Allulose has a story that stretches back a century. Discovered in the 1940s, researchers first identified this rare sugar in wheat, recognizing it as a low-calorie monosaccharide. Still, scientists viewed it more as a laboratory novelty for years. Only in the past two decades did interest catch fire, especially after metabolic studies highlighted how it passes through the body with only minimal absorption. The global push for healthier diets gave allulose a new spotlight, as consumers began searching for sugar alternatives that taste sweet without the baggage of extra calories or blood sugar spikes. The shift from obscurity to food product shelves has been quick, fueled by food tech advances and regulatory changes in countries like the USA and Japan.
Allulose walks the line between specialty sugar and mainstream sweetener. It looks and tastes much like ordinary table sugar, but there’s a big catch: it delivers about 0.2 calories per gram, a fraction of sucrose’s energy load. This makes it suited for more than specialty diets or diabetic-friendly treats. Beverage companies, bakeries, and snack manufacturers use allulose to create products that feel indulgent, even when they fit low-sugar or low-carb demands. At home, bakers use it to achieve tender cookies or frostings, thanks to its ability to brown and caramelize. Ice cream makers appreciate its freezing point depression, which keeps desserts scoopable. It behaves in recipes like sucrose, often substituting cup for cup, which keeps kitchen math simple.
Allulose belongs to the monosaccharide family, specifically known as D-psicose. Its chemical formula matches that of fructose and glucose (C6H12O6), though the arrangement of hydroxyl groups sets it apart. The molecule forms white, crystalline granules that dissolve easily in water and produce moderate sweetness, about 70% that of sucrose. Despite being a sugar, it barely ferments in the gut, so it doesn’t fuel the bacteria responsible for the digestive issues common with some alternative sweeteners. The melting point sits around 96°C, giving it familiar function in cooking—especially caramelization. Chemically, the structure features a ketose backbone, resistant to the metabolic enzymes that break down glucose and fructose rapidly.
Key standards often detail allulose content (typically above 98%, with tight limits on contaminants like lead), color, solubility, moisture, and pH. Food safety authorities set labeling guidelines, too, which recently have allowed producers in the United States to list allulose as a carbohydrate, but exempt it from total sugar and added sugar counts because the body doesn’t treat it like regular sugar. These regulatory moves form the backbone for its growth, giving manufacturers a way to tout “low sugar” and “keto-friendly” claims without misleading consumers. Detailed batch testing ensures that the crystalline or syrup forms going to market are free of unwanted off-flavors or color, with water content balanced for stable storage.
Large-scale allulose production typically begins with corn starch. Enzymes convert the starch to fructose. Specialized enzymes then take the lead, rearranging fructose molecules into allulose through epimerization. This process relies on precision; even small slips in temperature or pH can steer the reaction away from the product you want. Older chemical conversion methods existed, but these days, enzyme tech delivers greater yields and cleaner product with fewer byproducts. Yet purification remains important—chromatography and crystallization steps filter out other sugars, unwanted tastes, and impurities. The reliance on fermentation and biocatalysis reflects not just efficiency, but a broader movement in food manufacturing toward greener, more sustainable processes.
Although allulose itself stands stable in most food processing environments, it will react under certain conditions. Like many sugars, it undergoes Maillard browning when heated with proteins, lending attractive color and flavor in baked goods. It doesn’t participate much in Maillard reactions at low heat or neutral pH, so it won’t always brown as deeply as regular sugar in some recipes. Manufacturers sometimes tweak its properties through co-crystallization, blending it with other functional ingredients for better flow or solubility. Chemical reduction can produce derivatives like allitol, though these aren’t as popular in food. Comparative to other rare sugars, allulose resists acid hydrolysis, so shelf-stable drinks can include it without product breakdown or off-flavors over time.
Allulose goes by several names depending on the region or context. In scientific circles, it answers to D-psicose. Packaging might call it psicose, or sometimes “rare sugar” to underline its scarcity in nature. Some brands opt for catchy terms like “all-natural sweetener,” while regulatory texts stick to more technical phrasing. Regardless of the label, shoppers find products containing allulose grouped alongside familiar alternatives like erythritol or stevia, though many appreciate its lack of aftertaste or cooling sensation—two drawbacks common among other sugar substitutes.
Decades of toxicology studies support allulose’s safety story. Regulatory reviews in the US and Japan have led to GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) status, so food companies can include it widely without special warning labels. Safety reviews focus on metabolism and excretion—most of the sugar absorbs from the small intestine and exits unchanged in urine, skipping the pathways that would generate energy or boost blood sugar. For daily intake, research points to upper limits similar to other low-digestible carbohydrates, as very high doses might cause mild bloating. Employees handling bulk allulose in factories follow standard hygiene protocols backed by FDA and EFSA guidance.
Scientists continue pushing into new territory for allulose. R&D teams hunt for ways to push yields higher with more precise enzymes, aiming to cut unit costs further. They also seek to scale down waste in the production stream, since even the purest processes produce byproducts needing careful handling. Nutrition research tracks health benefits beyond blood sugar control, with studies exploring fat loss, gut microbiome shifts, and anti-inflammatory potential. Ingredient technologists look to modify allulose for new functional properties—think applications in fiber bars, sauces, and frozen desserts. These innovations often track consumer demand for clean labels and transparent sourcing, nudging the industry away from older chemical sweeteners.
Decades of animal and human trials build a strong safety case. Long-term feeding studies in rodents and non-human primates found no signs of cancer, organ toxicity, or metabolism disruption, even at substantial dosing. Clinical trials in people with and without diabetes show allulose barely alters blood sugar, rates well for taste and digestibility, and rarely causes digestive distress at standard serving sizes. The European Food Safety Authority and US FDA both list no genotoxic or carcinogenic findings. Rare cases of mild gastrointestinal upset surface mostly with intake far exceeding daily recommendations, paralleling results seen with other non-fermentable sugars.
Looking ahead, allulose seems poised to play a larger role as consumers chase functional foods and natural sweeteners. Regulatory acceptance in more regions would open fresh markets, while improved fermentation and enzymatic production could drive retail prices lower. Food scientists search for new blends that pair allulose with other rare sugars or prebiotic fibers to improve gut health alongside sweetness. Researchers tackling obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome cite allulose as an ingredient that could reshape how food contributes to public health. As sourcing shifts toward non-GMO and organic-certified crops, more shoppers can reach for a sweetener that fits their dietary hopes without trading taste or texture. Allulose’s journey from rare discovery to mainstream pantry staple is only picking up speed.
Anyone who has tried to reduce sugar knows it isn’t easy. Grocery aisles carry promises of sweet without regret, but labels often lead us down a path full of aftertastes and confusion. Allulose stands out in this crowd. It looks like sugar, tastes like sugar, but the story changes past the first spoonful. I first came across allulose during a late-night baking spree, searching for something that wouldn’t wreck my blood sugar or add unwanted calories.
Allulose comes from the same family as glucose and fructose. It’s found in small quantities in foods like figs, raisins, and maple syrup. Unlike the sugar we pour into coffee, the body doesn’t absorb allulose efficiently. It passes through, with just a fraction being metabolized. Regular sugar hits the bloodstream fast, spiking blood sugar levels and setting off cravings. Allulose does almost the opposite — studies show it barely nudges blood glucose and doesn’t trigger large insulin responses.
Most alternative sweeteners leave a strange aftertaste. Allulose, though, dissolves like cane sugar and tastes clean. Its sweetness measures about 70% of table sugar, enough to satisfy a craving without feeling shortchanged. I’ve baked cookies and whipped cream with it, and the results surprise every skeptic at the table. There’s no cold sensation, no bitterness lingering on the tongue.
Even brand names like Quest and Chobani use allulose in their products these days, showing that food companies see real potential.
Americans eat more than 50 pounds of added sugar a year. This routine fuels obesity, diabetes, and heart conditions. The FDA recognizes allulose as “generally recognized as safe,” and research finds it doesn’t contribute to tooth decay. Beyond that, allulose counts as just 0.2 calories per gram, a sharp contrast to sugar’s four calories per gram. That gap makes a difference for anyone watching their weight or managing diabetes.
I’ve looked for studies and checked with dietitians. They agree allulose works for people aiming to keep glucose in check, though some folks may feel digestive discomfort if they overdo it, especially those new to low-calorie sweeteners.
Price makes people think twice before tossing allulose into their grocery carts. Supply issues and limited production drive costs up. Plus, some skeptics worry about artificial sweeteners in general — although allulose occurs naturally, it often gets manufactured in bulk from corn or wheat. Honesty on labels and more research help build trust. Anyone looking to swap should read labels and start slow, checking for any digestive reactions.
Food scientists and nutrition experts keep pushing for more natural sugar substitutes. Offering allulose in affordable, widespread packaging would break down the price barrier for more families. Real-world clinical trials and long-term studies help answer lingering health questions.
In my own kitchen, allulose has stayed on the shelf longer than stevia or erythritol ever did. Real taste, fewer calories, and a little peace of mind — that’s something worth finding in a sweetener.
Allulose belongs to the family of rare sugars. It shows up in small amounts in a handful of foods like figs and raisins. Food companies have started adding it to snacks, beverages, and baked goods. It tastes like table sugar but carries a fraction of the calories. This gives people a chance to enjoy sweetness without the usual blood sugar spike or extra calories tied to regular sugar.
The FDA says allulose is “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS). This isn’t a light statement. For food additives to get this status, researchers and public health experts spend years studying safety data. The review process digs deep. Researchers tested allulose’s effects on the body at different doses, checking for changes in blood sugar, cholesterol, and organ health. So far, the science points to allulose as being well tolerated by most people, with rare side effects even at higher consumption levels.
I’ve seen diabetes run in my family. Watching relatives prick their fingers and worry over every food choice makes me appreciate safe sugar substitutes that don’t spike blood glucose. Allulose stands out because, unlike most sugars, the body absorbs it but then quickly flushes it out via urine. Most of it doesn’t turn into energy or fat. Studies in people with and without diabetes support this. Test volunteers taking allulose saw stable blood sugar levels, and the sweetener delivered none of the rough gastrointestinal side effects seen with sugar alcohols like maltitol or sorbitol. For those hoping to lose weight or keep it off, allulose also appears promising. Researchers found it doesn’t feed the cycle of cravings and hunger the way regular sugar can.
I’ve tried foods with allulose and never noticed bloating or discomfort. Friends shared the same story, but everyone’s gut handles things differently. If someone eats lots of allulose in one sitting, a mild laxative effect could pop up. Still, reports show this happens less frequently than with other alternative sweeteners. No major red flags have surfaced with reasonable amounts. Outliers always exist, so anybody with known trouble tolerating alternative sweeteners might want to start with a low dose and see.
No sweetener, no matter how natural it sounds, replaces the benefits of eating more whole foods. Long-term studies on allulose in massive, diverse groups of people still haven’t wrapped up. Regulators in Europe act cautiously, still weighing approval. For now, the facts show that allulose serves as a safer alternative for people who must monitor their sugar intake or keep calories low.
Always read nutrition labels and keep an open mind when trying new foods. Watch out for “zero sugar” claims; just because a sweetener is considered safe doesn’t mean everyone will react the same way. If you have a medical condition, talking with a healthcare provider before adding a new ingredient usually saves trouble later. Everyone deserves delicious, safe food, but knowing what goes into your snack or coffee gives power and peace of mind.
Allulose looks and tastes like sugar—real table sugar, not the bitter artificial substitutes—or at least that’s been my experience mixing it into my morning oatmeal. It crops up in keto bars, “guilt-free” jams, and sugar-free sodas. Behind the friendly label sits a molecule almost identical to standard fructose, but your body barely recognizes it as fuel. The FDA calls it a “rare sugar.” Nature puts it in tiny traces in figs or raisins. Most food companies create it using enzymes that transform regular corn fructose.
People care about calories for lots of reasons—keeping weight in check, managing diabetes, or just feeling better day to day. Allulose offers something surprising here. Regular sugar brings the classic punch of four calories per gram. Allulose slides in at a measly 0.2 to 0.4 calories per gram. Eat a cookie with allulose swapped in and you save meaningful calories.
Scientists have run the tests. One clinical trial from the journal Nutrients observed that allulose delivers almost no energy for humans. You eat it, but most passes right through or is peed out. Our bodies don’t break down and use it as they would glucose or fructose. So that’s where food labels get permission to state “zero” or “near zero” calories.
Type 2 diabetes runs in my family. I watch glycemic numbers closer than most. Sugar substitutes used to spook me, because many of them triggered weird blood spikes or aftertastes. Allulose doesn’t behave like that. Researchers checking blood sugar responses see almost flat lines. One Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition study watched adults eating rice with and without allulose. Those who ate the rice with added allulose showed a gentler, lower blood sugar rise.
The mechanism isn’t complicated. The body absorbs allulose, but doesn’t metabolize it for energy. Liver enzymes mostly ignore it. Most allulose leaves the bloodstream through urine. No insulin rush. Hardly a blip in blood glucose, even for people who already have diabetes or prediabetes. That’s different from many “sugar alcohols,” which can still nudge glucose in some folks.
Not everyone feels great after loading up on any sugar alternative. Some folks report digestive rumbles—think bloating or loose stools—especially at higher doses. But ordinary servings in most foods rarely reach this threshold. The FDA labeled allulose as “generally recognized as safe.” For added reassurance, Japan and Korea both gave it an official green light years ago, based on their own large safety trials.
Many people chasing lower-carb lives or managing blood sugar want choices that taste real. Stevia sometimes tastes bitter, and erythritol feels cold and powdery to me. Allulose fills the gap, letting people bake, brown, caramelize, and spoon it just like sugar. It helps make classic recipes without sacrificing flavor or crunch.
Having tried it with pancakes and homemade jam, there’s no question in my mind—swapping out part of the sugar for allulose actually works, especially if you watch your blood sugar meter. More doctors and registered dietitians suggest allulose as an option for people wanting to shave down sugar and calorie intake. It doesn’t solve every diet challenge, but it gives one more tool to anyone wanting sweetness without real impact on calories or glucose.
People still need to look at their whole diet, not just one ingredient, but for most, allulose means enjoying sweetness with less worry. It’s not hype. That’s what the data and my pantry both show.
Every trip to the store seems to bring a new “natural” sweetener crowding the shelf. One name making its way into kitchens is allulose. This sugar alternative claims real sugar taste without packing the calories or spiking blood sugar. That sounds appealing, but the real question starts in the kitchen: can allulose actually bake and cook like sugar?
From my experience in home baking, switching out sugar usually means some serious disappointment. Stevia leaves an odd aftertaste, erythritol can crunch like sand, and replacing sugar with applesauce? Your cookies don’t stand a chance. Allulose brings something different to the table—it’s found in small quantities in figs and raisins, tastes sweet without bitterness, and browns beautifully in the oven.
A lot of scientific attention comes down to how closely allulose matches the real thing. Unlike some other low-calorie sweeteners, allulose caramelizes like table sugar and can create golden crusts on pies and fluffy loaves. In my own tests, allulose whipped up meringues that baked into crisp shells and chewy muffins that rose well, as long as I kept an eye on browning.
Home cooks and chefs share that allulose keeps recipes moist and soft. I see cakes that don’t dry out, and cookies that don’t go rock-hard like they sometimes do with some blends. This moisture retention comes from allulose’s chemical structure, which helps trap water in doughs and batters. Scientific studies back up the experience—research in Food Chemistry points to better texture and less crystallization compared to erythritol and xylitol.
It’s great news for folks limiting sugar for medical reasons. The FDA reports almost zero impact on blood glucose and insulin levels, which supports its use by people living with diabetes. The calorie count is also very low: just 0.4 calories per gram, close to a tenth of table sugar. For someone watching both calories and glucose, that’s a big step forward.
Not everything is perfect. If you try to swap allulose for sugar one-to-one in a jam or a thick caramel, the result may fall flat. It won’t set exactly the same, as allulose doesn’t crystallize like sugar. In my own chutney batch, the fruit cooked down well, but the texture felt runnier than normal. Some people also notice stomach issues after eating large amounts. As with erythritol, your digestive system may need to adjust. The general consensus: keep total daily intake below 0.4 grams per pound of body weight.
Price also remains an obstacle; allulose costs much more than table sugar or even erythritol. Sourcing a consistent supply sometimes frustrates commercial bakers looking to scale up recipes. The market still needs time to bring prices down and supplies up to meet bigger demand.
Expect to do some fine tuning. Start by swapping only half the sugar for allulose in favorite cookie or cake recipes and taste as you go. In custards and ice creams, try blending allulose with another bulk sweetener. Manufacturers like Quest and RXBAR use these combinations in protein bars and baked snacks.
Experimenting keeps baking interesting and teaches what works for your own recipes. Pay attention to how quickly baked goods brown—they often turn dark faster than with cane sugar, so try lowering the oven temperature. Small changes help make allulose a viable option without losing the feel and flavor you want.
Many kitchens have started using allulose, and with a bit more practice and awareness about cost and digestive tolerance, it can become as familiar as sugar once was.
Sugar substitutes have been part of grocery shopping for years, yet allulose has started drawing interest for its unique sweetness and low calorie count. Unlike many sugar alcohols, allulose doesn’t leave that telltale aftertaste and generally agrees with most digestive systems. As someone who once struggled to find sweeteners that allowed for the occasional cookie without the blood sugar spike, I can see why families and health-conscious shoppers want clear answers.
Most local supermarkets stock a modest range of alternative sweeteners, but not all of them have allulose. Grocery chains with a larger health food selection, like Whole Foods Market or Sprouts, tend to keep it in the baking goods aisle. Some Kroger and Safeway locations also carry it, usually with other niche sweeteners. Allulose usually appears in granulated or liquid form, so it’s easy to spot next to monk fruit and stevia.
Online offers more choice and often better prices. Amazon carries bulk options as well as single pouches. Thrive Market, iHerb, and Vitacost list several brands, letting buyers compare by certification (organic, non-GMO). Today’s shoppers often check retailer reviews and third-party certifications, searching for details about sourcing or taste. Meanwhile, baking blogs have pointed me toward specialty sites that deal only in low-carb goods—often the best bet for people with allergies or strong views on ingredient traceability.
People should pay attention to purity, with single-ingredient allulose granules or syrup on the label. Some blends sneak in other sweeteners or fillers, which change both the taste and the health impact. The Food and Drug Administration counts allulose as “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS), and the calorie count supports its role in diabetic or low-carb eating plans. Dietitians, including the American Diabetes Association, point out that it does not raise blood sugar or insulin levels. Those facts help explain the sudden rise in popularity.
Family and friends have sometimes worried about unfamiliar names. Talking with a nutritionist often clears up concerns, along with a peek at scientific articles. Consumer Reports and similar sources run comparison tests and keep tabs on ingredient quality, which helps shoppers separate hype from science.
Allulose keeps best in a dry, cool cupboard away from direct sunlight. My kitchen pantry works just fine—airtight containers help ward off clumping caused by humidity. Granulated versions should stay sealed, since moisture triggers hardening. If allulose comes in a resealable bag, squeezing out excess air before closing preserves texture.
Store liquid allulose in its original bottle, capped tightly, and stash it with your other baking staples, again far from heat. Refrigeration usually isn’t needed, but it won’t hurt if your kitchen gets especially warm in summer. Shelf life extends for months, much like white sugar or erythritol, as long as it stays dry and uncontaminated.
A little research goes a long way in finding allulose from a reliable source. Big stores offer convenience, while specialized websites cater to specific needs. Storing it correctly extends its usefulness, letting families manage calorie intake without skipping dessert. In today’s world, awareness and transparency matter as much as sweetness, pushing both sellers and buyers to look beyond the label and build lasting trust.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | D-erythro-hex-2-ulose |
| Other names |
D-psicose D-allulose Psicose |
| Pronunciation | /ˈæl.jʊ.loʊs/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | (3R,4R,5R)-1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxyhexan-2-one |
| Other names |
D-psicose D-Allulose Psicose Rare sugar Allose |
| Pronunciation | /ˈæl.jʊ.loʊs/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 551-68-8 |
| Beilstein Reference | 120928 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:132283 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL3707261 |
| ChemSpider | 8560989 |
| DrugBank | DB15236 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03c43c3d-80b5-4e1e-bec0-b8bebd3ac2e6 |
| EC Number | E963 |
| Gmelin Reference | 71539 |
| KEGG | C19615 |
| MeSH | D000686 |
| PubChem CID | 440522 |
| RTECS number | OA9865000 |
| UNII | 30XIY7NO0W |
| UN number | UN number: "Not regulated |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | urn:epa.gov:compound:1145250 |
| CAS Number | 551-68-8 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1721777 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:132107 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2108751 |
| ChemSpider | 164931 |
| DrugBank | DB15675 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03e8d98e-200d-44b7-80ca-fcc1372b85a5 |
| EC Number | E963 |
| Gmelin Reference | 122223 |
| KEGG | C19600 |
| MeSH | D000686 |
| PubChem CID | 440003 |
| RTECS number | WA0300000 |
| UNII | Y6LIZ7FI77 |
| UN number | UN Not Listed |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID20874454 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C6H12O6 |
| Molar mass | 180.16 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.5 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Fully soluble |
| log P | -3.05 |
| Vapor pressure | Vapor pressure: 0.0 Pa (at 25 °C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 12.34 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 11.98 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.408 |
| Viscosity | Low |
| Dipole moment | 1.72 D |
| Chemical formula | C6H12O6 |
| Molar mass | 180.16 g/mol |
| Appearance | White crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.7 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Very soluble |
| log P | -3.24 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 12.28 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 10.39 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.412 |
| Viscosity | Low viscosity |
| Dipole moment | 2.99 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 409.7 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -1242.2 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -1205 kJ/mol |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 395.8 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -1249.3 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -1192 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A16AX21 |
| ATC code | A16AX14 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | No significant hazards identified. |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling of Allulose: `"Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP/GHS). No GHS label required."` |
| Pictograms | Allulose; Food Additive; Sweetener; Low Calorie; Sugar Substitute; White Powder; Packaging; Spoon; Leaf |
| Hazard statements | No hazard statements |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
| Autoignition temperature | 380 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | Oral LD50 (rat): > 15,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | 15,000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | Not listed |
| PEL (Permissible) | 30 mg/kg bw |
| REL (Recommended) | 13 g |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Main hazards | May cause mild gastrointestinal discomfort if consumed in large quantities |
| GHS labelling | GHS Label: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Hazard statements | Not a hazardous substance or mixture. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | NFPA 704: 1-0-0 |
| Autoignition temperature | 440°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (rat, oral): >15,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | 15 g/kg |
| NIOSH | WA2070000 |
| PEL (Permissible) | 30 mg/kg bw |
| REL (Recommended) | 10 g |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Fructose Glucose D-Psicose Tagatose Sorbitol |
| Related compounds |
Fructose Glucose Galactose Tagatose Psicose |