Dehydroacetic acid first caught the attention of chemists back in the late 19th century. As folks in food preservation and pharmaceuticals got busier in the 20th century, it moved out of the lab and into factories. The German chemist Fichter introduced a practical synthetic route during the 1920s, noticing how this compound performed as a mild preservative. Over time, it found its way into everything from consumer goods to agricultural products. Its story mirrors the growth in safety standards and evolving concerns about consumer health. At a time when benzoates and parabens came under scrutiny, dehydroacetic acid became an alternative for anyone trying to avoid traditional preservatives.
Dehydroacetic acid looks like a white, almost odorless powder. It’s known mainly for stopping microbes, which keeps fungus out of creams and food jars. The molecule belongs to the family of six-membered heterocycles. Industrial suppliers offer it in drums and secure bags, all according to purity levels demanded by food, pharma, and cosmetic companies. Formulators keep it handy on the shelf right next to other common preservatives, but many lean toward it since its performance stays steady over time. There's something reassuring in seeing it keep products from spoiling, especially as folks become pickier about what goes into their groceries and skincare.
You can expect dehydroacetic acid to clock in at a melting point near 110°C. Its molecular formula is C8H8O4, packing two ketone groups and one carboxyl group, so the chemistry folks call it a pyrone derivative. Water doesn’t break it down easily, but it mixes into ethanol and lots of organic solvents. At room temperature, it won’t evaporate or degrade on the shelf. Add it to mixtures needing a preservative, and it does its job without leaving an off flavor, which matters in food and cosmetics. Suppliers report typical assay values above 98%, and samples shouldn’t show any yellowing or odd clumping. This isn’t a substance that takes kindly to strong acids or bases, but routine storage keeps it stable for years.
Regulatory guidance sets purity and acceptable daily intake, especially for food and cosmetic use. Packages normally include batch number, expiration date, and concentration values, plus warnings about improper storage. It’s sold with tech specs mentioning its melting point, solubility, and maximum allowed impurities. EU and US labeling laws call for clear naming, hazard info, and compliance badges like REACH. Some buyers require kosher or halal certification on top. Cosmetics often cap concentration at 0.6%, while food law in some countries permits up to 0.5%. All things considered, buyers want assurance about both origin and safe processing, driven by more informed end-users and watchdog groups.
Manufacturers synthesize dehydroacetic acid by condensing ethyl acetoacetate with itself in the presence of acetic anhydride and a little heat. The result is a ring closure that snaps together the six-membered skeleton. The process takes skill to keep byproducts low and meet regulations for food or pharmaceutical grade. Engineers scale the batch up while watching temperature and pressure, making sure conversion rates hit target numbers. The final product gets purified by washing, filtration, and drying under vacuum. No one cuts corners, since downstream customers run their own QC tests and won’t tolerate surprises.
Dehydroacetic acid has a knack for undergoing alkali hydrolysis and esterification. Chemists take advantage of the active methylene group, which reacts under basic conditions to give derivatives for different uses. Add alcohol under acid catalysis and esters form, expanding the toolbox for tailored preservation. The molecule resists mild oxidation, but can take on halogens or amines for specialty synthesis. Biotechnology labs have tried tweaking it for improved antifungal or antimicrobial activity, extending its shelf life in trickier formulations. The story here gets interesting as researchers push the boundaries, hoping for even less toxicity and better compatibility.
Folks sometimes call dehydroacetic acid by its old trade names like “DHA,” “DHA acid,” or “pyrone-2,4(3H,5H)-dione.” In food and cosmetics labeling, you’ll spot numbers like E265, especially in Europe. Some companies use unique branding for blends or modified versions, but the base molecule always matches CAS number 520-45-6. In everyday lab notes, chemists often shorten it to “dehydroacetic” or just “DHAA” to save time. The same compound can wear different hats on an ingredient deck, but sooner or later, everyone recognizes that six-carbon backbone.
Every workplace handling dehydroacetic acid enforces eye protection, gloves, and dust masks. MSDS sheets list it as an irritant in concentrate, though exposures stay moderate during normal use. Safe storage calls for a dry, locked environment at room temperature. Regulations require spill kits, with sweep-up procedures and proper disposal if any powder escapes. I’ve seen manufacturers invest in automated conveyance to cut down on air exposure and keep workplace air quality up. In finished goods, authorities demand safety studies and heavy documentation to back up claims—nobody wants hidden risks in a preservative that lands up in baby food or sunscreen. Workers get regular training, reminded why safe handling rules exist.
Dehydroacetic acid finds itself in an impressive spread of goods. Bakers and processors use it to push back mold in bread, cheese, and dressings. Skincare and shampoo manufacturers prefer it as a gentle preservative, friendly for allergy-sensitive formulas. Paint makers take advantage of its stability in water-based systems, keeping cans fresh in storage. Farms use it in post-harvest treatments. Some medicine tablets contain dehydroacetic acid to keep bacteria at bay, and paper manufacturers lean on it for coated products. I’ve run across it in hobby products, too, where preventing mold keeps paint and glue bottles usable month after month. It’s a low-key backbone in modern preservation, present in many supplies most of us keep on hand.
Researchers have spent years probing exactly how dehydroacetic acid fights off microbes and works with other compounds. Labs turn out new derivatives every year, looking to fine-tune performance and lower unwanted side effects. Some work explores blends with natural antimicrobials, aiming at the “clean label” crowd. Recent academic studies dig into its compatibility with bio-based formulations, since the green chemistry push means more interest in renewable preservatives. Computer models run simulations on the toxicity of analogues before anyone even weighs out an actual batch. Funding comes from both public-health organizations and big consumer brands, as safety standards keep shifting and shoppers demand “no compromise” products. Scientists keen on sustainability keep pushing to find production methods that use less energy and feedstock, nudging the economics in a greener direction.
A lot of scrutiny has landed on dehydroacetic acid over the decades, especially on the question of safe consumption and skin exposure. Animal studies set early safety benchmarks, showing low acute toxicity but requiring extra caution in chronic or heavy use. Human patch testing reveals that only a few develop irritation, mostly with concentrated solution. Regulatory bodies like EFSA and the US FDA have endorsed its use within stated limits, but every decade brings a new cycle of studies to double-check long-term safety, including any chance of breakdown into risky byproducts. Food manufacturers rely on strict intake thresholds, while cosmetic regulations limit how much goes in per batch. Some studies test environmental risk, since runoff from factories adds up. Committees keep reviewing every angle, unwilling to assume yesterday’s safety data covers new uses or higher exposure levels.
People talk more about sustainable manufacturing, lower chemical exposure, and more transparency in ingredients than in years past. Dehydroacetic acid’s moderate toxicity and reliable action mean it’ll likely keep a foothold in preservation, but competition is rising from new bio-based preservatives with even lower human and environmental risks. I see R&D budgets favoring the development of versions made from renewable resources, plus safety studies reaching for ever wider data sets. There’s a push for more applications outside food and cosmetics, maybe in antimicrobial packaging or agriculture. Anyone in the field sees the writing on the wall—innovation drives adoption, but only if backed by data speaking to both regulatory agencies and wary consumers. Companies hedging bets with dehydroacetic acid still keep one eye on alternative molecules, watching for shifts in the rules or the market. The story isn’t over, but the next chapter will favor safe, effective, and less-impactful chemicals across industries.
Step into any bathroom or open up a kitchen cupboard, and there’s a good chance you’ll spot a product containing dehydroacetic acid. Shampoo bottles, lotions, sunscreens, even some jams and cheeses on the shelf – these all use this ingredient as a way to combat unwanted bacteria and fungi. Most people never notice or pronounce this tongue-twister, but it quietly extends the shelf life and safety of countless goods.
From my own experience working with small entrepreneurs in the natural skincare world, many struggle to keep their creams and serums stable without resorting to harsh preservatives. Here’s where dehydroacetic acid shines. It blocks the growth of mold and bacteria in creams, serums, and shampoos. Since it’s milder than some traditional preservatives, many “clean beauty” labels use it to meet stricter standards. The European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety states it’s safe at concentrations up to 0.6% in cosmetics. That’s enough to fight microbes, without making products harsh on skin.
Food makers have a constant enemy: spoilage. Bread gets moldy, jams start to ferment, cheese can turn slimy in just a few days. To keep food from going bad fast, producers sometimes add dehydroacetic acid (or its salt, sodium dehydroacetate). This stops yeasts and molds from ruining taste and texture, and it does so without the odd aftertaste that preservatives like sorbic acid sometimes leave behind. Regulators, like the European Food Safety Authority, set strict upper limits to make sure consumption stays well within safe levels.
Away from the kitchen and bathroom, dehydroacetic acid pops up in industrial uses. Paints, adhesives, and coatings often need protection from mold during storage, especially in humid places. Dehydroacetic acid works quietly in these settings, keeping mold at bay and making sure the materials last longer on the shelf and after application.
There’s always a trade-off when choosing a preservative. Some, like parabens, have sparked health debates, while others simply fail to keep products stable after being opened. Dehydroacetic acid comes with a reassuring track record of low toxicity and good results across a wide range of products. I recall a natural soap maker telling me switching to dehydroacetic acid finally gave her peace of mind—her citrus-scented bars stopped molding before she could sell them.
Yet there’s room for improvement. Consumers now crave products with even fewer additives. Scientists are experimenting with plant-based alternatives and better packaging to reduce the need for preservatives altogether. Still, unless supply chains jump straight from factory to your doorstep in a perfectly sterile environment, ingredients like dehydroacetic acid fill a real-world need.
Trust begins with clear information. Brands earn respect when they spell out not just the presence of dehydroacetic acid but the reason for using it—product safety. Regulatory agencies around the world continue to review the data as new research becomes available. Until technology finds a new way to keep products fresh, this underrated acid remains an unsung hero tucked in the fine print of ingredient lists everywhere.
Peering at the back of a face cream jar, names like dehydroacetic acid jump out at me. As a daily skin care user, I've wondered whether these ingredients live up to the safe-for-skin claims tossed around by brands. Dehydroacetic acid shows up in a surprising number of cleansers and creams. So, it makes sense to ask whether this one deserves a spot on our faces or if it hides any risks.
Dehydroacetic acid works as a preservative. Without something to fend off yeast, mold, or bacteria, lotions go bad fast. The idea is to keep shelves safe and the formulas fresh without pushing big doses of harsher chemicals. Brands like the fact that this acid isn’t one of the paraben family, which often triggers public concern due to links with hormone disruption.
This ingredient helps lotions and serums last on your bathroom counter. So far, it sounds practical from a manufacturing standpoint. But real-world use means more than formula stability. What matters as a consumer is how a product interacts with skin, not just what it does for the manufacturer's bottom line.
Safety studies matter to me because marketing phrases rarely tell the full story. According to the Cosmetic Ingredient Review, dehydroacetic acid gets a safety seal for use in cosmetics up to 0.6%. The European Union Cosmetics Regulation agrees—setting limits while keeping it on the "allowed" list. These organizations tend to stay wary of anything with a questionable record.
Independent clinical research points out that skin reactions to this preservative are rare. Allergic contact dermatitis pops up only in a tiny slice of the population. Reports of irritation mostly come from exceeding recommended levels or using the pure acid instead of a finished product.
On my own bathroom counter, several moisturizers and toners include dehydroacetic acid. Over many months, no redness or itching showed up. Stories in online forums support this experience. Some people with especially reactive skin may get a rash, but that holds true for almost any ingredient. Allergies exist for nearly everything—from avocado to almond oil.
I value brands that list concentrations and explain the role each ingredient plays. Blind trust can’t replace evidence. A clear explanation of ingredient levels takes out the guesswork. By checking labels, a consumer spots irritants faster and stays in control. If brands step up with transparency, anxiety about preservatives falls away.
Alternatives like potassium sorbate appear in the preservative world but don’t always outperform dehydroacetic acid for shelf life or gentle skin feel. Switching to products labeled “preservative-free” brings its own set of risks, including contamination or spoilage. Storing creams in cool, dry spots and avoiding open containers makes a difference, especially with natural or minimalist formulas.
Scanning an ingredient list before purchase helps anyone with allergies or a sensitive complexion. Reviewing information from trusted dermatology sites or health agencies lends extra peace of mind. Patch testing each new product on a small patch of skin—maybe the inside of the arm—cuts down the chance of a bad reaction.
Every ingredient deserves this kind of scrutiny, but so far, dehydroacetic acid passes the science and safety tests for most people at regulated levels. Listen to your skin and trusted sources instead of quick marketing buzzwords.
Stepping into any drugstore, I notice shelf after shelf lined with creams, shampoos, lotions, and makeup promising all sorts of miracles. Most folks grab what looks appealing on the label. Digging a little deeper, though, I always care about what keeps those products safe to use long after the day I buy them. Dehydroacetic acid plays a quiet but crucial role, and it deserves some honest discussion.
Dehydroacetic acid acts as a preservative that helps stop bacteria, mold, and yeast from growing in water-based beauty products. Without strong preservation, that favorite moisturizer could turn into a science experiment before you reach the bottom. This compound steps in to protect both the product and your skin.
People often worry about skin reactions and long ingredient decks loaded with tongue-twisters. Parabens, formaldehyde donors, and some widely-used preservatives have caught flak for years because links to allergy, irritation, or even hormone disruption surfaced in scientific studies.
Dehydroacetic acid stands apart because experts recognize it as generally safe when used within recommended guidelines. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review and the European Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety both agree the compound works well in modest concentrations—usually around 0.5% to 1.0%—without raising red flags for most healthy adults. I like knowing that choices like this help brands build cleaner, safer products that work for daily routines.
Plenty of my friends and family react badly to fragrance, dyes, and certain preservatives. Through real-world use, I’ve noticed products with dehydroacetic acid often fit those with reactive or sensitive skin types. It shows up in formulas labeled hypoallergenic or gentle, for babies or for folks with eczema-prone skin. Brands use it with confidence because it rarely causes stinging, rashes, or upset compared to some harsher chemicals.
Many of us want to make smarter choices for both our bodies and the planet. Some older preservatives harm aquatic life or break down into persistence pollutants. By contrast, dehydroacetic acid doesn’t build up in waterways or wildlife. Its environmental risk sits low, and that fits with current shifts toward greener oceans and soil. The European Union lets brands use this compound in both rinse-off and leave-on formulas, reflecting its safer environmental footprint.
It’s easy to overlook what stands behind a fresh jar of eye cream or tube of sunscreen. Heat and humidity at home, or even a forgotten bottle baked in a car, challenge the stability of every cosmetic. Dehydroacetic acid helps those products last without losing texture, breaking down, or separating. Brands trust it to maintain quality without the greasy film or strange smells some other choices bring.
With rising demand for cleaner, responsibly sourced ingredients, dehydroacetic acid plays a valuable role. More brands turning to it instead of older, questionable preservatives shows a commitment to safety and product integrity. For folks searching out gentle, trustworthy, and long-lasting formulas, reading labels and understanding each component matters. In this space, dehydroacetic acid earns its place in a well-stocked beauty routine.
People run into dehydroacetic acid constantly, though it doesn’t come up in conversation at the dinner table. You’ll spot it in makeup, lotions, sunscreens, shampoo, and sometimes even food. Manufacturers choose it for its power to stop germs and fungi from spoiling products. It keeps cosmetics safer for longer on shelf and in your bathroom cabinet.
I checked ingredients lists for years after I started having skin flare-ups. Ingredients like this one always made me nervous until I learned what real research says about risk. The word “acid” itself can be intimidating, but dehydroacetic acid isn’t a harsh, peeling kind. The structure makes it especially helpful against yeast and bacteria, which keeps products from picking up mold.
Every person’s skin reacts in its own way. My sister breaks out in rashes at new sunscreens, while I can slather almost anything without an issue. Scientists look at allergies and irritation potential, so the industry can spot trouble before products hit stores. European labs tested creams with dehydroacetic acid on volunteers who already had sensitive skin. Most people reported no trouble, but a tiny handful did feel mild redness or stinging, especially when the product sat on damaged skin or active eczema patches.
The European Commission and the U.S. Cosmetic Ingredient Review both studied how the substance behaves on skin and in the body. They’ve agreed small amounts used in cosmetics don’t raise dangerous risks. Regulators want to see clear proof that a preservative doesn’t affect hormones, cause birth defects, or damage organs after long-term use. Dehydroacetic acid hasn’t triggered concerns about cancer, reproductive health, or hormone disruption in available animal and lab studies.
People with no history of sensitive skin almost never report reactions. For a few, dehydroacetic acid causes mild contact dermatitis – a bit of itching or redness – which usually settles after washing it off. Years ago, I switched to a moisturizer with a higher concentration of preservatives and got an itchy rash. Once I dropped it, the rash faded without a doctor’s visit. Anyone seeing hives, blisters, or swelling should call a professional, since severe allergy can happen with even “safe” ingredients.
Scientists always work to catch rare risks. After a German hospital logged several contact allergy cases, doctors double-checked records worldwide and confirmed the numbers remain tiny compared to more common triggers like fragrance or nickel.
As a person with a love-hate relationship with new skincare launches, I find ingredient lists and patch tests matter more than trends. Many companies now list full formulas online, which helps customers avoid what doesn’t work for them. Checking for dehydroacetic acid gives people with known allergies peace of mind. Trying a small amount on the inside of the arm before a full-face application can save a lot of trouble, especially for anyone with eczema or chronic allergies.
For food, dehydroacetic acid gets regulated by the FDA and similar agencies worldwide. The amount allowed remains much lower than you’ll see in makeup, and so far, regulators haven’t turned up real cause for worry from diet.
Preservatives like dehydroacetic acid shore up the safety of sunscreen, soap, and mascara. Allergies will always turn up in a few people, just as with nuts or shellfish, but for the broader population, it stays low-risk when used at recommended levels. Staying alert for any irritation and checking with a trusted doctor remains the smartest move for anyone with concerns.
People often check labels, running a cautious finger down lists stuffed with tongue-twisting words. Dehydroacetic acid pops up in creams, shampoos, and even some foods. At first glance, the name alone feels like it belongs in a laboratory, far removed from the steamy kitchens and backyard gardens where natural preservatives like salt, vinegar, or rosemary thrive.
Digging into its roots, dehydroacetic acid does not start as a natural ingredient pulled directly from plants or minerals. Chemists first created this molecule in the lab back in the late 1800s. It does not occur in large amounts anywhere in nature. Instead, it’s pieced together with intention—through a multi-step chemical process, far removed from the old-fashioned ways our grandparents fought mold with kitchen staples.
Manufacturers lean on it because it slows the growth of bacteria and fungi, extending shelf life. They see less waste, more products reach customers in good condition, and the risk of spoilage drops. But any honest conversation comes back to what “natural” really means. People like me grew up with the idea that natural equals safer, sometimes even better. Dehydroacetic acid doesn’t land in that space, at least not by any definition that centers on material coming straight from the earth.
A growing number of shoppers want products they can trace back to a natural origin. Transparency is now king in many households, especially for parents or the skincare crowd entrusting their health to brands. The shift isn’t just about trends—the trust is built on remembering what goes in, or on, our bodies day in and day out. Synthetic ingredients tend to raise eyebrows.
Big brands and smaller labels both know consumer trust matters. The European Union and the US Food and Drug Administration have weighed in, each evaluating the safety profile of dehydroacetic acid for use in cosmetics and foods. Scientific panels studied it closely, setting limits to make sure it doesn’t cause skin irritation or harm when used as directed. These reviews help companies stand behind the safety of their formulations, but not everyone cares only about regulatory approval—many people want to know how an ingredient is made.
Natural preservatives like ascorbic acid (vitamin C), grapefruit seed extract, or plant oils can serve as alternatives in some cases, but they may not deliver the same shelf life or broad protection. Making the switch also tends to cost more—so some companies stick with what’s proven and allowed.
My experience working with natural food brands shows that being upfront about ingredients pays off. Labels that call out synthetic preservatives risk losing buyers looking for “clean” formulations, even if the safety data lines up in their favor. Responding to this, some manufacturers push to develop new preservatives derived from fermented plants or by harnessing beneficial bacteria, hoping to split the difference between shelf life and clean-label demands.
Education helps close the gap, too. Teaching people the reason behind ingredient choices—whether synthetic or not—lets families make more informed decisions. Nobody wants scares about spoiled products or confuse safe, lab-crafted preservatives with dangerous chemicals. Companies that answer tough questions honestly keep pace with what customers value: clarity, safety, and respect for personal choice.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 3-acetyl-4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-one |
| Other names |
DHA Dehydroacetic acid 2H-Pyran-2,4(3H)-dione, 3-acetyl- Acetylpyruvic acid lactone |
| Pronunciation | /diˌhaɪdroʊəˈsiːtɪk ˈæsɪd/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 3-acetyl-4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-one |
| Other names |
DHA 2H-Pyran-2,4(3H)-dione, 3-acetyl- 3-Acetyl-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2,4(3H)-dione Acetic acid, dehydro- Dehydroacetic acid |
| Pronunciation | /diˌhaɪdroʊəˈsɛtɪk ˈæsɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 520-45-6 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `3D model (JSmol)` string for **Dehydroacetic Acid**: ``` CC1=CC(=O)C(=O)OC1=O ``` |
| Beilstein Reference | 410865 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:39049 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1406 |
| ChemSpider | 5667 |
| DrugBank | DB11249 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 07c2f4e0-2ea2-4823-b133-b7f6e0bb52d2 |
| EC Number | 4.2.1.108 |
| Gmelin Reference | 82190 |
| KEGG | C02332 |
| MeSH | D003836 |
| PubChem CID | 11007 |
| RTECS number | AB1925000 |
| UNII | MG6DLEDZ6O |
| UN number | UN2811 |
| CAS Number | 520-45-6 |
| Beilstein Reference | 84134 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:34556 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL416098 |
| ChemSpider | 6761 |
| DrugBank | DB14653 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03e2231a-7e1e-4c85-92a2-22a48f8ff69a |
| EC Number | 4.4.1.3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 66352 |
| KEGG | C11060 |
| MeSH | D003816 |
| PubChem CID | 2955 |
| RTECS number | AC8010000 |
| UNII | 2KAG279R6O |
| UN number | UN2811 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID8021394 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C8H8O4 |
| Molar mass | 168.16 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to yellowish crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.41 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Slightly soluble |
| log P | 1.40 |
| Vapor pressure | 1.05E-6 mmHg at 25°C |
| Acidity (pKa) | 4.75 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 6.75 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.412 |
| Viscosity | 34 mPa·s (20°C) |
| Dipole moment | 3.51 D |
| Chemical formula | C8H8O4 |
| Molar mass | 168.16 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to pale yellow crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.41 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Slightly soluble |
| log P | 1.44 |
| Vapor pressure | <0.01 mmHg (20 °C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 4.73 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 7.40 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.495 |
| Viscosity | 12-20 mPa.s |
| Dipole moment | 3.59 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 252.0 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -567.7 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -1426 kJ/mol |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 253.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -489.9 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -1869 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A01AB17 |
| ATC code | A11HA06 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed. Causes serious eye irritation. Causes skin irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H315, H319 |
| Precautionary statements | P264; P270; P301+P312; P330; P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | > 156°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 280 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): 1600 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 1600 mg/kg (oral, rat) |
| NIOSH | JM9235000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 6 mg/m³ |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed. Causes serious eye irritation. Causes skin irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS05, GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H315, H319 |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P264, P271, P272, P280, P301+P312, P302+P352, P304+P340, P305+P351+P338, P312, P321, P330, P332+P313, P333+P313, P337+P313, P362+P364, P501 |
| Flash point | > 156°C |
| Autoignition temperature | 280 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat 1600 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 2,500 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | JM9175000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 6 mg/m³ |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | No IDLH established. |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
2-Acetyl-1,3-cyclohexanedione Maltol Ethyl maltol Acetylacetone |