driven by renewable power. The search for compositional tweaks continues, not just to follow taste trends, but to address legislation that keeps evolving. The push for safer, traceable, and more sustainable additives won’t slow down. Staying on top means working with customers, regulators, and scientists, shaping the future of soft drinks, snacks, and the countless products touched by GEWR.
Some folks might notice “glycerol ester of wood rosin” printed on the back of their favorite soda or fruit-flavored drink. It sounds a bit like something you’d find in a science lab, but this ingredient has a straightforward purpose. It keeps certain flavors from floating to the top of the bottle, making sure each sip tastes just as good as the last. The reason for using wood rosin goes back decades, especially in beverages that mix oil-based flavors with water. Think of orange, lemon, or tropical fruit sodas, or those colorful sports drinks in the convenience store fridge. Without something to hold them together, the citrus oils would rise in the bottle and ruin the experience.
Wood rosin comes from pine trees, especially those grown in the American South. Workers tap these trees, gather the sap, and then separate the thick, sticky resin. A bit of science turns this rosin into a food-grade material, and mixing it with glycerol makes it easier to work with for food producers. This whole process isn’t just mechanical; it’s based on decades of food safety research, following strict processing guidelines laid out by health authorities in the United States, the European Union, and countries in Asia. I spent years reading ingredient lists as a health-conscious shopper, and glycerol ester of wood rosin always showed up in the context of transparency and regulation. This gives me a level of comfort I just don’t feel with newer, less-researched additives.
Many companies lean on this rosin-based additive because it doesn’t leave behind a weird aftertaste that you sometimes get with other stabilizers. I remember noticing the difference in flavor between lemon sodas with this ingredient and those without it. The ones using it seemed to have a fresher, more natural feel, largely because the oils blend better and stay put. Plus, unlike some other similar chemicals, glycerol ester doesn’t break down or release off-flavors if the drink sits in a warm garage or gets tossed around in a delivery truck. It also stays effective over long shelf times, which matters for both stores and households that grab drinks in bulk.
People trust the foods and drinks they pick up only as much as they trust what goes into them. That’s where transparency steps in. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved glycerol ester of wood rosin for use in food and set limits on how much can show up in drinks. The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives has also reviewed safety data and backs controlled use. That doesn’t mean folks with allergies or special health needs shouldn't read their labels. People sometimes misunderstand unfamiliar ingredients, but open labeling lets everyone decide what’s safe for them. In my own home, I always take a closer look at what my kids drink, checking for any additives that stand out.
The bigger question isn’t just whether this rosin-based additive belongs in food or drinks. People want clearer answers about why manufacturers use certain ingredients in the first place. One solution would be for companies to explain in plain language what these additives do, not just list their chemical names. Health professionals could do more outreach, breaking down food science in simple terms. As consumers get more educated, food labels start leading to better trust. Instead of always going for something “natural” or “artificial,” people can choose based on facts and their own values. In a world full of chemistry and marketing, a bit of real information goes a long way.
Plenty of folks glance at a juice bottle or a soda can and wonder about the ingredients. Glycerol ester of wood rosin often shows up near the bottom of the list, tucked between flavors and colorings. I grew up figuring most things in food had to be safe, but as you pay more attention, these names stick out.
Glycerol ester of wood rosin comes from pine trees. Processing companies mix rosin with glycerol to create a sticky, amber substance. Food makers use it to help citrus oils stay mixed in drinks—especially in sodas and sports beverages. Imagine lemonade without any bits floating to the top; that’s what this ingredient helps with.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration labels this additive as “generally recognized as safe,” or GRAS. The European Food Safety Authority arrives at a similar stance, setting an acceptable daily intake number after looking at animal and human studies. Research hasn’t flagged any genetic problems, nor has it pointed to big risks of cancer or toxicity in normal amounts found in soda. Researchers found that the body doesn’t easily absorb the large molecules in this resin. Instead, most of it ends up leaving our bodies without any drama.
Every few years, stories stir up worry around food additives. Friends ask if wood rosin is some harsh chemical just because it’s got “wood” in the name. But it isn’t wood pulp or sawdust. The process pulls out the resin and goes through some heavy-duty cleaning. That doesn’t mean ignore every worry. People with allergies to pine trees, for example, may still decide to avoid it, though actual allergic reactions to this additive rarely turn up in medical literature.
Nobody gets stronger or healthier by chugging more soda or processed drinks. That doesn’t come down to just glycerol ester of wood rosin—it’s about drinking too much sugar and reaching for chemical-heavy options way more often than needed. Eating mostly fresh food and water skips these ingredients entirely. Food companies could lean toward cleaner, simpler recipes, maybe swapping out certain emulsifiers or just finding other ways to keep drinks looking fresh.
Choosing what to eat or drink feels overwhelming. I read labels and try new things that skip mysterious chemicals. If something feels off or you’re worried about allergies, asking a healthcare provider gives peace of mind. The science says moderate consumption of drinks containing glycerol ester of wood rosin won’t harm most people, but eating home-cooked meals and drinking plain water is always a sure bet.
Food safety teams keep testing these additives as new evidence pops up. If real danger surfaces, regulations will shift. Until then, recognizing names like glycerol ester of wood rosin takes some of the mystery out of what's in your glass. The choice comes down to balance and keeping an eye out for the big picture—nutrition matters a lot more than any single ingredient on the label.
Each time I see a can of citrus soda or a bright sports drink, I think of how many food labels feature ingredients you wouldn’t find in your kitchen cupboards. Glycerol ester of wood rosin, often listed as E445, pops up exactly there. Some call it a stabilizer, but most folks just want to know if it’s natural or synthetic.
Glycerol ester of wood rosin starts out quite literally in the woods, tapped from pine trees as sticky sap or resin. Pine trees, especially longleaf and slash pines in the U.S. South or plantations in South America, give up this resin through sustainable harvesting. That part feels natural enough—nothing synthetic there. Harvesters gather the crude gum, then heat and distill it, driving out impurities while pulling out what we call wood rosin.
To transform the sticky, sometimes brittle rosin into something the food industry can use, manufacturers mix it with glycerol—a natural alcohol most people know from the soap aisle or medical supply cabinets. Glycerol comes from animal fats or vegetable oils by breaking down triglycerides. At this stage, both ingredients are natural, though they’ve already taken the scenic route through a lab or factory.
Here’s where things get industrial. The process involves high heat and controlled reactions that bond the glycerol to the rosin acids. Chemists shape these new molecules to make a product that won’t separate out in drinks and can hold up in the harsh world of acidic citrus flavors.
Glycerol ester of wood rosin doesn’t grow straight from the pine tree, ready to be stirred into a soda can. Chemistry does most of the heavy lifting. Still, its roots lie in these recognizable, plant-based materials. Labels like "natural" or "synthetic" don’t always match the journey modern ingredients take.
This question stirs up debate. Some say natural means the ingredient comes from nature and gets processed in ways people recognize—think oil pressing, boiling, or fermentation. Others argue that once you start rearranging molecules in controlled ways, it steps over the line into “synthetic.”
Glycerol ester of wood rosin lands on that blurry border. Its building blocks are natural, but the process looks nothing like grandma making jam. Food authorities, including the FDA and European Food Safety Authority, have declared it safe for the levels seen in drinks and gums.
More shoppers want to know what’s really in their food and how it’s made. A label that just says “glycerol ester of wood rosin” isn’t going to win much trust. I’ve seen calls for food companies to explain their sources and let shoppers trace these ingredients right back to a pine forest—or at least admit when factories step in.
Clear, simple ingredient lists aren’t just a trend. They give people choices, especially those with allergies or strict dietary needs. Some soda makers have started testing alternatives based on citrus peels or other plant fibers to sidestep confusion, but no option easily replaces the functionality of wood rosin in drinks.
Full transparency, better labeling, and giving shoppers a seat at the table all count more than some broad “natural” stamp ever could.
Food labels look complicated enough. Most people spot words like “glycerol ester of wood rosin” and wonder what they’re eating. This strange-sounding ingredient pops up in citrus soft drinks, sports beverages, and even some candy. It plays a behind-the-scenes role—keeping oil-based flavors from separating out, which helps drinks taste the same from first sip to last. Still, the bigger question stands: does this additive kick up allergy concerns?
Manufacturers extract glycerol ester of wood rosin from pine tree stumps—specifically, from species in the Pinus family. The resulting resin gets processed, purified, and approved under food safety rules in the US, the EU, and other places. Seeing “natural” on the label doesn’t put every mind at ease, though. Pine pollen famously causes allergy misery each spring. This link to pine trees prompts some people to worry about reactions, even if the resin comes from a different part of the tree.
Digging through published medical reports and food safety watchdog data, true allergies triggered by glycerol ester of wood rosin look extremely rare. The FDA and the European Food Safety Authority both evaluated it for possible toxic or allergic risks. So far, they haven’t found evidence that it tends to provoke allergic reactions, even among those sensitive to pine pollen or sap. This matches what I’ve seen in families managing food allergies—few people point to this ingredient as a problem compared to milk, nuts, soy, or eggs.
Scientific advisory panels have checked for the usual red flags: skin rashes, swelling, trouble breathing, or more subtle responses. Across documented cases, researchers saw hardly any links to this food additive. Most people—including those prone to seasonal allergies—drink soft drinks with glycerol ester of wood rosin without issue. That said, allergy science always involves some uncertainty, and there’s no way to say zero risk exists.
For those with a history of severe food allergies, reading labels never stops. New allergies can appear unexpectedly, especially in children. Reports exist of rosin (mostly in adhesives, bandages, or cosmetics) causing skin reactions for some people, especially among workers who use the substance regularly. But ingesting it from food isn’t quite the same as direct skin contact. If someone notices symptoms after eating foods with this additive—like itching, swelling, or stomach issues—it’s worth discussing with their doctor or allergist.
To boost confidence in what we eat, scientists and regulators need to stay alert for uncommon, overlooked reactions. Companies can help by being transparent, especially for those managing allergies daily. Meanwhile, parents and individuals with allergy histories can keep a food diary if they suspect anything unusual linked to new ingredients. Medical professionals can add to the pool of knowledge by reporting and researching any new cases linked to additives like glycerol ester of wood rosin.
What’s clear is this: Glycerol ester of wood rosin appears safe for most people. No food system is foolproof, and staying tuned to our own bodies—while listening to evolving science—remains the safest bet.
Start reading ingredient labels at the store and this name pops up more than you might think. Glycerol ester of wood rosin plays a big role in drinks that look and taste bright and fruity. Soda companies lean on it for certain citrus sodas. Sip an orange or lemon-lime soda, and there’s a good chance this additive helped keep the flavor oil mixed perfectly in the bottle. Sports drinks, some energy drinks, and fruit punches use it for a similar reason, especially those that go heavy with natural oils for flavor and aroma. The result: clean, even-tasting drinks without mystery floating particles.
It’s not only in drinks. Certain candies also use glycerol ester of wood rosin—not for a citrus swirl, but for keeping sticky, chewy treats pleasant. Think of those fruit-flavored gumdrops or jelly candies with their smooth bite and bright, clear color. Sometimes, this additive helps prevent sugar crystallization, so relief for the teeth and gums lasts from the first piece to the last. It finds its way into some chewing gums too, mainly to stabilize the flavor or help keep the texture consistent in the mouth.
Feeling a summer craving? Look at popsicle wrappers, sherbet tubs, or non-dairy frozen treats. Fruit bars advertising a long list of “natural flavors” often rely on this ingredient. Manufacturers use glycerol ester of wood rosin so citrus oils and other extracts don’t separate or clump up during freezing. This keeps every bite smooth and bright, and stops awkward icy patches from forming inside the treat. Based on my own years of reading wrappers for allergens, I've noticed it most often in products made with more fruit oil than fruit juice.
The food industry has options when emulsifying citrus flavors, but this particular resin stands out. It comes from the sap of pine trees, processed and purified for food safety. The FDA gave it the green light as a food additive, and studies support that it breaks down safely when eaten in reasonable amounts. It does not show evidence of causing food allergies in the general population, based on recent FDA reviews and food safety reports. Food makers pick it for its ability to solve problems—whether that’s keeping ingredients mixed, improving shelf life, or just making foods look and taste their very best.
People keeping careful track of what they eat or avoiding additives for health reasons want honest information. Ingredient labeling laws in the U.S., Canada, and Europe require food makers to list this additive clearly. That’s helped people with sensitivities or those taking special care of kids’ diets spot it when picking snacks. That level of transparency empowers shoppers to make choices based on science, not suspicion. The challenge remains for anyone with special health needs—like certain metabolic conditions—to check the details with their health provider.
Anyone uncomfortable with this additive can look for sodas labeled “all-natural” or “additive-free.” Many brands now offer products stabilized with pea protein, gum arabic, or even natural fruit pectin. Homemade options or local juice bars usually skip commercial emulsifiers entirely. For food producers, clear education about the source and purpose of glycerol ester of wood rosin helps ease confusion. Keeping the conversation science-based lessens worry and gives buyers real control at the checkout.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Oxa-1,4-dioxacyclohexadecan-15-one, polymer with 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol |
| Other names |
Glycerol Ester of Wood Rosin Ester gum INS 445 E445 Gum Rosin Ester Glyceryl Abietate |
| Pronunciation | /ˈɡlɪsəˌrɒl ˈɛstər əv wʊd ˈrəʊzɪn/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Glycerol tri(resinolate) |
| Other names |
Ester Gum Glycerol Ester of Gum Rosin Gum Rosin Ester Glyceryl Rosinate INS 445 E445 |
| Pronunciation | /ˈɡlɪs.ə.rɒl ˈɛs.tər ʌv wʊd ˈrəʊ.zɪn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 8050-31-5 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `JSmol.loadInline("data/mol;base64,AAADnBn//////////////////wAAAAAAQAAAAgAAAAABAAACAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAABAAAAgAAAAAAAAACAAAAAAAAAAEAAAD///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////8AAAA=")` |
| Beilstein Reference | 1911815 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:537005 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1954154 |
| ChemSpider | 14647001 |
| DrugBank | DB11172 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03f8e4d9-14d3-44b7-bab9-4bc1e7f345d0 |
| EC Number | 232-482-5 |
| Gmelin Reference | 108945 |
| KEGG | C02634 |
| MeSH | D005956 |
| PubChem CID | 24899612 |
| RTECS number | WGK7WYA9CA |
| UNII | W2ZH39126B |
| UN number | UN1866 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID6030547 |
| CAS Number | 8050-31-5 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `C(C(CO)O)O` |
| Beilstein Reference | 1726 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:87194 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201479 |
| ChemSpider | 21505230 |
| DrugBank | DB11106 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03bf7085-00d9-4053-92d6-dd665c951810 |
| EC Number | E 445 |
| Gmelin Reference | 65076 |
| KEGG | C02364 |
| MeSH | D005957 |
| PubChem CID | 24899746 |
| RTECS number | WK6990000 |
| UNII | W2Z9GXK08M |
| UN number | UN1866 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID6025046 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C3H5(OOR)3 |
| Molar mass | 306.368 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow to amber-colored solid or granular material |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.99–1.10 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 0.9 |
| Vapor pressure | Vapor pressure: <0.01 mmHg (20°C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 13.47 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 11.89 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.490 - 1.520 |
| Viscosity | Viscosity: 50–100 cP |
| Dipole moment | 2.8 D |
| Chemical formula | C3H5(COOR)3 |
| Molar mass | 306.446 g/mol |
| Appearance | Pale yellow to amber, glassy solid or flakes |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.995 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | insoluble |
| log P | 1.78 |
| Vapor pressure | Vapor pressure: <0.01 mmHg (20°C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | pKa ≈ 4.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 12.84 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.500 - 1.510 |
| Viscosity | 140 - 200 mPa·s (25°C) |
| Dipole moment | 0.00 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 1040.0 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -1244.1 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -10168 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -6602 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A06AG04 |
| ATC code | A16AX30 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. |
| GHS labelling | Not classified as hazardous according to GHS |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | > 200°C (392°F) |
| Autoignition temperature | 450°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (Oral, Rat): >5,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 7,000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | WA9130000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 50 mg/kg |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not listed |
| Main hazards | May cause respiratory irritation. May cause skin and eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | Non-hazardous according to GHS |
| Pictograms | no_pictogram |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | > 220 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 450°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (Oral, Rat): > 5,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | 7000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | Not Listed |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) for Glycerol Ester Of Wood Rosin: Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 30 mg/kg |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not listed |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Gum rosin Tall oil rosin Partially hydrogenated gum rosin Maleic anhydride modified rosin Pentaerythritol ester of wood rosin Glycerol ester of gum rosin |
| Related compounds |
Ester gum Hydrogenated rosin Partially dimerized rosin Partially hydrogenated rosin Rosin Tall oil rosin |