People have turned to the ocean for healing properties long before omega-3s earned their celebrity status. Eicosapentaenoic acid—EPA—wasn’t isolated and identified until researchers started tracing the links between the traditional diets of Inuit populations and low rates of heart disease by the mid-20th century. It took patience and persistence for early scientists to parse out the specific molecules. Over the next decades, the health and food industries grabbed onto studies linking EPA-rich fish oil to cardiovascular protection and anti-inflammatory effects. Now, EPA stands as a pillar ingredient in both nutrition research and the supplement market, not because of clever branding or a catchy name, but because decades of real-world evidence show a connection between fish oils and long-term health, especially in countries with seafood-heavy diets.
EPA most often comes to us in the form of softgel capsules loaded with concentrated fish oil. Pharmaceutical companies also supply it in prescription formulations, tailored for people with high triglycerides. Food manufacturers enrich everything from eggs to dairy with EPA, aiming for health-conscious shoppers. The source usually comes from deep-sea fish like anchovy, sardine, or mackerel, but newer biotech firms are exploring algae-based EPA, a nod to environmental pressures and dietary preferences. The public’s focus on “omega-3” sometimes lumps EPA together with DHA and ALA, but studies suggest each plays its own distinct roles in inflammation, mood, and cardiac function.
EPA falls into the category of long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. With twenty carbons and five double bonds (20:5 n-3), its structure makes it fluid and reactive—hence its role in cell membranes and signaling pathways. In its pure form, EPA appears as a slightly yellow, oily liquid, prone to oxidation. Its low melting point sits far below room temperature, so storage calls for dark, cool spaces, and preferably some added antioxidants. Chemists still puzzle over how EPA’s double bonds influence its interaction with other lipids in biological membranes, where fluidity matters for nerve function and inflammation.
Manufacturers don’t skimp on detail when labeling EPA. Nutrition facts list EPA content by weight, sometimes alongside DHA and total omega-3s. Standards on identification and purity differ by jurisdiction: the United States Pharmacopeia, European Pharmacopoeia, and Japanese Pharmacopoeia each spell out acceptable levels of oxidation, heavy metals (especially mercury), and residual solvents. Softgel supplements often specify the source—wild-caught fish or algae—and carry third-party certifications like IFOS, USP Verified, or NSF. In clinical-grade products, batches are tested for EPA content using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and paperwork on traceability comes standard, especially after fish oil’s rise in popularity brought worries about adulteration.
Fish oil extraction usually starts with steam cooking, then pressing and separating the crude oil. Molecular distillation follows, targeting EPA and removing contaminants like PCBs and dioxins. Winterization cuts out solid fats, and sometimes, chemists convert triglycerides into ethyl esters, which boost EPA concentration. Algae-derived EPA depends on fermentation in controlled tanks, where select strains of microalgae are fed nutrients until they pump out high levels of the omega-3, then harvested, lysed, and filtered. Both paths involve lots of purification steps to chase away heavy metals and spoilage compounds, which can spike consumer complaints and derail regulatory approval.
EPA doesn’t just sit quietly in its bottle after production. Inside the body, it’s known for converting into eicosanoids—cell signaling molecules that drive inflammation and clotting responses. In the lab, chemists transform EPA into ethyl esters or re-esterified triglycerides, methods that tweak absorption rates and shelf stability. Some biochemists work on semi-synthetic derivatives of EPA for targeted drug delivery, exploring new touches to counter oxidation without blocking its biological activity. On the culinary side, food scientists look for ways to bind EPA to edible emulsifiers, folding it into everyday foods without making flavors noticeably “fishy.” The challenge isn’t just chemistry, but palatability—no one wants omelets tasting like the open sea.
EPA shows up on ingredient lists under several aliases, including all-E-Eicosapentaenoic acid, icosapentaenoic acid, and 20:5 n-3. Prescription versions draw names like “icosapent ethyl,” as in the medication Vascepa. Fish oil blends sometimes describe the omega-3 as “marine-sourced polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA),” and in the academic literature, it stands as EPA both in shorthand and in systematic chemical nomenclature. Dietitians and supplement companies prefer plain “EPA” for simplicity, but professionals in regulatory or pharmaceutical settings use the full names for accuracy and traceability. Branding can make or break EPA’s acceptance in food and pharma, so companies steer clear of technical jargon that might confuse the average consumer.
Quality control doesn’t slack off with EPA: International standards steer how fish or algae are harvested, transported, and processed. Organizations like the GOED (Global Organization for EPA and DHA Omega-3s) enforce best practices on oxidation prevention—using nitrogen flushes, low-temperature process steps, and sealed packaging. Mercury and other heavy metals draw extra scrutiny because of ongoing public concern and real health risks, especially for expecting mothers. Every batch destined for supplements gets a panel of stability tests, and companies run random sampling to catch outliers. Label claims face verification not just in the lab, but through market surveillance and consumer watchdogs. No one wants recalls tied to rancid or contaminated product, and regulatory agencies inspect facilities for GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) certification.
EPA’s day job revolves around reducing triglycerides and supporting heart health. Cardiologists increasingly prescribe pure EPA formulas to patients with established risk factors, based on large randomized studies like REDUCE-IT, which showed a serious reduction in heart attacks and strokes. Sports nutrition brands tout EPA’s link to reduced muscle soreness and inflammation after exercise, while mental health advocates look at the early data connecting EPA with mood improvement, especially in depression. In infant formula, regulatory agencies set limits on EPA and DHA to strike the right balance for brain and eye development. Research labs also use EPA in cell culture studies, probing how it interacts with immune system pathways or impacts gene expression. Food technologists add microencapsulated EPA to bars and shakes for people who avoid fish but need omega-3s.
Scientific curiosity still drives much of the research surrounding EPA. Molecular biologists chart its effect on cell signaling, especially in chronic inflammatory diseases. Clinical researchers explore if EPA beats out other omega-3s in treating psychiatric conditions like bipolar disorder or preventing major cardiovascular events. Biotechnology firms race to develop non-animal sources, with gene-edited oilseed crops and algae fermentation at the center. Analytical chemists refine detection techniques to distinguish EPA from similar fatty acids in complex biological samples. Consumer demands for sustainable, clean-label omega-3 supplements spur innovation in encapsulation, stabilization, and labeling. Large clinical trials continue to dig into combinations of EPA and other nutrients, seeking new uses and clarifying real-world benefits.
EPA’s safety profile depends heavily on dose and purity. Most studies using up to 3 grams a day show only mild side effects—like fishy burps or stomach upset—in healthy adults. Higher doses can thin the blood, so there’s always a cross-check with anticoagulant use. Regulators keep a sharp eye for mercury, dioxins, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), since bioaccumulation in marine life poses real threats. The FDA and EFSA set upper intake levels and demand evidence that products stay well below thresholds for environmental toxins. A few rare studies reported allergic reactions in individuals with fish or shellfish allergy, prompting calls for careful labeling. Pediatric and prenatal studies look for developmental safety and highlight the need for cleaner, plant-based sources that avoid marine contaminants.
The horizon for EPA is crowded with both promise and caution. As climate change disrupts fish stocks, the move to algae farms and gene-edited oilseeds will become necessary. Researchers look for new EPA derivatives with targeted actions—potentially anti-inflammatory treatments that don’t thin blood. Nutritional science shifts focus to precision: tailoring omega-3 intake to genetic profiles and disease markers. Supplement companies work on format innovations, aiming for gummies, liquids, or fortification in staple foods without the telltale taste or smell. Regulations will tighten on traceability and label accuracy as consumers demand higher standards and clearer science. There’s a growing interest in how EPA might ease psychiatric disorders or minimize chemo side effects, not just heart health. Every breakthrough must balance environmental responsibility, human health, and honest marketing, as the world’s appetite for omega-3s shows no sign of slowing down.
Omega-3s started getting attention because folks noticed people who ate a lot of oily fish had fewer heart problems. Among these omega-3s, EPA stands out, especially for the way it supports the body’s fight against modern health worries. EPA, found in fatty fish like mackerel, sardines, and salmon, builds itself right into cell membranes. This helps keep those cells flexible and able to do their job, whether they’re in our brains, our blood vessels, or somewhere else entirely.
When cholesterol and blood pressure both run high in a family, you start looking for ways to help your own numbers. I began trying to eat more fish and added an EPA-heavy supplement after my cardiologist pointed to research showing it can lower certain heart risks. Studies have shown that EPA has the power to help lower triglyceride levels, a type of fat in the blood that raises heart disease risk. EPA helps in a different way from most cholesterol pills: it softens inflammation in the blood vessels and discourages the kind of sticky buildup that can block an artery.
Not just for the heart, EPA grabs headlines for supporting mental wellness too. Some research shows that people with higher EPA in their diet may feel less burdened by depression. One well-known study out of the UK tracked people who started taking EPA and saw noticeable improvement in mood symptoms within a month or two, especially those who had not benefited as much from other approaches. EPA seems to work by gently adjusting the chemical signals in the brain, so cells fire more smoothly.
Anyone with sore hands or creaky knees tends to keep an eye out for any tool that makes daily movement easier. EPA works alongside another omega-3, DHA, to help calm the swelling and irritation that feeds chronic pain. Athletes and folks working with their hands all day sometimes say their joints feel looser or more comfortable after adding fish or EPA oil to their routine. Clinical trials also show that people with rheumatoid arthritis who take EPA report less tenderness and less morning stiffness.
You can get EPA from wild-caught fish, and for folks who don’t care for seafood, there are purified fish oil or algae-based supplements. Aim for fish that come from clean waters and supplement labels that show third-party testing, since EPA is only as good as its source.
Not every bottle of fish oil gives the same amount of EPA, and many don’t give enough to make a difference. Some supplements get oxidized before you ever take them, which can remove any benefit and add a funny taste. Check that your source is fresh, clearly labeled, and preferably recommended by a health professional. For vegetarians, new advances in algae-based products finally give a way to get EPA without fish.
The science on EPA keeps evolving. What never changes is the basic truth: real food sources and trusted supplements can plug a common nutritional gap and offer protection to the parts of the body that handle the most stress—heart, brain, joints, and immune cells. It’s worth talking with medical providers before starting any consistent supplement, especially for those already on blood thinners or heart medication.
Omega-3s grabbed attention in my own family years ago after my dad’s cardiologist mentioned something called EPA. It stands for eicosapentaenoic acid, one of the main omega-3 fats you find in fatty fish and many supplements. Why care? Because EPA helps your heart, brain, and overall inflammation stay in check. Chronic inflammation, which creeps up with age and stress, often sets the stage for bigger problems like heart attacks or mood swings.
You’ll hear a lot of numbers about EPA, but it’s more than just hitting a target. The American Heart Association points to about 1,000 mg of EPA and DHA (combined) each day for folks with heart concerns. Most fish oil capsules split EPA and DHA almost evenly. The average adult who eats fish twice a week probably lands closer to 250–500 mg EPA plus DHA a day. Hardcore science like the REDUCE-IT trial used 1,800 mg of pure EPA daily to cut down on high cholesterol risk. That’s a bigger dose, usually under a doctor’s eye.
Many factors shape your ideal EPA intake. Age, genetics, health history, and personal metabolism juggle the numbers around. Older adults, people on blood thinners, or someone already taking statins might need to talk it out with their care team before chugging extra omega-3s. The healthy young athlete might need less, since they’re already fighting off inflammation and keeping vessels clean with exercise and a balanced diet.
Skipping out on EPA long term leaves the door open for subtle problems. I’ve seen friends struggle with constantly sore joints and cloudy moods. There’s peer-reviewed evidence backing those observations: missing omega-3s links to higher rates of depression, memory glitches, and unchecked cholesterol. EPA especially plays a key role in taming triglycerides, which—if left wild—harden artery walls. No one really wants that sneak attack later in life.
Wild salmon, mackerel, sardines, and trout naturally serve up EPA, with a filet of salmon delivering 500–1,000 mg per serving. Not everyone likes fish, and I get that. In that case, algae-based omega-3s and fish oil capsules step in. Not all supplements stack up equally; look for one with clear EPA amounts and third-party purity testing. I avoid knock-off brands for this reason. I’d rather spend an extra few dollars for a bottle with a clean label and proven sourcing.
Doctors, dietitians, and researchers agree real progress starts with a conversation. I’ve brought supplement bottles to appointments myself to make sure labels actually match up with recommendations. Tracking total omega-3s—including what’s in lunch and dinner—can nudge intake into the healthy range. Blood tests now exist to check omega-3 levels in red blood cells, which gives a tailored target instead of just guessing.
EPA isn’t a cure-all, but hitting reliable intake marks helps protect the heart and mind for the long haul. A fish-heavy meal twice a week sets a good foundation. For some, pure EPA supplements fill the gaps safely, just not without guidance for the higher doses pushed in research trials. The numbers matter, but the bigger win lies in small, regular choices over time.
EPA—eicosapentaenoic acid—gets most of its praise for supporting heart health and calming down inflammation. It comes mainly from fatty fish, but many choose supplements believing it’s an easier route than weekly salmon dinners. Every bottle promises something: better focus, fewer aches, maybe even a lower risk for chronic illness.
I once thought fish oil was as safe as a glass of water. After watching a relative double up on supplements and bruise easily, I started to dig into potential risks. Too much EPA thins blood, raising the risk of bleeding. It becomes a bigger problem for folks taking aspirin, blood thinners like warfarin, or those with bleeding disorders.
Doctors at Harvard and the Mayo Clinic back this up. Studies suggest high EPA intake—more than 3 grams per day—raises bleeding risk, especially nosebleeds and slow-healing cuts. Some people report upset stomach, fishy aftertaste, or even mild diarrhea with everyday doses.
Fish allergies can sneak up in supplement form. Capsules often start with anchovy or sardines. Allergic reactions show up as hives, wheezing, or swelling, and that means EPA is off the table.
Even for the non-allergic, fish oil can stir up the gut. My experience: burping up fish taste for hours after taking softgels. Some brands use coatings to prevent this, but that doesn’t help everyone. Newcomers should expect a short stomach adjustment period.
Large research efforts, such as the VITAL and REDUCE-IT trials, have kept an eye on possible downsides. They flag that excessive EPA (in prescription amounts, not over-the-counter doses) slightly bumps up atrial fibrillation risk—a type of irregular heartbeat. This risk looks highest in people over 65, especially if mixing other supplements or medications.
Some worry about heavy metals or PCBs in fish oil, since contaminated oceans leave their mark. Trusted supplement companies distill their oil and run tests, but not all brands meet the same standards. Reading third-party lab reports goes a long way.
Most healthy people don’t need mega-doses. The American Heart Association suggests up to 1 gram per day for certain heart patients, but doesn’t recommend daily fish oil supplements for everyone. Taking more, in search of a faster benefit, piles on risk without much added reward.
Mixing EPA with medications can change the way blood clots or raise chances of side effects. Both my pharmacist and doctor agree: bring up every supplement you take, especially if you’re already treating high blood pressure or cholesterol.
Not all supplements solve every problem, and even something as common as EPA comes with a learning curve. Anyone considering a daily dose should check ingredient lists, choose brands vetted for purity, and stay in touch with a healthcare provider. Small steps leave room for benefits without blindsiding anyone with surprises.
Plenty of folks have grabbed fish oil capsules off the shelf, hoping to do right by their hearts. Much of that hope comes down to one ingredient: EPA, a type of omega-3 fatty acid found in fish. Many know omega-3s are healthy, but sorting out what actually helps and what’s just hype isn’t simple. The FDA even approved prescription EPA to lower high triglycerides, which are fats in the blood tied to heart risk. That’s caught the eye of doctors and everyday people who want a straightforward way to tackle cholesterol and cut their odds of heart trouble.
Large studies, like the REDUCE-IT trial, showed prescription-strength EPA cut real dangers—such as heart attacks and strokes—in folks with high triglycerides, even when they already took statins. These aren’t just numbers on a chart. Every heart attack that never happens saves pain and money, and those benefits ripple out. No one likes sitting through months of cardiac rehab or paying hospital bills they never expected. EPA gave results, not just promises.
Most over-the-counter fish oil supplements don’t match the prescription versions. They often mix EPA with DHA, another omega-3, but research leans toward EPA alone making the real difference. Dietary sources like salmon and sardines give EPA naturally, but not everyone eats fish several times a week, so supplementation fills the gap for some people.
Doctors talk about cholesterol a lot, but it’s only one part of the big heart-health puzzle. Triglycerides often fly under the radar, even though they're linked to heart risk too. Some folks have stubbornly high triglycerides despite diet, exercise, and medicine. That’s where EPA steps in, showing a clear drop in triglycerides for many. That doesn’t mean everyone gets a prescription tomorrow, but it brings up a bigger point: the old one-size-fits-all advice about fats and heart disease doesn’t work for everyone.
Eating healthier, exercising, and quitting smoking still take center stage. No capsule fixes everything. Still, people facing genetic cholesterol issues or side effects from statins deserve more tools, and EPA has evidence behind it, not just wishful thinking.
Access matters. Prescription EPA often costs a lot, and insurance doesn’t always help. Cheaper fish oil may not carry the same benefits. I’ve watched friends and family try to sort out what’s worth their money, confused by big claims on little bottles at the drugstore. Doctors, pharmacists, and nutritionists need to talk people through real risks and benefits, looking at lab numbers, diets, and family history to help shape smart decisions. Transparency from supplement makers about what’s actually in each dose would help too.
Better food labeling and more guidance from trusted public health groups would cut through the confusion. People deserve clear facts about the power—and the limits—of EPA for heart health. Nothing matters more than keeping hearts beating strong, and giving people honest, practical advice lets them take control of their health with both eyes open.
Every trip down the supplement aisle shows shelves lined with bottles boasting omega-3 benefits. On the labels, words like EPA and DHA pop up often, sometimes alongside ALA. For most people, these letters look a bit mysterious. I learned how important these distinctions can be after my dad’s cardiologist nudged him toward more fish oil, but didn’t explain why one type mattered over another. Many folks have the same questions. Let’s get into what sets EPA apart from DHA, and why both matter to health.
EPA stands for eicosapentaenoic acid. The body uses EPA in several ways, but its main claim to fame ties to heart and mental health. Scientific research shows EPA supports normal blood fat levels and can help with mood balance in certain people. It’s found in oily fish like mackerel and sardines, and in good fish oil supplements. One large review published in the journal JAMA found that people who consumed at least 250 mg of EPA and DHA daily had a lower risk of dying from heart disease.
EPA plays a specific role in controlling inflammation. Chronic inflammation nudges up the risk of heart disease, stroke, and even some mental health conditions. EPA helps put out these fires by influencing molecules in the blood that regulate inflammation. When my family started eating more salmon and less processed food, the shift in energy levels and joint comfort was pretty clear — and science backs up these observations.
DHA stands for docosahexaenoic acid. The brain and eyes hoard DHA, and the body relies on it during childhood development and throughout life to keep nerves firing and vision clear. My niece was born premature, and her pediatrician recommended DHA-rich formula to support her brain development. Many health guidelines, including recommendations from the American Pregnancy Association, point out that DHA is especially important during pregnancy and breastfeeding. DHA builds up in the gray matter of the brain, influencing focus, memory, and even mood.
Most fish oil contains both EPA and DHA, but the ratio changes depending on the source. Algal oils, 100% plant-based, deliver DHA for vegetarians and vegans.
ALA, or alpha-linolenic acid, comes mostly from plants — think flaxseeds, chia, and walnuts. The body transforms only a small part of ALA into EPA and even less into DHA. I tried boosting my omega-3s by adding flaxseed to my smoothies. Lab tests later showed a tiny bump in omega-3 status, reflecting the scientific consensus: most plant-based omega-3s won’t bring the same impacts as eating fish or fish oil.
People ask which supplement to choose. Anyone aiming for a healthier heart might benefit from EPA-rich formulations. For pregnant or breastfeeding women, or those looking to maintain sharp thinking and good vision, look for DHA. Reading labels helps, since not every supplement lists amounts clearly. Doctors and dietitians who keep up with research offer the best guidance, adjusting recommendations based on personal health needs and current science.
Swapping junk snacks for salmon twice a week, or topping salads with walnuts, both help move blood levels in the right direction. For folks skipping seafood, algae-based DHA offers a clean option. Everyone deserves the chance to know what these fats do, so those choices feel less like guesswork and more like strategic steps for long-term health.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | icosa-5,8,11,14,17-pentaenoic acid |
| Other names |
EPA Timnodonic acid Icosapentaenoic acid 5,8,11,14,17-Eicosapentaenoic acid Cis-5,8,11,14,17-eicosapentaenoic acid |
| Pronunciation | /ˌaɪ.kəʊ.səˌpɛn.təˌiː.nəʊ.ɪk ˈæs.ɪd ˌiː.piːˈeɪ/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | icosa-5,8,11,14,17-pentaenoic acid |
| Other names |
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid cis-5,8,11,14,17-Eicosapentaenoic acid All-cis-5,8,11,14,17-Eicosapentaenoic acid EPA Icosa-5,8,11,14,17-pentaenoic acid |
| Pronunciation | /ˌaɪ.kə.səˌpɛn.təˌiː.noʊ.ɪk ˈæs.ɪd ˌiː.piːˈeɪ/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 10417-94-4 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1729004 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:37855 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL10964 |
| ChemSpider | 5462174 |
| DrugBank | DB04573 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.218.907 |
| EC Number | 5.4.99.5 |
| Gmelin Reference | 7662 |
| KEGG | C06429 |
| MeSH | D001233 |
| PubChem CID | 446284 |
| RTECS number | RH6996800 |
| UNII | Y32P2U4LYA |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID6025046 |
| CAS Number | 10417-94-4 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1847552 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:28364 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1425 |
| ChemSpider | 5462328 |
| DrugBank | DB04573 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 100.185.083 |
| EC Number | 3.1.1.4 |
| Gmelin Reference | 110455 |
| KEGG | C06429 |
| MeSH | D001233 |
| PubChem CID | 446284 |
| RTECS number | RH7680000 |
| UNII | DN969L0A60 |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID8020804 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C20H30O2 |
| Molar mass | 302.451 g/mol |
| Appearance | Clear, pale yellow oily liquid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.943 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 2.8 |
| Vapor pressure | 2.91E-7 mm Hg at 25 °C |
| Acidity (pKa) | 4.75 |
| Basicity (pKb) | pKb: 13.37 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -71.5×10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.485 |
| Dipole moment | 1.3614 D |
| Chemical formula | C20H30O2 |
| Molar mass | 302.451 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to pale yellow liquid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.944 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 2.80 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 4.75 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.478 |
| Dipole moment | 1.4149 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 340.1 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -296.8 kcal/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -11800 kJ/mol |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | Entropy = 632.5 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -277.7 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -12430.6 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | C10AX06 |
| ATC code | C10AX06 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Causes serious eye irritation. Causes skin irritation. Harmful if swallowed. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | Xi (Irritant), N (Dangerous for the environment) |
| Signal word | No signal word |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). |
| Precautionary statements | IF SWALLOWED: Call a POISON CENTER/doctor if you feel unwell. IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | Flash point: 113 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 400 °C (752 °F; 673 K) |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat > 5000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 18,000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 1000 mg per day |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Main hazards | May cause respiratory and skin irritation. May cause eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | No signal word |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. |
| Precautionary statements | Keep out of reach of children. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your healthcare practitioner before use. Store in a cool, dry place. Do not use if seal is broken or missing. |
| Flash point | Flash point: >110 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 430 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat > 5000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): >5000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | Not Listed |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 1,000 mg per day |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) Alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) Arachidonic acid (AA) Gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) |
| Related compounds |
Arachidonic acid Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) Alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) Linoleic acid |