Calcium stearoyl lactylate (CSL) didn’t spring up out of nowhere. Going through decades of shift in food science, CSL came into play in the post-war era, when bakers and food engineers were up against shelf stability and texture setbacks as industrialized bread baked in bigger plants made its way onto grocery shelves. Formulators realized mono- and diglycerides weren’t always enough for security. In the 1950s, CSL found its foothold. It pulled ahead of older emulsifiers, thanks to its easier blending with dough and superior crumb softness. By the 1970s, the FDA included CSL in its food additive regulations, reflecting the belief that CSL steered bread formulations to higher quality, not just longer storage. We can’t discount the role of changing consumer habits and global bread brands, which drove researchers and manufacturers to adopt CSL for consistent results across scales.
CSL sits in the emulsifier family, but it offers more complexity than simple surfactants. It is a white or slightly yellow powder, sometimes pasty, and does not carry a strong odor. It comes from lactic acid, stearic acid (sourced either from animal fat or plants), and calcium salts. Its shipment and storage allow for flexible logistics, especially since it resists caking and clumping if packaged right. It doesn’t break down quickly in air or sunlight thanks to its stable nature. This is why industrial bakeries lean on CSL for dough conditioning: it gives baked goods greater tolerance to over-mixing, keeps them fresher for longer, and has a positive impact on the mouthfeel of crumb and crust.
Physical stability sets CSL apart, so manufacturers value its moisture resistance and ability to form a creamy dispersion. CSL presents as a fine powder, melting between 50°C and 60°C. Chemically speaking, this compound combines a hydrophilic lactylate group and a lipophilic stearate, which allows it to latch onto both water and fat molecules in a recipe. Its solubility in ethanol, but not in pure water, opens avenues for use in more than bread. CSL gives food both structure and resilience, making it essential for demanding formulations. The regulated acetate value and calcium content, as well as specific monoglyceride ratios, regularly make their way into quality audits, reflecting industry scrutiny on maintaining product integrity.
Food ingredients like CSL can’t skirt on technical specs. To comply with FDA and Codex Alimentarius, manufacturers put real focus on purity (not less than 80%), calcium content, acid number, free stearic acid, and water content. The emulsifier gets labeled as “Calcium Stearoyl-2-Lactylate” or simply “E482” in the European system. This coding makes CSL instantly recognizable for regulators and food technologists, simplifying recalls when required. Product data sheets confirm that no ingredient substitution or batch variation flies under the radar. Some companies push for non-GMO plant origins and kosher or halal certificates, which signals rising consumer demand for traceable, responsibly sourced ingredients.
Industrial players produce CSL by direct esterification or transesterification. The main process involves heating stearic acid or its esters with lactic acid, followed by neutralization with calcium hydroxide or calcium carbonate. Temperature, pH control, and reaction time take center stage in laboratories. Impurities such as free acids and residual solvents go through filter or distillation phases. These steps have to stack up to food-grade standards, else food safety authorities would turn down a batch before it even leaves the refinery. Equipment designers help optimize mixing and heating so the chemical reaction completes efficiently, keeping production energy use within limits.
CSL doesn’t just stop at emulsification. Under processing conditions, its lactylate ester bonds can hydrolyze, breaking down in the presence of acids or enzymes found in bread dough. This breakdown releases stearic and lactic acids, shifting dough pH and gluten structure, resulting in softer, more elastic bread. Researchers seeking different textural outcomes in tortillas, cakes, and non-bakery snacks adjust the ratio of lactylate to stearate, or blend with mono- and diglycerides for a combined effect. These modifications broaden the ingredient’s appeal, supporting new product development in plant-based and gluten-free lines too.
Reading an ingredients list, a shopper may see “Calcium Stearoyl-2-Lactylate,” “CSL,” “E482,” or, more rarely, “Calcium salt of stearoyl lactic acid.” Pharmaceutical and food companies sometimes sell CSL under proprietary names, branding the same molecule for different applications or market sectors. It’s not unusual for regional preferences to shape the naming on packaging or documentation, but the chemical backbone stays the same across geographies, reflecting its recognized food additive status worldwide.
Safety doesn’t just come from regulatory paperwork—food technologists have to keep a close eye on exposure limits and allergen risk during day-to-day handling. OSHA and EU-REACH assign a low toxicity profile to CSL, with minimal irritation risk. Food additive committees put a recommended maximum exposure of 0.5% to 1% of final product weight, based on chronic toxicity and metabolism studies. In the plant, dust control and ergonomic packaging are standard, with training programs in place to minimize respiratory exposure. Auditors will examine traceability and cleanliness from sourcing through to final application, since foodborne illness outbreaks can devastate both reputation and public trust.
The bread aisle at any supermarket offers a window into CSL’s power. In bread, buns, rolls, and even some gluten-free formulations, CSL boosts dough tolerance during mixing, fermentation, and baking. Cakes, donuts, waffles, and tortillas also benefit from its emulsifying action, which translates to better texture and moisture retention. Food producers in dairy, confectionery, and breakfast cereals factor it in to improve shelf life and create creamier structures without extra fat. CSL slips into non-food uses as well, like pills and supplements, where it helps bind tablets and keeps powders from clumping. This broad scope shows CSL isn’t just a one-note ingredient; it’s versatile, shaping the modern processed food supply.
The steady climb of CSL research keeps the ingredient moving forward. Food technologists work to adapt CSL for alternative grains and novel bakery techniques, exploring whether tweaks to lactose or fatty acid components boost performance for gluten-free or high-fiber recipes. Collaborations with universities give deeper insight into CSL’s interaction with yeast, gluten, and sugar. Researchers have started using more advanced tools like rheology and food imaging to capture how small changes in dosing can shift dough elasticity and final product crumb. As global pressure mounts for “clean label” foods, R&D teams look at reducing additives while still retaining the softness and shelf life that CSL provides.
Safety reviews dive into metabolic pathways and long-term consumption trends. CSL goes through rigorous tests for acute and chronic oral toxicity, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity. Clinical trials in animals and people confirm that CSL passes through the gastrointestinal tract largely untransformed, breaking down into lactic and stearic acids that the body already recognizes. Peer-reviewed studies have not linked CSL to allergic response or organ toxicity at food-use levels. Regulatory agencies keep revisiting these findings, especially with shifts in food labeling standards and public demand for additive-free shelves. The ongoing need for transparent, science-driven communication means that research into the metabolic fate and possible new toxicity endpoints for CSL will likely continue.
Industrial bakers, plant-based developers, and nutraceutical companies watch CSL closely, seeing opportunity in new formulations. Shifting consumer attitudes put pressure on brands to drop chemical-sounding names and reduce unfamiliar ingredients, yet, the benefits CSL delivers keep it locked into recipes. Researchers chart new ways to produce CSL from renewable sources, like sustainable palm or non-GMO crops, minimizing environmental footprints. Others look beyond just food into medicine, exploring CSL for improved delivery or preservation of active nutrients. Global food supply chain disruptions highlight the importance of stable, versatile, and thoroughly tested ingredients like CSL. Technology advances may eventually yield even better lactylate-based emulsifiers, but for now, CSL continues to quietly power the bread and snack foods that millions of people reach for every day.
Pick up a bag of sandwich bread. Right after the flour, water, and yeast, you’ll spot some unfamiliar names. Calcium stearoyl lactylate tends to pop up somewhere on that list. Most people don’t talk much about this ingredient, unless they have to memorize labels for allergies or food science classes. Still, it’s worth asking why food companies turn to this slightly tongue-twisting additive.
Bakers use calcium stearoyl lactylate for one simple reason: soft, fresh-tasting bread. This additive helps mix water and fats together, which matters for dough that needs both moisture and a gentle texture. Anyone who’s baked at home has likely pulled a tough, crumbly loaf out of the oven at least once. Food companies want to avoid that. By tossing some calcium stearoyl lactylate into the mix, commercial bread stays soft for days and slices neatly straight out of the bag.
This ingredient acts as an emulsifier. In plain terms, it lets water and fat get along inside bread dough. That means the gluten proteins line up just right. The result: slices of bread don’t fall apart, especially in sandwiches, and the texture feels pillowy. Bakers also notice that dough with this additive rises higher in the oven and forms a better crumb structure.
Calcium stearoyl lactylate doesn’t stick to bread alone. You’ll find it in tortillas and other baked goods where flexibility and softness score big points. Even some noodles and breakfast cereals use it to keep texture light. In pasta, for instance, it helps the dough roll into a smooth sheet, and in cereal bars, it keeps chewy layers from pulling apart.
This ingredient shows up in plenty of global food standards. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the European Food Safety Authority, and other regulatory agencies recognize it as safe for humans to eat in the quantities found in food. Over the years, researchers and safety groups have followed its effects on health. No evidence points to it causing harm in typical diets. Personally, I find this reassuring, especially in grocery shopping for my family’s daily staples.
The long ingredient lists on some bread brands can raise eyebrows. People want to know what’s in their food and whether it matters for health or allergies. It makes sense to look up each unfamiliar name, see how it’s used, and check for possible side effects. More brands now share why they use ingredients like calcium stearoyl lactylate, and some add info online or on packaging. That helps shoppers decide what matches their views on food, whether seeking simple recipes or best shelf-life.
People eat a lot of bread worldwide, and not everyone wants extra additives. Bakers who look for “clean label” solutions keep testing new recipes with natural ingredients. Sometimes this means removing calcium stearoyl lactylate by replacing it with more butter, oil, or longer fermenting times. That can drive up costs for both bakeries and shoppers. As a parent, I watch price tags closely but also flip over packages to check ingredients before buying. It becomes a balance between freshness, cost, and comfort with the ingredient list.
Shoppers influence what ends up in the bread aisle. Every time someone chooses a loaf because it’s softer, lasts longer, or skips certain additives, stores and bakeries pay attention. Calcium stearoyl lactylate may not make headlines, but it shapes the look and feel of morning toast and peanut butter sandwiches around the world.
At the grocery store, food labels sometimes read like a chemistry lesson. When I first saw “calcium stearoyl lactylate” (CSL), I had no clue what it meant. After digging through some scientific journals and food safety records, I realized this common additive shows up everywhere from bread to tortillas and even some whipped toppings. CSL keeps baked goods soft longer, helps dough rise, and makes chewy things a little more enjoyable. Bread stays fresh and less crumbly, which saves money and cuts down on food waste.
CSL gets made through a reaction between lactic acid, stearic acid, and calcium. These building blocks come from plants or animals, but producers use mostly vegetable sources. The sources matter for folks with allergies or dietary restrictions, and food makers usually provide this information if you call or send an email.
Food safety experts around the world—think the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, European Food Safety Authority, and food authorities in Japan and Australia—have checked out CSL and set limits that balance food science with public health. The FDA gave CSL “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) status. Scientific reviews looked at both rodents and people eating large amounts of it and didn’t find any health problems tied to normal use in foods.
International health bodies identified 22 milligrams per kilogram of body weight daily as an amount unlikely to cause harm, and most diets only reach a tiny fraction of that. To be honest, you’d have to eat piles of processed bread every day to even approach half that amount.
Once you eat it, CSL basically breaks down into basic nutrients: calcium, stearic acid, and lactic acid. Most people handle these without any trouble because they show up in all kinds of foods already. You’ll find calcium in dairy and leafy greens, stearic acid in seeds and cocoa butter, and lactic acid during digestion or in fermented products. Allergic reactions to CSL itself haven’t shown up in any medical records I could find. Still, anyone who has ever struggled with food allergies learns to check for possible animal-derived ingredients.
Some folks don’t trust food additives, and I get it. Food should feel familiar, not like a lab experiment. There were years when I tried baking bread without any emulsifiers like CSL, just to see the difference. The shelf life dropped dramatically, and the texture usually disappointed in a lunchbox by day three. For parents, people with limited grocery options, or folks on a budget, CSL helps keep food fresher for longer.
Taking all the evidence into account, CSL doesn’t raise any red flags in the doses used today. Still, if you want to avoid it, bake at home or look for products labeled as “additive free.” Reading packaging and supporting companies that value transparency turns consumers into a force for better practices. The food system works best when companies, regulators, and regular shoppers all pay attention—not just to what’s safe, but to what people actually want from their bread, snacks, and meals.
Anyone trying to stick to a vegetarian or vegan lifestyle learns the drill pretty fast: check labels, look out for animal-derived ingredients, and sometimes navigate long scientific names. Calcium stearoyl lactylate (CSL) shows up often in bread, baked snacks, and even some pastas. Food manufacturers rely on it to keep textures soft and dough pliable. But is it safe for vegans and vegetarians to eat?
CSL comes from lactic acid, stearic acid, and calcium salts. The big question comes down to where those acids originate. Lactic acid often starts with the fermentation of carbohydrates like corn or sugar beets. These sources fit most vegetarian and vegan guidelines. I learned this after contacting bread producers for a friend with strict dietary needs. Most confirmed their lactic acid came from plants.
Stearic acid, on the other hand, can be tricky. It exists in both animal fats and vegetable oils such as palm and soy. Europe and the US usually source it from plants since plant oils are cheaper and easier to work with. Still, “usually” leaves some uncertainty. Without transparency from the food producer, the only way to know for sure is to ask or check for a vegan certification label.
In the grocery aisle, quick choices rarely leave room for nuance. Stearic acid doesn’t require a source disclosure in many regions, so the label won't say "from plant oil” or “from animal fat.” The average consumer faces a guessing game. Food manufacturers could clear this up with better labeling. I’ve found that some brands will provide clarity by stamping on “vegan-friendly” or “suitable for vegetarians.” This small step goes a long way in building trust.
Some people, including those with food allergies or dietary restrictions, end up scrolling manufacturer websites or sending emails. That’s extra work for everyone involved. The best approach, in my experience, is supporting brands that offer transparency, even if it means spending a little more. Shoppers send a clear message: the more honest the label, the more loyalty they get in return.
For many, vegan or vegetarian choices aren’t just about avoiding animal products—they’re also about supporting sustainability. Plant-based stearic acid avoids the environmental problems tied to animal agriculture, like heavy water use and higher carbon emissions. Switching to or demanding plant-sourced emulsifiers could encourage manufacturers to cut animal fat from their supply chains.
Big brands already respond to demand for clearer vegan options. Certification bodies play a huge role here. “Certified Vegan” and “Vegetarian Society Approved” stamps take away the guesswork. Supermarkets can push for these guarantees by prioritizing products with recognized certifications, much like they already do for organic and fair-trade foods.
I usually scan for certification icons or contact the company if things stay unclear. Online forums or apps sometimes carry lists of certified vegan bread, snacks, or pasta. When in doubt, skipping the product pushes brands to respond; enough lost sales mean changes happen fast. Each choice on the shelf pays for clarity, transparency, and a more honest food system.
I’ve watched people scour labels for hidden allergens, especially if they or their kids have celiac disease or lactose intolerance. The fear is real, especially with names like “lactylate” making people think of lactose, and the root “stearoyl” sounding a lot like animal fat. Calcium stearoyl lactylate, or CSL, turns up in all sorts of foods: bread, tortillas, baked snacks, and even some creamy-style beverages. It keeps things soft and extends shelf life. People hear “lactylate” and immediately think dairy, but things aren’t always so straightforward.
Figuring out if CSL contains dairy or gluten starts with understanding how it’s made. The “lactylate” part comes from lactic acid—not the same as lactose, the sugar found in milk. Lactic acid pops up in many places: fermented vegetables, some meats, even human muscle during exercise. Commercial lactic acid usually comes from fermenting carbohydrates like corn or beets. The “stearoyl” side refers to stearic acid, a fatty acid mostly found in vegetable oils or animal fats. Bread-making-grade CSL tends to use only vegetable sources. So, when looking at CSL on an ingredient label, you’re not really dealing with milk or gluten, unless the manufacturer added something extra.
Real-life allergen issues almost always come from hidden ingredients or contamination in the factory, not CSL itself. Every big regulatory agency—the FDA, the European Food Safety Authority, Health Canada—classifies CSL as generally safe. They don’t list it as a top allergen, and most CSL is made without dairy or gluten starting materials. Gluten never enters the picture, since lactic acid fermentation uses corn, tapioca, or potatoes instead of wheat. Some manufacturers use milk sugar as a starting point for lactic acid, but that’s rare and clearly labeled. Strict allergen labeling laws in the United States and the European Union would flag any milk derivative.
It makes sense that people hesitate. Allergic reactions can be life-threatening. The problem is made worse by food labels sometimes using scientific names that don’t mean much to the average shopper. My sister, who has a severe gluten allergy, has called me in a panic more than once after seeing CSL on a label. Yet, after double-checking with food safety data, she found the product was fine. The real world rarely lines up perfectly with what food chemistry textbooks say. Factory contamination, bad labeling, and regional sourcing can cause confusion. Someone with a severe allergy or intolerance needs to check with a company directly or look for the “certified gluten-free” or “vegan” symbols to feel confident.
Companies already list milk and wheat as allergens in bold under “contains” or “may contain” sections. This helps, but sometimes, “processing aids” and “anti-caking agents” fly under the radar because the label rules don’t recognize those as key ingredients. Food manufacturers can help by clearly explaining where their enzymes, acids, and other food chemicals come from. Third-party certifications make a real difference, offering some peace of mind for shoppers who can’t take any risks. True transparency—telling people exactly how something is made—should be a baseline expectation, not a bonus. Every step that boosts trust helps families like mine make safer choices at the dinner table.
Spotting “calcium stearoyl lactylate” on an ingredient list tends to make eyes glaze over. Most people have no idea what it does, or why it’s everywhere from sliced bread to pancake mix. I started noticing it when my doctor told me to watch food additives because of my sensitive stomach. That led to reading labels and then, of course, a lot of Googling. If you care about what’s in your food, or just wonder why certain groceries last longer or feel softer, it’s worth leaning in a bit closer.
Bread comes first in my grocery haul, so I’ll start there. Most commercial loaves, from burger buns to “country white,” contain calcium stearoyl lactylate. Bakers rely on it because it helps dough rise higher and feel soft longer on shelves. Walk down the bread aisle: the sandwich loaves, English muffins, tortillas—almost anything that’s packaged and promises “softness” or “extended freshness” probably contains this additive.
Pasta also gets a boost from this ingredient, particularly in instant or enriched varieties. Croissants at the supermarket or frozen dinner rolls have it as well, to keep them fluffy and hold their shape through freezing and reheating.
Non-dairy creamers and whipped toppings use calcium stearoyl lactylate for texture. It helps bind fat and water, so coffee creamers pour smooth and stable, never curdle, and desserts stay light. In ice cream, I’ve found it lets cheaper brands get that creamy feel without extra milk fat.
Breakfast cereals, especially the crunchy types or those advertised as “heart-healthy,” often list it, too. It keeps flakes crisp in milk and prevents everything from fusing together during production.
The food industry favors calcium stearoyl lactylate mainly because it enhances texture and extends shelf life. That might sound technical, but honestly, people just want bread that stays soft for days and ice cream that doesn’t separate. In big production runs, these tiny ingredients keep costs down and reduce waste from spoiled goods. It’s gone almost unnoticed because, unlike artificial colors or preservatives, it doesn’t bring dramatic downsides for most folks.
Still, I get questions about how safe it is. Global food safety agencies, including the FDA, set strict guidelines for its use. Most research suggests it’s safe at the levels found in foods, digested as common dietary fats and acids. Still, some people avoid it based on preference or allergies, even though reactions remain pretty rare.
Some folks want fewer ingredients in their food, just for peace of mind. That’s one reason for the recent rise in “clean label” baking, where producers cut out additives like this. Neighborhood bakeries and some smaller brands proudly highlight simple, traditional recipes on their packaging, and bread from these, while fresher, might go stale faster—something I’ve experienced more than once when making my own.
Reading labels changed the way I shop, but it hasn’t made me a zealot. I still pick up sandwich bread for busy weeks—but every so often, I support my local baker or try my hand at baking at home. For anyone at risk for sensitivities, or for parents managing food allergies, keeping a close eye on ingredients like calcium stearoyl lactylate just makes sense. For others, understanding why it’s there helps cut through misinformation and lets us make choices that work for our families. The food world won’t get less complex anytime soon, but clear info makes all the difference.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Calcium (R)-2-hydroxypropanoate octadecanoate |
| Other names |
E482 Calcium Stearyl-2-Lactylate CSL |
| Pronunciation | /ˈkæl.si.əm stɪˈrɔɪl lækˈtɪl.ˌeɪt/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Calcium 2-(1-carboxylatoethoxy)octadecanoate |
| Other names |
E482 Calcium stearoyl-2-lactylate Calcium stearoyl lactate Calcium stearolactylate |
| Pronunciation | /ˈkæl.si.əm ˈstɪə.rɔɪl lækˈtɪl.eɪt/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 5785-44-4 |
| Beilstein Reference | 2040145 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:85147 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL3980520 |
| ChemSpider | 126628 |
| DrugBank | DB11110 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03b9f0f0-5cc4-4da4-903e-a1a1006dbe24 |
| EC Number | E481 |
| Gmelin Reference | 31121 |
| KEGG | C16583 |
| MeSH | D017708 |
| PubChem CID | 3084072 |
| RTECS number | OJ7800000 |
| UNII | YWQ5OI1Z8O |
| UN number | UN number: "Not regulated |
| CAS Number | 814-80-2 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1325959 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:85121 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1629279 |
| ChemSpider | 85136 |
| DrugBank | DB11221 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 03-2119486675-24-0000 |
| EC Number | E 482 |
| Gmelin Reference | 57743 |
| KEGG | C20670 |
| MeSH | D016720 |
| PubChem CID | 24375 |
| RTECS number | FH2575000 |
| UNII | 48M2P60V96 |
| UN number | UN number: "Not regulated |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID8031797 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C24H46CaO6 |
| Molar mass | 430.664 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to pale yellow powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.7 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Dispersible |
| log P | -2.8 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.2 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 2.77 D |
| Chemical formula | C24H46CaO6 |
| Molar mass | 430.6 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to cream-colored powder |
| Odor | Slight odor |
| Density | 0.9 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Dispersible |
| log P | -5.2 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Basicity (pKb) | pKb 12.4 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 0 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 714 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A20AX |
| ATC code | A01AD20 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Not considered hazardous. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, Warning |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. |
| Precautionary statements | IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat) > 25,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): >25,000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | NX8200000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 5 mg/m³ |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not listed |
| Main hazards | May cause mild skin and eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): > 25,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Rat oral > 25,000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | SOY9588750 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 5 mg/m³ |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Sodium Stearoyl Lactylate Calcium Stearate Stearic Acid Lactic Acid Sodium Lactate |
| Related compounds |
Sodium Stearoyl Lactylate Calcium Lactate Stearic Acid Lactic Acid |