Decades ago, formulators in cosmetics and medical industries started tinkering with silicon-based oils, hunting for a better way to create stable emulsions that played nicely with water and oil alike. Originally, these materials came in their raw, unmodified forms. Chemists learned quickly that pure silicon oil could resist most blends, so they started grafting polyether or hydrophilic groups onto the chains. Early patents from the 1950s and 1960s tried everything from mechanical dispersion to chemical surface treatments. By the 1980s, a handful of grades—linear and crosslinked—found their place in markets from eye surgery to waterproofing sprays. Every small improvement meant safer eye surgery irrigation fluids, longer-lasting makeup, and new possibilities for drug-delivery systems. Lessons from those early years showed just how much trial and error can drive innovation, and how collaborative R&D pushes a material from lab notes to regulated, real-life use.
Today, emulsifying silicon oil is a staple for companies working in personal care, food processing, pharmaceuticals, and specialty coatings. At a glance, emulsifying silicon oil doesn’t look very different from the lubricants in mechanics’ kits or the defoamers in industrial vats, but its defining twist comes from the hydrophilic ends attached to its siloxane backbone. There’s polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) with PEG, PPG, or organic surfactant links hugging the usually oil-loving chain. Producers list oils in a range of viscosities—low numbers flow with ease for sprays or serums; thicker cuts get their use in creams or wound-dressing gels. Despite long product sheets, most of these mention either a single emulsifier or a blend, always targeting a balance between solubility and resistance to breakdown when stressed by temperature or pH swings.
These oils stand out with a distinct slippery feel that never quite washes away unless detergents touch them. Most versions go clear and colorless, resisting water and holding up under repeated heating. Hydrophilic modification means some now mix comfortably with water, forming opaque or milky emulsions that let actives travel through creams without separating over time. Molecular weights fall anywhere from a couple of thousand Daltons to over a hundred thousand, changing their spread and film-forming strength. Importantly, silicon oils avoid quick oxidation, so they don’t turn rancid when left on shelves. Refractive index bumps up visual clarity in cosmetics, and electrical insulation opens uses in electronics protection and design.
Bottles and barrels of emulsifying silicon oil don’t just show a name: manufacturers have to print out viscosity (centistokes or mm²/s), density, color limit, volatile content, percentage of active emulsifier, and pH compatibility. For medical uses, requirements get strict—impurities, metal ions, and microbial load must all fall below tight thresholds, often checked per batch. Food and drug uses in Europe or the US bring extra audits and documentation. I’ve noticed that the finest producers run side-by-side stability testing, measuring drop-formation time and creaming rates across months in heated environments, not just controlled fridges. If a batch fails to hold its mix together, regulatory teams won’t let it out the door. This direct test-and-certify approach underscores how safety and effectiveness need to back up any spec sheet.
Engineers blend emulsifying silicon oil through controlled addition of hydrophilic surfactant groups—often PEG chains are attached through hydrosilylation, driven by trace platinum catalysts at well-controlled temperatures. After functionalization, oils get vacuum stripped to remove solvents and low-molecular fragments, a step that matters especially for eye and skin-contact applications. Careful mixing avoids unwanted foam, and filters catch particulate matter before filling. Industrial setups run jacketed reactors and in-line quality testing to catch any variation in batch-to-batch chemical structure. Real improvements came from switching to continuous reactors and re-using unreacted dimethylsiloxane, both spanning cost savings and environmental compliance.
Chemists rarely leave these oils alone: they react PDMS chains with ethylene oxide or propylene oxide, creating chains that dangle from the silicon chain ends or side positions. As research deepened, reactive side-groups like amino, carboxyl, or epoxy moieties appeared, fine-tuning emulsification to match stubborn actives. In healthcare, surface modification means better compatibility with blood or tissue fluids, reducing inflammatory response or haze formation during surgical healing. Each new variant usually brings its own set of trade-offs; improved emulsifying strength may shave down UV resistance, or add cost with every extra step. These hands-on tweaks underscore that incremental progress in emulsifier chemistry can have outsize effects out in the field, on clinics’ supply lists or formulators’ lab benches.
Depending on manufacturer and region, you’ll hear these oils called silicone emulsifiers, polyether-modified siloxanes, silicone surfactant, or just silicone-in-water emulsion. Some products get trademarked names—Dow Corning’s Q2-5220, Shin-Etsu’s KF-6038, Wacker’s BELSIL, Momentive’s Silsoft—though the chemistry inside often matches broad industry standards. Ingredient lists in personal-care or medical packaging show these as PEG/PPG-18/18 dimethicone, Laureth-4 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl, or Cyclopentasiloxane/PEG-10 Dimethicone, with manufacturers adjusting names to comply with INCI or other international nomenclatures. For users in research or industry, double-checking a supplier’s detailed breakdown remains vital; sometimes performance differences stem from what looks at first like a tweak in name alone.
In practice, safety guides every step, from plant handling to end-user dosing. Manufacturing sites keep strict rules on dust, vapor, and slip hazards, sometimes with custom drains for overflow. For medical and cosmetic markets, Certificate of Analysis paperwork gets as much weight as the product itself. As someone who’s spent time with regulatory teams, I’ve seen labels reviewed for residual catalyst, solvent traces, and bioaccumulation risk, with disposal handled by strict local government standards. Long-term storage containers come fitted with inert blankets to stop water ingress and biological contamination. In public health use—say, a wound-dressing cream or eye tamponade—regular biocompatibility and toxicity reviews shape both production and post-market surveillance. Community monitoring strengthens consumer trust and underpins product approval worldwide.
Silicon oil emulsifiers have carved out uses that stretch from luxury skincare to quick-cure coatings. Personal care remains a huge market—moisturizers, sunscreens, hair serums, and antiperspirants all depend on their “dry touch” and smooth slip. In medicine, these oils give controlled drug delivery through topical creams, drop-in surgical fluids for retinal detachment, or clear, non-irritating bases for skin-contact sensors. Lubricants use their thermal stability and film formation, while electronics sectors draw on hydrophobicity for circuit protection. Each application builds off the same core strengths—chemical stability, ease of formulation, and proven compatibility with both natural and synthetic materials—yet careful selection keeps failures rare. Firsthand, I’ve seen product designers run dozens of test cycles customizing their emulsifier blend just to keep a sunscreen silky and non-sticky after exposure to sweat or saltwater. Much of today’s user acceptance rides on those iterations.
Research teams don’t just revisit old formulas—they’re constantly looking for better surface modification and clean-synthesis strategies. Lately, universities and industry partners have focused on sustainable hydrophilic groups to replace PEG, as regulatory reviews push toward biodegradable alternatives. Enzyme-based grafting and green catalysts gain attention, not just for biosafety, but to drive down long-term production risk and costs. One overlooked trend has been sensor-driven feedback in reactor monitoring, cutting out human guesswork and trimming energy use. Researchers run parallel batches, measuring every change in stability or toxicity, feeding lessons into digital design tools. This push toward greener, smarter manufacturing shows up in every new patent and research report. If anything, the steady flow of new variants gives formulators an ever-growing toolkit for addressing untapped markets and more complex chemical payloads.
Most silicon oils rate low in acute mammalian toxicity, supported by animal testing and clinical skin-contact trials. Still, biocompatibility is not a one-size-fits-all win—some modified chains have flagged liver or reproductive effects in long-term animal studies, with regulatory flags for non-biodegradability and aquatic hazards for certain surfactant groups. Cosmetic companies must provide irritation, patch, and ocular-safety data before launch. In my own experience as a technical consultant, I’ve had clients held up for months by missing cumulative toxicity data for niche off-label uses. Increasingly, lab groups run in vitro cell toxicity and eco-breakdown screens, reporting not only what happens in humans, but impacts on soil and water as discarded products enter waste streams. The burden of proof for broad safety always rests with producers; only transparency and ongoing monitoring build real-world trust.
The outlook for emulsifying silicon oil links directly to tighter regulations and manufacturers’ creativity in sustainable chemistry. The future will probably see new surfactants that move beyond PEG and related chains, addressing health and environmental persistence. Data mining and AI-based molecule optimization look set to replace some historic trial and error, with machine learning finding the next hydrophilic modification or synthesis shortcut. Real-time sensors and modular manufacturing gear will likely reduce costs and improve traceability through the entire supply chain. No matter where the technology heads, the conversation between science, regulation, and industry experience will decide which next-generation products reach markets safely. For innovators, being willing to learn from every step forward—and every real-world setback—remains the best predictor of what will succeed.
Silicon oil comes with a slippery, almost otherworldly feel. Silky, clear, and stable, this stuff stands up to heat, water, and plenty of chemicals. But pure silicon oil doesn't mix with water. Think of it like cooking oil: it floats, refusing to mingle. That’s where emulsifying comes in. Turning this oil into an emulsion means blending it with water, so instead of separating, it forms a smooth mix. Suddenly, new doors open—all kinds of industries start using silicon oil where water contact can’t be avoided.
Step into hospitals, and you’ll spot emulsified silicon oil popping up as a tool for eye surgeons. Retinal detachment surgery often needs a material to keep the retina in place. Standard silicon oil can blur vision, but stable emulsions help keep the oil from forming problematic droplets. This translates to less discomfort for patients and an easier time for doctors working under tough conditions.
Everyday products borrow the same science. Hair conditioners, skin lotions, sunscreens—all take advantage of emulsifying silicon oil. The technology slips past your radar. You feel the soft texture on your hair and skin, but you’re not thinking about the chemical know-how behind it. Emulsified oil means a lightweight feel, extra shine, and a barrier that locks in moisture or repels humidity. Without the emulsion, these products would separate, feel tacky, or go greasy. In my house, running a hand through freshly-washed hair, the improvement in slip and smoothness is obvious and hard to overstate.
Beyond grooming, factories and car shops draw on emulsifying silicon oil, too. Lubricants in metalworking cool cutting blades and prevent rust without making a mess. Textile workers use this emulsion to give fabrics a soft finish. Car polishers want a gleaming shine with zero oily residue—emulsifying silicon oil makes this possible. Quality and speed rise when workers can rely on smooth, consistent performance.
Using any chemical, even one as seemingly mild as silicon oil, brings up safety concerns. Trace amounts get inhaled or washed into rivers. Studies show that the risk from diluted emulsions, especially in personal care, stays low for most folks. But for workers and frequent users, checking for skin irritation and possible lung exposure matters. The same goes for those in surgery. Ongoing research keeps companies and doctors on their toes. People deserve peace of mind along with the benefits.
One growing challenge ties back to environmental impact. Wastewater plants struggle to strip out emulsified silicon oils before water heads downstream. Over time, slick buildup can harm wildlife. Companies are racing to invent greener emulsifiers, turning to biodegradable ingredients or even bacteria that break down oil. Working on site myself, I’ve seen trial runs with biobased additives that cut pollution and keep performance high. More pressure and innovation from all sides promises cleaner waters ahead—with no loss to the convenience we’re used to.
Mixing oil into water never looked like a game changer. But emulsifying silicon oil has shaped healthcare, beauty, industry, and even the way we clean our cars. Experience and science meet here. And as we keep finding new ways to reduce unwanted side effects, the story of this unassuming chemical keeps expanding—not just in labs, but in kitchens, classrooms, and everyday routines.
Silicon oils show up everywhere – from shiny serums to slick conditioners. They often promise glossy hair, a soft touch, or a smooth finish. The real question is whether the way these oils get blended into creams and sprays brings any risks to the skin and scalp. Most people don’t pause in the drugstore aisle to ask what it means to emulsify silicon oil, but the answer shapes the quality and the safety of what we put on our bodies.
Silicon oil on its own doesn’t mix with water. Manufacturers pair it with surfactants—think of these as bridge-builders that pull oil and water together. This is called emulsification. Without this process, your leave-in conditioner would split, and your lotion would turn lumpy. In the lab, chemists test these blends for stability and skin feel, but the story doesn’t end there.
Most skin and hair products use specific grades of silicon oil. Cosmetic-grade dimethicone ranks among the most studied, with decades of safety data behind it. The FDA and the European Union have cleared many silicon-based ingredients for topical use in the right concentrations. Studies in clinical journals report rare allergy reactions and no proven long-term harm for most consumers. The real risk often emerges from improper use or overuse, not from the oil itself. For instance, one report in the “International Journal of Toxicology” found dimethicone to be biologically inert and non-irritating at the strengths used in daily products.
Emulsifiers aren’t all the same. Some blends get sticky or coat the scalp too thickly, which traps sebum, dead skin, and dirt. That’s what leads to buildup—a word many hairstylists dread. Buildup causes dull hair and clogged pores, especially if someone never clarifies or switches products. Rarely, emulsifiers like PEG compounds have raised flags for contamination with lingering manufacturing byproducts. Scarcity of regulation in certain regions lets lower-quality blends onto the shelf, often without enough lab testing or safety checks.
I’ve worked with products on my own fine, sensitive scalp that promised miracle slip and silky texture. After a few weeks, my roots felt lank, and breakouts appeared along my hairline. Swapping for a product with a cleaner ingredient list—fewer emulsifiers, lower levels of silicon oil—my scalp cleared in days. What’s in the bottle matters, and even low-risk emulsifiers don’t fit everyone’s skin chemistry.
People have options even in markets crowded with similar-looking bottles. Reading ingredient panels helps. Dimethicone, cyclopentasiloxane, cetearyl methicone—these show up often and have the most safety data. Consumers can seek out brands that test for skin compatibility, avoid unnecessary fillers, and practice transparency with sourcing and formulations. Third-party certifications give some confidence. For those with allergies or sensitive skin, patch-testing any new lotion or serum on a small patch helps weed out early reactions.
Dermatologists say moderation matters. Using silicon-based products daily, especially with heavy emulsifiers, sometimes clogs pores or irritates scalps that already struggle. Experts encourage people to alternate products and clarify hair once in a while. If irritation pops up, less is more. Skin and hair recover fast if people listen to what their bodies are saying.
The bottom line—emulsified silicon oils can be safe, but quality, formulation, and personal routine shape the real answer much more than the ingredient itself. Choices, both by manufacturers and consumers, make the biggest difference for health and satisfaction.
Some folks see silicon oil as nothing more than a slippery companion for skincare, cleaning goods, or even industrial polishes. The emulsifying part, though, turns a basic material into a reliable workhorse. Having spent time wrestling with everything from moisturizer recipes to tire dressings, clear lessons stand out: you want a silky texture, good slip, and a stable mix, but getting there rarely plays out like following a recipe on a blog. Oil and water don’t make friends quietly — so that’s where emulsifying silicon oil enters, doing jobs that regular oils simply can’t.
Mixing oil with water always asks for some know-how, but silicon-based oils cook up a whole new set of challenges. These materials resist both water and normal blends of botanical oils, showing off their hydrophobic (and often lipophobic) nature. In plain language, they act stubborn. Add a surfactant, particularly a silicon-compatible one, and the story changes: these emulsifiers wrap around silicon oil droplets, so the oil slips smoothly into water-based blends. Without this step, you just end up with separated gunk, no matter how hard the blender works.
Labs, workshops, and kitchen tables have something in common — the mess that comes from rushing through the mixing process. A balanced ratio matters. I’ve watched small-batch runs flop because someone underestimated just how much emulsifier to use or dumped everything in at once. Silicon oils thrive in low concentrations, usually between 1% and 10% in cosmetic products, depending on the finish and the slip you want.
Heating oil and water phases separately, then adding the emulsifier to the silicon oil before any water hits the mix, keeps things predictable. High-shear mixers help a ton, especially in bigger batches. Small-scale crafters sometimes switch to stick blenders, keeping movement fast enough so droplets stay tiny. Even with the right gear, patience still counts. Pour too quickly, or skip temperature checks (around 70°C for most emulsifying silicon blends), and things can curdle or separate before you hit the jar.
Reading safety data and choosing food or cosmetic-grade silicon oils makes a real difference. Contaminants, heavy metals, or impure emulsifiers should not land in anyone’s bathroom or on their skin. Manufacturers know this — they run batch tests and require certificates of analysis. Still, small-scale formulators sometimes buy bulk, off-label silicon oil for a discount. That can turn basic skincare experiments toxic, so it’s not worth the risk, no matter the savings.
The push for clean beauty or “greener” polishes hasn’t replaced silicon oils for good reasons. Properly emulsified silicon oil delivers unmatched spreadability, water-resistance, and shine. Some people worry about biocompatibility or environmental impact — fair points, but new blends avoid the worst hazards, thanks to changes in silicon chemistry and stricter rules worldwide.
Switching to plant-derived or natural-emulsifier silicon systems serves as a next step. Scientists keep testing alternatives but, right now, nothing else pairs durability and safety quite so well in certain formulas. Hobbyists and pros both benefit from knowing these materials inside-out, not just because the lotion will look better, but because the risk of failure drops.
I’ve watched plenty of products flop on store shelves — separation, cloudy bottles, weird after-tack. Often, the root cause traces back to someone misunderstanding silicon oil or rushing the emulsification stage. Training, stricter quality checks, and smarter choices in emulsifier selection do more than prevent recalls or disappointed customers — they build trust. Respecting the science behind emulsifying silicon oil avoids shortcuts that lead to trouble, and that’s a habit worth building on for everyone mixing, stirring, or selling these products.
Silicon oil stands out for its slippery feel and resistance to high temperatures. It's no stranger to my workbench, whether I’m protecting bike parts or moisturizing dry hands. Most people know it as a heavy, transparent liquid that sticks to tools or sits in medical syringes. Still, smart adjustments have given this material a new role in everyday products through emulsification. Changes in texture and handling through emulsifying silicon oil have practical benefits. Manufacturers make a water-based, lighter mixture, instead of relying on the thick, sometimes greasy unaltered oil that’s tough to spread, mix, or wash away.
Any parent who’s wrestled with sticky skin creams can spot the difference that emulsification brings. In lotions, emulsified silicon oil turns a greasy layer into a silky finish. My own preference in sunscreen and moisturizer leans hard towards those that blend and disappear quickly—most rely on some form of emulsified silicon for that reason. Regular oil can leave a film or clog pores, especially in humid climates. Emulsified forms wash off cleanly, so skin stays fresh and less irritated.
Hospitals, especially burn units, use silicon oil for its healing properties, but straightforward applications get messy and can interfere with wound cleaning. Emulsified silicon fits better with watery dressings, so nurses can swap bandages without yanking on skin or hair. Care workers report that patients stay more comfortable, and wounds stay cleaner.
Production lines keep running smoother with fewer shutdowns for cleaning if the products leave less oily residue. Pure silicon oil splatters or leaks out of tubes, gumming up machine parts. Emulsified versions rinse out faster with water, letting operators cut down on harsh cleaning agents and machine downtime. Less clean-up keeps costs down for businesses and shrinks chemical waste.
As someone who tinkers in kitchens and garages, I see that cleanup time drops when messy greases get replaced with rinse-friendly blends. If something spills, you reach for a rag, not industrial solvents.
Straight silicon oil hangs around in soil and water, raising disposal headaches. Emulsified forms break apart more easily, so they move through water treatment systems or compost piles faster. Cities struggle with clogged drains and tainted water from oil-heavy runoff; lighter, water-dispersed silicon cuts this risk. A municipal waste report I read pinpoints industrial oil pollution as a constant issue—solutions that emulsify instead of dumping raw oil actually help reduce long-term environmental pressures.
Silicon oil started as a niche material for machine shops and hospitals, but its emulsified counterpart now shows up everywhere: in paints, conditioners, lubricants, and even kitchen tools. This comes from honest benefits—handling gets easier, mixing takes less time, and there’s less lingering residue. In my own work, I find it easier to recommend and use products with emulsified oil because the results match what real people need—something that cleans up well, feels pleasant, and keeps machines or bodies in good shape. Technology keeps shaping better solutions, and in this case, emulsification gives silicon oil a much broader and safer reach.
Anyone who ever shook a bottle of salad dressing has seen oil and water resist each other. In labs and factories, the story repeats with silicone oil. Even the fancy “emulsifying” silicon oils don’t work magic alone. Most emulsifiers are chemical bridges: one side bonds with oil, the other with water. But when the base oil is made of silicone, the usual rules change.
Silicone oil brings something rare to the table. Its backbone is silicon and oxygen, not carbon. So plenty of typical food or cosmetic emulsifiers hardly register silicone as oil at all. Back in grad school, I tried dumping common emulsifiers into cyclopentasiloxane and water. The layers barely moved. No emulsion, no blend—just frustration and a reminder that surface chemistry can be a stubborn beast.
Companies looking to create creams, serums, or industrial fluids often want that transparent, stable mixture. Problem is, most surfactants built for vegetable oils or mineral oils fail or yield poor shelf life for silicone-and-water pairs. The solution usually involves silicone-specific emulsifiers. Polysiloxane-polyether copolymers are one type. Picture a backbone of silicone atoms with water-friendly polyether groups sticking out. In a beaker, these copolymers wrap around each droplet of silicone oil, holding it inside a watery world.
Tried-and-true hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) numbers do play a role, but formulators working with silicone oil focus on specialized blends. One study from the International Journal of Cosmetic Science showed formulations using dimethicone copolyol successfully led to emulsions that resisted separation. Products from major cosmetic brands don’t happen by chance—they’re built around these tailored surfactants.
Without the correct blend, end products split after days or weeks. Customers won’t accept a cream that turns runny or greasy by day three. Lab teams spend months stability testing because mixing methods can fool even seasoned formulators. Mechanical agitation or high-shear mixing equipment can make blends look creamy for a short period. Only time tells if the emulsion will last.
I’ve watched R&D teams scramble with customer returns whenever cheap or generic emulsifiers get used in personal care or automotive fluids. There’s a reason ingredient lists often rely on big chemical suppliers with field-tested silicone emulsifiers. That’s experience over speculation. Sometimes the safest path is to start with small batches and test them hard—temperature swings, humidity, and shelf time beat any theoretical spreadsheet.
Skin absorption and toxicity sometimes come into play. The European Union and US FDA strictly control which emulsifiers appear in products. Just because something blends in the lab doesn’t mean regulators sign off for food or skin use. I follow the latest research, because the landscape keeps shifting. Some emulsifiers get banned or face restrictions over allergy or hormone disruption concerns. Brands that protect customers by staying ahead of regulations tend to outlast short-term players.
Who makes progress in this field? Companies and researchers that invest in their staff’s understanding and practical trial of silicone emulsions see fewer failures and better product reviews. There’s real art in picking the right blend. My own advice: Always rely on up-to-date studies, proven chemical suppliers, and real-world testing rather than sales pitches. That mix of experience and science gives stable, safe silicone-in-water emulsions that actually deliver on promises.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | polyoxyethylene(20) sorbitan monooleate |
| Other names |
Emulsified Silicone Oil Silicone Emulsion Silicone Oil Emulsion Silicone Emulsifier Polydimethylsiloxane Emulsion |
| Pronunciation | /ɪˈmʌl.sɪˌfaɪ.ɪŋ ˈsɪl.ɪ.kən ɔɪl/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Polyoxyethylene-(20)-cetyl-ether-dimethylpolysiloxane |
| Other names |
Silicone Emulsifier Emulsified Silicone Oil Silicone Emulsion Silicone Oil Emulsion Polydimethylsiloxane Emulsion |
| Pronunciation | /ɪˈmʌl.sɪ.faɪ.ɪŋ ˈsɪl.ɪ.kən ɔɪl/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 63148-62-9 |
| Beilstein Reference | 4-06-00-03669 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53772 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201544 |
| DrugBank | DB15954 |
| ECHA InfoCard | The ECHA InfoCard for "Emulsifying Silicon Oil" is: **03-2119475104-45-0000** |
| EC Number | 63148-62-9 |
| Gmelin Reference | 1145023 |
| KEGG | C14778 |
| MeSH | D020847 |
| PubChem CID | 3084095 |
| RTECS number | VX8050000 |
| UNII | 5W8W8T8E26 |
| UN number | UN1993 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | Emulsifying Silicon Oil: `DTXSID5021324` |
| CAS Number | 63148-62-9 |
| Beilstein Reference | 4-13-04-00002 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53774 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201560 |
| DrugBank | DB09469 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03f0c9a6-f700-4584-81e0-13fa6d0e4048 |
| EC Number | 265-199-0 |
| Gmelin Reference | 1871417 |
| KEGG | KEGG:C18673 |
| MeSH | D20.346.483.520.875 |
| PubChem CID | 9930956 |
| RTECS number | VX8050000 |
| UNII | HG7B320F69 |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | (C2H6OSi)n |
| Appearance | Appearance: "Colorless to light yellow transparent liquid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.98 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 3.1 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 7.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.5~9.5 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | −9.05×10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.400 ~ 1.410 |
| Viscosity | 350~500 cps |
| Dipole moment | 1.70 D |
| Chemical formula | (C2H6OSi)n |
| Molar mass | 5000 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to light yellow transparent liquid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | ~1.0 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | -0.08 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.5 – 9.5 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | χ = -9.05 x 10⁻⁶ |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.400 |
| Viscosity | 1000~2000cps |
| Dipole moment | 1.7 D |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | D11AX |
| ATC code | V06DF |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause eye and skin irritation; harmful if swallowed; may cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: H315 Causes skin irritation. H319 Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P280, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313 |
| Flash point | > 250°C |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): > 5000 mg/kg (Rat) |
| PEL (Permissible) | 50 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 1.0 ~ 5.0% |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Main hazards | Main hazards: Causes skin and eye irritation. Harmful if swallowed or inhaled. |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H319: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | P280: Wear protective gloves/protective clothing/eye protection/face protection. |
| Flash point | > 270°C |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): > 10000 mg/kg (rat) |
| PEL (Permissible) | 50 ppm |
| REL (Recommended) | 1.0 ~ 5.0% |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Amino Silicone Oil Hydroxyl Silicone Oil Epoxy Silicone Oil Vinyl Silicone Oil Methyl Hydrogen Silicone Oil Polyether Modified Silicone Oil |
| Related compounds |
Dimethicone Cyclopentasiloxane Cetyl Dimethicone PEG-12 Dimethicone Amodimethicone Lauryl Methicone Copolyol Phenyl Trimethicone Dimethiconol |