Ethyl-p-hydroxybenzoate, long recognized in the global preservative market, comes from a rich history in organic chemistry. Back in the early 1900s, scientists searching for better ways to prevent spoilage in medicines and cosmetics landed on the paraben family. Chemists quickly found that sticking an ethyl group on p-hydroxybenzoic acid made a substance that handled fungus and bacteria better than many older agents. This shift brought lower production costs and longer product shelf life to many industries. The science started in Europe, hopped to the United States before World War II, and now shows up everywhere—from drug factories in India to skin care labs in South Korea. Each advance, each tweak, has followed society’s growing demand for safer, longer-lasting goods.
Some folks know it as Ethylparaben, but it wears many hats. Its biggest role has been stopping the unchecked growth of mold and yeast. People use it in creams, cough syrups, ointments, and even some processed foods. By making sure these products stay free of microbial nasties, this compound allows companies to keep items fresh without calling upon refrigeration or single-use packaging. Global sales show billions of units containing this chemical, and countries like Japan and Germany have company-specific rules on allowable concentrations. The demand keeps growing, especially in regions where stable, robust preservative systems matter most.
Ethyl-p-hydroxybenzoate comes as a white, crystalline powder. It dissolves easily in alcohol but only partly in water, giving manufacturers clear cues on how to blend it into different bases. Chemically, the molecule packs a benzene ring, a hydroxyl group on the para position, and an ethyl ester. Heat resistance and stability under UV light rank high, so companies favor it in formulas exposed to sun and temperature swings. Its melting point circles around 115°C. The smell is almost nothing—unlike stronger salty or acidic preservatives—letting formulators keep aromas and flavors pure.
Reputable suppliers deliver Ethylparaben at above 99% purity, keeping impurities such as chlorides and sulfates below strict limits. Labels usually list batch numbers, manufacturing dates, and recommended storage conditions—cool, dry, tightly sealed containers. Regulatory frameworks in the US, EU, and Asia define allowable concentrations. Most health authorities set limits in cosmetics between 0.1% to 0.8%, though actual product needs often sit at the lower end. Finished goods must disclose its presence to help consumers dealing with rare allergies. Labs run annual audits to make sure each scoop of powder meets specifications.
Production begins by reacting p-hydroxybenzoic acid with ethanol using sulfuric acid as the catalyst. The mixture heats gently, coaxing the acid to swap its hydrogen for an ethyl group. Technicians wash the mix to remove excess acid, pushing the product through a round of recrystallization for ultra-pure, pharma-grade powder. Factories invested in better solvent recovery systems and smarter filters over the years, pushing yields up and waste down.
Inside a beaker or a living system, Ethyl-p-hydroxybenzoate doesn’t just sit there. It can hydrolyze in strong acidic or alkaline environments, giving back its building blocks—ethanol and the original acid. Chemists sometimes tweak the chain, substituting the ethyl group for longer alkyl chains, which changes solubility and antimicrobial effect. Modification experiments in the 2000s made analogues for longer shelf life or broader activity against stubborn molds. Some tweaks reduce skin sensitivity, sparking medical journals to publish hundreds of comparative studies.
You’ll spot this chemical under several names: Ethylparaben, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid ethyl ester, E214 (in food), and Aseptin E. Big ingredient databases catalog it under dozens of trade names. Chemists spot these different names in patent applications and technical bulletins. This ‘alias list’ streamlines global trade, since exporters know which code, label, or phrase fits a given regulatory region.
Safe handling practices keep operators out of trouble. Lab workers wear gloves and goggles—no shortcuts, since repeated skin contact sometimes leads to rashes, especially in jobs requiring eight-hour shifts. Dust inhalation risks exist for those pouring kilos into mixers; modern upgrades like vacuum feeders and dust extractors sliced workplace complaints by half in the 2010s. Bio-monitoring and annual health screenings now form a standard part of employment at top facilities. End users see clear labels, fast-track batch recalls, and allergy advisories. Quality departments run accelerated aging tests to make sure storage instructions truly match real-world conditions.
Ethyl-p-hydroxybenzoate shows up in shelf-stable medicines, face washes, body lotions, liquid foods like syrups, and topical medical creams. It preserves vaccines, where cold-chain distribution might fail. Food technologists use it only in select processed goods, such as flavored gels and jams in regions that approve it. Rapidly growing markets—like natural cosmetics—debate its use, but cost and proven track record keep it on many ingredient lists. The compound has played a part in curbing hospital-acquired infections by stabilizing ointments and wound dressings stored at room temperature.
Lab teams continue searching for safer, more efficient preservatives. Recent years brought deeper looks into how bacteria sometimes tolerate parabens after decades of exposure. Microbiology labs in Europe monitor resistance patterns, while pharmacology journals publish head-to-head trials against new synthetic rivals. Formulation specialists analyze stability at varying pH levels, shining a light on how Ethylparaben works—or fails—inside today’s complex emulsions. Data from both industrial and academic sources compare shelf life, safety, and cost against emerging alternatives.
Toxicologists have studied its absorption, metabolism, and potential links to hormone disruption since media coverage grew sharper in the early 2000s. Most scientific bodies, including the US FDA and the European SCCS, say Ethylparaben remains safe at current levels. Large-scale studies using rodents and cell cultures focus on potential estrogen-like effects, while epidemiologists track population exposure in urine samples across continents. After long-term reviews, most authorities found no direct proof of cancer or toxic effects from low-level use, but ongoing criticism from advocacy groups keeps research funding alive. Researchers in Japan published several hundred papers over the past decade, covering everything from gene expression changes to joint effects with other chemicals found in personal care products.
Looking ahead, Ethyl-p-hydroxybenzoate faces stiff competition from next-generation preservatives promising lower allergen rates and ‘green’ profiles. Regulatory agencies may set even tighter limits, pushing makers to innovate yet again. The clean-label trend in both food and personal care industries opens up space for new bio-based molecules, yet supply chain disruptions highlight the risk of abandoning tried-and-tested options too soon. Meanwhile, international trade laws keep shifting, so both exporters and regulators continually revise their documents. Advanced analytical tools—faster mass spectrometry, smarter contamination tracing, AI-driven batch release forecasting—will let producers keep a step ahead of both regulators and consumer watchdogs. The story isn’t over yet; very likely, Ethyl-p-hydroxybenzoate or its chemical descendants will remain present in everyday life, gathering new scrutiny as science, policy, and public attitudes shift.
Ethyl-p-hydroxybenzoate often gets lost behind more attention-grabbing ingredients listed on packaging. Most people know it by another name: ethylparaben. This compound helps keep a mind-boggling variety of goods, from cosmetics to foods, safe and fresh during their trip from factory to bathroom shelf—or kitchen cupboard. Without this preservative, that favorite face cream, packaged muffin, or bottle of cough syrup would spoil long before we had a chance to use it.
People have relied on ethylparaben for decades. It protects against mold, yeast, and bacteria. This matters anywhere products might sit around unrefrigerated, especially in humid bathrooms or warm kitchens. That powder compact or body lotion on the countertop owes its long shelf life to the presence of this simple molecule, which interrupts the growth of germs before they become a health hazard.
Long-term use hasn’t gone unnoticed by scientists and health agencies. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Food Safety Authority have both reviewed its safety record many times. They set clear limits on how much can go into products. For ethylparaben in food, it usually stays under 0.1% by weight. Safety testing continues, but so far, most scientific reviews haven’t found convincing evidence of harm for the vast majority of people, though some individuals can experience mild skin reactions.
The word “paraben” sometimes sets off alarms for folks who worry about chemicals in personal care products. Reports about possible hormone disruption have made their mark in public debates. The research here is ongoing, and most experts agree that current levels in consumer products fall far below any known danger zones. Still, this ongoing debate drives many companies to explore preservative alternatives, which often come with their own trade-offs in cost and product stability.
Pushes for cleaner ingredients mean some brands advertise “paraben-free” on labels. As a dad who juggles concerns over skin irritation with the reality that moldy creams have sent more than one friend to the dermatologist, I pay close attention to these labels but don’t panic if I spot ethylparaben in something I trust. What matters more is honest ingredient lists and science-backed limits, not scare tactics.
Moving forward, it helps when companies clearly explain why they use certain preservatives. A good step is offering smaller package sizes to limit the time products spend open, cutting the need for heavy-duty preservatives. Scientists keep searching for new compounds that work as well with less controversy, but for now, ethylparaben continues pulling its weight in keeping favorite lotions, foods, and medicines worry-free.
Reading ingredient lists, storing products as directed, and using items within recommended periods all help manage risk. Science supports the responsible use of ethylparaben, but people deserve to make informed choices. Honest communication, ongoing research, and real-life vigilance create a world where both safe preservation and consumer trust can thrive.
Open any bathroom cabinet, dig out your favorite lotion, cleanser, or shampoo, and you’ll probably run into a chemical called Ethyl-P-Hydroxybenzoate. Most people know it by another name—ethylparaben. It helps keep mold, yeast, and bacteria out of creams and serums. The conversation about its safety doesn’t happen in a vacuum. For years I’ve watched concerned consumers, parents, and some vocal advocacy groups point fingers at parabens, worrying about long-term health.
Early lab studies, especially those on animals, linked high doses of parabens to hormone disruption. That pattern puts people on edge. Regulation pulls these findings into perspective. Scientific committees in both the US and Europe took hard looks at the research. The European Commission's Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety gives ethylparaben the green light for daily use in personal care, as long as the concentration sticks below 0.4%. The US Food and Drug Administration, while calling for good data, hasn’t slammed on the brakes either. In my own experience working with people dealing with sensitive skin, the ingredient rarely sets off allergic reactions. It scores low on the irritant scale compared to other preservatives. Dermatologists keep recommending products that use it because it’s predictable and does its job.
Plenty of the panic stems from a misunderstanding of "dose makes the poison." Nearly anything, even water, gets toxic at sky-high levels. In cosmetics, exposure to ethylparaben doesn’t get close to those animal testing dosages. Big safety reviews, including studies from the Cosmetic Ingredient Review panel, point to safe use in humans—no spikes in cancer, no proven links to reproductive harm, just the usual chance of a mild rash if you’re one of the unlucky few.
Consumers often want to avoid anything synthetic, thinking natural means safer. But take away preservatives and the real villain—microbial growth—steps in. You end up with spoiled products, leading to breakouts or infections. I’ve seen more skin issues crop up from moldy, preservative-free creams than regulated products containing parabens. The irony is, by banning compounds like ethylparaben, brands switch to alternatives with even less testing behind them, such as potassium sorbate or methylisothiazolinone. Those newcomers sometimes cause more irritation.
Staying safe goes beyond the headline-grabbing studies. Watchdog groups like the Environmental Working Group give ethylparaben a moderate risk profile, but context matters—a broad look across scientific research points to its responsible use as low-risk. I always remind friends and clients to check expiration dates, store products out of heat and sunlight, and toss anything that smells or looks off. Smart use makes a bigger difference than ingredients lists ever could.
Long-term, solutions aren’t either all-or-nothing. Brands should keep pushing for more transparent testing. Regulatory agencies need steady funding for research on ingredient safety in real-world scenarios, not just in labs. Shoppers can keep asking questions, but looking for evidence beats listening to fearmongering every time. Ethyl-P-Hydroxybenzoate has held up under close inspection so far. People deserve real facts so they can make their own decisions for themselves and their families.
Ethyl-P-Hydroxybenzoate, also known as ethylparaben, shows up in plenty of products people use every day—moisturizers, sunscreens, shampoo, and even some processed foods. Companies rely on it because it stops bacteria and mold, which keeps things fresh longer. People rarely stop to think about ingredients like this unless a problem pops up.
Most folks use products with ethylparaben and never notice an issue. Some people have more sensitive skin and may run into allergic reactions. These reactions look like redness, itching, or even swelling after putting on a cream or lotion. In my own experience working in a dermatology clinic, it’s usually folks with existing conditions like eczema who noticed a flare-up if their creams contain parabens. Rashes and patchy skin reactions don’t happen to everyone, but for someone already struggling with sensitive skin, even small amounts can make life harder.
For years, scientists have looked into whether ethylparaben acts like a weak estrogen in the body. Some lab studies in animals and cell cultures point to a mild ability to mimic the female hormone estrogen. The concern here is that, if a person is exposed to large enough amounts of parabens every day, they might upset the body’s normal hormone balance. The European Food Safety Authority and the FDA both say the amounts found in consumer products usually stay far below what’s considered risky. Still, people often feel uneasy about any ingredient linked, even slightly, to hormone changes, especially in kids and people with hormonal health issues.
I once met a patient who developed an intense allergic reaction after using a new ointment for a skin rash. Patch-testing confirmed ethylparaben as the culprit. This kind of true allergy stays rare, but for people who develop a sensitivity, accidentally using products with this ingredient means repeat trouble. People with known paraben allergies benefit from reading ingredient labels closely, especially since parabens show up in various forms under different names.
Many studies suggest the body quickly breaks down ethylparaben and flushes it out in urine. That makes long-term buildup in the body less likely. Still, there’s a lot we don’t know about how tiny doses from many products stack up over a lifetime. Some researchers keep digging into links between parabens and breast cancer, but large reviews haven’t nailed down a direct cause-and-effect. As a parent and healthcare worker, I like to err on the side of moderation—using products that work but not going overboard with anything that raises big questions, even if the data isn’t conclusive yet.
People who worry about parabens have more options now than ever before. You can walk into any pharmacy and find personal care items labeled “paraben-free.” That approach makes sense for families with allergies or anyone who prefers fewer synthetic ingredients. For folks who rely on prescription creams or medicines that can’t easily be swapped out, pharmacists and doctors can look at alternatives or suggest ways to reduce exposure without giving up on treatment. Sticking with well-known brands that follow safety regulations means fewer surprises. Watching for skin changes and talking with a healthcare provider about any issues goes farther than a simple ingredient list.
Ask anyone who checks labels about preservatives, and Ethyl-P-Hydroxybenzoate, commonly called ethylparaben, shows up a lot. You’ll spot it in cosmetics, many personal care items, and a surprising list of foods. The stuff does a solid job keeping bacteria and mold away, but that’s not always enough to win the full trust of public health bodies around the world.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tracks parabens closely. They haven’t banned ethylparaben in food, drugs, or cosmetics, but they do keep an eye on new research. The European Union has allowed its use, but strict limits apply. In both the U.S. and Europe, ethylparaben has found its way into thousands of products before tighter rules kicked in. These products had to pass safety assessments, proving that everyday exposure stays within a safe range.
Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare approves ethylparaben for both food and cosmetic use. Countries tend to follow international precedent, adopting similar restrictions on maximum amounts, especially for products made for babies or people with sensitive skin. These limits didn’t appear overnight. They reflect decades of toxicology studies and real-world reports.
Stories about chemicals in food and beauty items travel fast, and for good reason. Ethylparaben, like other parabens, has come under the microscope for possible health risks, including allergy concerns and questions about hormone disruption. That’s one reason agencies keep reviewing new evidence. So far, major health authorities agree that ethylparaben doesn’t threaten health at approved levels, but these decisions can shift with science.
Living in a world packed with synthetic compounds, people grow wary when exposure climbs. Parabens bring up bigger issues, like how much data regulators need before saying a substance goes too far. As someone who has chosen products for my family based on ingredient lists, I value clarity in what agencies allow and why.
Research doesn’t always turn up black-and-white answers. Many researchers call for deeper, longer-term studies. What stands out: regulators adjust their stance when evidence steers public policy. For example, the European Commission limited the combined sum of certain parabens in leave-on products soon after new findings emerged.
The U.S. and EU require full disclosure on labels. That gives people with allergies or concerns a chance to steer clear. This is one way industry responds to consumer demand for more natural or transparent choices. Anyone looking to avoid ethylparaben can find alternatives, but those come with their own pros and cons.
It makes sense for agencies to keep updating risk assessments as new studies come out. Public involvement matters, too. When people demand clear, concise ingredient lists, brands usually respond with more transparent products. Talking to dermatologists or food safety experts adds a layer of trust beyond what’s printed on a label.
No single solution covers everything. Strong rules, solid science, and honest labels offer the best path. For companies, that means placing evidence before profit—and for the rest of us, staying informed gives us real choices.
Working in labs, warehouses, and even DIY medicine cabinets shows one thing clearly—safe chemical storage rarely gets the attention it deserves. Ethyl-p-hydroxybenzoate, better known as ethylparaben, gets tossed into mixed bins, forgotten on pharmacy shelves, and crammed in closets “out of the way.” It seems harmless on paper. Used as a preservative, this little compound helps keep lotions, syrups, and ointments fresh and free from harmful microbes. But like most chemicals, ideal storage is more than just closing a lid.
Ethylparaben doesn’t explode in sunlight or melt through glass, but real risks come from long-term exposure. Sitting out in humid air, the powder or liquid form will clump, degrade, and lose its punch. Sunlight, high temperatures, and moisture band together to break down the molecule. As potency drops, the preservative can’t stop bacteria or fungi from blooming. Medicines or food can spoil faster, sometimes without any obvious signs. In healthcare, that can spell serious trouble—ineffective doses, lost shelf life, and, in some rare cases, health risks.
From time spent in compounding pharmacies and working alongside regulators, certain habits ring true every time. Dry, cool, and dark environments are non-negotiable. Ordinary shelf in a steamy bathroom? No. Glass jars left near a sunny window? Still a bad call. Chemicals crave consistency.
Most facilities rely on tightly sealed containers, preferably amber-colored glass or heavy-duty HDPE plastics. The color blocks out UV rays—one of the main culprits behind chemical breakdown. Temperature should stay below 25°C (77°F), so don’t park bottles beside radiators or heat vents. Keep it below eye level in a ventilated cabinet, out of direct reach for kids or anyone not trained to handle it. Simple rules—clear labels with the full name, date of purchase, and batch number—end up saving confusion months down the line. Shrugging off these steps has led to more ruined batches than I’d care to admit.
It seems obvious, but never mix leftovers from one bottle into another unless absolutely certain about the contents and source. Even small changes—like a sticker peeling off or exposure to moisture—reduce reliability. Ethylparaben isn’t the most dangerous item in the cabinet, but a poorly stored jar can create legal headaches and health scares, especially with stricter quality controls in pharmaceuticals or food.
Ignoring storage advice saves a little time up front but often causes grief later. Good practice preserves both the safety of consumers and the reputation of anyone handling or selling chemicals. One bad batch costs more—financially and ethically—than ten extra minutes of proper handling. In labs, keeping a close eye on storage stops small issues from snowballing into disasters. Training new staff to respect these basics, rather than treating them like afterthoughts, pays off every single time.
Regular audits, basic training, and accessible documentation on chemical storage make a big difference. Even small companies and home users can set up storage checklists and stick to them. Label everything, track usage dates, inspect seals, and keep logs. It’s not complicated, but consistency matters more than fancy equipment.
Ethyl-p-hydroxybenzoate keeps products safe when treated right. Safe storage, clear labeling, and careful habits protect more than formulas—they protect people.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Ethyl 4-hydroxybenzoate |
| Other names |
Ethylparaben Ethyl p-hydroxybenzoate Ethyl 4-hydroxybenzoate |
| Pronunciation | /ˈiːθɪl paɪ hɑːkˈsɪl.oʊˌbɛnˈzoʊ.eɪt/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Ethyl 4-hydroxybenzoate |
| Other names |
Ethylparaben Ethyl para-hydroxybenzoate Ethyl 4-hydroxybenzoate Paraben A p-Hydroxybenzoic acid ethyl ester |
| Pronunciation | /ˌiːθɪl paɪ hɑːˈdrɒk.siˌbɛnˈzoʊ.eɪt/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 120-47-8 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `3D model (JSmol)` string for **Ethyl-p-hydroxybenzoate** (also known as **Ethyl paraben**) is: ``` CCOC(=O)C1=CC=C(C=C1)O ``` |
| Beilstein Reference | Beilstein Reference: 2041194 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:17608 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1409 |
| ChemSpider | 8226 |
| DrugBank | DB03793 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.005.388 |
| EC Number | 202-307-7 |
| Gmelin Reference | 8867 |
| KEGG | C07155 |
| MeSH | D010634 |
| PubChem CID | 6150 |
| RTECS number | DH6650000 |
| UNII | 4JL2948U0F |
| UN number | UN2811 |
| CAS Number | 120-47-8 |
| Beilstein Reference | **1364044** |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:17615 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1409 |
| ChemSpider | 16563 |
| DrugBank | DB00719 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.003.345 |
| EC Number | 202-307-7 |
| Gmelin Reference | 14108 |
| KEGG | C07343 |
| MeSH | D010435 |
| PubChem CID | 6130 |
| RTECS number | DH6650000 |
| UNII | HBM4L6R9SY |
| UN number | 3077 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID5020357 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C9H10O3 |
| Molar mass | 166.17 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder. |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.34 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | Slightly soluble |
| log P | 2.45 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.000133 hPa (25 °C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 9.97 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.14 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -49.2·10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.507 |
| Viscosity | 2.45 mPa·s (30°C) |
| Dipole moment | 3.07 D |
| Chemical formula | C9H10O3 |
| Molar mass | 166.17 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder |
| Odor | odorless |
| Density | 1.347 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Slightly soluble |
| log P | 2.5 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.00011 mmHg (25°C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 8.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.4 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -47.5e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.504 |
| Viscosity | 4.84 mPa·s (20°C) |
| Dipole moment | 3.07 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 221.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -453.2 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -3226 kJ/mol |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 242.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -421.8 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -3215 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A01AB02 |
| ATC code | A01AB02 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause eye, skin, and respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, Warning, H315, H319, H335 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H315, H319 |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: P261, P264, P271, P272, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P332+P313, P337+P313, P362+P364, P501 |
| Flash point | 250°C (482°F) |
| Autoignition temperature | 580°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): 2,700 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 2,700 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | DH6650000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL: 5 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 10 mg/m³ |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not listed |
| Main hazards | May cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS02,GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H319: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: P261, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313 |
| Flash point | 198°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 580°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral (rat): 2,700 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Rat oral 2,700 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | SC7545000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | 5 mg/m3 |
| REL (Recommended) | 10 mg/m³ |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Methylparaben Propylparaben Butylparaben Benzylparaben Sodium ethylparaben |
| Related compounds |
Methylparaben Propylparaben Butylparaben Isobutylparaben Benzylparaben |