Glucoamylase does not arrive on the modern stage by accident. Its story stretches back to traditional fermentations, where people depended on molds or malted grains to break down starches for food and drink. Over time, as fermentation science grew clearer, the connection between these processes and the involvement of enzymes became hard to ignore. Japanese scientists isolated “Koji” molds in sake breweries, and by the early twentieth century, researchers started identifying enzymes that played a part in these age-old processes. By the mid-1900s, people saw glucoamylase emerge from the larger family of amylases, thanks to deeper work with Aspergillus and Rhizopus species. This enzyme started playing its part not just in food traditions but as a distinct product in industry. These days, commercial production brings together the knowledge of generations—the fermentation crocks of the past inspire today’s tightly controlled biotech factories fermenting precise fungal strains for widespread use.
Commercial glucoamylase comes in both liquid and powdered forms. The liquid format allows for direct integration into wet processes, while powders suit dry mix or high-temperature environments where stability matters. Product labeling typically specifies enzyme activity (often measured in AGU or GAU units), source organism, recommended pH and temperature ranges, and microbial purity assurances. Some firms highlight certifications for kosher, halal, non-GMO, or allergen-free status, appealing to specialty markets in food and beverage manufacturing. Quality control in production—like consistent activity ratings and absence of harmful by-products—reflects the rigorous standards of modern bioprocessing.
Glucoamylase stands as a globular protein, usually with a molecular weight near 60-80 kilodaltons, depending on the organism and expression system. This enzyme’s activity sweeps through the acidic zone of pH 4.0 to 5.5 and keeps up its work between 55°C and 65°C. Amino acid sequencing over the past decades opened up new ways to enhance its stability against temperature swings and proteolytic breakdown. Its water solubility enables easy dilution, critical for industrial tanks where precise dosing makes all the difference. An unmistakable protein smell comes with fresh glucoamylase solutions, and the color range usually drifts from light yellow to brown, depending on the process and stabilizers present.
Manufacturers supply glucoamylase according to international food and feed enzyme standards. Activity measurements stick to protocols set by groups like the Food Chemicals Codex (FCC) and the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). Activity units often rest on the enzyme’s ability to release glucose from soluble starch under defined conditions. Heavy metal content, microbiological purity, and absence of detectable toxins must fall within narrow bands to gain regulatory approval. Product labels highlight activity range, optimum temperature and pH profiles, shelf-life under specified storage conditions, and directions for dilution or direct application in various industrial scenarios. Proper hazard and precautionary labeling satisfy global safety regulations for workers and consumers alike.
Scaling glucoamylase production starts with specific fungal strains or genetically enhanced yeast, grown in carefully controlled fermentation tanks. High-carbon substrates, often derived from corn or cassava, drive rich fungal growth and encourage enzyme secretion. After fermentation, a series of filtration, centrifugation, and ultrafiltration steps clarify and concentrate the enzyme soup. The purification line removes cells and unwanted proteins, leaving high-purity glucoamylase. Concentrated liquid may go straight to bulk sale, or further drying and stabilization convert it to granules or powders for easier handling. Throughout production, strict process controls keep contamination in check and maintain product safety for food and beverage applications.
Glucoamylase cleaves glucose units from the non-reducing ends of starches, dextrins, and similar polysaccharides through hydrolysis of α-1,4 and, more weakly, α-1,6 linkages. In industry, this action pairs with other starch-splitting enzymes for rapid, wide-spectrum breakdown. Modern molecular biology lets scientists tweak glucoamylase at the genetic level for better resistance to high temperatures or extreme pH, or to enhance performance on non-traditional feedstocks. Chemical modifications—such as pegylation or cross-linking—extend enzyme operational life or tune substrate specificity. Scientists keep exploring new expression hosts and post-translational tweaks, seeking greater yield and process resilience.
In the industry, glucoamylase carries several alternative names—such as amyloglucosidase, γ-amylase, or glucan 1,4-α-glucosidase. Different suppliers brand their products under unique trade names, but nearly all reference the underlying activity or source. In lab catalogs and academic journals, enzyme preparations often specify the microbial source: for instance, "Amyloglucosidase from Aspergillus niger." These subtle differences help users verify enzyme origin, which can influence performance or regulatory compliance. Local regulations in North America, Europe, and Asia keep close eyes on labeling terms for any enzyme in food processing, demanding clarity for traceability and safety.
Globally recognized agencies treat glucoamylase as safe for food production, provided production strains and processes meet cleanliness and purity requirements. Occupational exposure gets attention, especially in powdered forms, since enzyme dust can trigger respiratory or skin reactions. Facilities adopt strict dust control, protective clothing, and air-handling systems, training staff to recognize and respond to accidental exposure. Food allergen risk remains low but not nonexistent, so both upstream manufacturing and downstream application maintain detailed record-keeping and product tracing. Filing safety data sheets with comprehensive toxicology, ecotoxicology, and handling guidelines ensures that users stay informed about safe storage, usage, and disposal.
Glucoamylase has carved a large space in the global food and beverage industry. Large-scale fuel ethanol plants depend on it to break starches into fermentable glucose for biofuel production. Bakeries and brewery operations employ it to tweak texture, boost yields, or manage sweetness levels. Corn syrup and high-fructose sweetener manufacturers rely on its precise starch-hydrolyzing activity for predictable syrup profiles and consistent product performance. Beyond food, animal feed producers and detergent manufacturers use this enzyme to enhance nutritional value or cleaning power. As new plant-based feedstocks move into the spotlight, the role of glucoamylase will only expand, shaping the way enzymes support sustainable, efficient bioprocessing.
Every year brings leaps in enzyme engineering, with glucoamylase often leading the charge. Genomic and proteomic advances let researchers pick apart enzyme structures and zero in on weak spots—then design more robust versions or express them in faster-growing, low-cost hosts. High-throughput screening and automated fermentation facilities churn through thousands of mutant strains or engineered variants to optimize not just yield but also pH stability, temperature tolerance, and resistance to product inhibition. Collaboration between universities, biotech firms, and food giants accelerates these cycles of improvement, ensuring the next generation of enzymes keeps pace with an industry hungry for efficiency and adaptability.
A strong body of toxicological research tracks the safety of glucoamylase in food systems. Acute and subchronic studies in animals show no signs of systemic toxicity at industrially relevant concentrations. Allergenicity studies confirm that glucoamylase proteins, while foreign, have low potential to cause food-related reactions, especially after typical processing steps. Regulatory review panels worldwide scan for unwanted residues, microbial contaminants, and unexpected by-products to guarantee consumer safety. Periodic reviews draw from ongoing surveillance data and new research, updating acceptable daily intakes and usage levels in response to improved understanding of exposure risks.
Better understanding of protein folding and enzyme-substrate binding opens the door for tailor-made glucoamylases suited to specific, fast-growing markets. Progress in CRISPR and synthetic biology tools brings custom strains to life in months rather than years, while automated fermentation scales up new solutions for old challenges. Circular bioeconomy pushes—converting food waste or high-fiber residues into valuable products—rely on ever-tougher, more adaptable enzymes like glucoamylase. As climate change drives demand for efficient crop processing, and as dietary shifts boost plant-based protein markets, this enzyme’s impact will run even deeper, mixing long tradition with the precision of modern industrial biotechnology.
Glucoamylase has a knack for breaking down starch, and you’ll find it working away in plenty of industries that rely on converting starches into glucose. Having spent time in food manufacturing, it’s easy to see the difference a good enzyme can make. Glucoamylase comes from fungi like Aspergillus niger or some bacteria, and it zeroes in on those long chains of starch, clipping away glucose units one at a time. That’s a game-changer for food producers who want to get the most out of corn, potatoes, or wheat.
Corn syrup would never reach its sweet potential without glucoamylase. That glucose you taste in corn syrup drinks, sports gels, and processed foods often starts with grains that couldn’t stand out on their own. Adding glucoamylase to liquefied starch slurries kicks off a transformation, giving you pure glucose syrup. My first job in a syrup plant involved testing the sweetness of different batches, and I saw that even a slight error in the glucoamylase dose could cost thousands in wasted product or rework. Supply chain managers and quality controllers know every drop of yield adds up. The focus sits on maximizing sugar output and lowering production cost.
Brewers and distillers have relied on glucoamylase for decades. Beer needs fermentable sugars if yeast is going to do its job. Without enzymes, only a fraction of the grain’s possible sugars make it into the glass. Glucoamylase gets tossed into the mash or wort and quickly frees up more glucose than malt alone. Distilleries don’t waste a single molecule. From the biggest global brands to tiny craft producers, glucoamylase means stronger and more predictable alcohol yields. Working alongside a brewer over a few late shifts gave me a real respect for how precision and science support traditional crafts. Every consistent pint owes something to this hard-working enzyme.
Anyone following renewable energy has heard of bioethanol, made from plant starch. Enzymes run the show here. Glucoamylase helps turn large starches in corn or cassava into fermentable sugars. Microbes then convert that sugar into ethanol, a major part of fuel blends around the world. The Department of Energy says the U.S. produced over 15 billion gallons of ethanol last year. Without enzymes like glucoamylase, these numbers would fall off a cliff. Plants running 24/7 depend on reliable, robust enzyme supplies and pay close attention to efficiency. Cutting even a few cents off each gallon significantly changes economic outcomes.
Besides big industries, smaller-scale uses help in making certain medicines, vitamins, or functional food ingredients. Specialty labs often break down starch for fermentation processes that isolation of specific vitamins or probiotic ingredients. A controlled reaction with glucoamylase offers a safe, natural avenue instead of harsh chemical treatments, and strict regulations call for proven solutions.
Enzyme manufacturing raises other questions—how sustainable is enzyme production? Most companies extracting glucoamylase now invest in fermentation plants that run off renewable energy and recycle water. Food technologists search for strains that boost yield with fewer inputs. Speaking with partners in the industry, current research focuses on not just improving performance but also reducing the environmental footprint of enzyme manufacturing. Increasing collaboration between food scientists, farmers, and biotech firms has opened new and promising directions.
Anyone who has worked with enzymes, especially glucoamylase, has faced the constant struggle against breaking down activity. These protein catalysts start out robust, but let them sit exposed to warmth or handle them carelessly, and activity drops fast. I remember watching a batch lose efficiency because a technician left it on a shelf near a sunny window. It might seem like an innocent move, but for glucoamylase, every degree counts.
This enzyme isn’t as fragile as some, but its power relies on the environment matching its comfort zone. Research and industry standards agree—cold storage extends shelf life. Anything above room temperature and you’re gambling with potency. Most manufacturers suggest 2°C to 8°C, refrigerator temperature. Even a few hours at 25°C can cut working life by half over weeks. Based on my experience, a sturdy, well-sealed glass bottle keeps moisture out, which matters as much as temperature. Humidity ruins glucoamylase, creating lumps and triggering early breakdown.
Light and air chip away at enzyme integrity. Think brown or opaque bottles, tightly closed after each use. In my years spent working around fermentation facilities, I’ve seen how oxygen creeping in leads to “off” smells and shifting color—a warning sign for product gone bad. Sealing bottles right after scooping out your portion makes a real difference, especially for bulk supplies meant to last months.
Mix-ups sneak up on even organized labs. Clear labeling with dates and batch numbers eliminates confusion, especially in settings with high staff turnover. At one plant, we marked every container by both date received and date first opened. This way, no one grabs an old, heat-exposed bottle by accident, and a fresh batch always stays in play. Using older stock first makes sense, too, but only if everyone follows the system every time.
People new to enzyme storage sometimes assume colder is always better. That’s dangerous advice for glucoamylase—once it freezes, ice crystals tear up the protein structure, turning a reliable catalyst into a dud. In practice, I tell team members: keep it cool, not frozen. A good fridge, away from the back wall, does the job. Freezers are for long-term emergencies only, and then, only after confirming with the supplier.
Improper storage wastes money and time, but more than that, it opens the door for contamination. Glucoamylase solutions—once opened—should be checked for cloudiness or unexpected smells before use. Mold or bacteria in contaminated bottles can lead to ruined batches downstream, causing product recalls or worse. Reporting problems promptly and discarding anything questionable protects not just the process but end consumers.
After years of hands-on work, here’s my takeaway: invest in a reliable fridge, use small containers for day-to-day work to limit openings, seal bottles tight, and label clearly. Build these habits and most problems never show up. Enzyme storage isn’t glamourous, but done right, it keeps production steady and safe, batch after batch.
Glucoamylase isn’t some recent creation. It’s an enzyme that helps break down starch into glucose. Brewers, bakers, and folks in food processing have relied on it for decades. The enzyme usually comes from fungi like Aspergillus niger or bacteria such as Bacillus species. The big reason for using glucoamylase in food production is simple: it makes starches in grains and other foods easier to digest and use.
Food regulators worldwide have looked closely at glucoamylase. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration lists certain forms of this enzyme as “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS). Europe’s food safety authority (EFSA) has also reviewed it, weighing evidence ranging from how the enzyme is made to how people actually use it in food. Both sides of the Atlantic, their findings line up: glucoamylase, when made under proper conditions, doesn’t raise red flags for most people.
From my own kitchen, using bread machines or making my own beer, glucoamylase often appears as a behind-the-scenes helper. The loaves rise better, the brews come out clearer, and there’s rarely a sniff of trouble. I like knowing that official reviewers tracked safety in trials, scoured reports of allergic reactions, and checked food manufacturing techniques for any leftover residue.
Allergies crop up occasionally with any enzyme. Workers in food factories who breathe in high levels of powdered glucoamylase might run into respiratory sensitivity, especially if they spend years on the job. For folks at home eating foods with glucoamylase, the risk stays extremely low. The amounts used in processing end up almost entirely washed out, consumed or destroyed during baking, fermenting, or cooking. I’ve never seen allergy warnings on supermarket bread because the trace levels are less than what triggers problems.
For people following strict vegan, kosher, or halal diets, the source of enzymes is worth checking. Some forms use microbial fermentation, while others pull from animal sources. Labels don’t always tell the whole story. I learned to ask bakers about the origins or check with manufacturers if that detail matters to my guests.
Transparency around ingredient sourcing helps. Clearer food labeling would let people who care about processing aids make better choices. Food regulators need to keep reviewing updates. New ways to make glucoamylase, or engineered enzymes, arrive all the time, so close oversight and public updates build trust.
Companies producing the enzyme benefit from open communication and good hygiene controls. Food safety programs like Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) lower the risk of contamination. Regular testing for purity and allergen traces gives industry and consumers the same confidence.
Glucoamylase works behind the scenes, quietly improving bread, beer, sweeteners and more. Longstanding safety studies and regulatory reviews show that enjoying foods prepared with this enzyme rarely puts consumers at risk, as long as manufacturers stick to high standards. For most people, there’s little to stress about. For those with specific dietary needs, checking the source still makes sense.
Glucoamylase has a straightforward job when it comes to the food and beverage world. It breaks down complex sugars, turning starches into something sweet and simple—glucose. Brewers, bakers, and distillers everywhere reach for it because the process just works. But the dosage isn’t something to just guess. It can make or break both the output and the flavor.
I’ve spent time with homebrewers and professionals in food tech. In both worlds, there’s a moment when someone pours in the enzyme and hopes for magic. Well, science wants more than hope. For most, the recommended dosage for liquid glucoamylase lands between 0.2 and 0.6 milliliters per kilogram of starch, though it varies by product and application.
Some folks assume that more enzyme always means better yield. Reality doesn’t cooperate. Too much can lead to a thin, overly dry beer or strange textures in baked goods. Too little, and leftover starch makes the product cloudy or leaves off-notes behind. Across countless batches, a measured approach wins every time.
Manufacturers tend to print recommended ranges right on the label. You’ll find numbers like 0.2–0.5 mL per kg if you’re brewing, or closer to 0.4–0.6 mL per kg for ethanol production because starch concentrations and fermentation goals fluctuate. These aren’t just guesses—they draw on years of lab testing and real-world application. In fact, a 2016 review in the Journal of the Institute of Brewing compared industrial dosages and found that sticking close to those guidelines preserves flavor while maximizing conversion.
Temperature and pH swing the impact as well. Glucoamylase likes it warm—around 60°C—and slightly acidic. If the environment drifts, the enzyme can slow down or stop, causing inconsistencies. Many small-scale brewers and distillers check pH and temps before dosing. For bakeries, the focus lands on dough hydration and resting periods, not just straight enzyme dosing.
Safety is the other piece the home user shouldn’t overlook. Enzymes seem harmless enough, but improper handling—like dust exposure or contact with eyes—can cause allergic reactions in rare cases. Protective gear and proper storage keep risk in check. It’s worth remembering that glucoamylase for industrial food use goes through strict quality controls. Reputable suppliers provide Certificates of Analysis and meet standards such as FCC or Food Chemicals Codex.
One common issue: incomplete starch breakdown. Sometimes, folks see cloudy beer or flat bread and blame the ingredient list. Often, it’s a dosing or mixing mistake. Double-checking measurements and stirring thoroughly avoids these headaches. Another problem—batch-to-batch variability—trips up small businesses. Investing in a pocket scale and keeping better production records can solve a lot of mysteries.
Some users turn to online communities to compare notes. Everyone swears by their favorite brand or method. Experienced brewers often recommend running smaller test batches before scaling up. It saves money and heartache down the line. Recent innovations—like enzyme blends tailored for specific grains—let users fine-tune the process, but the old advice sticks: start with the manufacturer’s guidelines and adjust based on the results you see and taste.
Dosing glucoamylase isn’t just a routine task. Skipping instructions or eye-balling quantities leads to waste and disappointment. Focusing on the basics—label directions, careful measurements, clean equipment—pays off. And for a process based on centuries of tradition and modern science, paying attention to dose is a mark of serious brewing or baking, not just a detail to gloss over.
Glucoamylase breaks down starches into simple sugars, which yeast can then ferment or use for leavening. Home brewing enthusiasts usually want to convert those malty starches into sugars that give beer body and character. Home bakers, on the other hand, chase better dough texture or subtle flavor shifts. I’ve dabbled in both brewing and baking, and heard countless questions from other hobbyists about getting the most flavor or lift from their grains — so I understand why people look for enzymes like glucoamylase.
In brewing, adding glucoamylase during mashing or fermentation turns complex carbohydrates into glucose. This boosts alcohol production, but it can also make the end product drier, since more sugar gets fermented. Some homebrewers use it to push high-gravity beers (think high-alcohol stouts or Belgian triples), squeezing out every bit of sugar from their grains. I’ve seen it used for “brut” IPAs that demand a bone-dry finish.
In the kitchen, using glucoamylase isn’t common, but it has a niche following among sourdough fans and gluten-free bakers. By breaking starches into simple sugars, the dough ferments faster and flavors shift. Gluten-free recipes that lean on rice or corn starch can benefit from glucoamylase for structure and rise. Instead of relying on expensive specialty flours, it’s possible to create a homemade solution by adjusting sugar content with enzyme treatment.
This enzyme has a well-documented record in commercial food production. The US Food and Drug Administration lists it as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) when sourced from the right strains. Food safety depends on using products intended for food, not those sold for industrial purposes. Some enzyme powders on brewing supply shelves are sold specifically for home use, so it pays to read labels and get familiar with the manufacturer. Ingredient traceability matters — no brewer or baker likes a mystery product in their loaf or lager.
Success with enzymes has a learning curve. Homebrewers sometimes complain that their beers turn thin or taste odd after using too much. In baking, an overdose can leave doughs excessively sticky or lead to off flavors. I always recommend small-batch tests and steady note-taking — a basic food thermometer and a kitchen scale prevent most problems. Temperature matters: glucoamylase works best just above body temperature, so too much heat or a cold setup will waste your ingredients.
Enzyme activity doesn’t fix poor recipe formulation. Balance matters. If you target lower sugar, more rise, or drier beer, adjust other variables along the way — fermenting time, yeast choice, or even flour blends. Support comes from community learning. Homebrew forums, baking groups, or even enzyme supplier Q&As provide collective guidance. Sharing experiences, both good and disastrous, grows everyone’s confidence.
Knowledge and intention guide safe, effective use of enzymes in the home kitchen or garage brewery. Glucoamylase unlocks new possibilities, but results depend on thoughtful, informed decisions. If someone’s curious, starting simple and learning by doing gives more than chasing high-tech shortcuts or following trends blindly. If your goal is tastier bread or a better pint, glucoamylase might add just the touch of science that lifts your craft.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 4-α-D-Glucan glucohydrolase |
| Other names |
Amyloglucosidase GA 1,4-α-D-glucan glucohydrolase |
| Pronunciation | /ɡluː.koʊˈæm.ɪ.leɪs/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Glucoamidohydrolase |
| Other names |
Amyloglucosidase Gamma-amylase |
| Pronunciation | /ˌɡluː.koʊˈæm.ɪ.leɪz/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 9032-08-0 |
| Beilstein Reference | 61868 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:6107 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL4518 |
| DrugBank | DB01343 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.011.708 |
| EC Number | 3.2.1.3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 61393 |
| KEGG | K01179 |
| MeSH | D006170 |
| PubChem CID | 4393553 |
| RTECS number | MD8200000 |
| UNII | 8N3J2K45SC |
| UN number | UN3272 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID2021258 |
| CAS Number | 9032-08-0 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1366593 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:37627 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL204 |
| DrugBank | DB09410 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.007.796 |
| EC Number | 3.2.1.3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 83484 |
| KEGG | K01179 |
| MeSH | D006825 |
| PubChem CID | 59812659 |
| RTECS number | MD8200000 |
| UNII | 1XDN6005JP |
| UN number | UN3272 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID7020244 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C12H22O11 |
| Molar mass | 250 kDa |
| Appearance | Light brown liquid |
| Odor | Slightly yeasty |
| Density | DENSITY: 1.10-1.25 g/mL |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 2.1 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 4.0 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 2.6 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Magnetic susceptibility (χ) of Glucoamylase: −61.0 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.360 – 1.420 |
| Viscosity | Low |
| Dipole moment | 4.9 ± 0.1 D |
| Chemical formula | C16H25N3O11 |
| Molar mass | ~50,000 Da |
| Appearance | Light brown powder |
| Odor | Characteristic |
| Density | Density: 1.10-1.20 g/mL |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 3.6 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 3.9 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 4.1 - 4.8 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Magnetic susceptibility (χ) of Glucoamylase: -74.0 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.350 – 1.370 |
| Viscosity | Liquid |
| Dipole moment | 2.75 D |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A16AB09 |
| ATC code | A16AB09 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause allergy or asthma symptoms or breathing difficulties if inhaled. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07; Warning; H317 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H315: Causes skin irritation. H319: Causes serious eye irritation. H334: May cause allergy or asthma symptoms or breathing difficulties if inhaled. H335: May cause respiratory irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | May cause allergy or asthma symptoms or breathing difficulties if inhaled. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): > 2,000 mg/kg (rat) |
| NIOSH | MDL MFCD00130832 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL: Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 135-135 |
| Main hazards | May cause allergy or asthma symptoms or breathing difficulties if inhaled. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS05 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H315: Causes skin irritation. H319: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P280, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 15,379 mg/kg |
| PEL (Permissible) | 5 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 75-85 |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not Established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Alpha-amylase Beta-amylase Pullulanase Isoamylase Maltase Cellulase Beta-glucosidase |
| Related compounds |
Alpha-amylase Beta-amylase Amyloglucosidase Pullulanase Isoamylase |