Bacillus subtilis belongs to the classics of microbiology. In the nineteenth century, researchers digging through hay infusions found robust, rod-shaped spores that thrived without much fuss. They didn’t realize at the time that these microbes could survive harsh conditions—heat, drought, even exposure to chemicals—by forming tough, dormant spores. Over the decades, scientists started using Bacillus subtilis to understand life at the cellular level. It served as a workhorse for uncovering the inner workings of gene regulation and protein production. During the twentieth century, industry caught on, exploring its potential for enzyme production and biological agriculture supplements. People have come to recognize Bacillus subtilis not just as lab furniture, but as a reliable partner for modern biotech.
Manufacturers usually sell Bacillus subtilis as a freeze-dried powder, liquid suspension, or granule. This isn’t a single-product market; sources might offer concentrated spores for agricultural use, or blends tailored for animal feed, waste treatment, or human health supplements. The value comes from living spores that “wake up” in the right conditions. Companies work hard to protect the purity of spores from contaminants, and choices about how to deliver Bacillus subtilis make a difference in shelf life and ease of mixing. Users, whether they are farmers, feed producers, or supplement makers, look for guaranteed spore counts and clear, verifiable ingredients.
Spores of Bacillus subtilis look like hard, oval beads under a microscope. Dry Bacillus subtilis powders carry a dusty tan color, with slight earthy smell. In liquid form, suspensions appear cloudy white to beige and settle if left standing. These spores don’t dissolve in water, but they disperse easily with stirring. Heat up to 80°C doesn’t bother them; only strong sterilizers kill them off. Chemically, Bacillus subtilis spores feature a thick, protein-rich coat that resists ordinary cleaning agents. The vegetative cells thrive in neutral pH, breaking sugars and proteins into smaller metabolites. Surfactants and mild oxidizers gradually break down the spore coat, but the bacteria survive most food and feed processing steps.
Buyers find clear technical specs crucial. Labels should tell you the minimum count of viable spores per gram or milliliter—typical numbers run from one to ten billion CFUs. Labels specify moisture content, carrier material, and possible allergens. Most regulatory bodies require documentation for purity, absence of pathogens, and genetic stability, usually referencing ISO or local GMP standards. Expiry dates draw from stability studies at room temperature and humidity. Packaging includes tamper-proof seals, lot numbers, and contact details for producer or importer. In regulated markets—especially for animal feed or probiotics—documents track every batch for traceability and safety audits.
Commercial Bacillus subtilis starts with a seed culture grown from a master cell line tested for purity. Manufacturers use large fermenters filled with nutrient broth—usually a mix of sugars, extracts, and salts—to grow billions of cells. Operators monitor temperature, oxygen, and acidity closely so the bacteria switch into spore-forming mode. Once sporulation is complete, they harvest the thick cell paste, wash out fermentation byproducts, and spray-dry or freeze-dry the spores to produce a free-flowing powder. For liquids, spores are suspended in saline or glycerol-based buffers before bottling. Each run requires sterility, batch tracking, and routine tests for contamination. Final products pass through sieving, blending, and quality checks before packaging.
Bacillus subtilis shows strong enzymatic activity. In nature and in products, these bacteria break down proteins, starches, and fats using secreted enzymes. Its enzymes—proteases, amylases, lipases—perform work for food processing, laundry detergents, and waste remediation. Some industries add chemical cofactors to boost biocatalysis, or combine Bacillus subtilis with other microbes for broader substrate coverage. Genetic engineering can tweak metabolic traits, for example, to build strains for vitamin B12 production or improved protease yields. In animal-feed blends, synergistic microbes and prebiotics get blended with the base spores. Chemical reactions involving Bacillus subtilis usually involve breaking up macromolecules from natural substrates, not harsh solvents or exotic reagents.
People use plenty of names for Bacillus subtilis depending on market or science. Synonyms in older literature include hay bacillus or grass bacillus. Some producers call it by specific strain numbers like B. subtilis DSM 29784 in technical documents. Trade names shift with purpose: agricultural brands sell “Probiotics X” or “SoilGuard”; feed supplement brands might use “GutBoost” or “SubtilBio”. Research suppliers list it under ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) codes. Users in pharmaceuticals or food sometimes call out “Bacillus probiotics” or name specific enzyme blends to distinguish their products in a crowded field.
Bacillus subtilis enjoys a long-standing reputation as safe, both for people and the environment. Regulatory bodies such as the US FDA and EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) recognize the species as “Generally Recognized As Safe” for food, feed, and supplement use. Still, standards insist on rigorous testing for contamination by pathogens like Salmonella or Staphylococcus. Manufacturing flows use strict GMP protocols, documented sanitation routines, and periodic environmental monitoring to keep unwanted microbes out. Workers who handle powder or concentrated forms take care to avoid inhaling dust and to use gloves to limit skin exposure. Storage guidelines recommend keeping spores cool and dry, away from sunlight or oxidizing agents. Any operations near food production meet HACCP or similar safety standards, with full records in place for audits.
Industries lean heavily on Bacillus subtilis’s versatility. Farmers use it for biocontrol—fighting root rot and soilborne diseases in vegetables and grains. In animal feed, Bacillus subtilis supports healthy gut flora in poultry, swine, and cattle, crowding out harmful bacteria and boosting digestion. Food processors count on Bacillus subtilis enzymes for fermentation—natto, a Japanese soybean food, owes its texture and flavor to this microbe. Wastewater plants value its ability to break down organic matter and reduce sludge. In research, it helps uncover the workings of DNA, stress responses, and metabolic engineering. Even detergent producers harness enzymes from Bacillus subtilis to clean stains at low temperatures. The reach extends to human probiotics, food preservation, aquaculture, and beyond.
Research labs continue to unlock new value from Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnologists explore gene editing for higher yields of vital compounds—vitamins, amino acids, biodegradable plastics. New fermentation approaches squeeze better growth from cheaper agricultural byproducts, adding sustainability to large-scale production. Metabolic engineers push Bacillus subtilis to make novel bio-surfactants that replace petroleum-based chemicals. Clinical trials for probiotic supplements expand as more evidence arrives about the impact of microbiome balance on disease and nutrition. R&D groups join forces with computational biologists to map protein structures and regulatory networks using AI-assisted modeling. Even space agencies look at Bacillus subtilis as a candidate for closed-loop life support systems. This microbial workhorse keeps drawing attention as scientific tools get stronger and problems get tougher.
Skeptical inquiry never hurts, no matter how safe a species seems. Decades of animal studies have investigated high-dose Bacillus subtilis spores in feed and water. Results show that healthy animals tolerate very high spore loads without changes in weight, organ health, or blood values. Human clinical trials for food and supplement use have checked single and repeated intake, reporting rare, mild side effects (primarily bloating in unusually sensitive users). Environmental research backs up the case for safety, as spores introduced in soil or water don’t outcompete native species or cause harmful shifts in ecosystem dynamics. Occasional reports flag rare allergic reactions from occupational exposure, pushing employers to set basic handling precautions in production and research settings. Long-term monitoring helps regulators set science-based limits for spore levels in food, feed, and the environment.
Interest in Bacillus subtilis keeps growing along with global needs for sustainable food production, resilient agriculture, and cleaner industry. As pressure mounts to reduce chemical inputs, living bioproducts stand out for solving challenges that synthetic formulas can’t touch. Researchers now piece together designer strains that boost crop yields, fight crop pests, and chase down waste streams. Demand rises for greener cleaning products where enzymes from Bacillus subtilis handle laundry at lower energy costs. Feed and food sectors seek new blends that offer better nutrition, safety, and shelf life. These innovations do require tough oversight and honest communication with end users, so that new products don’t slip past the safety checks earned over a century of careful work. From my perspective, the best progress comes when industry and science keep customers in the loop and stay open to scrutiny.
Ask any farmer, breeder, or plant scientist who’s dealt with soil fatigue or stubborn diseases—they’ll tell you, it’s tough to bring tired land back to life or fight off invisible threats. Here’s where Bacillus subtilis plays a game-changing role. This single-celled bacterium, which thrives in soil and roots, keeps pulling attention with its broad real-world benefits in agriculture, animal health, and even certain foods.
Planting season brings equal parts hope and anxiety. I’ve witnessed firsthand how soil affected by too many years of one crop falls flat: stunted roots, slow shoots, and bumper-damage from pathogens. Bacillus subtilis tackles that. It crowds out plant diseases such as Fusarium and Rhizoctonia, forming a kind of forcefield around developing roots. I’ve seen bigger strawberries and thicker lettuce leaves after switching to treatments based on this microbe. It’s not about fancy tech—it’s about letting plants hold their ground and reach for more nutrients and water.
And it’s not snake oil; data stacks up behind this. Trials run in India, Europe, and the U.S. point to improved yields and root mass. The National Institute of Agricultural Botany in the UK outlined how using Bacillus subtilis nearly cut one farm’s root rot losses in half. These results convince people who’ve staked their livelihoods on their fields, not just boardroom researchers.
Livestock health didn’t used to get so much attention, but overused antibiotics brought trouble, from drug-resistant bugs to stricter import rules. Bacillus subtilis gives another option—one that works inside the animal’s gut, much like yogurt helps people. Farmers add the bacterium to feed. The bugs head straight for the intestines, where they outcompete harmful bacteria, help break down fiber, and sometimes even boost immune systems.
Having seen shifts on a dairy farm outside Cleveland, the change stood out. Calves with Bacillus subtilis in their feed grew more steadily, and there were fewer cases of diarrhea. My neighbor was no lab scientist, but after a year he said the difference stuck. Reliable research backs this up; studies from Wageningen University in the Netherlands and China Agricultural University both report higher daily weight gains, especially in piglets and poultry, with less need for antibiotics. Farmers aren’t switching from tradition for the sake of novelty; they want results they can see—and this microbe delivers.
Consumers and regulators want farming and food production to be safer. Bacillus subtilis ticks boxes that stricter safety rules demand. The American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies it as “Generally Recognized As Safe,” and the European Food Safety Authority lists it as qualified for its low risk—far from some chemical residue horror story. In soil, it breaks down quickly, so it doesn’t stick around or pollute. This helps everybody who wants food that’s healthy and grown sustainably.
Looking at the big picture, Bacillus subtilis offers tools for healthier soils, stronger crops, and better livestock. There’s room for careful use, responsible marketing, and ongoing follow-up by both farmers and researchers. Solutions won’t come from hype or shortcuts but from listening to those who know the land best and building on their experience, one harvest and one product at a time.
Bacillus subtilis has grown familiar to many who work in agriculture, food, and nutrition. It’s a rod-shaped bacterium that shows up in soil, vegetables, and even the human gut. People have used it to make fermented foods for centuries—Natto eaters in Japan might not even realize their breakfast owes its stickiness to this little germ. For years, researchers have explored it as a probiotic and as an alternative to antibiotics in animal feeds. Those uses have people asking whether it poses a risk to either humans or animals.
Look at fermentation and you see Bacillus subtilis is nothing new in food production. Traditional foods don’t bring stories of foodborne illness outbreaks tied to this bacterium when handled properly. The European Food Safety Authority lists it among strains with their “Qualified Presumption of Safety” status. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration recognizes certain Bacillus subtilis strains as Generally Recognized as Safe for use in food and supplements.
I’ve worked with a neighbor who grows soybeans for Natto. Her family has been using the same starter culture for generations. Never heard them complain of gut trouble linked to what they grow or eat. Most commercially prepared supplements rely on strains proven to be non-pathogenic and tested for toxin production before turning them loose in the market. Companies producing animal feed additives based on Bacillus subtilis go through regulatory hoops: batches must clear tests for antibiotic resistance, enterotoxin production, and contamination.
No living organism is perfectly risk-free for every situation. Some people have weaker immune systems. In rare medical cases, a Bacillus subtilis infection might pop up, mostly in hospital settings where immune defenses already run low. These incidents stay rare. Healthy adults eating or handling foods containing approved strains face almost no threat after normal washing and cooking.
For animals, the focus is mostly on livestock. Studies in pigs, poultry, and cattle show Bacillus subtilis often helps balance gut flora, cut down on harmful bacteria, and support better nutrient absorption. My cousin’s poultry farm switched from antibiotics to a Bacillus subtilis probiotic to stay ahead of drug resistance worries. Bird growth and feed conversion improved, and he stopped worrying about banned drugs showing up in his feed.
Still, safety checks can’t stop. Not every strain shares the same genes. Some strains could carry resistance genes or rare toxins. Screening and batch testing matter—to keep manufacturers honest and feed or supplement users safe. Scientists and regulators check every new strain for safety before recommending it for humans and animals.
Talk with any veterinarian or nutritionist serious about animal care, and you’ll hear the same advice: know your supplier and trace your strains. Ask for proof that what you’re buying has cleared regulatory hurdles. Citizens and farmers should keep up with current science and changing rules. If a supplement or new food ingredient comes on the market, it pays to read up and ask experts questions.
Living on a small farm myself, sharing close quarters with both animals and garden soil, I trust Bacillus subtilis for composting and occasionally in the chicken coop. I keep records of brands and batches, talk with feed suppliers, and watch for changes in animal appetite or behavior. It's all about paying attention and putting science to work in daily routines. That’s what builds trust in safe bacteria for humans and animals alike.
Storing bacteria like Bacillus Subtilis doesn't sound glamorous, but sloppy handling can wreck a whole batch and flush money down the drain. It's a living organism, not just some chemical powder tossed in a bucket. So the trick comes down to shielding those little cells from anything that stresses them out.
Like many bacteria, Bacillus Subtilis doesn't appreciate heat, humidity, or sunlight. A warm and moist environment encourages growth— unfortunately, that growth usually invites the wrong strains or triggers early degradation. In practical terms, a sealed container in a cool, dry area gives the best shot at keeping bacteria lively. Some folks invest in temperature-controlled rooms for larger operations, but for smaller labs or farms, a plain shelf away from windows does the trick, as long as the room doesn't get steamy or hot.
From my own experience, there’s no shortcut or “good enough” trick. Toss a bucket too close to a heater or in a greenhouse, and you'll find powder caked, maybe with odd spots of growth. The bacteria lose punch fast, so the yield drops. These mistakes usually show up a few weeks later when results take a dip and a batch gets sent out for micro count testing.
Packing and repacking calls for clean hands and clean tools. Open containers quickly— don’t let the air hang around. One time, a careless scoop left a whole lot of condensation in the bucket by the next day, and that put most of the batch out of commission. Moisture triggers the spores, and once they wake up, shelf life falls apart.
A habit I picked up from industry techs: mark open dates, seal containers well, and keep things tidy. A scoop, a glove, a wipe down— it takes less than a minute, and the difference shows up in fewer returns and complaints.
Living products keep a window for use. There’s always a temptation to stretch the expiry date, especially if the supply runs low or prices spike. Resisting that urge means fewer problems down the line. Distributors and users need to talk straight about batch age. Stale stock puts entire projects at risk. Most suppliers print a batch date and shelf span— usually six months to a year for dry material— so always check before buying, not just when opening.
A lot of issues start at the labeling. Too many times I've seen containers with faded text, missing temperature info, or barely legible batch numbers. This confuses everyone along the line, especially if the storage changes hands a few times before usage. Invest a few extra minutes labeling and double-checking storage info. It pays back later in peace of mind.
Losing track of storage routines hits both wallets and reputations. Farmers, manufacturers, and research folks all rely on good quality culture. Consistency depends as much on basic care as fancy packaging or expensive testing. Anyone working with Bacillus Subtilis gets better results by focusing on old-fashioned diligence— keep things dry, cool, sealed, and clean. Storage isn’t just an afterthought. It’s the difference between success and a lot of wasted effort.
Bacillus subtilis remains one of those probiotics you see on supplement shelves and in animal feed around the world. For the longest time, people overlooked its value in digestive support and immune function. As researchers studied it, the importance of correct dosing came into sharper focus. It’s never just about tossing some bacteria into a mix and hoping for the best. With living microbes like this, getting the dose right makes all the difference between helping your gut and wasting your money.
Gut health, immunity, even nutrient absorption—these are linked to our microbiome. Studies show B. subtilis can support all of these, but only at certain levels. Too little, and there’s no real benefit. Too much, and you haven’t really gained anything extra, but you might hit digestion problems. There’s no magic number printed on every product, since doses often depend on if you’re using it for humans, pets, livestock, or special applications like aquaculture.
Most probiotic supplements meant for adults sit somewhere around 1 billion to 10 billion CFU (colony-forming units) per daily dose. Some products combine this species with other probiotics and push the count higher. For reference, a clinical trial published in 2021 using B. subtilis in irritable bowel syndrome relied on daily doses of about 2-5 billion CFU. That lined up with improvements in symptoms, so researchers and doctors now often suggest this as an effective window.
Livestock farmers turn to B. subtilis as an alternative to antibiotics and as a growth promoter. Cows, chickens, and pigs each need different amounts, and these numbers tend to be way higher than what you’d see for humans. A broiler chicken feed might contain 1x106 to 1x108 CFU per gram of feed. The European Food Safety Authority reviews these feed additives and lays out guidelines to keep animals safe. My own experience with poultry farms reinforced how attentive feed formulators must stay—underdosing brings no improvement in gut health, but excessive supplementation equals money down the drain.
Pets are a middle ground. Doses range from thousands to millions of CFU per day, depending on size and health needs. Veterinary advice always helps, since each pet’s gut and immune system behaves in its own way. Some retailers push high numbers to grab attention, but the published research has yet to prove much benefit from megadoses.
Bacillus subtilis boasts a long record of safety in food and supplement use. The World Health Organization and several regulatory authorities place it on the list of safe bacteria. But people with suppressed immune systems, or anyone recovering from serious illness, should check in with a doctor. Rare infections from spore-forming bacteria can happen, even if the odds are low. As for the healthy population, consistent dosing often beats wild swings and sporadic use. The body likes routine, and the gut microbiome rewards regular support.
Everyone wants a simple “one size fits all” answer, but context rules. Age, health, reason for using the probiotic, and even local regulations shape what makes sense on dosing. The best bet: check product labels for detailed CFU counts based on reputable clinical research, look for third-party testing, and use advice from qualified dietitians or veterinarians where possible. As long as you keep those checks in place, Bacillus subtilis can have a clear role in supporting daily health or animal performance.
Growing up, digestive issues made dinner an adventure. I remember pouring kefir on cereal, popping yogurt tabs, anything the local health shop stocked. Over time, curiosity grew into research. Bacillus subtilis showed up in textbooks, recognized for its tough spore form and reputation of supporting the gut. Today, people wonder if this “friendly” microbe can mix with other probiotic strains or medicines for more benefits.
Bacillus subtilis thrives in harsh parts of the digestive tract and doesn’t quit at the first challenge. On its own, this bacterium produces enzymes and fights unwanted microbes. Studies point to its ability to support the gut barrier and nudge the immune system. But life in the gut rarely works solo. Researchers ask if pairing B. subtilis with Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, or other well-studied strains brings more stability or faster recovery after antibiotics.
The evidence supports teaming up. A 2022 trial looked at people taking B. subtilis with Lactobacillus acidophilus. They returned to normal digestion faster after antibiotics than those using just one strain. A different study from 2021 found combinations keep inflammation markers low in the gut lining. In the U.S., combination probiotics with B. subtilis already appear on pharmacy shelves, marketed for irritable bowel symptoms or for children recovering from rotavirus.
Mixing probiotics with prescription medications sometimes triggers concern. Some fear “good bugs” could make certain medicines less effective or complicate immune situations. Decades in hospitals taught me to respect these concerns. Yet, common antibiotics wipe out friendly flora, making room for gut trouble. Here, doctors started using B. subtilis blends, especially with immune-suppressed or elderly patients, showing fewer side effects and stronger recoveries in small studies.
Cancer patients facing harsh chemotherapy often struggle with nausea and diarrhea. Trials suggest B. subtilis helps them hold onto more normal gut function, especially when paired with other probiotics like Saccharomyces boulardii. Still, doctors crowdsource safety data across large, real-world populations. Not every person responds the same way, so monitoring remains key.
Nature rarely sends just one champion to fix a messy problem. Cottage gardens flourish through diversity, not monoculture. The gut, much like that garden, does best with a resilient mix of microbes. Bacillus subtilis never tries to outcompete everyone else. It works by setting the stage for other probiotics. These teams crowd out bad bacteria, maintain the right acidity, and help break down nutrients we’d otherwise miss.
Tailoring the right blend can take some trial and error. Doctors and dietitians keep track of the bacterial strains that match specific patients. Not everyone with constipation, diarrhea, or food intolerances needs the same fix. Real progress happens when science teams up with everyday observation—tracking meals, symptoms, and responses over time.
Mixing Bacillus subtilis with other probiotics or treatments brings promise, not a shortcut. Smart choices lean on studies, tradition, and paying attention to how our bodies respond. Companies investing in research partnerships with universities have started publishing strain-specific results, making it easier for consumers to avoid one-size-fits-all solutions. No pill or powder replaces balanced meals, hydration, and sleep—but adding “good bugs” may help bridge health gaps, especially for those recovering from illness or modern diets lacking natural variety.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Bacillus subtilis |
| Other names |
Hay bacillus Grass bacillus |
| Pronunciation | / bəˈsɪl.əs səbˈtɪl.ɪs / |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Bacillus subtilis |
| Other names |
Hay bacillus Grass bacillus |
| Pronunciation | /bəˈsɪl.əs səbˈtɪl.ɪs/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 68038-70-0 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3579532 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:63514 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL504 |
| ChemSpider | 86511 |
| DrugBank | DB15875 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 100.000.013 |
| EC Number | 4.1.1.11 |
| Gmelin Reference | 84943 |
| KEGG | bsu |
| MeSH | D001447 |
| PubChem CID | 6857381 |
| RTECS number | QT4275000 |
| UNII | RUJ6805E9Z |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID8021057 |
| CAS Number | 68038-70-0 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3593836 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:1446 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL504 |
| ChemSpider | 86510 |
| DrugBank | DB15873 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03b229e3-0e00-45db-8aea-cfbc998525a3 |
| EC Number | 3.4.21.62 |
| Gmelin Reference | 82652 |
| KEGG | bsu |
| MeSH | D001470 |
| PubChem CID | 6854364 |
| RTECS number | QT3330000 |
| UNII | WVE3SWJ8KP |
| UN number | UN3077 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID8035106 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C15H23N5O10 |
| Molar mass | NA |
| Appearance | Light yellow to brownish yellow powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.50 g/ml |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 6.30 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 6.8 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 4.5 - 5.5 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Negligible |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.335 |
| Dipole moment | 0 D |
| Chemical formula | C15H23N5O10 |
| Molar mass | 4.10 x 10^12 g/mol |
| Appearance | Light yellow, slightly turbid powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.50 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | 3.49 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 6.8 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.2 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic (-10^-5 to -10^-6) |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.333 |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | Bacillus Subtilis: 41.7 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 228.0 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | QA07AX89 |
| ATC code | QA07AX92 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | No signal word |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements |
| Precautionary statements | Keep out of reach of children. Avoid contact with eyes, skin and clothing. Do not inhale dust or spray mist. Wash hands thoroughly after handling. Do not eat, drink or smoke during use. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 0-0-0-SA |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 5,000 mg/kg |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL: Not Established |
| REL (Recommended) | 3 × 10^8 CFU/g |
| Main hazards | May cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, Exclamation mark, Warning, May cause respiratory irritation (H335), Avoid breathing dust/fume/gas/mist/vapours/spray (P261) |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statement. |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: "Keep out of reach of children. Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Wear protective gloves and eye protection. Do not eat, drink, or smoke when using this product. Wash hands thoroughly after handling. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD₅₀ (oral, rat): > 5,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (oral, rat) > 5,000 mg/kg |
| PEL (Permissible) | 5 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 100,000 CFU/g |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bacillus licheniformis Bacillus pumilus Bacillus cereus Bacillus megaterium Bacillus thuringiensis |
| Related compounds |
Bacillus atrophaeus Bacillus licheniformis Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Bacillus pumilus Bacillus cereus |