People have worked with sulfur since the days of ancient civilizations. The Greeks and Romans put it to use for religious rites, while alchemists swore by its essential role in early chemistry. Once the 18th and 19th centuries rolled around, French scientist Antoine Lavoisier recognized sulfur as a chemical element. Fast forward to the rise of modern biology, and researchers learned how bacteria and other microbes used sulfur compounds both for energy and nutrient cycling. Sulfur’s biological chapter keeps expanding, especially as mining, farming, and chemical engineering bring ever more of it through our everyday world.
You find biological sulfur mainly as a yellow powder or brittle solid, showing up in products ranging from soil supplements and pesticides to pharmaceuticals. Agriculture uses elemental sulfur and its bio-variants to help balance soil chemistry, repel fungi, and even control pests. In medicine, sulfur finds a role in ointments and skin treatments. It’s not unusual for technical specifications to offer versions with high purity, often above 99.5%, meeting the food, pharma, and electronic standards in different markets.
Sulfur has a distinct yellow color—bright, easily recognized in either its powdered or crystalline form. It won’t dissolve in water, but it does dissolve in some organic solvents like carbon disulfide. Temperature brings big changes. Sulfur melts around 119°C, boils just above 400°C, and transitions between several allotropes, giving it a unique fingerprint among elements. You find it forming bonds with oxygen, hydrogen, and a handful of metals in both biological and industrial settings. Its odor depends on its form—elemental sulfur has almost no smell, but hydrogen sulfide or other derivatives smell strongly like rotten eggs. These physical traits influence how sulfur gets moved, stored, and used.
Most labels for biological sulfur mention its source, particle size, purity grade, and any additives. Food-grade and pharma-grade sulfur go through strict screening to remove contaminants like heavy metals or unwanted organics. You’ll find detailed data sheets listing melting point, crystalline phase, and solubility along with safety and handling instructions. Regulations in different regions push companies to track and document traceability, thanks to sulfur’s use in sensitive and regulated applications. Labels now often include QR codes for digital access to safety and handling guides, and product descriptions can identify batch numbers and processing dates for quality control audits.
Producing high-grade biological sulfur usually follows a handful of proven paths. Recovery from underground or volcanic mines gives big solid deposits, but bio-sulfur production has become more common. Bacteria help pull sulfur from sulfides in wastewater or gas streams, converting pollutants into marketable materials. Chemical processes also refine industrial sulfur—the Frasch process, for instance, pushes out hot water and air to extract sulfur from deep underground, which is then cleaned and converted to a bio-usable form. Some operations pull sulfur directly from biogas or tailor mixtures for organic farming by leveraging fermentation or microbial desulfurization.
Biological sulfur rarely stays put in one chemical form. Bacteria can turn sulfides into elemental sulfur or further into sulfate, shifting the form based on changes in pH, temperature, and microbial communities. In soils, sulfur reacts with moisture and oxygen, gradually forming sulfates that plants take up. Scientists modify sulfur by oxidizing it in reactors, forming novel links with other elements, or crafting it into compounds like sulfonates useful for pharmaceuticals and detergents. Chemical engineers often tweak these reactions using heat, pressure, and catalysts to make new products for everything from fertilizers to rubber vulcanization.
Over the years, biological sulfur has picked up a stack of names depending on its source and usage. People call it brimstone in historical texts. Trade names include “sublimed sulfur,” “precipitated sulfur,” and “biogenic elemental sulfur.” Labels in agriculture sometimes just read “soil sulfur” or “plant sulfur.” In pharma and food, you’ll spot “sulphur BP” for British Pharmacopoeia–approved products, or the “USP” tag for US Pharmacopeia compliance. Some companies brand eco-friendly forms as “microbial sulfur” or “green sulfur” to showcase their sustainable production.
Handling biological sulfur safely means paying attention to dust control, fire hazards, and ventilation. Its fine powder can ignite and burn swiftly, so storage in airtight containers away from open flames or sparks stays critical. Workers get equipped with masks or respirators and gloves to avoid inhalation or skin contact. Eye protection comes standard in processing plants. Safety data sheets follow strict regional guidelines, explaining hazard symbols and recommended response steps for accidents. Regular facility inspections focus on dust-collection systems, and operational training covers how to fight sulfur fires, since water alone doesn’t always do the job. Regulatory agencies impose maximum contaminant limits and demand record-keeping for transportation, storage, and disposal.
Agriculture remains the heavy hitter for biological sulfur demand. Farmers rely on it to boost crop yields, fight fungal blight, and improve soil health, particularly in places with ongoing nutrient depletion. Food processing companies lace certain products with minute sulfur doses as preservatives and anti-caking agents. The agriculture, food, and pharmaceutical sectors all have specific protocols, but sulfur’s reach goes even further. Electronics manufacturers use ultra-pure sulfur to make semiconductors and specialty plastics. Wastewater treatment plants count on sulfuric bacteria to strip pollutants out, turning a waste stream into a saleable solid. Rubber and tire producers use modified sulfur to vulcanize rubber, strengthening the end product.
Science keeps pressing onward in the quest to expand sulfur’s role in sustainable tech. Labs across the globe are engineering microbes to handle desulfurization better, making bioreactors more efficient and less reliant on harsh chemicals. Teams study soil biology to unlock ways to recycle sulfur fields faster, fighting nutrient loss in depleted terrains. Pharma research explores high-value sulfur compounds with antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties, hoping to uncover novel drugs. Polymer chemists push the envelope on sulfur-derived plastics for recyclability and strength. Cutting-edge studies look at how sulfur interacts with DNA and enzymes in living cells, opening doors into cancer prevention, genetics, and diagnostics.
Logs of medical records show that pure, elemental sulfur isn’t very toxic to humans or most animals when handled safely, but inhaling too much dust or fumes can irritate lungs and eyes. Certain derivatives like hydrogen sulfide, produced during biological transformations, are dangerously toxic. Chronic exposure to high levels triggers headaches, nausea, and other symptoms, so facilities set strict workplace air limits. Labs have carried out animal studies showing that unfavorable forms of sulfur or heavy-metal contamination can pose real risks to both workers and consumers. Ongoing research tracks the long-term effects of low-level sulfur exposure on soils, crops, and food chains, hoping to prevent toxic buildup in food systems.
Biological sulfur’s future could reach far beyond agriculture and industry. New fermentation reactors might turn municipal waste streams into a steady sulfur source, cutting reliance on mining. As governments regulate fertilizer runoff and industrial pollution, precision sulfur applications will help reshape sustainable farming practices. Synthetic biology could lead to novel enzymes that transform sulfur into custom compounds for medicine, electronics, and green chemistry. Tech companies hunt for sulfur-based energy storage materials to power the next wave of batteries. With the world tightening environmental standards and looking for earth-friendly processes, sulfur research promises both growth and complexity.
You can walk through fields and see healthy green leaves, but the real story sits underground. Nutrients shape everything above as well as below. Sulfur holds a place many farmers ignore, but it shapes the health and yield of crops just as much as nitrogen or phosphorus. Biological sulfur, unlike synthetic versions, starts with naturally occurring bacteria and fungi. These microbes pull sulfur from the air and organic residue, changing it into a form that plant roots can easily grab. Anyone who’s wrestled with pale leaves or limp wheat knows that missing this element throws off the whole system.
Young plants use sulfur to build proteins, vitamins, and enzymes. Cereal crops like wheat and barley soak up more sulfur than you might expect. Vegetables, canola, garlic, and onions show bigger boosts when they get enough biological sulfur. Without it, fields often show yellow tops or stunted growth, symptoms that look a lot like nitrogen issues but don’t fix themselves with more fertilizer pellets.
It takes more than digging up another bag of product. Biological sulfur slips into the soil cycle, moving at a pace that creates steady uptake rather than quick chemical spikes. Crops strengthen their immune systems, holding back fungal and bacterial invaders while building more robust root structures. This returns to the key soil life stories—use what nature made, blend it with careful observation, and the fields give more back.
I’ve watched fields hammered for years by heavy chemical inputs start to recover once we added compost, manure, or natural sulfur-rich bacteria. Soils change color. Worms reappear. Plants react with a kind of vigor synthetic formulas rarely deliver over the long haul. Biological sulfur steps in through several natural pathways. Some folks add it as part of compost teas, some spread elemental sulfur for soil microbes to break down, and others rely on planting certain legumes or cover crops with high sulfur content. Each approach blends local know-how and observation, not just tests run in a distant lab.
Scientific research shows sulfur-deficient soils leave behind poor harvests. A long-term trial in Canada documented a 35% yield bump for canola fields shifted to biological sulfur management. In the European Union, reducing reliance on chemical products also helps keep water tables free from run-off and promotes higher bacterial counts in the soil.
Not every farm can switch overnight. I’ve seen some who face compacted fields or overworked ground struggle to reestablish the balance. Soil tests still matter, but regular scouting for visible signs—like faded leaf tips or thin stalks—can point toward the right adjustment. Local experience, listening to neighbors who track their fields year after year, ends up more reliable than any single guideline. Sometimes it takes letting fields breathe, rotating crops, or experimenting with small batches of compost before the benefits take hold.
In the end, using biological sulfur is like music done with a live band instead of a machine. The rhythm takes attention, and it rewards patience. Fields become more resilient, yields increase, and the ground supports those who’ll work it in the decades ahead. Biological sulfur isn’t just a product on the supply shelf. It is a quiet solution rooted in experience, observation, and respect for how soil used to work—and can still work—without cutting corners.
Farmers often face the question of which soil amendments genuinely nourish crops without harming the land or the food chain. I’ve spent a good deal of time walking fields and talking with growers who want the best for their plants, their customers, and the next season. That’s how the debate around biological sulfur keeps showing up at local co-ops and extension offices. Some folks get confused by the word “biological,” expecting it to mean safer or more natural—so, is biological sulfur really organic and safe for crops?
Most biological sulfur used in agriculture comes from bacteria-driven processes. Certain microbes “eat” sulfur in waste streams or natural deposits and produce a powder or granular sulfur that ends up looking pretty pure. This isn’t a new trick. For decades, sulfur scrubbed from oil and gas production has found its way onto farm fields since elemental sulfur is a critical plant nutrient. The biological label just refers to the way microbes convert it. In my view, it’s always important to ask where any farm input comes from and how it’s made, even when the word “bio” is on the bag.
Sulfur ranks as an essential nutrient, right up there with nitrogen and potassium. Without enough sulfur, crops like wheat and cabbage struggle to make proteins and take on their familiar flavors. Farmers often spot yellowing leaves or stunted growth when sulfur runs low. As for its safety, elemental sulfur itself isn’t toxic to people, animals, or soil microbes when applied at recommended doses. It’s recognized by organic certification bodies like OMRI and is used in organic programs across the country. That approval builds confidence, but it doesn’t mean dumping on extra is risk-free.
No farm input works in a vacuum. Too much sulfur, even if it’s labeled “biological,” can acidify soil and throw off the delicate balance that roots rely on. I’ve seen fields where overuse changed the pH enough to reduce yields, which meant more fertilizer needed to fix what got out of balance. There’s also the runoff angle—while sulfur itself isn’t a major water polluter like phosphorus, getting application rates right always matters. Soil testing before adding nutrients keeps you on safe ground.
Anyone working to improve their fields wants methods that raise healthy crops without leaving a mess for the future. Trust in a product grows when it’s both organically certified and field-proven. Peer-reviewed studies, such as those from university extension programs, back up the suitability of biological sulfur for organic farming. Research confirms its low toxicity and how it can restore sulfur-deficient soils without harming the broader ecology.
Farmers know that each field is unique. Soil tests, thoughtful record keeping, and some old-fashioned neighbor-to-neighbor advice often guide decision-making more than sales pitches. Good stewardship calls for using only what’s needed, sourced responsibly, and tracked over time. As someone who’s seen both bumper crops and disappointing years, I find that “more” isn’t always better, but the careful use of biological sulfur delivers real value when used with intention and understanding. Organic or not, safety depends on informed application and ongoing soil health monitoring.
Folks who work the land know that plant nutrition involves more than just nitrogen or phosphorus. Sulfur’s been the unsung hero in agriculture, even though it plays a bigger part in healthy crops than many give it credit for. With today’s rise in cleaner air and fewer sulfur-rich emissions, what once fell from the sky must now go back into the soil—by deliberate application. Biological sulfur, made with help from microbes, stands out as one reliable solution. But the question stands: which crops show the most appreciation for this boost?
Cabbage, canola, broccoli, and other brassicas always demand attention. These crops build much of their structure using sulfur, not just for yield but also for taste and disease resistance. The zing you get from a fresh radish or the depth in a bite of broccoli owes a lot to well-supplied sulfur. Canola’s oil content also needs sulfur, with studies showing yield often climbs by 15% or more in fields where sulfur gets applied at the right time.
Farmers putting in wheat have seen patchy heads or inconsistent protein numbers when sulfur gets left behind. Bread quality, gluten formation, and even grain fill all slide without enough available sulfur. In my area, local grain elevators can point to years where just a small drop in sulfur supplies led to more dockage for producers. It’s not guesswork—there’s a pile of research linking sulfur to improved wheat protein content and test weights.
Out on prairie fields, alfalfa and clover soak up sulfur faster than a dry sponge grabs water. These legumes grow best with steady nutrient flows and kick up their protein when sulfur isn’t scarce. Hay buyers don’t just sniff at color—they want feed that keeps up milk yields and livestock health. Proper biological sulfur application means fewer stunted patches and better regrowth after each cut.
Potatoes, onions, and garlic all show their gratitude for sulfur with bigger yields. Tuber crops not only bulk up more but also resist disease when their sulfur needs are met. You’ll find potato growers in regions with younger, sandier soils often seeing the biggest return on every dollar they put into sulfur amendments. The healthier cell tissue and stronger disease defense mean less spent on fungicides along the way.
Farmers aiming for top dollar see the value. Sulfur isn’t flashy, yet it plays a role in building amino acids, chlorophyll, and defensive compounds in plants. Putting microbes to work with biological sulfur allows for a steady trickle of available sulfur, not just one big hit that washes away with the next rain. In my own fields, row crops react quickly. You smell the difference in canola after a June rain, and weed pressure drops in the richer soils with ample sulfur.
The market offers test kits and lab analyses now, making it easier to check soil and tissue sulfur levels. Foliar application or soil-applied pellets each work, but matching the product to crop and timing gives the edge. Biological sulfur carries less risk of burn or runoff compared to old-fashioned synthetics, and that fits right in with more sustainable and regenerative approaches catching on.
Sulfur used to come for free in rainfall, but those days have waned. Farmers can count on clear benefits—bigger yields, better taste, stronger plants—by giving sulfur its due spot in their nutrient program. As research keeps growing, so does the list of crops that show results from biological sulfur. Whether it’s brassicas, grains, or root crops, the soil remembers, and the harvest shows it.
Farmers everywhere keep running into the same issue: soils get worn out. Crops pull nutrients from the ground, and without adding some of those elements back, fields just don’t deliver the same results year after year. Sulfur stands out among the important nutrients that crops crave. I remember walking row after row of soybeans, yellow and stunted because the soil lacked what they needed. These aren’t scenes from distant lands—they show up on the best farms, from Illinois to Punjab.
Sulfur works its magic in building proteins and helping with chlorophyll production. The natural way to deliver this comes in the form of biological sulfur, pulled from sources like elemental sulfur or specially processed organics. For growers who want to cut back on synthesized chemicals, biological sulfur gives that extra option: the plant gets fed, and the environment doesn't suffer as much.
We don’t just toss sulfur around and hope for the best. Application calls for knowing what the soil holds and what the crop demands. A typical soil test lays out the current sulfur levels, along with everything else. In Midwest cornfields, soils can show just a few parts per million, which isn’t enough. Brassica vegetables, potatoes, and canola soak up more than others—these crops never forgive a deficit.
Over the years, researchers at land-grant universities like Iowa State and extension agents across Canada have tracked sulfur loss and buildup to pin down reliable advice. In most cases, biological sulfur gets spread as a fine-grained powder or granule, mixed into the top few inches of soil either before planting or as a side-dress during early growth. For the application, I’ve worked with both spinner spreaders for broad acre crops and simple hand applicators for smaller patches. A light, even layer goes much further than big clumps or careless heaps.
Every book and supplier points growers to the same truth—there’s no magic value for every field. Still, some basic numbers guide the routine. For most major crops like corn, wheat, or soy, applying between 10 and 30 kilograms per hectare covers the deficit. Sandy soils, which hold water and nutrients poorly, often get the higher end of that range. In heavy, wet soils, or where manure has been spread regularly, less is often needed.
Biological sulfur shows its power slowly. Unlike soluble fertilizers, elemental forms rely on soil microbes and warmth to break down and release the sulfur plants can use. For instance, a 20-kilogram dose in spring may not all show up right away—it could take weeks, especially in cool, early-season fields. Crop advisors urge following up with proper tissue tests, watching for any lag in sulfur uptake, and adapting doses season by season.
Some hesitate to use biological soil amendments because every farm budget feels tight. Evidence stacks in favor of sulfur though, showing not just yield bump but better grain quality and improved disease resistance in crops like canola. In the long run, precise application pays back more than the original outlay.
Keeping sulfur losses down means thinking about timing too—ahead of a rain, but not so early that it washes away. Combining sulfur with organic matter returns keeps biology humming and reduces runoff risk. Local extension bulletins, crop consultants, and field trials offer the best place to start. As fields keep evolving, growers armed with soil tests and the right sulfur dose put themselves way ahead.
Farmers and industries across the board turn to sulfur, in biological forms, for soil health, crop resilience, and even water treatment. It’s an old element with a new image—biological sulfur draws attention because it breaks down gently in the environment. Unlike some synthetic chemicals, it comes from processes like microbial oxidation, which feels natural. The world’s push for green methods gives biological sulfur an edge, especially as stricter regulations challenge chemical-heavy systems.
No farm input comes without questions about safety. Sulfur, in powder or granular form, can be a problem if people ignore common-sense rules. Dust kicked up during handling irritates eyes and lungs. Workers in fertilizer plants or on farms need to wear masks and goggles—simple steps, but often skipped during busy schedules. Cases show farmers sometimes neglect these basics, often trusting organic-sounding inputs to be risk-free. Respirators and proper storage cut most dangers, but only if consistently used.
I’ve met growers who felt safe just because sulfur didn’t dissolve fast. Microbes break it down, so movement into the air and water is slower than for other materials, but that delay sometimes leads folks to ignore safety just because effects seem invisible. Even so, the occupational risk drops compared to harsh chemical fungicides, a detail farm safety experts always point out.
Sulfur cycling in the soil supports many crops and microbes. Bacteria convert sulfur into sulfate, which plants absorb. That sounds entirely positive, and usually it is. Trouble starts if large amounts build up. Overuse can mess with soil pH, making it more acidic. In the 1980s and ‘90s, farmers in areas like the Midwest USA saw acidification appear after several seasons of heavy sulfur amendments. Those fields took years to recover. If runoff happens, small creeks nearby get a blast of acidity—bad news for aquatic insects and amphibians.
Another worry shows up near sulfur storage or during big application events. Rain can wash fine sulfur dust into water courses. In low-oxygen parts of ponds and marshes, sulfur compounds convert to hydrogen sulfide, a stinky and toxic gas. Fish kills have been documented where this gets out of hand. The lesson remains: sulfur has a natural look, but it’s not harmless if mishandled.
Solving these issues doesn’t call for huge inventions. Most problems ease up once growers accurately test their soils before and after sulfur use. Extension agents recommend routine sampling so that applications match what crops actually need. Buffer strips of grass or shallow marshes between fields and streams trap excess particles before they reach water, a practice borrowed from standard nutrient management. Farmers and local governments working together on clear storage rules—keeping sulfur covered and away from high-traffic areas—help cut both dust and accidental runoff.
A big part of the answer lies in making information practical. Workshops on sulfur handling and simple mask distribution at farm supply stores keep the word out. Farmers take advice seriously when results—cleaner streams and fewer respiratory complaints—show up fast. No miracle is needed, just shared effort rooted in both observation and science.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | sulfur |
| Other names |
Bio Sulfur Sulphur WP Sulphur 80% WDG Elemental Sulphur Wettable Sulphur |
| Pronunciation | /baɪ.əˈlɒdʒ.ɪ.kəl ˈsʌl.fər/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | sulfur |
| Other names |
Sulphur 80% WDG Sulphur 90% WG Sulphur 80% DP Sulphur 90% DP Wettable Sulphur |
| Pronunciation | /baɪ.əˈlɒdʒ.ɪ.kəl ˈsʌl.fə/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 7704-34-9 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3586416 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:26833 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2107729 |
| ChemSpider | 3325687 |
| DrugBank | DB09240 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03c1606c-6bd5-44e8-84e7-1117ae1d9358 |
| EC Number | EC 232-224-9 |
| Gmelin Reference | 563 |
| KEGG | CYS12320 |
| MeSH | D013406 |
| PubChem CID | 24898 |
| RTECS number | WN2700000 |
| UNII | QFD430D2HR |
| UN number | 3077 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID5023827 |
| CAS Number | 7704-34-9 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1460841 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:26833 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2108751 |
| ChemSpider | 36693573 |
| DrugBank | DB01398 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 31b356e7-24f9-4046-9f41-0669db85868a |
| EC Number | EC 232-393-2 |
| Gmelin Reference | Gmelin Reference: "83333 |
| KEGG | map00920 |
| MeSH | D013406 |
| PubChem CID | 23932 |
| RTECS number | WN5600000 |
| UNII | NUA4V03S7Z |
| UN number | UN2929 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID5046976 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | S8 |
| Molar mass | 32.065 g/mol |
| Appearance | Appearance: Light yellow powder |
| Odor | Slight rotten egg odor |
| Density | 0.98 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | -2.054 |
| Acidity (pKa) | > 7.2 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.9 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.000 |
| Viscosity | Medium to high |
| Dipole moment | 0 D |
| Chemical formula | S |
| Molar mass | 32.07 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow crystalline powder |
| Odor | Faint Sulphur Odor |
| Density | 1.35 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 2.13 |
| Acidity (pKa) | ~7.0 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.85 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.600 |
| Viscosity | 800-1200 cps |
| Dipole moment | 1.73 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 87.3 J/(mol·K) |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | 0 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -297.0 kJ/mol |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 87.3 J/(mol·K) |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | 0 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -293 kJ·mol⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | V10AA03 |
| ATC code | V10AX |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause allergic respiratory reaction. |
| GHS labelling | **"GHS07, GHS09"** |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: H315, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | Keep out of reach of children. Avoid contact with eyes, skin and clothing. Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product. Wash hands thoroughly after handling. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 3-0-0-W |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral, rat >2000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 5000 mg/kg (rat) |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL: Not Established |
| REL (Recommended) | 40 kg/ha |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P264, P270, P273, P280, P302+P352, P304+P340, P312, P332+P313, P362+P364 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-0-0 |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 5000 mg/kg |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) for Biological Sulfur: Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 1600 g/ha |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | No IDLH established. |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Thiourea Sodium thiosulfate Sulfur dioxide Hydrogen sulfide |
| Related compounds |
Potassium polysulfide Calcium polysulfide Lime sulfur Ammonium thiosulfate Sodium thiosulfate |