Iron’s story stretches across centuries, yet the chapter on electrolytic iron begins in the late 1800s. Early metallurgists started experimenting with electrolysis as a way to strip away impurities that traditional smelting couldn’t touch. This slow and painstaking process created unusually pure iron—so pure, in fact, that researchers and industry specialists soon realized it opened doors standard pig iron left firmly shut. Laboratories in Europe, the U.S., and Japan found uses right away; some of the sleekest early alloys and electrical components came from this ultra-clean metal. Electrolytic iron moved from scientific oddity to industrial staple during the explosion of high-tech manufacturing, especially in sectors like aerospace, electronics, and medical tools.
Electrolytic iron shows up on pallets as shiny, brittle flakes or fine powder. It comes from an electric current passed through iron solutions, not from a furnace loaded with ore and coke. With purity often above 99.95%, even the trace elements—carbon, sulfur, and phosphorus—drop down to vanishing levels. No other iron on the market, not even vacuum-melted types, compares for lack of dirt and unwanted bits. This brings silent benefits: less risk of weird reactions, cleaner alloying for demanding applications, and improved reproducibility in finished parts. It lands in small, heavy drums at R&D departments and factory floors where high standards are written in stone.
This is the kind of iron most kids never see, not in cutlery, cars, or even classic construction beams. Electrolytic iron has a silvery sheen, a crystalline structure bordering on brittle in its raw state, and a faint but sharp metallic smell that suggests purity without the tang of contamination. Analysts spot a melting point near 1538°C. Density clocks in at 7.87 g/cm³, no higher or lower than standard iron, but what matters most is what’s missing: carbon lurks at less than 0.005%, with sulfur and silicon barely scraping detection limits. These qualities shift the metal’s magnetic, mechanical, and chemical behavior, allowing specialty alloys that hold up under extreme temperatures, radiation, or corrosive environments.
Industrial buyers ask for real numbers. Typical electrolytic iron specifications list iron content above 99.95% by weight, and the datasheet spells out elemental analysis for carbon, sulfur, silicon, phosphorus, copper, nickel, and cobalt—almost all listed below 10 parts per million. Larger producers label drums with key stats, include batch numbers, and provide certificates of analysis for regulatory compliance. Color, particle size, and bulk density might show up on paperwork for customers needing consistent flow and dosing. Global regulations force producers to mention hazard statements, though this iron doesn’t pose much risk unless handled carelessly in a dusty form or mixed with strong acids.
Electrolytic iron does not come from heated rock, but from a quiet tank sitting under a low-voltage power supply. Pure iron salts dissolve in an acidic solution, forming the electrolyte. Metal sheets form the electrodes, and once the current switches on, iron ions migrate to the cathode, depositing as a thin, flaky layer. Operators scrape or peel off the iron, wash it, and sometimes melt it down for further refinement. Tight process controls mean very little opportunity for tramp elements to hitch a ride. It’s slow compared to basic steelmaking, but produces unmatched purity batch after batch.
High-purity means predictability in the lab or at the bench. Electrolytic iron reacts cleanly with various acids, picking up hydrogen and dissolving without forming sticky byproduct messes. In air, it rusts less quickly than lower-grade iron simply because there’s so little carbon or sulfur for catalytic formation of oxides. Additive manufacturing researchers tweak electrolytic iron by alloying with trace chromium, molybdenum, or boron, pushing boundaries in mechanical strength and corrosion resistance. Chemical vapor deposition and sintering techniques both lean on electrolytic iron’s predictable reactivity and absence of harmful inclusions.
Electrolytic iron pops up under different names in procurement databases. Some catalogs call it “high-purity iron” or “electrolytic refined iron.” Powder forms might carry the label “electrolytic iron powder” or “iron (Electrolytic),” often followed by a grade or mesh size. Laboratory suppliers sometimes call it “ultra-pure iron,” while older references stick with “cathodic iron.” There’s no mistaking the origin: every variant refers to iron produced by electrolysis, labeled by purity percentage and particle specifications.
On site, safety looks straightforward. Big drums of electrolytic iron are heavy, solid, and non-flammable, but powder forms can irritate the lungs if inhaled. Spills remain manageable with vacuums and simple clean-up; sparks or open flames don’t threaten this product unless ground fine and dispersed in air. For those mixing iron powders, dust masks and gloves do the job. Most jurisdictions require routine workplace air quality monitoring to catch stray dust, and material safety data sheets highlight the importance of proper storage—cool, dry spaces work best because high humidity eventually brings rust, even to pure iron.
Every application makes the iron’s purity count. High-reliability electronics use electrolytic iron for magnetic alloys—permalloy and mumetal, for example—where trace impurities would foul tight magnetic tolerances. Aerospace giants select electrolytic iron when melting precision parts for turbines, where even one wrong atom could shorten a component’s lifespan in screaming engines. In the world of pharmaceuticals, pure iron enters supplements for iron-deficiency anemia, where heavy metals and contaminants spell regulatory trouble and health risk. Engineers blend it into soft magnetic cores, radar antennas, welding electrodes, and high-efficiency transformer laminations. Even some art conservators and metal restoration experts prefer electrolytic iron for inlays and repairs to historic artifacts, trusting that its predictable oxide behavior yields less corrosion and longer life.
Electrolytic iron stays central for researchers pushing new alloys, medical implants, and magnetic materials. It serves as a reference standard for metallurgical testing and as a starting point for developing exotic compounds—iron-cobalt-vanadium, for instance, grows as an ultra-strong magnet from pure roots. University and government R&D laboratories use electrolytic iron to benchmark impurity effects, document corrosion rates, or prepare calibration materials for spectroscopy. Additive manufacturing outfits blend it into special powder mixes, seeking the ultimate balance of printability, strength, and biocompatibility. Materials scientists still try to coax new life out of this old material by refining deposition, sintering, or alloying methods.
Extensive toxicological work shows that iron at high purity holds few surprises. Ingestion through accidental consumption poses the same risk as standard iron, with toxicity depending on dose rather than source; adults choke down 45 mg daily before risking symptoms, kids face far lower thresholds. Laboratory studies tracking inhaled electrolytic iron dust show minor irritant behavior, with little to no chronic risk at expected workplace exposures if proper controls are in place. Environmental investigations confirm that iron itself causes less harm in soils or water than trace heavy metals—electrolytic iron, with its low impurity content, slips past regulatory scrutiny in most regions. Some researchers keep a watchful eye on nanoparticle forms, but traditional flakes and powders don’t cross the blood-brain barrier or accumulate in organs under normal exposure.
The drive for higher-performance alloys and electronics keeps electrolytic iron near the top of the specialty metals market. With the rapid rise in electric vehicle motors, high-frequency transformers, and scientific instruments that tolerate no contamination, demand looks strong for years ahead. Clean energy technologies—think advanced hydrogen production, low-loss transmission, cutting-edge battery development—call for starter metals free of sulfur, phosphorus, and non-metallic inclusions. Improvements in process efficiency, increased scale, and tighter analytical controls will likely drop costs over time. Some envision novel uses in additive manufacturing, with custom-designed powders tailored for biomedical or micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) applications. All signs point toward steady growth, with new challenges on the horizon keeping this old material young in purpose and potential.
Electrolytic iron stands out as one of the purest forms of iron available today. Regular iron carries traces of carbon and other elements, but electrolytic iron clocks in at around 99.9% purity or better. This grade of purity makes it special, especially in industries where even a tiny splash of contamination can upset the final product.
Most of us don’t spend much time thinking about the source of the iron in medical devices, lab standards, or specialty alloys. In those fields, pure iron matters a lot. Even a small amount of sulfur or carbon can limit how a material behaves. Back in my days working alongside metallurgy engineers, I saw lab-scale magnetic materials change performance simply because of trace elements in commercial iron powders.
In pharmaceutical or food industries, purity means safety. Contamination sneaks in everywhere if you’re not careful. I remember a team lead once showing us the difference between a batch produced with standard iron and another with electrolytic iron. The reading on the mass spectrometer left no room for debate: only the “pure stuff” would work for their application.
The story of electrolytic iron traces back to the basics of electrolysis. Take an iron anode—often a piece of relatively pure iron—and stick it in a bath filled with a specialized electrolyte. Most producers use a solution containing ferrous sulfate. Across the tank sits the cathode, often made from stainless steel or another inert material.
Next, electricity runs through the bath. As the current flows, iron dissolves from the anode. The dissolved iron, carried as Fe2+ ions, drifts across and deposits as nearly pure iron on the cathode. In the process, impurities stay put or fall to the bottom as sludge. Each run peels away another layer of unwanted elements.
This simple setup hides all sorts of details. The bath’s temperature, current density, electrolyte concentration, and even how you clean the electrodes all play a part in how pure your iron gets. The folks running these operations spend plenty of time fine-tuning so only iron makes it to the finish line.
Nobody gets electrolytic iron for the same price as scrap. The gear, chemicals, and time all pile up on the ledger. Plus, the process eats up lots of electricity. Still, if you ever see what a single impurity does to ultra-sensitive magnetic alloys or high-grade electronics, you’ll understand why certain buyers keep coming back.
Some worry about the environmental impact. The process, if not managed well, can leave behind chemical waste. Good outfits set up recovery and recycling systems, but there’s always room for better controls and stricter oversight. Clean energy can lower the environmental toll, too. In my view, pushing research into alternative, less resource-heavy purification methods still matters, but for now, electrolysis keeps offering results that other methods struggle to match.
As technology gets more demanding, pure iron’s importance only grows. Even as other purification tricks come along, the simple power of electrolysis delivers results people trust. That reliability counts for something. Most of the time, the iron carrying the “electrolytic” tag ends up in places where shortcuts just invite trouble.
Walk into any serious laboratory, and it won’t take long to spot a sample labeled “electrolytic iron.” Scientists count on it to control experiments because impurities in other types of iron throw off results—one random element at the wrong place, and a whole day’s work can go to waste. Electrolytic iron offers remarkable consistency, hitting purity marks above 99.9 percent. This trait isn’t just a number on a sheet; it means researchers know exactly what they’re dealing with. Results come out more reliable, and the data can stand up to scrutiny. Researchers in metallurgy, chemistry, or even pharmaceuticals lean on this special iron to test new coatings, medications that might react with metals, and in developing magnetic materials. Without this high-purity material, it’s tough to draw any trustworthy lessons from samples contaminated in unpredictable ways.
Electrolytic iron makes a difference in medicine that few people notice, though it’s woven into millions of lives. It turns out to be a key component in iron supplements and fortified food products. Supplements using this form help treat anemia—an issue I’ve seen affect families, robbing energy and focus from kids trying to keep up in school. Because of its high purity and predictable behavior in the body, electrolytic iron gets absorbed without upsetting the digestive system as some other forms do. Food technologists pick it less because it’s showy and more because it does what it’s supposed to do: restore iron levels efficiently, especially crucial in places where diets simply don’t carry enough iron. The World Health Organization points to iron deficiency as a widespread health problem, and electrolytic iron’s role in tackling that isn’t minor—it’s a quiet workhorse in public health.
Steelmakers and foundries chase precise outcomes. They can’t afford to have hidden variables—especially as cars, trains, and even small household devices depend on safe, strong metal parts. Electrolytic iron comes straight from the process with hardly any sulfur, phosphorus, or carbon. That means engineers and metallurgists can control the recipe for specialty steels and magnetic alloys right down to the decimal point. Without that control, safety or durability takes a hit. I’ve spoken with toolmakers who say that even the blades used for food processing, surgical tools, and heat-resistant parts trace their reliability back to this high-grade iron. If the base isn’t clean, the final product develops weaknesses, risking everything from product recalls to accidents.
The world’s energy needs don’t slow down, and battery makers are always on the hunt for better, stronger materials. They’ve turned to electrolytic iron for use in new battery chemistries and advanced electronics—it serves as a dependable starting point, offering known performance every time. Companies exploring hydrogen, renewables, or sustainable transport also count on its properties, ensuring their prototypes don’t get derailed by tiny impurities. Every time a manufacturer tests an electric motor or a battery cathode, the purity of electrolytic iron keeps innovation moving along instead of backtracking over false starts caused by poor materials.
Demand for reliability threads through science, medicine, and manufacturing. Electrolytic iron may not turn heads, but its purity unlocks new opportunities—better diagnostics, stronger materials, new medicines, cleaner energy. Solutions keep emerging as people find creative uses for a pure, predictable building block. That’s a foundation worth paying attention to.
Electrolytic iron stands out in the metal world, mainly because of its purity. Most ordinary people never think about it, but what goes into bridges, smartphones, medical devices, or electric cars often depends on how clean the starting materials are. Most commercial iron sits somewhere around 99.5% pure. That number looks impressive until you see what electrolytic iron offers. Here, the iron clocks in at 99.95% to even 99.999%, putting it leagues above other forms. This isn’t about nice decimal places — those tiny fractions make the difference when absolute consistency, sensitive electronics, or medical implants come into play.
In my own experience working with engineers, I’ve seen how trace elements — just a handful of atoms — can send entire projects off the rails. Add a handful of sulfur, oxygen, phosphorus, or carbon to iron, and suddenly it gets a different hue, becomes more brittle, or turns open to rust. Steel produced for cars doesn’t have to be as pure as iron for scientific instruments. Get into research or medicine, and a single atom in a million matters. Think about pure iron used for MRI shielding in hospitals. One trace of magnetic contaminant, and the machine could snap or give off wrong readings. People’s safety depends on this accuracy.
Electrolytic iron starts from an old trick: using electricity to deposit iron out of a solution layer by layer. This method lets manufacturers skip the usual impurities left behind in traditional smelting. Most manufacturers rely on blast furnaces; they melt iron ore with coke, which introduces unwanted elements. The electrolytic process strips the metal down even further. That’s why only a special set of industries even bother to source it. This isn’t the material for building a garden shed — this is for laboratory experiments, aerospace alloys, batteries, and high-end electrical parts where performance can’t be left to chance.
On the downside, electrolytic iron comes at a cost. The process takes much more energy. The output doesn’t come in massive slabs, but in smaller quantities. This bumps up the price to many times that of regular iron. So, in day-to-day construction, using electrolytic iron wouldn’t make sense. Factories making it don’t operate on the same scale as big steel mills, so anyone requiring this grade will struggle with supply limits now and then. In countries without easy access, prices can spike or shipments can be delayed.
As electric vehicles, hydrogen technology, and advanced electronics demand cleaner starting materials, the iron industry faces new pressure. Research in cleaner, more energy-efficient production methods could lower costs. Increased recycling of high-purity scrap from electronics and medical equipment offers another path. It would make sense for universities and technology labs to push for efficient small-batch production, rather than scaling up old methods that eat through resources. The cleaner the feedstock, the cleaner the results downstream, not only in performance but also in reliability and safety for end users.
People rarely appreciate the link between material purity and daily life. Tiny percentages in iron purity affect how long a part lasts, whether a medical device keeps working, and how well green energy tech steps up to the challenge. Choosing the right material keeps cars safer, gadgets more reliable, and hospital machines sharper. So, even if most folks won’t ever see a shiny bar of electrolytic iron up close, its impact reaches into regular lives in quiet but critical ways.
Plenty of folks know someone who struggles with low iron. I’ve watched friends struggle through tired days, barely making it through work or school before finally getting their anemia diagnosed. Doctors write a prescription or recommend a supplement from the drugstore shelf, and suddenly, they have a new reason to care about the source and quality of the iron they’re taking. It’s worth digging into just what ends up in these products—because not all iron is the same.
Electrolytic iron shows up in some supplements and food fortification because it’s got a reputation for being purer than simple iron powders from scrap. Think of it as the straight-arrow cousin to recycled material—cleaner, with a lower chance of picking up heavy metals or other unwanted leftovers from old industry parts.
Food scientists like this type because its purity makes it safer. According to studies supported by the World Health Organization, electrolytic iron doesn’t have the contamination risks that come with iron filings or recycled scrap sources. For anyone worried about lead, arsenic, or other troublemakers, that matters.
It’s easy to celebrate purity, but the ability to get iron into the body matters more for folks who need every milligram. Electrolytic iron dissolves slowly in the gut. Most of what goes in can pass straight through, especially if stomach acid isn’t on your side. Some research has looked at cereals fortified with this form, but reported less success at improving iron status compared to ferrous sulfate or gluconate. A 2017 review found younger kids gained less benefit from foods using electrolytic iron than from more soluble forms.
I have a friend whose doctor suggested a switch to “gentler” iron. His pills were easier on the stomach, but even after weeks, his blood numbers barely budged. The doctor explained that gentler often means slower absorption, especially with less soluble forms. That gap between chemical safety and actual nourishment shows up again and again in studies about electrolytic iron.
Manufacturers tout electrolytic iron for meeting food-grade and pharmacopeia standards in many countries. The raw cleanliness is real—labs test for trace metals and other contaminants. This satisfies safety watchdogs, and on paper, those numbers reassure people who worry about hidden risks in supplements.
Big brands include this iron in fortified grain, pasta, or even some iron tablets. It sometimes shows up during national programs to tackle anemia. Yet medical groups often warn that people with moderate or severe iron deficiency won’t get the boost they need from products using slowly-absorbed iron. Groups like the CDC and WHO urge higher-risk folks—pregnant women, growing kids, those with chronic illnesses—to stick with the more soluble salts for the sake of speed and impact.
Anyone shopping for iron—especially for at-risk relatives or as a parent—would do well to check not just the source but the type. Healthcare providers play a big part in clearing up confusion. More transparency from manufacturers would help. Product labels rarely spell out the form and the science, but better education can push both sides to do more.
A smarter approach brings people and science together. The safest sources matter for the long haul, but the body’s ability to use the iron remains the make-or-break factor. Until more research delivers better absorption or new production tricks, sticking with proven, absorbable forms looks wiser for those with real deficiency problems.
Those who handle metals know purity changes everything. Impurities creep into steel and iron from recycling, mining, or smelting, adding uncertainty to every batch. Electrolytic iron steps around these headaches. Through an electric process, it strips away most contaminants found in traditional iron—delivering iron with up to 99.99% purity. In my experience, nothing builds trust in experimental data like knowing your base material sits nearly “elemental” clean. Less unpredictable chemistry means fewer wild cards when results go off script.
Researchers and technicians run up against one wall more than any other—reproducibility. Small differences in iron content or trace elements like sulfur and phosphorus will wreck months of careful work. Electrolytic iron offers relief: every shipment performs like the last. I’ve seen battery developers, pharmaceutical scientists, and metallurgists count on this predictability because high-purity iron meets the same spec year after year. This kind of consistency turns out to be priceless when experiments or products go under the regulatory microscope or need scaling from pilot to production.
Cleaner metals aren’t just for laboratory standoffs. The jump toward green energy and medical devices raises the bar for what raw materials must deliver. When working in fuel cells or medical implants, even tiny contaminants can set off chain reactions—think contaminated catalysts or allergic responses. Electrolytic iron gives engineers a controlled starting point. The lack of trace metals also reduces the risk of unexpected breakdowns in demanding environments. It’s not hype; medical teams building MRI-compatible tools or precise dosing machines report far fewer complications using this grade.
Ever watch machinists or lab staff handle iron powder? The dust, the odd chemical reactions—it can grind workflow to a halt and create safety questions. Electrolytic iron, either as powder or granules, packs and pours with minimal drama. It doesn’t leak strange odors or react with moisture the same way some crude iron stocks do. Crews spend less time on cleanup and more on meaningful work.
It’s tempting to stick with cheaper iron until waste piles up or parts fail. The numbers flip fast when you factor in labor wasted on troubleshooting, equipment fouled by impurities, and end users complaining about inferior products. Electrolytic iron costs more up front, but the real savings show up through better yields, fewer production hiccups, and longer part lifespans. In basic terms, spending a bit more on raw material avoids spending a fortune on damage control.
Quality raw materials have always pushed boundaries. Students, researchers, and manufacturers working on new alloys, electronics, or biocompatible materials need something reliable beneath their experiments. With electrolytic iron in the toolbox, teams can focus on new ideas rather than chasing material flaws.
If manufacturing and research keep chasing smarter solutions, efficient energy, or medical breakthroughs, clean and reliable metals will matter more than ever. Electrolytic iron, with unmatched purity and consistency, sits in a sweet spot—proven for the toughest specs, accessible to those that demand more from every project.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | iron |
| Other names |
Electrolytic iron powder High purity iron Reduced iron |
| Pronunciation | /ɪˌlɛk.trəˈlɪt.ɪk ˈaɪ.ən/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | iron |
| Other names |
Armco iron Electrolytic refined iron Electrolytic pure iron |
| Pronunciation | /ɪˌlɛk.trəˈlɪt.ɪk ˈaɪ.ən/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 7439-89-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 505021 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:50846 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201740 |
| ChemSpider | 20525 |
| DrugBank | DB14506 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.028.765 |
| EC Number | 231-096-4 |
| Gmelin Reference | 56388 |
| KEGG | C14818 |
| MeSH | D019375 |
| PubChem CID | 23980 |
| RTECS number | NO4565500 |
| UNII | E1UOL152H7 |
| UN number | UN3178 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DJ7ZWA9V8T |
| CAS Number | 7439-89-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1698733 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:50802 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201880 |
| ChemSpider | 11729 |
| DrugBank | DB14568 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 100.028.941 |
| EC Number | 231-096-4 |
| Gmelin Reference | 5788 |
| KEGG | C07630 |
| MeSH | D018110 |
| PubChem CID | 24867986 |
| RTECS number | NO4565500 |
| UNII | H4N04661BO |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | 6T56RV8549 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | Fe |
| Molar mass | 55.85 g/mol |
| Appearance | Grey powder or brittle, lustrous, silvery-gray pieces |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 7.86 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 1.54 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Basicity (pKb) | 7.2 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | +0.3 × 10⁻⁶ to +1.5 × 10⁻⁶ |
| Dipole moment | 0.00 D |
| Chemical formula | Fe |
| Molar mass | 55.845 g/mol |
| Appearance | Grey powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 7.86 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 3.21 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Basicity (pKb) | 14.0 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | +300e-6 |
| Dipole moment | 0 Debye |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 27.3 J/(mol·K) |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | 0 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | 0 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 27.32 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | 0 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | 0 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | B03AB05 |
| ATC code | B03AB05 |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: Not classified as hazardous according to GHS. |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS08 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Precautionary statements | Keep out of reach of children. Wash hands thoroughly after handling. Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product. Wear protective gloves/eye protection. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | Health: 1, Flammability: 0, Instability: 0, Special: - |
| Explosive limits | Not explosive |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 Oral Rat > 5,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | 30,000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | 1310-36-5 |
| PEL (Permissible) | 5 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 35 mg |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: Not classified as hazardous according to GHS. |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
| Precautionary statements | Keep out of reach of children. Store in a cool, dry place. Avoid ingestion in large amounts. In case of accidental overdose, seek medical attention immediately. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | Health: 1, Flammability: 0, Instability: 0, Special: - |
| Autoignition temperature | 700°C (1,292°F) |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 Oral Rat 30,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | 30,000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | 1314-41-6 |
| PEL (Permissible) | 10 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 18 mg |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not listed. |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Carbonyl iron Iron(II) sulfate Iron(III) oxide Iron powder Reduced iron |
| Related compounds |
Carbonyl iron Iron powder Reduced iron powder Ferric oxide Ferrous sulfate |