Back in the early years of processed food manufacturing, folks noticed that fats didn’t always mix easily into doughs or batters. The push for better food shelf life and improved textures set off a wave of tinkering during the middle of the 20th century. Food scientists landed on mono- and diglycerides as useful tools, borrowing ideas from soap-makers and chemists. Later, they acetylated these glycerides, aiming for products that could handle everything from frozen desserts to dairy whips without going sticky or greasy. That spirit of experimentation stuck around, shaping the ways these emulsifiers turned up in everything from supermarket baked goods to big-batch frying operations.
Acetylated mono- and diglycerides come out as off-white powders or waxy granules. The trick lies in their versatility; bread loaves slice neater, whipped toppings hold their peaks, and margarines resist separation, thanks in large part to these additives. This isn’t just kitchen magic. Years in plant labs have proven that a dash of these emulsifiers supports moisture retention, softer textures, and longer shelf life, especially in environments where basic fats fell short. Food technologists rely on them for consistent results batch after batch. Sports nutrition, confectionery work, and even vegetarian cheese production all benefit from these humble stabilizers.
What makes acetylated mono- and diglycerides stand out? They show a lower melting point than their straight mono- and diglyceride cousins because acetyl groups block some of the natural bonds fats use to solidify. Their powder or bead form blends smoothly, dissolving in hot oils or dispersing in water to create stable emulsions. On a molecular level, the acetylation process trims down the bitterness sometimes found in straight diglycerides. Since these molecules carry both water-loving and fat-loving tails, they help oil and water stay together. They stand up to both high and low temperatures, which matters on the production lines in frozen novelties or ready meals.
Food-grade acetylated mono- and diglycerides meet strict specifications, with purity levels usually north of 90%. Major markets list them as E472a in Europe and number them as 472a in Australia. North American manufacturers call them “acetylated mono- and diglycerides” on ingredient lists, and each batch comes with documentation confirming levels of free glycerol, appearance, acid value, and moisture. Today’s buyers pay attention to allergen risks, so suppliers disclose palm, soy, or sunflower oil as the source fat. Specification sheets cover everything from particle size and melting profile to heavy metal limits. Regulatory agencies demand clean records from producers, especially on contaminants like 3-MCPD or glycidyl esters.
To make this product, you start with edible-grade fats—often palm, soy, or sometimes canola oil. Standard factory practice splits the triglyceride molecules using water and steam, yielding mono- and diglycerides. These molecules then react with acetic anhydride, under controlled heat and absence of water, leading to the acetylated form. Filtration, drying, and milling finish the process. It takes clean manufacturing lines to prevent cross-contamination, especially in facilities handling allergens or animal-tested ingredients. Food safety standards call for exhaustive checks at every stage. That’s a far cry from the slapdash ways early inventors did their work.
Chemists focus on the balance between functionality and safety. Acetylation replaces one or more of the natural fatty acid chains with an acetyl group, making the end product more hydrophilic. Manufacturers often tweak the degree of acetylation, matching properties to end-use. Higher acetyl content means lower melting points, better bread crumb softness, and superior aeration in creams. Some companies try further blending with other emulsifiers or antioxidants for products targeting specialized diets or higher heat tolerances. Reactions happen at tightly controlled temperatures, with waste acetic acid removed during purification so it doesn’t affect flavor.
On global ingredient lists, you’ll see synonyms like acetylated mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids, E472a, or acetylated glyceryl monostearate. Branded products sometimes use proprietary names, especially in bakery or frozen foods. Some markets lean toward local language labeling, making it tricky for importers or foodservice buyers sifting through spec sheets from half a world away. It pays to check for aliasing on technical documents so mix-ups don’t occur during product development.
Regulators in the US Food and Drug Administration, European Food Safety Authority, and China’s SAMR keep a close watch, regularly reevaluating allowed levels and source fats. Certified suppliers commit to HACCP and ISO 22000 standards in production. Facilities undergo unannounced audits and pull samples for third-party testing, ensuring no cross-contact with allergens, pathogens, or prohibited chemicals. Factory staff wear protective equipment, minimize dust generation, and log every step on batch records, since mistakes in dosing could knock a recipe off spec or trigger recalls in finished goods. Some producers track fat sources from field to final bag, for both allergen control and sustainability claims.
These emulsifiers find work in all corners of the grocery store. Frozen desserts rely on them for smoother scooping; large-scale bakeries use them for soft crumb and improved loaf volume; and foodservice folks appreciate longer-lasting sandwich breads and burger buns. Ingredient buyers running sports nutrition lines use them for stable protein bars. Other industries take note too; pharmaceutical companies use these emulsifiers for better drug solubility, and cosmetics developers flag their stabilizing edge for creams and lotions. This versatility owes much to safety records and broad regulatory acceptance across dozens of countries.
Academic and corporate labs test acetylation levels for foaming strength, shelf life, and mouthfeel. Researchers hope to reduce the palm oil footprint, since sustainability demands keep rising, so sunflower and rapeseed versions get more funding. Processing engineers run application trials at pilot scale, tracking results not just on food attributes, but also on environmental impacts. New test panels score products for sensory attributes, adjusted for changing dietary patterns worldwide. The march toward “clean label” pushes developers to lower acetyl content or find blends with natural extracts, which often involves months of working through regulatory approvals and production line tweaks.
Long-term studies by government agencies and university groups reviewed metabolism and excretion of acetylated mono- and diglycerides in animals and humans. So far, toxicologists found no significant buildup in tissues, with most compounds breaking down to harmless fats and acetic acid — both common in the body’s routine chemistry. Large reviews find no consistent link to reproductive harm, carcinogenicity, or allergic reactions, provided dosing sticks to established maximum levels. Today, international bodies rely on decades of feeding trials and contemporary surveillance for continued safety assurance. Researchers do call for vigilance on source material, since pesticides or unapproved oils could present new risks if upstream supply chains slip.
Shoppers demand cleaner labels and more sustainable ingredients. Producers now explore acylation methods using green chemistry, hoping to reduce waste and eliminate petrochemical reagents entirely. Advances in enzyme-based acetylation get attention for lower energy use and potentially gentler processing. Industry groups track crop sourcing, making it possible for some acetylated mono- and diglycerides to carry non-GMO or organic certifications in future. Given ongoing research on fat replacers for health, the next decade could see new blends pairing these emulsifiers with plant-based proteins or fibers. Rapid feedback loops from consumer panel data promise even faster innovation, as brands rush to meet both culinary and regulatory expectations around the world.
Most people open a loaf of bread or slice into a cake without thinking about what keeps it soft and fresh. That's where acetylated mono- and diglycerides step in. These food additives help trap air and moisture, so baked goods stay light instead of turning chewy or hard. Years working in bakeries taught me that getting the right texture isn’t only about flour and technique. Emulsifiers like these handle the behind-the-scenes work, keeping fats and water mixed, and easing the production stress by making dough less likely to collapse during baking.
Processed foods—yes, even mayonnaise and ice cream—rely on this trick. Acetylated mono- and diglycerides hold water and oil together where they’d usually separate. That makes for ice cream that stays creamy longer, or margarine that spreads straight from the fridge. Foods sit longer on supermarket shelves, all because of this small but mighty ingredient.
Many folks check labels for unfamiliar words and see these additives. Years spent in the kitchen taught me this: emulsifiers make life easier for manufacturers, but safety matters more than convenience. The FDA rates acetylated mono- and diglycerides as generally recognized as safe (GRAS), so they’re considered safe when eaten as intended. That confidence comes from years of research and real-world use, not just one-time tests.
People still have questions, though. Processed foods get a bad rap. Recent studies haven’t linked acetylated mono- and diglycerides to health risks when consumed at common levels. Still, eating a lot of ultra-processed foods brings concerns like heart disease and obesity—not because of these emulsifiers alone, but as part of a bigger picture. Whole foods matter most, and it’s smart to think about overall diet, not single additives.
This ingredient doesn’t stop at the grocery store. Factories use acetylated mono- and diglycerides in plastics, cosmetics, and even pharmaceuticals. In lotions or creams, they help oil mix with water, just like in food. Shampoos, ointments, and even some medicines benefit from this same quality. Think of it as a bridge-builder, pulling together things that don’t easily get along.
In every role, acetylated mono- and diglycerides add stability where it counts. That’s not hype—just practical chemistry improving both the performance and shelf life of everyday products people might never think twice about.
Given questions about food processing and health, people want more transparency. If someone seeks out foods free from synthetic additives, they’ll want more whole-food options and honest labeling. Producers who shift toward simpler ingredient lists build consumer trust. For the rest of us, access to research studies and real-world evidence builds the confidence people need to make informed choices.
People raise a fair point about relying too much on processed foods. Encouraging home cooking, fresh produce, and minimally-processed choices goes further than simply attacking or praising any one ingredient. In my experience, balance brings better results than strict elimination or blind acceptance. In the end, acetylated mono- and diglycerides play a supporting role, not the star, in modern food and manufacturing.
Take a look at the back of your snack food or bakery bread. You’ll likely spot a parade of ingredients, some you recognize and others that sound more at home in a chemistry class. Among them, acetylated mono- and diglycerides often slip under the radar. But with so much talk about what’s safe to eat, it makes sense to wonder if these additives belong on our tables.
In basic terms, these ingredients come from simple fats. Producers take mono- and diglycerides, which already show up in lots of foods, and react them with acetic acid. This creates an ingredient that helps keep products like bread, cakes, and ice cream creamy or moist. The FDA gives these additives a green light, calling them generally recognized as safe (GRAS) when manufacturers use them properly. Got some skepticism about GRAS status? I’ve felt the same. The GRAS process does rely on expert review and decades of food-safety data—not just industry promises.
Worry grows each time a new study questions a food additive. Even if major health organizations and the European Food Safety Authority reviewed the data and found no evidence these emulsifiers harm consumers, plenty of people (myself included) want reassurance beyond government approval. The idea that our favorite packaged foods rely on industrial chemistry can feel unsettling. If you think of classic home baking, you picture eggs and butter, not lab-tweaked fats.
Research keeps an eye on long-term health effects. Critics push for more independent studies that look at chronic exposure to additives. Some animal research points toward possible links between certain emulsifiers and changes in gut health, but the evidence on acetylated mono- and diglycerides in particular hasn’t shown harmful outcomes in realistic amounts found in food. Still, consumers benefit from greater transparency about how much of these substances end up in what we eat.
Not every additive earns the same scrutiny. I learned this lesson as a parent trying to decipher snack labels in the supermarket aisle. There’s solid research showing some food chemicals, especially in large doses, can spell trouble. At the same time, context matters. Acetylated mono- and diglycerides break down in our bodies very similarly to regular fats. Our digestive system knows how to handle these compounds, reducing worries about odd byproducts sticking around.
Still, processed foods containing emulsifiers tend to be energy-dense and low in nutrients. That’s a bigger problem, long-term, than these additives alone. Swapping some packaged goods for fresh meals can lower intake of both additives and excess sugar or salt.
If you want to limit additives like acetylated mono- and diglycerides, focus on whole ingredients—foods you’d see at a farmers market. Reading labels helps you stay aware of what goes into your cart. For those with allergies, it pays to check for possible cross-contamination or unexpected ingredients. Demand for more honest labeling and funding for long-term studies keeps everyone safer in the long run.
Overall, health boils down to your everyday choices. No single additive—acetylated mono- and diglycerides included—is likely to make or break your well-being, but keeping an eye on overall diet will pay off far more than stressing over occasional processed snacks.
Acetylated mono- and diglycerides often pop up on food labels. Their names might sound complex, but my time in both the commercial bakery and grocery industries has shown how common they have become. They serve as emulsifiers, helping oil and water mix smoothly in baked goods, frozen desserts, and even margarine. Yet most people have little clue about what goes into these additives beyond the scientific jargon.
These ingredients don’t spring whole from nature. Companies start with fats and oils, mostly from plants like soybeans, canola, sunflower, and palm. The first step breaks down these oils using water, heat, and sometimes mild acids, separating them into fatty acids and glycerol. By combining one or two fatty acids back with a single glycerol backbone, they get mono- and diglycerides. The acetylation process adds acetic acid—plain old vinegar’s key component—turning the mix into acetylated mono- and diglycerides.
Refined vegetable oils take the lead because they are cheap and available year-round. In some cases, animal fats, such as tallow, get used, particularly if a manufacturer focuses on classic or regional baked products. The reality in North American and European production is the primary raw input comes from plants, following trends away from animal-derived additives.
People pay more attention to ingredient labels now than ever. I’ve met parents searching out clean, allergen-free snacks for their kids or shoppers avoiding soy or palm because of environmental or health reasons. Acetylated mono- and diglycerides might come from genetically engineered soybeans, which matters to those shopping for non-GMO foods. There’s another layer: palm oil’s role in deforestation and habitat loss puts pressure on brands to find sustainable sources or look for alternatives.
Vegan and vegetarian shoppers also look for plant-based sources, so transparency counts. Kosher and halal certification depends on the original fat being acceptable by those dietary laws. It all boils down to trust between the producer and the end customer, something I’ve learned firsthand after hearing feedback at trade shows and on the grocery floor.
The biggest issue is transparency. Ingredient lists can leave out specifics about the source of the raw fats, leading to confusion for those with food sensitivities or dietary preferences. A shopper may see “acetylated mono- and diglycerides” and not realize the source might conflict with personal or religious beliefs.
Clearer labeling and accurate source tracking would solve a lot of headaches. Voluntary guidelines from some food manufacturers, especially in organic and allergy-friendly brands, set the right example. There’s also the doubt about genetically modified inputs, especially in regions worried about GMOs or synthetic processing aids.
The demand for sustainably sourced palm oil or an alternative altogether grows each year. Organizations certifying sustainable sources help consumers align purchases with their values. As awareness spreads, more pressure lands on mass-market brands to explain where their additives actually come from.
Acetylated mono- and diglycerides don’t dominate headlines, but as food trends bend toward transparency, more people want to know the story behind the ingredients in their sandwich bread or ice cream. Pushing for open information, supporting brands that use traceable, plant-based ingredients, and encouraging responsible production of oils will make a difference, even if most of us only notice these additives in the fine print.
People care a lot about what goes into their food—especially those living with allergies. Food labels help, but the ingredients themselves often carry complicated names that blur the line between safety and risk. Acetylated mono- and diglycerides are just one example. They show up in all sorts of products, from bread to ice cream. Not everyone can pronounce them, let alone explain what they do. Yet if you’ve ever had to scan labels for allergens, you start to wonder: could these ingredients trigger a reaction?
Acetylated mono- and diglycerides come from the fat side of food science. Chemists produce them by modifying plant or animal fats. Most often, factories use vegetable oils like soybean, sunflower, or palm. These substances keep baked goods soft, make spreads extra creamy, and help chocolate hold its shape. The process involves combining fats with acetic acid, which leaves us with emulsifiers that food manufacturers lean on for texture. After working in kitchens and reading plenty of ingredient lists, I know how common these additives have become.
Anyone living with allergies becomes a detective. The real worry with acetylated mono- and diglycerides doesn’t lie in their name—it’s in the source oils. For example, if the emulsifiers come from soy oil, and the soy hasn’t been highly refined, traces of soy protein could linger. Soy can set off an allergic reaction in a sensitive person. Even though refining usually removes most proteins, it only takes a trace to cause trouble for some. Other risks could show up if the product started from peanuts or tree nuts, though that’s much less typical. What matters is the original fat, and how carefully it was refined.
It’s not uncommon to find food labels that just list “mono- and diglycerides,” without saying what they came from. That puts people with allergies in a tough spot. Without clear information, there’s a risk of accidental exposure. The Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) only requires manufacturers to declare the source if it’s among the major allergens in the U.S., like soy or milk. If these emulsifiers come from soy, regulations usually expect clear labeling. But “usually” leaves room for error, for imports, and for small manufacturers who may not follow best practices as tightly as big brands.
Researchers who study food allergies often focus on the proteins, since those provoke the immune system. Acetylated mono- and diglycerides themselves are fats, without protein chains, but traces of allergenic proteins could remain if the starting oils aren’t fully refined. The FDA points out that highly refined oils are generally safe, but anecdotal evidence still shows a few allergic reactions. In practice, that means the risk isn’t zero for everyone.
I’ve learned that trust in the food supply comes from good communication. The best fix for the uncertainty around acetylated mono- and diglycerides? Clear labeling. Manufacturers can commit to disclosing every source, even if not legally required. This empowers people with allergies to make safer choices. Medical staff could raise awareness among patients navigating ingredient lists. Regular folks who enjoy home cooking find confidence in using basic ingredients that don’t hide behind long names. As a society, open access to food source information protects vulnerable eaters and builds trust that benefits everyone.
Acetylated mono- and diglycerides do a specific job in food processing that sometimes gets overlooked. These food additives keep water and oil mixed together in products like bakery items and frozen desserts. Food companies find them desirable because of their smooth mouthfeel and reliable performance, but the main difference comes from chemical structure. Manufacturers treat mono- and diglycerides with acetic acid. Doing so introduces acetyl groups into the original fat-based molecule, which leads to different behavior in food systems compared to plain mono- and diglycerides or others such as lecithin or polysorbate 80.
Food technologists and bakers choose emulsifiers based on needs that go beyond simple mixing. Regular mono- and diglycerides, which come from natural fats and oils like soybean or palm, work well for basic emulsification. They turn up often in breads and cakes. Acetylation gives the molecule extra flexibility to tolerate freezing and thawing, absorbing less water and keeping the blend creamy in low- or no-fat recipes. This matters to anyone who’s spooned out ice cream and wondered how it stays smooth. Ice crystals might turn a treat gritty, but acetylated versions help fight that, resulting in better texture and shelf stability. Other emulsifiers, like soy lecithin, play a bigger role blending chocolate or in products with high fat loads, but they lack this edge on freeze-thaw stability or low water absorption. Polysorbates add air and creaminess in whipped products, yet bring in a synthetic taste and can trigger labeling concerns in some markets.
Consumers today look harder at food ingredients, asking companies to be up front about additives. Emulsifiers don’t usually make headlines the way sugar or GMOs do, but concerned shoppers still read the backs of packages. Acetylated mono- and diglycerides sound intimidating, so some manufacturers move away from them simply to avoid alarming shoppers who want “kitchen cupboard” ingredients. Even so, the FDA considers these safe for use in foods, and they don’t contain the artificial flavors or colors many people try to steer away from. The bigger problem isn’t toxicity, but keeping food labels clear and honest. It helps when companies explain the role each additive plays, reassuring people that they're not eating something strange or unsafe.
Cooks at home use oil, eggs, or even honey as natural emulsifiers, but industrial-scale foods face trickier problems. Bread, ice cream, and margarine must survive shipping, supermarket storage, and long shelf-life expectations. For businesses, it becomes a balancing act—using the least complicated additive that still gives the texture and stability customers expect. There’s potential for more research into plant-based alternatives and cleaner processing. Some startups experiment with fermentation or algae as sources of new emulsifiers. Others support reformulation with focus groups, testing which changes consumers actually taste. From personal experience working with chefs and food companies, it's clear that direct communication and transparency around every ingredient—especially the ones with hard-to-pronounce names—helps break down barriers between food makers and eaters. A shared effort between scientists, manufacturers, and consumers can support safer, simpler food—without giving up the qualities we enjoy at the table.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 2-(Acetyloxy)propane-1,3-diyl diacetate |
| Other names |
Acetylated monoglycerides E472a Acetic acid esters of mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids |
| Pronunciation | /əˈsiː.tɪ.leɪ.tɪd ˌmɒn.oʊ ænd daɪˈɡlɪs.ə.raɪdz/ |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 2-(Acetyloxy)propane-1,3-diyl esters of fatty acids |
| Other names |
Acetic acid esters of mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids Acetylated monoglycerides E472a |
| Pronunciation | /əˈsiː.tɪ.leɪ.tɪd ˌmɒn.oʊ ænd ˌdaɪˈɡlɪs.ə.raɪdz/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 68201-37-6 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `"C[C](=O)OCC(=O)OC(C)CO"` |
| Beilstein Reference | 1474306 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:53173 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL572053 |
| ChemSpider | 2216237 |
| DrugBank | DB11110 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03b0c1f2-0d6d-452d-9ee0-748e1e37e0ed |
| EC Number | E472a |
| Gmelin Reference | 145180 |
| KEGG | C02737 |
| MeSH | D018142 |
| PubChem CID | 86745 |
| RTECS number | AU8400000 |
| UNII | CP6ZP66291 |
| UN number | UN 1987 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID6032816 |
| CAS Number | 685-88-1 |
| Beilstein Reference | 1721441 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:74510 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL3184823 |
| ChemSpider | 2246752 |
| DrugBank | DB11160 |
| ECHA InfoCard | echa.infoCard: 03b940db-26de-4faa-ba9f-17c8d68495c9 |
| EC Number | E472a |
| Gmelin Reference | 65828 |
| KEGG | C01637 |
| MeSH | D004003 |
| PubChem CID | 25243946 |
| RTECS number | AU8150000 |
| UNII | 7I12P7Y67N |
| UN number | UN No. 2810 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID2040369 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C₇H₁₂O₄ |
| Molar mass | 472.63 g/mol |
| Appearance | White or off-white powder or flakes |
| Odor | Faint fatty odor |
| Density | 0.96 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 13.6 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | ~4.8 |
| Basicity (pKb) | pKb: 15.9 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.4300 - 1.4350 |
| Viscosity | 200-400 mPa·s |
| Dipole moment | 2.64 D |
| Chemical formula | C₅H₈O₂(C₃H₆O₂)_n(C₂H₄O)_mCOCH₃ |
| Molar mass | Variable |
| Appearance | White or light yellow powder |
| Odor | Faint fatty odor |
| Density | 0.96 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 2.4 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | approximately 4.8 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 13.5 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.4400 - 1.4730 |
| Viscosity | Viscosity: 250-600 cP |
| Dipole moment | 1.67 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | NaN |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -1200.2 kJ/mol |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | NaN |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -1716.5 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A06AA11 |
| ATC code | A21CE |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause mild skin and eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | May cause eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | > 230°C (446°F) |
| Autoignition temperature | > 400 °C (752 °F; 673 K) |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Rat oral >24 gm/kg |
| NIOSH | NA343 |
| REL (Recommended) | 300 mg/kg |
| Main hazards | May cause eye, skin, and respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | Not classified as hazardous according to GHS. |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | > 220 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | > 400°C (752°F) |
| LD50 (median dose) | > 42,000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| REL (Recommended) | 20 mg/kg |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Monoglycerides Diglycerides Acetylated monoglycerides Acetylated diglycerides Glycerol Triglycerides Diacetin Monoacetin Propylene glycol esters of fatty acids Lactic acid esters of mono- and diglycerides |
| Related compounds |
Monoglycerides Diglycerides Glycerol Acetylated monoglycerides Acetylated diglycerides |