Chlortetracycline hydrochloride walked onto the stage back in the 1940s, sprouting from the soil of antibiotic discovery. Researchers at Lederle Laboratories, working with soil samples, noticed a potent compound that tackled a range of bacteria. At the time, antibiotics changed how infectious diseases played out, so every new addition drew headlines. Chlortetracycline picked up a reputation as one of the first broad-spectrum tetracyclines. From early trials, it stood out for its ability to manage diseases in both animals and humans. Over decades, the molecule influenced antibiotic production, acting as a template for spin-off compounds and modified tetracyclines seen in clinics today.
Chlortetracycline hydrochloride shows up as a yellow, odorless powder, designed for both human and animal uses. Its antibacterial reach covers Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In veterinary circles, it's given by mouth or topically for livestock, where it helps control infections in poultry, cattle, and swine. Human medicine has mostly let it go, preferring other antibiotics with fewer side effects and less risk of resistance, but some places pull it off the shelf for stubborn infections. Over-the-counter options in some regions include eye ointments and topical creams.
With a molecular formula of C22H23ClN2O8•HCl, chlortetracycline hydrochloride carries a distinct yellow color. It dissolves well in water but less so in alcohol or ether, which lines up with practical demands for mixing solutions or dosing animals. The crystalline powder clumps if allowed to pull in moisture, so storage stays cool and dry. Its melting point hovers close to 220 degrees Celsius. Lab workers recognize the sharp color and slightly bitter taste, which, though not pleasant, signals the strength of the compound inside.
Manufacturers sell chlortetracycline hydrochloride with strict guidelines on purity, moisture, pH range, and microbial contamination limits. Labels state the percentage of active ingredient by weight, residue limits, appearance, and recommended uses. Packages include clear dosage tables and withdrawal times for animals headed to slaughter, reflecting the push to keep antibiotic residues out of the food chain. Labels warn against use in layers producing eggs for human consumption and highlight allergic reaction risks. This level of detail owes a lot to regulatory bodies and organizations like the World Health Organization, which respond to the public’s right to safe, well-informed medication.
Manufacturers grow chlortetracycline hydrochloride from Streptomyces aureofaciens in large fermenters, just like early penicillin production. During fermentation, the bacteria churn out the antibiotic into the growth medium. Technicians extract the broth, isolate crude chlortetracycline, purify it through filtration and crystallization, and convert the product to the hydrochloride salt for better stability and solubility. The process involves multiple washing, pH adjustments, and controlled temperature to maximize yield. Many labs repeat similar steps worldwide, adjusting the fermentation conditions to drive up output with fewer byproducts.
After base-level production, scientists look at ways to tweak chlortetracycline for better performance. Modifying the core structure through methylation, acylation, or nitrate additions creates new derivatives, some with greater absorption or resistance to enzymes that sap antibacterial effect. Epimerization provides alpha and beta forms, each with unique biological activity. Chemical changes usually aim for improved dosing or safety, but every alteration gets a second look for toxicity, which affects how much the market welcomes these spinoffs.
The scientific world refers to chlortetracycline hydrochloride with synonyms like Aureomycin hydrochloride and 7-chlortetracycline. Researchers might mention its registry numbers or shorthand codes, while animal feed companies market commercial products with brand names that link back to the original discovery at Lederle. No matter the label, farmers recognize the yellow antibiotic, and pharmacists look for approved generic names on containers to match against local regulations.
Using chlortetracycline calls for gloves and dust protection, especially in feed mills or veterinary clinics where exposure risk climbs. Inhalation or skin contact irritates, rarely leading to allergies in sensitive people. Comprehensive safety data sheets walk through storage away from sunlight, and emergency protocols demand quick water rinses after spills. Legal limits on residue in food animals protect public health, so regulatory agencies enforce heavy penalties for misuse. Companies keep strict logs and dosing records for audits, especially if exporting food products.
Chlortetracycline’s role in animal health takes center stage, showing up most in poultry, cattle, swine, and even aquaculture. Farmers mix it into feed or water to stamp out respiratory, intestinal, or systemic infections. Topical ointments show up in small animal and equine care, treating cuts, eye infections, and skin wounds. Some ornamental fish treatments use this antibiotic to save prized collections from mass die-offs. Human use dwindled as resistance and alternatives emerged, but some developing regions keep it in their medical kits for diseases like trachoma. For the most part, hospitals stick with newer tetracyclines or unrelated drugs in similar situations.
Companies and academic labs invest in streamlining production, searching out bacterial strains that ferment better or need less sugar and nitrogen. New delivery mechanisms look to reduce environmental discharge and improve how much of the drug makes it to infection sites. Gene sequencing opens up unique bacterial strains, pushing researchers to map out new byproducts from the fermentation tanks. Formulators keep testing longer shelf-life blends and combination therapies to delay resistance in common pathogens. Technical advances spill into regulatory science, where electronic tagging and precise residue tracking counter rising concern about antibiotic overuse.
Chlortetracycline’s low toxicity in proper doses makes it popular, but risks remain when people or animals get too much. High exposure triggers gastrointestinal trouble, liver issues, or, in rare cases, kidney strain. Younger animals and children face particular risks like tooth discoloration or bone interference, tied to the antibiotic’s action on calcium. Allergenic reactions appear in small populations, usually as rash or swelling, and long-term exposure in feed operations occasionally lands workers with respiratory complaints. Ongoing testing by independent labs and regulatory agencies helps keep guides updated as new data roll in, digging into soil residue and environmental impact as well.
Modern medicine and agriculture treat chlortetracycline with caution. The swell of antibiotic resistance shifts attention to stewardship, limiting routine use and tightening sales. On the research front, scientists try to repurpose the molecule to fight resistant pathogens by combining it with enzyme inhibitors or making smarter, targeted delivery vehicles. In agriculture, some countries move toward alternatives, such as probiotics or vaccines, but cost barriers and regulatory inertia slow adoption. Upcoming years will probably see tighter laws and more precise diagnostic tools at the farm level, while labs track resistance in real time. Across regions, the conversation pushes balance between urgent animal health needs and public responsibility for antibiotic lifespan, using every insight from generations of research.
Chlortetracycline Hydrochloride isn’t a household name, but its reach stretches far beyond science labs. It stands as one of the established antibiotics, developed during the post-war race to support both human and animal health. This drug belongs to the tetracycline family—older, but still holding its ground where needed.
Spend any time among veterinarians, and you’ll hear about Chlortetracycline Hydrochloride. Cattle, pigs, and poultry farmers know it works as a powerful tool against respiratory and digestive infections. Animal agriculture leans heavily on this type of antibiotic when facing outbreaks of diseases like pneumonia or enteritis. These infections, if left unchecked, don’t just hurt animal welfare—they reduce output and financial stability on the farm. From personal experience growing up near dairy operations, I saw how quickly diseases could spread through herds. Solutions felt urgent, and antibiotics made the difference between survival and massive loss.
Beyond daily treatments, it’s also used in feed to prevent disease during times of stress, such as shipping or weather changes. Proper dosing and oversight from veterinarians always matter. Unchecked or unnecessary use creates resistance—one of the biggest problems modern agriculture faces.
Doctors still reach for Chlortetracycline when treating certain bacterial infections. Before penicillin and other drugs took over, tetracyclines served as frontline medicine for respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, and some less common diseases like rickettsial infections. Today, new antibiotics can do the same job with fewer side effects, so Chlortetracycline sees more restricted use in people. Still, in communities where options run thin, this drug remains part of the arsenal.
The widespread use of antibiotics in farming creates a balancing act. The risk of resistance has become painfully clear. Once antibiotics like Chlortetracycline find their way into the environment—through run-off or improper disposal—bacteria adapt, and medicines lose their edge. Studies from the CDC and WHO highlight this growing threat to both animal and human health. We can’t look at these drugs as simple fixes; responsible stewardship matters more than ever.
Farmers and veterinarians look for more targeted treatments, using diagnostics to pinpoint infection before reaching for a broad-spectrum antibiotic. Rotation with other drug classes, reduced metaphylaxis (the practice of dosing entire herds), and regular auditing of on-farm drug use help keep resistance at bay. Some farms now rely on vaccines or improved hygiene instead of preventive dosing, which pays off in the long run.
In healthcare, updated treatment guidelines and ongoing monitoring help keep Chlortetracycline in the background, ready for use only when other approaches fail. Any effort to limit misuse protects both people and animals from losing an important line of defense.
Antibiotics like Chlortetracycline Hydrochloride built a bridge to safer, more productive farming and saved countless lives. The real challenge comes with keeping these benefits without closing the door on future generations. Investment in better animal welfare, smarter diagnostics, and transparent data sharing between farms and regulators shape that future. The story of this medicine isn’t just about chemistry—it’s about how we choose to use it.
Deciding the right dosage of chlortetracycline hydrochloride can carry weighty consequences for livestock health. This antibiotic has gained a place on farms across the globe, treating bacterial infections in cattle, pigs, poultry, and sometimes even fish. Picking the correct dose doesn’t just speed recovery—done right, it safeguards animal health and keeps food supplies safer.
Growing up on a farm where animals counted as much as people, it always struck me how medicine could turn the tide for a sick calf or piglet. Chlortetracycline sits at the center of those efforts because it tackles respiratory and digestive infections, which hit livestock hard. But giving too much or too little brings risk. High doses can leave drug residues in meat or eggs, risking regulatory trouble or issues for people eating those products. Too little, and the bacteria may outsmart the medicine, building resistance.
In most cases, the right dose comes down to the type of animal and its weight. Chickens fighting chronic respiratory disease often need around 200-400 mg per gallon of drinking water for five to seven days, according to the FDA and veterinary sources. Cattle generally receive about 10 mg per pound of body weight per day, split up so the animal absorbs it with food or water. Pigs see similar recommendations, with 10 mg per pound daily during outbreaks of bacterial enteritis or pneumonia. The weight of each animal tips the scale for the amount used each time. Too much guesswork can bring trouble on all sides.
Trustworthy guidance grows from professional oversight. The American Veterinary Medical Association points to clear protocols and warns against unmonitored over-the-counter use. Local regulations often frame not just how much but for how long an animal takes the medicine, so it’s worth partnering with a licensed veterinarian. Online charts can help, but nothing beats a vet’s trained eye for matching dose to condition.
Across Europe and North America, food safety laws require farmers to respect withdrawal times after giving antibiotics. If medication ends up in the food supply, consumers lose trust, and the whole farm faces strict penalties. These timelines stick just as much as the numbers on the label.
Building safe habits pays off. Dosing is more than filling a scoop—accurate scales and well-mixed water medicines give each animal a fair shot at healing. Recording treatments in a logbook helps track patterns and satisfies inspectors. Farms that skip doses when animals recover quickly or extend treatments just in case create opportunities for antibiotic resistance and regulatory headaches.
Responsible use also means only using chlortetracycline for confirmed bacterial infections—not as a growth booster or for every sniffle on the farm. Overusing antibiotics in feed for growth has already driven up resistance worldwide, and only real need justifies reaching for this tool. Facing uncertainty, the best move is to call a professional and double-check before acting.
Agriculture keeps evolving, and so do the bacteria challenging our food supply. Education stands out as the best solution for the next generation of farmers and animal scientists. Reliable dosing, clear communication with veterinary experts, and respect for regulations can keep chlortetracycline working when it’s truly needed.
Chlortetracycline hydrochloride falls under the umbrella of tetracycline antibiotics. Anyone who’s worked around animal health or farming, or even spent time researching older antibiotics, has come across this medication. It serves as a tool for fighting bacterial infections—not just in people but often in animals, especially livestock. With all drugs, side effects can show up, and chlortetracycline isn’t an exception. I’ve seen this both on paper and on the ground, from veterinary settings to the once-common use in clinics.
Stomach issues tend to make up the most common trouble. People and animals sometimes complain about an upset stomach, loss of appetite, or diarrhea after taking this drug. It can feel like the gut just won’t settle. I’ve seen calves turn away from feed, and adults get stomach cramps. Science points to the gut’s own bacteria getting wiped out—a “collateral damage” problem.
After a dose of chlortetracycline, people and animals can become sun-sensitive. I remember a neighbor who spent an afternoon in the garden after starting a tetracycline. His arms burned almost instantly, much worse than usual. The science tracks with this: studies from the FDA and CDC show photosensitivity isn’t rare. It happens when the skin absorbs more UV light than it normally would, making regular sunlight turn dangerous.
Kids face a unique risk with this antibiotic. Tetracyclines like chlortetracycline have been shown to settle in growing teeth and bones. This can lead to permanent tooth discoloration—yellow or brown stains that never really go away. When I was studying pharmacy, this point was hammered home again and again: avoid giving tetracyclines to children under eight, and to pregnant women when possible. The risk of interfering with childhood growth isn’t theoretical; the stains and weakened enamel serve as lasting proof.
Antibiotics sometimes clear out not just the bad bacteria but some good ones, leaving the body open for new, less friendly guests. Yeast infections or overgrowth of unwanted bacteria can crop up. In farm animals, vets pay careful attention—the wrong treatment can let tougher, more resistant strains take over. This issue goes well beyond side effects; it feeds into the massive public health problem of antibiotic resistance.
Allergic reactions, while rare, can be serious. Hives, swelling, or trouble breathing are red flags. I once saw a patient break out into a sudden rash—the kind that makes you stop dosing and call for help. Risks like liver or kidney irritation exist, especially in those with pre-existing problems.
Many try to ease digestive upset with probiotics or by taking the drug with food, though food can reduce absorption. Direct sunlight should be avoided. For farmers and pet owners, careful dosing—and sticking to prescribed lengths—reduces resistance risks. The medical community continues to push for smarter, more targeted antibiotic use. Veterinarians and doctors now turn to alternatives when possible, keeping these older drugs as a last-line defense.
Side effects matter because they remind us that no treatment comes free. I always remember the value of talking straight with a doctor or vet before starting a medicine, weighing the risks against the benefits, and not cutting corners when it comes to follow-ups. Chlortetracycline hydrochloride can help, but it brings baggage worth respecting.
Chlortetracycline hydrochloride has played a big part in keeping livestock healthy. Farmers and veterinarians have relied on this antibiotic to treat infections in cattle, pigs, poultry, and sheep for years. Bacterial diseases — from respiratory problems to gut infections — can sweep through herds fast. Chlortetracycline gives farmers a tool to keep animals healthy and productive, which matters not just for animal welfare but also for making sure there’s enough food on grocery shelves.
On the farm, I’ve seen how this medicine can turn around a sickly animal. Livestock don’t always have the luxury of fancy quarantine. When one gets sick, something that can bring bacteria under control quickly makes a real difference in preventing losses. Used properly, these antibiotics support animal health and keep many people’s businesses afloat.
Doctors have prescribed tetracyclines to people since the 1940s. Chlortetracycline, as the first discovered tetracycline, helped treat infections like pneumonia and urinary tract infections. Over time, doxycycline and minocycline took its place for people, because they cause fewer side effects and get absorbed better.
With antibiotic resistance rising, doctors have tightened the rules for these drugs. Many health systems list chlortetracycline as “not for human use" in many countries. Newer antibiotics have a safer track record, so most folks with infections get prescribed other options these days.
Tetracyclines can affect tooth and bone development, which matters if they’re given to pregnant women or young kids. Skin sensitivity to sunlight and allergic reactions also cause concern. For these reasons, medical guidelines recommend not using chlortetracycline in vulnerable groups.
Overusing antibiotics in animals and people helps bacteria become stronger. Resistant bacteria don’t care about farm fences or hospital walls—they move between animals, food, water, and us. Researchers at the World Health Organization and CDC draw a clear line between feeding antibiotics to animals for growth and the rise in resistance that shows up in clinics.
On the farm, giving chlortetracycline only when animals get sick helps slow resistance. In medicine, choosing antibiotics carefully and finishing prescriptions helps. World Health Organization reports show that countries cutting back on unnecessary antibiotic use have seen resistance rates drop.
Tough decisions have to be made. Farmers care about animal health and their livelihoods but also don’t want to contribute to a bigger public health problem. Doctors face patients who want quick fixes but have to think about the risk of resistance for the whole community.
Better farm management, vaccines, and improved hygiene cut down on disease before antibiotics even enter the picture. Regular check-ups and accurate diagnosis help reduce unnecessary treatments. In health care, updating training for medical pros and more public education about antibiotics pays off. Pushing for more research into alternatives will help lighten the load antibiotics carry today.
Everyone — farmers, doctors, patients, and shoppers — has a part to play if we want antibiotics to keep working for both people and animals. Experience on the farm and in the clinic makes clear: careful, responsible use builds stronger farms and a safer future for everyone.
Chlortetracycline hydrochloride has been around for decades, serving as an effective antibiotic for both humans and animals. Its value in fighting bacterial infections speaks for itself, but the conversation doesn’t stop there. Misuse can turn helpful medicine into a source of harm. I’ve seen plenty of people view antibiotics as harmless quick fixes, only to face unwanted side effects or, worse, resistance issues down the line. Medicine works best when treated with respect, and this compound is no exception.
Doctors prescribe chlortetracycline for a reason. They weigh your age, the infection, allergies, and other medicines you might use. It’s easy to forget that antibiotics don’t help viral infections. People often start taking something like chlortetracycline at the first sign of a cough, then stop the minute they feel better. Stopping early just gives leftover bacteria a chance to regroup. This benefits nobody—least of all you, since that infection could bite back and stubborn bugs could become harder to kill next time.
Swallow the capsule or tablet with enough water. Don’t lie down right after, or you’ll risk a sore throat. Taking it with milk or antacids reduces how much gets absorbed, so timing makes a difference. Give your stomach a break, and wait at least two hours before and after dairy, calcium, or magnesium products. These small steps help your body get every bit of benefit from the medicine.
Stomach upset, nausea, and diarrhea pop up on the list of possible side effects. Look for color changes in teeth, especially in kids. Doctors keep this in mind and avoid this drug for young children and pregnant people. Sunburn sneaks up more easily, so don’t forget sunscreen or some shade if you work or play outdoors. Over the years, I’ve seen antibiotics lead to allergic reactions in certain folks. Difficulty breathing, swelling, or rash can mean a medical emergency. Taking other medicines? Tell your doctor, since blood thinners, birth control, and anti-seizure medicines can tangle badly with chlortetracycline. Grappling with kidney or liver troubles? The doctor will want to know since these organs process the drug.
Antibiotic resistance isn’t a distant threat—it's happening right now. I’ve met people who thought skipping a dose or hoarding leftovers would help in the long run, only to end up stuck with a tougher infection. By sticking to the full course as told by a medical professional, you protect not just yourself but your community. Throw out unused medicine the right way—don’t flush it down the toilet, or it’ll end up in the water supply. Many cities offer medicine take-back programs; use those to keep the environment safe.
Just as you’d buckle up in a car, treat antibiotics with care. Keep them out of reach of children and pets. Never share your prescription. Always double-check with a doctor or pharmacist if anything seems off. Investing a few minutes to ask questions saves a lot of trouble later. Clear communication turns antibiotics back into powerful allies against infection, and that benefits us all.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | (4S,4aS,5aS,6S,12aR)-7-chloro-4-(dimethylamino)-1,4,4a,5,5a,6,11,12a-octahydro-3,6,10,12,12a-pentahydroxy-6-methyl-1,11-dioxo-2-naphthacenecarboxamide hydrochloride |
| Other names |
Aureomycin Aureocycline Chlorotetracycline Clortetraciclina Clortétracycline Chlorotetra |
| Pronunciation | /ˌklɔːr.tɛ.trəˈsaɪ.kliːn haɪˌdrɒ.kləˈraɪd/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | (4S,4aS,5aR,6S,12aS)-7-chloro-4-(dimethylamino)-1,4,4a,5,5a,6,11,12a-octahydro-3,6,10,12,12a-pentahydroxy-6-methyl-1,11-dioxonaphthacene-2-carboxamide hydrochloride |
| Other names |
Aureomycin Chlor-T Clortetraciclina CTC Chlortet |
| Pronunciation | /ˌklɔːr.tɛtrəˈsaɪ.kliːn ˌhaɪ.drəˈklɔː.raɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 64-72-2 |
| Beilstein Reference | 80844 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:64341 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1450 |
| ChemSpider | 2297245 |
| DrugBank | DB13521 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03c4e485-96fe-446e-bb82-66b5f8d6b806 |
| EC Number | 231-174-5 |
| Gmelin Reference | 5955 |
| KEGG | C13830 |
| MeSH | D002709 |
| PubChem CID | 9572207 |
| RTECS number | XJ4175000 |
| UNII | 0T1YF56HRE |
| UN number | UN2811 |
| CAS Number | 64-72-2 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1348021 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:38602 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1565 |
| ChemSpider | 20557697 |
| DrugBank | DB13738 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03bab6c2-0c9a-4c7f-bd0a-f6a0bb519d44 |
| EC Number | 231-485-3 |
| Gmelin Reference | 80087 |
| KEGG | CHEBI:37962 |
| MeSH | D002698 |
| PubChem CID | 9572205 |
| RTECS number | XJ4375000 |
| UNII | 2Y9CS41874 |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID7020229 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C22H23ClN2O8·HCl |
| Molar mass | 515.35 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.78 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | -0.25 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 7.44 |
| Basicity (pKb) | pKb: 6.35 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -8.5 x 10^-6 cm^3/mol |
| Dipole moment | 2.27 D |
| Chemical formula | C22H23ClN2O8·HCl |
| Molar mass | 515.35 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.5 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | -1.6 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 7.44 |
| Basicity (pKb) | -7.37 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -7.8×10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Dipole moment | 6.25 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 589.7 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 385 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | J01AA03 |
| ATC code | J01AA03 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause an allergic skin reaction; Causes serious eye irritation |
| GHS labelling | GHS05, GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: Harmful if swallowed. Causes serious eye irritation. May cause an allergic skin reaction. May cause respiratory irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P273, P280, P301+P312, P305+P351+P338, P308+P311 |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD₅₀ (oral, rat): 4,600 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (oral, rat): 3,000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | XG1350000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 25 mg/kg |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not Listed/Established |
| Main hazards | Irritating to eyes, respiratory system, and skin. May cause allergic reactions. Harmful if swallowed. |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: H302, H315, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | Keep out of reach of children. Avoid contact with eyes, skin, and clothing. Wash thoroughly after handling. Do not breathe dust. Use with adequate ventilation. If swallowed, seek medical advice immediately and show this container or label. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-1-1 |
| Explosive limits | Non-explosive |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral, rat: 4,600 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (oral, rat): 6,000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | XW9000000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 25 mg/kg |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not Listed |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Tetracycline Oxytetracycline Demeclocycline Doxycycline Minocycline Meclocycline Rolitetracycline Methacycline Lymecycline |
| Related compounds |
Tetracycline Demeclocycline Oxytetracycline Doxycycline Minocycline |