© 2026 Alchemist Worldwide Ltd,
All Right Reserved
Basic copper chloride has a story that stretches back hundreds of years. Early chemists searching for copper-based pigments stumbled onto a greenish solid known as atacamite in natural mineral deposits. Over the past two centuries, advances in mining and chemical engineering made it easier to extract, refine, and manufacture this compound in consistent quality. In the late 1800s, researchers found new ways to process copper ores, isolating this green salt in labs across Europe. Industrial production ramped up after the Second World War, where the demand for specialty copper salts grew in agriculture and industry. Before strict environmental standards shaped production, copper compounds found their way into everything from textiles and fungicides to pigments. Experience, regulation, and better science blended to sharpen the manufacturing process and reduce pollution.
Basic copper chloride, sometimes called copper oxychloride, tends to appear as a green crystalline powder. Today, production often focuses on standardized grades—for use where purity levels really matter. In agriculture, it helps control fungal diseases on fruit trees and vegetables. Several markets look for consistent grain size, minimal heavy metal content, and formulations that blend easily into solutions or wettable powders. Manufacturers put in the work to meet strict technical requirements and fit these needs.
This substance generally takes the form of a green crystalline or powdery material, somewhat hygroscopic, and doesn’t dissolve easily in water. Its chemical formula, Cu2(OH)3Cl, hints at how copper sits at the core with three hydroxide groups and one chloride ion. The molecular weight tips the scales at about 213.6 g/mol. Under the microscope, it shows a crystalline structure, sometimes needle-shaped, depending on the production conditions. It does dissolve in acids and forms deeper green or blue-colored complexes with ammonia or ammonium salts. Heating above 100°C causes it to give off hydrochloric acid gas and break down into other copper oxides. Stability depends on pH and temperature. Given its insolubility, it doesn’t leach copper quickly, which explains some of its popularity in fields and orchards.
On labels, technical sheets usually list the minimum copper content, measured as a percentage of metallic copper—often aiming for 50-58% depending on grade. Producers outline moisture limits, impurity thresholds for elements like lead, arsenic, and cadmium, as well as recommended particle size distributions. Some regions demand clear hazard labeling and proper chemical identification, listing the CAS Number (1332-65-6), proper chemical names, and safety pictograms. Documentation includes instructions for safe storage, handling, and step-by-step guides for mixing or applying the compound, helping users avoid inhalation or skin contact. Crop treatment tables, expiry dates, and batch tracking round out what the customer expects.
Manufacturing basic copper chloride starts with copper raw material—either pure copper, copper oxides, or scrap. Processors dissolve copper in hydrochloric acid to get a copper(II) chloride solution. By careful adjustment of base (typically sodium hydroxide or lime), they encourage basic copper chloride to crystallize, filtering the solid out and washing it to remove excess chloride. Controlling pH and temperature during this stage directly affects purity and crystallinity. Large-scale factories rely on automated reactors, dust filtration, and water treatment systems to manage emissions and waste. Every step, from reacting the raw copper to drying the final product, shapes the outcome and safety profile.
This chemical will undergo plenty of reactions with other substances. Add acid, and it gives off copper(II) chloride, which is soluble. With heat, it loses hydrochloric acid gas and forms copper oxides. Using ammonia solutions results in deep blue tetrammine complexes, useful in analytical chemistry. Engineers sometimes tweak the synthesis conditions—using different bases, changes in temperature, or adding chelating agents—to tailor particle size and dispersibility. Newer research tries doping the structure with other metals, looking for properties that may improve utility in ceramics, electronics, or as precursors for nanomaterials.
Basic copper chloride goes by a host of names. The most common are copper oxychloride and copper(II) chloride trihydroxide. Industrial and trade names vary, especially since different suppliers might market special formulations for spraying or granulated forms for dusting crops. It could be listed as tribasic copper chloride or under old mineral names like atacamite or botallackite when referencing naturally occurring variants. The wide collection of names sometimes leads to confusion, so global exporters usually keep both the technical and trade name on documentation.
Copper compounds have a history of use, but they deserve respect. Direct inhalation of dusts or prolonged skin contact should be avoided because of the risk of irritation, headache, or nausea. Safety standards call for gloves, masks, and eye protection, particularly when mixing powders or preparing spray solutions in high volumes. Packing and shipping require moisture-proof packaging, clear hazard markings, and storing away from food or animal feed. Regulatory bodies like the EPA, REACH in Europe, and China’s chemical authority review and register these chemicals, limiting workplace exposure (typically below 1 mg/m³ of respirable dust for copper). Spill protocols, emergency eyewash, and ventilation all tie into modern operational standards.
Agriculture leads demand for basic copper chloride. Orchardists and vegetable producers rely on its fungicidal strengths to fight blight and mildew. Beyond farming, it finds its way into animal nutrition—trace copper supplementation for poultry and swine, carefully measured to avoid toxicity. Specialty ceramics and pigments harness its greens and blues for glazing. Some battery technologies and catalyst makers leverage the compound’s unique structure, and it occasionally surfaces in laboratory syntheses where specific copper salts are needed. In all these fields, regulatory compliance and clear guidance shape how much and where it can be used to manage both efficacy and safety risks.
In research labs, chemists continue probing this compound for new uses. Several studies in the last decade focus on its performance as a slow-release copper supplier, both for micronutrient delivery to crops and as an animal feed additive. Nanostructured versions have drawn the attention of material scientists aiming to build new catalysts for chemical manufacturing or environmental clean-up. Modern analysis also checks the fate of residual copper in soils, looking at how different forms of copper affect plant and microbial health. The push for lower-impact agriculture gives scientists a reason to refine application methods and investigate blends with other micronutrients or biopesticides.
Toxicologists keep a close eye on copper compounds. Chronic overexposure to basic copper chloride, whether through dust, skin, or swallowing, can upset liver and kidney function, particularly for workers and animals that eat contaminated feed. In plants, copper builds up in soil and risks damaging root systems if applied too heavily. Studies over the last twenty years confirm safe use rests on following label rates and using buffer zones to reduce runoff into streams and lakes. In my own time handling chemical labels and safety data sheets, I found the best way to keep risks low comes down to training, clean handling areas, and prompt clean-up after use. Regulators test each formulation’s impact on bees, fish, and birds before registration, making sure only safe, controlled doses go to market.
Looking ahead, demand for safe, efficient crop protection continues to push product evolution. Researchers in China, the EU, and the US work to design slow-release carriers, coatings that hold the copper in place, and blends that cut down both copper input and environmental footprint. There's also growing interest in how basic copper chloride can serve in next-generation batteries, as the electronics industry seeks alternative compounds. Improved recycling of copper from industrial byproducts could lower the environmental cost of production. For every farm, feed mill, or chemical lab that uses this product, success in the coming years relies on better science, common-sense safety habits, and good data from the field.
Basic copper chloride keeps showing up in farm supply shops and feed mills, and for a solid reason. Copper forms a crucial part of animal diets. Chickens, pigs, and cows all depend on it. Copper shapes blood health, bone growth, and immune protection. Basic copper chloride delivers copper without the dust and caking that plague some older mineral supplements. In my own experience growing up around rural livestock operations, local feed stores often stocked vivid green bags labeled as “copper source.” Most of those bags listed basic copper chloride alongside a carefully balanced list of vitamins and minerals. Farmers noticed healthier coats and better weight gain in animals when they took the time to balance trace minerals like copper. The feedback from small producers always impressed me more than sales brochures could.
Gardeners and field growers have been fighting fungus and bacteria for generations. Basic copper chloride gets mixed into sprays and powders to keep plants safe. Fungi thrive during wet seasons. Mildew sweeps through orchards, vineyards, and backyard tomato patches. With copper chloride, growers can manage common diseases before they scorch entire harvests. I spent many weekends talking with vegetable growers at farmers’ markets. They often cited copper sprays as their “insurance policy” against leaf spots and blight. Larger farms lean on these copper mixes to protect investments, since disease outbreaks can wipe out a whole growing season’s work. Copper-based fungicides shrugged off the stigma that clings to older, more toxic chemicals. With strict government limits on residues, these copper formulas offer a middle ground—keeping harvests clean without putting consumers or pollinators in danger.
Electronics manufacturers use basic copper chloride for more than its green color. Circuit boards rely on copper, and certain steps in their production need copper sources that dissolve evenly and coat surfaces cleanly. Metal finishers have favored basic copper chloride because it does the job without adding unnecessary contaminants. Clean copper layers matter for battery makers, too. Better batteries spark change in everything from laptops to renewable energy. The push for electric vehicles and storage just makes clean copper supplies more vital than ever.
Like most things, too much copper can cause problems. Some places saw copper runoff seep from fields and worry about groundwater. Responsible businesses and regulators set limits on how much copper they allow into local ecosystems. In feed, suppliers stick close to nutritional guidelines drawn by scientists. In plant protection, careful timing and well-placed applications keep copper from building up in the soil. The shift away from older chemical solutions to copper-based treatments came with new research and consumer demand for food safety.
Basic copper chloride isn’t a miracle product. It doesn’t solve every farm, garden, or factory’s needs overnight. Yet in every place I’ve seen it—feed store shelves, family gardens, industrial labs—it’s earned trust because it works, supports animal and plant health, and fits tighter environmental standards. As pressures on food security and cleaner technology keep growing, finding stable, safer minerals like this only gets more urgent. Direct experience in rural and industrial settings keeps showing me how practical chemistry makes a real-world difference, far outside a lab bench or spreadsheet.
Basic copper chloride shows up on a lot of animal feed labels. Farmers and nutritionists use this compound, often called tribasic copper chloride, because it supplies copper—a trace mineral that supports functions from growth to immune defense. Most people know copper pennies or the greenish tint it gives old statues, but animals need copper in small daily doses.
Growing up on a ranch, I learned mineral nutrition often walks a fine line. You feed not enough copper and animals can struggle with rough coats and poor performance. Too much, especially with sensitive species like sheep, brings up toxicity concerns. Basic copper chloride scores points over copper sulfate in stability and bioavailability, according to studies in animal science journals. Its less-reactive structure means it won’t break down in feed mixtures or destroy vitamins as quickly.
Still, just because a source is less harsh doesn’t turn it harmless. Experts say different animals process copper at different rates. Poultry and pigs use basic copper chloride well. Cows handle it just fine if you stick within NRC (National Research Council) guidelines. Sheep can run into trouble because their bodies store copper faster, which leads to a risk of copper accumulation. Reports of toxicity almost always track back to over-supplementation.
Good animal health relies on meeting—not exceeding—daily mineral needs. Heavy metals, even as trace nutrients, can build up over time if there's a mistake with diet formulation. Flocks and herds with regular blood testing avoid surprises. Following manufacturer dosing advice and consulting with vets or feed specialists has helped farms in my community avoid the problems that plagued previous generations.
Plants don’t eat minerals the way animals do, but copper, including in basic copper chloride, features in some fertilizers and sprays. Copper targets fungi in orchards and vineyards, and it’s still used for some crops under very specific conditions. Years of research show copper sticks in soil; it doesn’t wash away easily, especially with repeated application.
Too much copper changes soil life. Experts at land-grant universities point to how overuse can stunt plant growth or harm earthworms. My garden club’s test plots with copper sprays saw healthier leaves during blight outbreaks, but the soil tests afterward showed higher heavy metal counts. Eventually, soil organisms slow down, which can hurt long-term soil health.
It’s important to know copper doesn’t disappear. Responsible farming groups rotate products or limit copper use to keep soil life active. Testing soils every few years lets you spot problems early. Making smarter use of micronutrients means healthier crops without long-haul issues for fields or water runoff.
Any mineral additive in feed or on fields brings its own set of instructions. Accurate mixing with digital scales, batch record keeping, and regular feed analysis give livestock producers the controls they need. Plant producers lean on integrated pest management—mixing cultural controls with fertilizers and only reaching for copper as a safety net, not a crutch.
Transparency helps, too. Farm supply companies share lot numbers and analysis certificates now. Tracking exactly what’s going into feed and soil keeps animals, fields, and communities safer. My experience backs up what the science says: basic copper chloride works well in the right context, but regular checks and mindful use keep risks where they belong—small and manageable.
Basic copper chloride finds its way into feed mills, chemical labs, and manufacturing plants. It supports animal nutrition, copper plating, and a few industrial reactions. Handling it doesn’t have to create drama, but every person who walks past a bag or barrel of this stuff deserves some straight facts about keeping it—and themselves—safe.
Most powders and granules take on moisture. Basic copper chloride pulls water from air like sugar tossed on a humid porch. Lumpy, caked-up chemical refuses to flow through augers or feeders. Worse yet, moisture can spark unwanted chemical reactions, changing the copper content and forming byproducts no one wants in an animal's diet or a chemical batch. Metal bins and silos draw sweat if humidity swings up. You want containers that shut tight. My old boss stored copper compounds in a corner far from the mill’s loading door, after a winter’s worth of condensation turned a pallet into a crusty disaster.
Oxygen works quietly but steadily. Exposed piles and open sacks allow oxygen to nibble at the chloride, shifting color, lowering copper content, and complicating quality control tests. Each change chips away at shelf life and reliability, making proper closure of every drum and bag as much a habit as locking the front door.
Extreme heat bakes extra danger into basic copper chloride. Hot environments let chloride break down faster. Cold stops nothing—high humidity and temperature swings create condensation inside the package. Warehouses that hover around standard room temperature let this chemical last longer. That "just stick it in any corner" attitude causes more problems than any press release will ever admit, especially in storerooms doubling as loading docks.
Basic copper chloride doesn’t explode or burn easily, but it bothers skin, eyes, and especially lungs. Dust from dumping bags into mixers or weighing out portions carries copper, which can spark irritation, headaches, nausea, or even more serious illnesses with enough exposure. I’ve seen coworkers cough or itch after sloppy cleanup or during a quick, careless bag change. Glove up, use masks or at least a dust respirator, and keep eyewash stations serviced—neglecting this doesn’t pay off.
Cupric compounds harm fish and aquatic plants, so storm drains and dump sites aren’t places for leaks or spills. Even tiny amounts add up, so spill cleanup means collecting—never hosing down floors. Training matters as much as posted signs. In my mill days, we’d practice spill drills and double-bag containers leaving the building for disposal. Never hurts to keep spill kits handy, even outside the official ‘chemical storage’ rooms.
Contract with reputable suppliers and trace every shipment. Rotate stock. Post clear handling rules. Never pretend dust isn’t a problem. Stores that invest in decent ventilation and humidity control pay less for spoiled product and lost time. Give workers training, gloves, and enough time to do careful unloading and clean-up. Making these habits routine beats out any pamphlet or inspection checklist, and over time, that’s where real safety starts.
Basic copper chloride stands out as more than just a laboratory curiosity—it carries real significance off the shelf and in the field. Every time I hear its name, I picture its deep green hue, reminiscent of oxidized copper roofs, not only a chemical but a reminder of reactions happening all around us. Its chemical formula, Cu2(OH)3Cl, tells a clear story. It’s made up of two copper atoms, three hydroxide groups, and one chloride atom. This composition gives the compound its defining properties—part copper salt, part base, part halide. The combination makes it useful in many places, from plant protection to pigments in art and industry.
Copper forms the core of this compound, providing a reliable metal that biology and technology both prize. In agriculture, copper compounds trace their reputation back to vineyards and orchards, keeping fungi at bay. It turns out that basic copper chloride’s mix of copper and chloride helps it resist quick wash-off from rains, granting longer protection on leaves. The chlorine isn’t just a tagalong; it stabilizes the structure, making the compound more resilient than copper hydroxide alone.
Alongside those atoms, the hydroxide groups draw moisture and interact with other ions in unique ways. Their presence helps basic copper chloride dissolve slower in water than pure copper chloride, allowing more controlled release. That slow release matters—minimizing copper buildup in soil while still delivering results where needed. I remember reading field studies where soil health stayed stable with moderate use, showing it isn’t just the elements present, but also how they’re combined that matters for environmental outcomes.
Beyond agriculture, artists have used basic copper chloride’s natural green shade since ancient times. Renaissance painters and craftsmen leaned on mineral-based greens, including this compound, to give their works lasting color. In modern times, you’ll see it in ceramics and wood preservatives. Its stability means it lingers, fighting off decomposition and bringing peace of mind to those looking for longevity in their products.
In the lab, its unique crystalline structure makes it a teaching tool for chemistry students learning about double salts and basic salts. It can demonstrate hydrolysis, precipitation, and the balance between acid and base—a tangible way to learn about chemical reactions, not just abstract theory. It’s hands-on experience that sticks with you beyond the textbook.
Copper has its drawbacks. Too much in the environment harms aquatic life and disrupts healthy bacterial communities in the soil. As an avid gardener, I’ve seen the impact firsthand—using too much copper-based fungicide can tip the balance, creating issues down the line. This brings up the need for responsible application and strong regulations. It’s always a push and pull between stopping plant disease and protecting broader ecosystems.
There’s been real progress thanks to research—scientists keep refining formulas, so less product delivers the same punch. Manufacturers invest in education, helping farmers and gardeners measure carefully, not just dumping whatever’s at hand. Testing soil and runoff regularly also helps communities stay on track, preventing gradual copper buildup that nobody sees until crops suffer or streams turn sickly.
Solutions will keep evolving as environmental needs shift. Alternatives pop up—crop rotation, resistant crop strains, and biological controls hold promise. Even with these changes, understanding the chemistry of basic copper chloride gives a lens into both risks and advances. Respecting what’s under the microscope makes it easier to craft smart, sustainable practices, rooted in decades of discovery and experience.
Copper counts as one of those nutrients crops can’t do without. Plants need it for healthy growth and resistance to disease. Many soils don’t offer enough copper, especially after seasons of high-yield cropping or in sandy soils that lose nutrients quickly. Basic Copper Chloride brings copper to the table in a form plants can use, often showing results in greening up leaves and keeping fungal issues in check. Farmers I’ve spoken with, especially those growing fruits or cash crops, have told me that using the right copper product sometimes draws the line between loss or healthy harvest.
Tossing copper into the field isn’t the same as getting value from it. Basic Copper Chloride finds where it belongs—foliar sprays and soil treatments stick out as the two leading practices. Many farmers pick foliar application when they see disease pressure building, such as blight or mildew. Spraying lets the plant absorb copper through the leaves, making a direct hit on emerging problems. Some disease outbreaks, like bacterial leaf spot in vegetables, respond better to copper sprayed at the right time than to waiting for symptoms to worsen.
For long-term improvement, growers sometimes mix copper into the soil, especially if tests show a chronic shortage. Granular or powdered forms may go down before planting or during cultivation. Getting the dose right matters here—a little goes a long way. Excess copper lingers and can stress out beneficial microbes or even harm the next round of crops.
Soil testing saves both money and crop health. I’ve seen fields with beautiful, dark soil that looked full of promise but lab results told a different story—copper levels scraping the bottom. Applying Basic Copper Chloride starts after these tests, not before. The numbers point to the right dosage, tailored for what’s lacking. Over-application rarely leads to good stories. It’s easy to assume more equals better, yet copper in excess can influence soil biology and tie up other nutrients.
Applying copper during critical growth stages—right before rapid leaf or fruit development—usually brings the most benefit. That’s the time when deficiencies show up in pale shoots or weak fruit set. Weather counts as well. Rainstorms can wash treatments away or dilute their effect. Dry, calm mornings get the best uptake from foliar sprays and lessen drift risk for neighbors or non-target plants.
Copper, like any farm input, needs respect. Runoff spells trouble for waterways and wildlife. Farm advisors I work with always push for buffer zones near streams, especially in hilly or erosion-prone spots. Calibration of equipment makes sure each row gets covered evenly, not splashed or skipped. Regularly cleaning sprayers, watching out for clogged nozzles, and never blending copper with fertilizers that trigger clumping—all of these steps save headaches and future repair bills.
Rotating copper-based treatments with other management options keeps pests from building up resistance. Over time, just like with herbicides or fungicides, the same approach loses punch. Mixing up chemicals, using resistant crop varieties, and healthy crop rotation cut down disease risk and lower the need for heavy copper use in the first place.
Farmers today balance yields with stewardship. Basic Copper Chloride earns its spot by solving real-world field problems, but smart use means thinking of the next season and the next generation. Precision, planning, and checking what the soil really needs—these habits grow healthier plants and keep the toolbox full for the years ahead.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | dichlorocopper;hydroxyl |
| Other names |
Cuprous chloride Copper(I) chloride Copper monochloride Copper(I) monochloride Dicopper chloride Cuprous muriate |
| Pronunciation | /ˈbeɪ.sɪk ˈkɒp.ər ˈklɔː.raɪd/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Dichlorocopper;hydroxido铜 |
| Other names |
Copper(I) chloride Cuprous chloride Cupric chloride Copper monochloride |
| Pronunciation | /ˈbeɪsɪk ˈkɒpər ˈklɔːraɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 12069-69-1 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3586942 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53328 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201566 |
| ChemSpider | 14248 |
| DrugBank | DB14547 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03a188b1-c5c4-4f95-b52a-9a62a61f2c75 |
| EC Number | 215-609-9 |
| Gmelin Reference | Gmelin Reference: **7789** |
| KEGG | C18650 |
| MeSH | D002994 |
| PubChem CID | 24507 |
| RTECS number | GL8600000 |
| UNII | G89E7416C2 |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| CAS Number | 12069-69-1 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `"CuCl2"` |
| Beilstein Reference | 3918832 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53333 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201640 |
| ChemSpider | 19938938 |
| DrugBank | DB14592 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 100.028.830 |
| EC Number | 215-724-4 |
| Gmelin Reference | Gmelin Reference: **83344** |
| KEGG | C18457 |
| MeSH | D014829 |
| PubChem CID | 24657 |
| RTECS number | GB6475000 |
| UNII | J08U38V671 |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | CompTox Dashboard (EPA) of product 'Basic Copper Chloride' is: **DTXSID5024237** |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | Cu₂(OH)₃Cl |
| Molar mass | 213.0 g/mol |
| Appearance | Green crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | DENSITY: 3.386 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | -2.44 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 10.3 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.55 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | +54.0·10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.98 |
| Dipole moment | 1.94 D |
| Chemical formula | Cu₂(OH)₃Cl |
| Molar mass | 213.56 g/mol |
| Appearance | Light green crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 4.14 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | -1.94 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 8.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.55 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | +86.0·10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.98 |
| Dipole moment | 1.94 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 157.6 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -661.1 kJ/mol |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 137.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -362.42 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | QA06BC53 |
| ATC code | QA06AG04 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed, causes serious eye irritation, may cause respiratory irritation, toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302: Harmful if swallowed. |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P273, P301+P312, P330, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-1-1 |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat: 584 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 1,000 mg/kg (oral, rat) |
| NIOSH | GBK |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) of Basic Copper Chloride: "1 mg/m³ (as Copper dusts and mists) |
| REL (Recommended) | 150 mg/kg |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed, causes skin and eye irritation, may cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Pictograms | GHS07,GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302: Harmful if swallowed. H315: Causes skin irritation. H319: Causes serious eye irritation. H335: May cause respiratory irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P273, P280, P301+P312, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P330, P501 |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD₅₀ Oral Rat: 1,359 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Oral-rat LD50: 1380 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | MB6025000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL (Permissible Exposure Limit) for Basic Copper Chloride: 1 mg/m³ (as Copper, dusts and mists). |
| REL (Recommended) | 30-150 mg/kg |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Copper(II) chloride Copper(I) chloride Copper oxychloride Copper(II) sulfate |
| Related compounds |
Cupric chloride Copper(I) chloride Copper(II) oxide Copper(II) sulfate |
